Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: MM2 -> MM3 Migration

by Odhiambo Washington

On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 10:39 PM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 12/29/22 05:25, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > I looked at my list archives and saw that the latest post was on Dec 8, > > 2022. > > Then, because I wanted to import any posts that happened from 8th to > now(), > > I looked at two posts: > > 1. > > > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > This talks about 'hyperkitty_import *--since=01.01.2022* -l > mylist@mydomain > > my-mbox-file' > > > > 2. https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2018-July/083607.html > > Which talks about 'hyperkitty_import *--since='1990-01-01'* -l > > mylist@mydomain my-mbox-file' > > > The default without the since= option is to import only those messages > from the mbox which are newer than the newest message in the existing > archive which is exactly what you want. > So I ended up using this and I can see the list metrics indicating that the last post was on 29Dec22, but I don't seem to be able to see those posts in the archives. I have compared these two: 1. https://mm3-lists.kictanet.or.ke/archives/list/kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.k… 2. With - https://posts.kictanet.or.ke/ - a WordPress website where I also display those same posts - I am a little confused. Must I re-index for the new posts to display? > hyperkitty_import uses python-dateutil > <https://dateutil.readthedocs.io/en/stable/> to parse the since date. > See <https://dateutil.readthedocs.io/en/stable/parser.html> for info on > formats. > Thanks. Will look at this. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-)

3 years, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: User settings triggers error

by Mark Dadgar

On Jun 28, 2020, at 4:22 PM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > If I'm reading the above correctly, it appears that there is a message > in the archive database whose message_id value is > 'BYAPR02MB5976132151FF19510269C44CB3940(a)BYAPR02MB5976.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>'. > The trailing '>' is causing HyperKitty's Email.as_message() method to > try to set a value of > '<BYAPR02MB5976132151FF19510269C44CB3940(a)BYAPR02MB5976.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>>'. > > Or maybe there's leading white space in the value, or both. > > Try the following patch. > > > --- a/hyperkitty/models/email.py > +++ b/hyperkitty/models/email.py > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ import logging > import os > import re > from email.message import EmailMessage > -from email.utils import formataddr > +from email.utils import formataddr, make_msgid > > from django.conf import settings > from django.db import IntegrityError, models > @@ -175,7 +175,12 @@ class Email(models.Model): > header_date = self.date.astimezone(tz).replace(microsecond=0) > # Date format: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.3 > msg["Date"] = header_date.strftime("%a, %d %b %Y %H:%M:%S %z") > - msg["Message-ID"] = "<%s>" % self.message_id > + try: > + msg["Message-ID"] = "<%s>" % re.sub('[<>\s]', '', > + self.message_id) > + except: > + msg["Message-ID"] = make_msgid() > if self.in_reply_to: > msg["In-Reply-To"] = unfold(self.in_reply_to) > The patch does not apply cleanly against /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/hyperkitty/models/email.py patching file email.py patch: **** malformed patch at line 4: import os I am assuming that this is because I am running the Ubuntu packages, which are a year down-rev: Mailman Core Version GNU Mailman 3.2.2 (La Villa Strangiato) Mailman Core API Version 3.0 Mailman Core Python Version 3.8.2 (default, Apr 27 2020, 15:53:34) [GCC 9.3.0] - Mark ----- mark(a)pdc-racing.net | 408-348-2878

6 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: Timeout error on anonymous subscribe

by Gerald Vogt

On 23.10.24 21:35, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 10/22/24 23:07, Gerald Vogt wrote: >> >> For testing I have set >> >> POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL = 'https://lists.example.org' >> >> to the URL of our main domain, however, if I test an anonymous >> subscribe through the list info page I still get the timeout error > > This will have no effect unless you delete and recreate the template in > Postorius because simple changing the setting won't change the `uri` in > the template table. O.K. Did that. Now the uri in mailman.template is https://lists.example.org/mailman3/api/templates/list/community.lists.examp… However, it doesn't change the timeout issue, except now the error is HTTPSConnectionPool(host='lists.example.org', port=443): Read timed out. (read timeout=5) instead of localhost:8000. >> I can access http://localhost:8000/mailman3/api/templates/list/ >> community.lists.example.com/list:user:action:subscribe with curl and >> immediately get the response. > > Can you do that as the Mailman user?, e.g. > ``` > sudo -u mailman curl http://localhost:8000/mailman3/api/templates/list/ > community.lists.example.com/list:user:action:subscribe > ``` > assuming the Mailman user is `mailman`. I don't quite understand the relevance of the user accessing the localhost tcp port. Any local user can do that. I can access the template content with curl http://localhost:8000/mailman3/api/templates/list/community.lists.example.c… as well as curl http://lists.example.org/mailman3/api/templates/list/community.lists.exampl… as any user on the mailman server. And I can use the latter to access the template from anywhere as it's a public server. In any case, curl immediately returns the content. There is no delay. Thanks, Gerald

1 year, 10 months

[MM3-users] [Solved] PAM error (was Re: Re: OK, so I backed out completely and re-installed....)

by Bill Oliver

On Wed, 2024-10-16 at 12:19 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 10/16/24 10:26, Bill Oliver wrote: > > > > 1) I set up a mailinglist (tradfp(a)forensicpath.us) for "old school" > > forensic pathologists to discuss cases. > > > Does the forensicpath.us domain have an alias_domain configured in > mailman causing mailman to create > /opt/mailman/mm/var/data/postfix_vmap > and /opt/mailman/mm/var/data/postfix_vmap.db? You need this. Yes, I created a "lists.forensicpath.us" early on. > > > > In my previous attempt, I added > > > > hash:/opt/mailman/mm/var/data/postfix_lmtp > > > > to both virtual_mailbox_maps and virtual_alias_maps, but I haven't > > done that yet here. I thought I'd ask and make sure I should. > > > > Should that be my next step? > > You should add hash:/opt/mailman/mm/var/data/postfix_vmap to > virtual_alias_maps only. Done. I started getting the disappearing mail problem again, though none of the references to errors from the changes I made originally. After spending a few hours going over debug files, I noticed that I kept getting a pam error. The mails were getting rejected over authentication errors. It turns out it was all a permissions problem with /sbin/unix_chkpwd. Apparently the sticky bit was not set correctly on installation. Here's a discussion of the problem: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/422411/pam-authentication-failure-… I still don't understand why this was a problem with mailman and not with "regular" mail, but doing the "chmod u+s /sbin/unix_chkpwd" resulted in things magically working just like it's supposed to. Thanks for the help! billo

1 year, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: MM2.1 -> MM3.3 migration. To hold or not hold

by mark＠suburbia.org.au

Hi Mark, Thanks for taking the time to reply. Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 11/16/24 21:41, mark(a)suburbia.org.au wrote: > > However, I've just done a test of a newly added user (a test email account for me), seen that the Moderation Action is None, but when I posted to the list from the address, it was not held for moderation, and went through. > > Am I missing something with the expected functionality? > > A member's moderation action of None means use the Default action to take when a member posts to the list. Is that set to Hold for moderation? > Actually, it is good practice to set that to Hold for moderation for > all lists or at least all those that don't require moderator approval > for subscription to prevent a spammer from subscribing and spamming the > list. Then, upon approving a member's post you can also set the member's > moderation action to default processing and upon discarding a spammers > post, you can also set the spammer's moderation action to Discard. I agree. My point was that the list is set as default to hold for moderation. But, a new user who sends an email to the list, whose Moderation Action is set to "none", was able to email the list without the email being held for moderation. I would have expected based on the threads I quoted, that a user who is added to the list via Mass subscribe, would not be able to send to the list without it being held. I'm happy to do more testing, provide other information/logs as desired if that would help? cheers, Mark

1 year, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: hyperkitty url not found

by Eggert Ehmke

So I have to use the external url via https? I can access the address https://lists.[1]<tld>_/mailman3/archives/api/_ so I set: (<tld> is my existing domain) base_url: https://lists.<tld>/mailman3/archives Now I get this in the mailman.log: Mar 14 19:40:21 2022 (166928) ACCEPT: <12973151.uLZWGnKmhe@wookie> Mar 14 19:40:21 2022 (166932) HyperKitty failure on https://lists.<tld>/mailman3/archives/ api/mailman/urls: <html><title>Forbidden</title><body> <h1>Access is forbidden</h1><p>Please check the IP addresses assigned to MAILMAN_ARCHIVER_FROM in the settings file. </p></body></html> (403) In my settings I have my local IP and 127.0.0.1 and ::1. What should I set there? Am Montag, 14. März 2022, 18:48:51 CET schrieb Mark Sapiro: > On 3/9/22 07:13, Eggert Ehmke wrote: > > I installed mailman3 in a virtualenv following this guide: > > > > https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html[1] > > The mailinglists work very good. However, I did not manage to set up > > hyperkitty archiving. Archiving is enabled in mailman.cfg. I can call the > > Archive site from my configuration page, but it is empty. > > > > In my /opt/mailman/mm/var/logs/mailman.log > > file I find error messages like: > > > > HyperKitty failure on > > http://localhost/mailman/hyperkitty/api/mailman/archive: The requested > > URL was not found on this server. > > Your setting in mailman-hyperkitty.cfg for base_url is > > base_url: http://localhost/mailman/hyperkitty/ > > It needs to be the base URL for accessing hyperkitty, possibly > > base_url: http://localhost/mailman3/hyperkitty/ > > or whatever you use to access hyperkitty from a web browser. > > Whatever it is, `<base_url>/api` should return a page of API documentation. -------- [1] https://lists.ftv-spandau.de/mailman3/archives/api/

4 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: Sending a message to a subscription applicant when a subscription request is made

by Allan Hansen

Mark, I tried doing this. I unsubscribed myself from a list, set the policy as you suggest and re-applied. I got no confirmation messages but as moderator I got the moderate message. I then tried a bogus email and saw that a message was sent to that and no moderator message to me. Would the server skip the verification message because I'm a moderator/admin? Yours, Allan On 3/28/23, 08:57, "Mark Sapiro" <mark(a)msapiro.net <mailto:mark@msapiro.net>> wrote: On 3/28/23 01:49, Allan Hansen wrote: > > There is a template, 'list:user:action:subscribe' that almost does this, but it gets sent only if the email address of the applicant is unverified. A good number of our applicants are already on our lists, so they would not get this template if we set the Subscription Policy to 'Confirm, then moderate'. > > Our Subscription Policy is currently: 'Moderate' for all lists. If you set the subscription policy to 'Confirm, then moderate' the user will receive a confirmation request based on the list:user:action:subscribe template whether or not the address is verified. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net <mailto:mark@msapiro.net>> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/> Archived at: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org>/message/ORDAIBK4JUICZADYPEPWDVV2WP5EXWEB/ This message sent to hansen(a)rc.org <mailto:hansen@rc.org>

3 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Migrating Mailman 3 lists

by Mark Dadgar

On May 24, 2020, at 7:24 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <turnbull.stephen.fw(a)u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote: >> Mark Sapiro wrote: >>> On 5/19/20 7:25 PM, Mark Dadgar wrote: > >>>> For reference my pgloader script looks like: >>>> >>>> load database >>>> from sqlite:///var/lib/dbconfig-common/sqlite3/mailman3-web/mailman3web.db >>>> into postgresql://mailman3:XXREDACTEDXX@localhost/mailman >>>> >>>> with include drop, create tables, create indexes, reset sequences, no truncate > >> Have you tried this without indexes and then run the migrate >> script? It may re-create them as part of the schema upgrade >> check. > > That was my immediate guess. I'm not an SQL expert, but I believe > that sequences and indexes are different entities, they're both > optimizations that you don't need (ie, ignoring performance), and > implementations differ on how they're implemented. Eg, if sqlite > implements them as tables, while PostgreSQL has a special data > structure, you could run into this kind of behavior. I'm pretty sure > that these will be recreated appropriate to the new database when the > schema validator is done. > > But don't trust me, and *do* keep a backup. ;-) 😁 I did try it without indexes and it started showing the same warnings. I will give this another try and let it run to completion. I was hesitant to do that because the core database is 7.5 GB and the web database is 35 GB so there are only so many copies I can keep hanging around on the cloud volume. Since the data is mostly text, I am hoping that postgres will compress the bejeesus out of it. - Mark ----- mark(a)pdc-racing.net | 408-348-2878

6 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: config incoming email in my domain cpanel

by Rafael Mora

El jue., 3 ago. 2017 a las 16:25, tlhackque via Mailman-users (< mailman-users(a)mailman3.org>) escribió: > On 03-Aug-17 17:14, Rafael Mora wrote: > > > > > > El jue., 3 ago. 2017 a las 16:07, tlhackque via Mailman-users > > (<mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org>>) > > escribió: > > > > You've said you're working with labbrands.com <http://labbrands.com > >. > > > > labbrands.com <http://labbrands.com> has address > 192.185.51.89 > > mail.labbrands.com <http://mail.labbrands.com> has address > > 192.185.51.89 > > www.labbrands.com <http://www.labbrands.com> is an alias for > > labbrands.com <http://labbrands.com>. > > > > telnet proves that Exim is running on that IP address. Either you're > > running it, or hostgator is redirecting the SMTP ports. > > > > You added: > > lists.labbrands.com <http://lists.labbrands.com> has address > > 190.145.27.66 > > > > Presumably that's a different machine. > > > > So that now needs an MX record, and a firewall routing. > > > > > > I added the MX record on our hostgator hosting like this: > > image.png > > > > Is it correct??? > > > No. And sending images to the mailing list doesn't get you help. > > You set up lists.labbrands.com as a secondary server, not an independent > mail domain. This will cause you serious grief. > Ok I will remove that MX record on my hostgator hosting. Thank for your help. > > You need to get some help from a more suitable list. Setting this up is > not mailman-specific, and getting it right is more than a quick note. > > Try the Postfix documentation & mailing lists. > > > > > > > And the SPF > > records ... and spam and virus filters, and all the other stuff > > you need > > to setup an independent, public-facing smtp server. > > > > But at least you won't have to relay. > > > > Good luck. > > > > On 03-Aug-17 16:55, Rafael Mora wrote: > > > El jue., 3 ago. 2017 a las 15:49, tlhackque via Mailman-users (< > > > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org>>) > > escribió: > > > > > >> I think you're confused. > > >> > > >> You already have mail.labbrands.com <http://mail.labbrands.com> > > set up as the MX record for > > >> labbrands.com <http://labbrands.com>. And it has an A record > > with the same address as your > > >> webserver. > > >> > > > I'm working with the hostgator mailserver, we are not running a > > local > > > mailserver. > > > > > > As suggested I added an A record like this: > > > [image: image.png] > > > > > > Is it correct? is it redirecting to my Ip so I can redirect it to > my > > > postfix/mm3 server? > > > > > > > > >> So if you're getting e-mail on that domain, there's another e-mail > > >> server running on that IP address. You can't have 2 servers > > on port > > >> 25. In that case, as has been noted before, you'll need to setup > a > > >> relay in that server, not a firewall redirect. Depending on > > your MTA, > > >> you would need to relay to your internal server. And make sure > > your > > >> firewall setup allows your MTA to do this. > > >> > > >> We can see it's EXIM: > > >> > > >> telnet mail.labbrands.com <http://mail.labbrands.com> 25 > > >> Trying 192.185.51.89... > > >> Connected to mail.labbrands.com <http://mail.labbrands.com> > > (192.185.51.89). > > >> Escape character is '^]'. > > >> help > > >> 220-gator4137.hostgator.com > > <http://220-gator4137.hostgator.com> ESMTP Exim 4.87 #1 Thu, 03 > > Aug 2017 15:47:48 > > >> -0500 > > >> 220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport > > unsolicited, > > >> 220 and/or bulk e-mail. > > >> 214-Commands supported: > > >> 214 AUTH STARTTLS HELO EHLO MAIL RCPT DATA NOOP QUIT RSET HELP > > >> quit > > >> 221 gator4137.hostgator.com <http://gator4137.hostgator.com> > > closing connection > > >> Connection closed by foreign host. > > >> > > >> Or, consolidate all your e-mail to one server - which is a lot > > easier to > > >> manage unless you have a really big operation. Postfix is > > probably the > > >> right choice, but requires more setup. > > >> > > >> Although Mailman3 configuration is not well documented (as you've > > >> discovered), you may want to get help from someone with more > > general > > >> network and mail experience. You're now into territory that is, > as > > >> Simon indicated, not Mailman-specific. > > >> > > >> On 03-Aug-17 16:28, Rafael Mora wrote: > > >>> El jue., 3 ago. 2017 a las 15:26, Mark Sapiro > > (<mark(a)msapiro.net <mailto:mark@msapiro.net>>) > > >> escribió: > > >>>> On 08/03/2017 01:22 PM, Rafael Mora wrote: > > >>>>> El jue., 3 ago. 2017 a las 15:18, Mark Sapiro > > (<mark(a)msapiro.net <mailto:mark@msapiro.net>>) > > >>>> escribió: > > >>>>>> You need to forward port 25 for SMTP mail delivery and if > > you want the > > >>>>>> web UI (Postorius and HyperKitty) accessible from the > > outside, port 80 > > >>>>>> for http and/or port 443 for https > > >>>>>> < > > >>>>>> > > >> > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-p… > > >>>>>>> . > > >>>>> I mean for incoming mail redirected from my hostgator > > hosting, because > > >>>> when > > >>>>> I suscribe an email address MM3 sends a confirmation email, > > so I have > > >> to > > >>>>> reply to be suscribed to the list. > > >>>> As I said, for mail delivery you need to forward port 25 to > > the Mailman > > >>>> server. > > >>>> > > >>> Ok so I'll redirect in my zentyal firewall the port 25 to my > local > > >> centos7 > > >>> with postfix and MM3 with IP 192.168.1.42. Thanks Mark. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net <mailto:mark@msapiro.net>> > > The highway is for gamblers, > > >>>> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - > > B. Dylan > > >>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>> Mailman-users mailing list > > >>>> mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> > > >>>> > > > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > > >>>> > > >> -- > > >> This communication may not represent my employer's views, > > >> if any, on the matters discussed. > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Mailman-users mailing list > > >> mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> > > >> > > > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > > >> > > > > -- > > This communication may not represent my employer's views, > > if any, on the matters discussed. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailman-users mailing list > > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> > > > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > > > > -- > > > > Atentamente / Best Regards > > > > Ing. Rafael Mora > > > > -- > This communication may not represent my employer's views, > if any, on the matters discussed. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- Atentamente / Best Regards Ing. Rafael Mora

9 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Gmail emails bouncing - anybody seen this problem?

by worik

On 12/02/19 11:25 AM, worik wrote: > Friends > > On a fresh install (docker) on a fresh VPS I am getting all Mailman > messages to Gmail addresses bouncing telling me I am sending too many > messages. Has anybody else have this problem? > > I am getting the following error in mail.log: "Our system has detected > an unusual rate of 550-5.7.1 unsolicited mail originating from your IP > address. To protect our 550-5.7.1 users from spam, mail sent from your > IP address has been blocked. 550-5.7.1 Please visit 550-5.7.1 > https://support.google.com/mail/?p=UnsolicitedIPError to review our 550 > 5.7.1 Bulk Email Senders Guidelines. l26si395949wme.8 - gsmtp" > > I have been to the URL mentioned and exhausted my options there. > > Worik > Well. Golly. I complained to Google, and heard nothing back. But with no changes on my end they have stopped bouncing my emails. Now they are just marked as spam. I can live with that. Very frustrated with google's levels of service. What a pain! Thank you Brian Carpenter, who may well have been right about "warming up the IP". What ever that might mean. I have not read that RFC, but I have a lot to learn. Thank you Mark Sapiro, for your patience. Thank you every body for the obviously hard work creating this system. I have a long way to go until I know how to use it properly, but I am no longer stopped at the google cliff. Worik -- If not me then who? If not now then when? If not here then where? So, here I stand, I can do no other root(a)worik.org 021-1680650, (03) 4821804 Aotearoa (New Zealand) I have a lot of onion pie, that explains the aroma

7 years, 7 months

Search results for query "sapiro"