Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Postorius performance with over 1000 pending users

by Nick W

I've got a couple things I need help with: The Symptom and The Problem. The Symptom: Postorius has gotten quite slow to load, taking more than 30s to load the Subscription Requests tab. Having zero pending subscription requests (I'm on v1.2.5), I started investigating unconfirmed subscriptions. I followed the commands from here[1] and got this: mailman shell -l your.list.id util = getUtility(IPendings) print(len(list(util.find(mlist=m,pend_type='subscription')))) 1816 Wow, 1816 pending subscription requests. I can say for certain that my list is not popular so these requests must have been submitted by bots. Let's get there in The Problem. How can I "purge" this list? I'm willing to assume that none of these requests are valid and would reject all unconfirmed user requests. The Problem: How might this activity be happening? Running cat /opt/mailman/core/var/logs/mailman.log | grep POST returns a lot of 202 and 409 responses for `POST /3.1/members`. Could it be that these requests are being submitted through Postorius? I'd assume there would be some sort of honeypot input to prevent abuse. I'll continue investigating and follow up with any insight I can on the cause of The Problem. Thanks, Nick [1]: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message…>

6 years, 9 months

Re: Postorius web issues after upgrading mailman 3

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/12/21 8:38 AM, Tibor Molnar wrote: > Hello, > > I hope someone could help me in relation to this issue. I have experienced some error with my mailman3 deployment (only in postorius web) after went through the upgrading procedure following https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/upgrade-3.2.html#upgrading-mailman-3 > I believe this is nothing else then the wrong css/js files gone to the wrong directory or they aren't implemented properly. Basically some part of it works ok and some doesn't. > The following web pages doesn't seem to be implementing the css/js files is Archives, Account, Posting Activity, Log in and Log out web pages. Any help would be appreciated. These are all HyperKitty pages, not Postorius. Did you run all the post-upgrade tasks mentioned at <https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/upgrade-3.2.html#post-upgrade> after upgrading? Also, it is possible, but not the likely cause of this, that there is an incompatibility between the latest hyperkitty and django-mailman3 in PyPI. See <https://gitlab.com/mailman/django-mailman3/-/issues/48>. You could try ``` pip install -U git+https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty.git ``` and see if that helps. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 5 months

Re: Message-Footer after migrating to Mailman3

by Abhilash Raj

> On Jul 9, 2021, at 9:15 AM, christopher.claus(a)tgcamberg1848.de wrote: > > Mark Sapiro wrote: >>> ERROR 2021-05-24 16:22:22,895 1648 django.security.DisallowedHost Invalid HTTP_HOST header: 'tgc_mailman_web:8000'. The domain name provided is not valid according to RFC 1034/1035. >>> WARNING 2021-05-24 16:22:22,896 1648 django.request Bad Request: /postorius/api/templates/list/homepage.gruppe.tgcamberg1848.de/list:member:regular:footer >>> It appears you created the new template with Postorius, but there is an >> issue for Postorius templates. Possibly your Django setting for >> POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL needs to be adjusted. >>> Obviously I have a problem with the hostname. I set >>> [code] >>> POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL=http://tgc_mailman_web:8000 >>> [/code] >>> where tgc_mailman_web is my container name. This URL ist stored in the DB-table "template" for the name=list:member:regular:footer. A call to my fqdn or to localhost >>> [code] >>> wget http://localhost:8000/postorius/api/templates/list/homepage.gruppe.tgcamberg... >>> [/code] >>> will return the footer itself - this works fine. Therefore, should i set POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL to http://localhost:8000? >>> If that works, yes. > > Hi Mark, > > thanks for your reply and excuse my delay. I was very busy in the last weeks but made some tests. Newly created templates with POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8000 did not work. I changed it to my fqdn - at the moment I am able to access the template via this URl (e.G. http://lists.example.de:8000/postorius/api/templates/list/homepage.lists.ex…) > But if I try to send an email I got the following error: You want the URL at which Postorius (postorius) is available from Core (mailman-core container). The default for that in the container images is set to http://mailman-web:8000. Does that not work for you? If you want to verify, you want to exec into the Core’s container (`docker exec -it mailman-core bash`) and see if you can curl the URL from inside there. If you are using the default docker-compose-postorius.yaml then there is a /etc/hosts entry created by docker for the mailman-web container, hence `http://mailman-web:8000` works there (but it won’t work on the host, since docker doesn’t modify the host’s /etc/hosts). There might also be a bug in play here which would cause such connection refused errors when subscribing/unsubscribing when there was a template configured for the list. Is that the case for you or are you seeing always when trying to send the email (which would imply that the Web container simply isn’t reachable from Core). -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

4 years, 7 months

Re: only show mail domains from web host on web-host-url

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/19/21 11:14 AM, Jens Günther wrote: > Just checked again and saw: > > - in the setup it works perfectly in Hyperkitty, that's nice > > - for the first web host I have 2 mail domains registered, so it also > matches (unfortunately) with what you said :-( > > Anyway, I dceleted one of it, still both lists are shown on either web > host, so it's generally not working. I don't know why this didn't work. If there is only one mail host in the domains that has the current web host as its web host, it should work. > If I can do something on this issue, please advise me. Thanks. The issue is that neither Postorius or HyperKitty as a direct way of getting lists by web host as the web host information is not an attribute of the list. We have to see which mail hosts are associated with the current web host and then display only those lists that match one of those mail hosts. The issue with Postorius is if there was more than one mail host associated with the web host, this code https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/blob/master/src/postorius/views/list… could be relatively easily made to work by extending all_lists to include all the mail hosts, but it wasn't clear to me how to fix https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/blob/master/src/postorius/views/list… in the case where there was more than one mail host. If you can suggest a fix, that would help. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years

error changed after restart (was: KeyError: 'get_requests_count' after an upgrade)

by Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7)

I restarted de server and the error changed. Now the log shows "KeyError: 'subscription_mode'": ERROR 2021-02-06 11:47:49,015 26798 django.request Internal Server Error: /mailman3/mailman3/lists/name_and_domain.of.the.list Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/base.py", line 119, in __getattr__ return self._get(name) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/base.py", line 86, in _get raise KeyError(key) KeyError: 'subscription_mode' During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/core/handlers/exception.py", line 34, in inner response = get_response(request) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", line 115, in _get_response response = self.process_exception_by_middleware(e, request) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", line 113, in _get_response response = wrapped_callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/views/generic/base.py", line 71, in view return self.dispatch(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/postorius/views/generic.py", line 74, in dispatch return super(MailingListView, self).dispatch(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/views/generic/base.py", line 97, in dispatch return handler(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/postorius/views/list.py", line 295, in get member.subscription_mode == File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/base.py", line 124, in __getattr__ self.__class__.__name__, name)) AttributeError: 'Member' object has no attribute 'subscription_mode' *********************** some info about the installed versions via pip list: pip list | grep django django-allauth 0.44.0 django-appconf 1.0.4 django-compressor 2.4 django-extensions 3.1.0 django-gravatar2 1.4.4 django-haystack 3.0 django-mailman3 1.3.5 django-picklefield 3.0.1 django-q 1.3.4 djangorestframework 3.12.2 pip list | grep mailman django-mailman3 1.3.5 mailman 3.3.3 mailman-hyperkitty 1.1.0 mailmanclient 3.3.2 pip list | grep postorius postorius 1.3.4 On 6/2/21 11:12, Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7) via Mailman-users wrote: > I've just upgrade mailman 3 installation following Mr. Sapiro advice: > did a > > pip install --upgrade django-mailman3 hyperkitty mailman mailmanclient > mailman-hyperkitty postorius > > I did a "python3 manage.py migrate" after, too. > > And all seemed to run well. > > All the lists showed in postorius via web, but when I try to accesss > into one of them the browser shows an error. > > In the log you can see: > > *-*-*-*-*-*-* > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File > "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/base.py", > line 119, in __getattr__ > return self._get(name) > File > "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/base.py", > line 86, in _get > raise KeyError(key) > KeyError: 'get_requests_count' > > ... (And after all the traceback lines) > > AttributeError: 'MailingList' object has no attribute > 'get_requests_count' > > *-*-*-*-*-*-*-* > > The lists seem to be distributing messeages well.. but I cannot acces > via web administration (django/postorius) > > Can anyone point me in the right direction to solve this, please? > > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >

5 years, 1 month

Re: Postorius permissions granularity

by Odhiambo Washington

On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 11:43 AM Liam Reilly <l.reilly(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to have more granular permissions in Postorius than either > User or Superuser? The user permissions that are configurable under > /admin/auth/user/ do not seem to have any effect. > > We have a helpdesk team that would benefit from being able to access all > list pages in the same way as a Superuser, but without the ability to > accidentally delete the mail domain for example. > > Thanks, > > Liam > You can create several superusers. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

3 months, 1 week

Re: hidden list is hidden even to the owner

by Mark Sapiro

On 7/2/20 8:10 AM, Mohsen Masoudfar wrote: > > This is after a long fight with AWS and Redhat versions, I ended up installing the mailman3-full package on Ubuntu18. Installation was straight forward and easy, but it seems it is not easily possible to update/upgrade Postorius alone in this configuration, is it? You can't upgrade Postorius alone in any configuration because the latest Postorius requires recent Mailman core, mailmanclient and django-mailman3. Depending on how the Debian/Ubuntu package installs these things, it may be possible to upgrade them with pip3, but as I don't know the details of how they are installed in this package, I can't say how to do this. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 8 months

Re: Postorius permissions granularity

by Liam Reilly

Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Liam Reilly writes: > > Is there a way to have more granular permissions in Postorius than > > either User or Superuser? > > Not without additional code. It couldn't be a plugin. It would have > to be a fork of the main Postorius code at first (ie, you would be > responsible for patching it and merging our public releases, there > would not be regular releases). I doubt it would be merged in a near- > future release, at least I wouldn't be confident enough to do that > myself without beta testing on a branch. > I don't think it would be hard to implement a "restricted superuser" > role. The annoying part would be figuring out where to apply it, as > the "authenticated user", "moderator", and "superuser" roles are > implemented via Python "decorators" applied to the functions > implementing the various features. And the changes would likely need > to be pervasive in page templates, forms, and functional code. > > The user permissions that are configurable under /admin/auth/user/ > > do not seem to have any effect. > > As far as I know the only bit that has big effects is "superuser", and > there's a "staff" bit that has some effect on the superuser IIRC. > Everything else is implemented in Postorius. > > We have a helpdesk team that would benefit from being able to > > access all list pages in the same way as a Superuser, but without > > the ability to accidentally delete the mail domain for example. > > I almost started on this two years ago, but that customer wanted it > for individual lists rather than a helpdesk team, and realized that > all the relevant owners would be satisfied with promoting moderators > to owner. So it didn't happen. > Footnotes: > [1] There are several consultants who would be capable of maintenance > in the consultant list on the wiki, and more than one who would be > able to design and implement the code if you're in a we-want-it-enough- > to-pay hurry. > -- > GNU Mailman consultant (installation, migration, customization) > Sirius Open Source https://www.siriusopensource.com/ > Software systems consulting in Europe, North America, and Japan Thanks Stephen. It looks like we're going to take the simple route of the helpdesk using existing screen sharing tools to assist list owners, rather than providing elevated access in Postorius. Many of our list owners are not technical and so the transition from Mailman 2 to 3 has been challenging for some.

3 months

Re: Unknown attribute: process_bounces

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/18/21 1:29 AM, xlefloch--- via Mailman-users wrote: > Hello, > > I've upgraded my Mailman installation from those versions: > mailman==3.2.2 > postorius==1.2.4 > mailmanclient==3.2.2 > > To those ones: > mailman==3.3.0 > postorius==1.3.3 > mailmanclient==3.3.2 > > I'm having issues in Postorius in the settings section: Unknown attribute: process_bounces. > When i'm printing the settings list for the concerned list retrieved by the REST API, i'am missing all the parameters related to the management of bounces. In the "mailinglist" table of the Mailman database, i have the columns managing these parameters. > > Anyone have any ideas? Postorius 1.3.3 requires Mailman core >=3.3.1 How did you upgrade?. If this was a package upgrade, your packager has produced an incompatible set of components. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 10 months

Postorius not HTML-decoding < to "<" characters

by Ron / BCLUG

Andy Smith wrote on 2024-10-30 20:59: > # Block access to the signup form from Tor exit nodes. > <Location /mailman/accounts/signup> > <RequireAll> > Require all granted > Include /etc/apache2/tor-exit-list.conf > </RequireAll> > </Location> If we look at the above message, there are less-than and greater-than symbols around the Apache keywords in the email as expected. If we look at the archived version of the message, we see a slightly mangled representation: # Block access to the signup form from Tor exit nodes. <Location /mailman/accounts/signup> <RequireAll> Require all granted Include /etc/apache2/tor-exit-list.conf </RequireAll> </Location> https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… Hopefully I've assigned the blame to Postorius accurately and no formatting nor archiving issues make the issue difficult to understand. Thanks.

1 year, 4 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"