Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: config incoming email in my domain cpanel

by Rafael Mora

El jue., 3 ago. 2017 a las 14:09, Simon HANNA (<simon.hanna(a)serve-me.info>) escribió: > > > On August 3, 2017 8:50:41 PM GMT+02:00, Rafael Mora < > rafael.mora.guti(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >El jue., 3 ago. 2017 a las 13:21, Mark Sapiro (<mark(a)msapiro.net>) > >escribió: > > > >> On 08/03/2017 10:42 AM, Rafael Mora wrote: > >> > > >> > I've found the MX records on my cpanel but how do I redirect the > >emails > >> > going to my list to my private server? > >> > >> > >> You have to configure the MTA that is the MX for the domain to relay > >the > >> mail to the Mailman server. > >> > > > >Our domain is: LABBRANDS.COM We have that domain config in a Hosgator > >hosting. The emails sent to labbrands.com go to our hosting, so how do > >I > >tell cpanel in hostgator hosting that the mails sent to the list ( > >mailing(a)labbrands.com) are redirect to the MTA (postfix) in my private > >server (we have static public IP address) ?? > > > You can't redirect one email address using DNS! > If you don't want to host an entire domain on your own server, I suggest > using a subdomain (lists.example.con) instead. > Should I configure my private Centos7 server with subdomain lists.labbrands.com? Doing so how do I redirect the email to the private Centos where postfix and MM3 are installed? > You could probably also redirect one email in cpanel to the subdomain, but > I'm not sure how mailman and clients like emails with different domains... > In theory postfix can send emails using any domain. You just have to make > sure spf, dkim and PTR records are properly set. Otherwise you'll most > likely get issues with rejected mail... > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- Atentamente / Best Regards Ing. Rafael Mora

7 years, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: Splitting hosts: mta&core vs postorius

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Ruth Ivimey-Cook writes: > On 21/06/2020 04:52, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > Change that to greyarea-post > Problem is, if I do that (which I did in the beginning), the core rest > service listens on localhost / 127.0.0.1 I don't understand. I'm not in a position to test with Mailman itself right now, but the standalone gunicorn[1] does the right thing (takes an IP address and binds to the corresponding interface, or takes a domain name, resolves it to the IP address, and binds that to the corresponding interface). It does not substitute localhost. It could be a Mailman bug (Mailman 3 is usually configured with all components running on the same host, and that's how it's tested), but first, does greyarea-post resolve to a routable address on the relevant network when queried from that host? > IMO, the hostname parameter needs to be split up into a "what address > should the rest of the world use to address me" and separately "what > address(es) should I listen on". Multiple listen addresses enable > multihomed hosts to get the right connectivity, too. I'm not clear on what you're saying. An address is a rendezvous point; if you're not listening on the address that others are using, you won't meet. What good does it do to split them up? It's not clear to me why you think Mailman might want to be multihomed (which is different from the host wanting to be multihomed). I don't object to the work to make it so. But my paranoia says it's best if Mailman is cordoned off into the DMZ with webservers and other hazmat. By design, Mailman core doesn't need to talk to the Internet or to the secure internal network -- Internet functions are delegated to the MTA and the webapps, and local configuration is via shell access which in principle could be console. I'd rather not enable the complexity of a multihomed application unless there's an important use case. (I don't make the final decision, but I am listened to by Those Who Do.) Footnotes: [1] gunicorn is the Python module that manages web services for the REST interface.

5 years

[MM3-users] Re: MM3 Docker

by Odhiambo Washington

On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 23:39, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 1/6/19 8:47 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > > If you could include the missing steps that you left out then I could > > possibly be able to follow the steps :-) > > > Please help me understand what steps are missing and I will try to > provide the information. Okay. At the installation stage, you say the following: "I already had some things set up in /opt/mailman including a git subdirectory containing clones of the GitLab mailman, mailmanclient, mailman-hyperkitty, hyperkitty, django-mailman3 and postorius projects. On the third server I have added mailman-suite because I use the settings.py from that project as the basis for mine." Please assume that the reader is a newbie to python3 virtualenv and give the details of the commands they need to execute to (a) clone all the projects needed and (b) create the virtualenv. The next steps are: mkdir /opt/mailman/mm Then you say "I then created a /opt/mailman/mm directory and within that a Python 3.6 virtualenv" What happens here is something that needs clarification, because you are specific about "python3.6". I have googled and realized that one has to be specific about the python version they want to use in their virtualenv as shown here -> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45293436/how-to-specify-python-version-… exact command to execute to create the /opt/mailman/mm/venv exact command to execute to activate virtualenv From there, I think the newbie can follow and fumble till they come up with a working MM3 site. Come to think of it, your steps kind of look clearer than most that I have encountered. I do understand that there are only a few people working on the MM3 development, which I think is the reason there still isn't a document similar to the ones included with MM2.1x source under doc/ However, if your steps here are polished a little, they can possibly become one such doc. I think MM3 docs would come with three options - virtualenv option, docker option and package option. Installing from source seems like something not easily doable. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", grep ^[^#] :-)

6 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Dealing with confirmation requests for unsubscribes

by Brian Carpenter

On 11/18/20 6:17 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 11/18/20 7:41 AM, Brian Carpenter wrote: >> Hello List, >> >> I ran into the following issue for some mailman 3 lists that I am hosting: >> >> https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/768 >> >> Since there is no way for a list owner to deal with a moderation request >> for an unsubscription task, I assume I need to do something via the >> command line. This is where I need some help with. How do I deal with >> these moderation requests that are unable to be reviewed in an admin gui >> (Postorius/Affinity)? > > mailman shell -l list(a)example.com > Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell > Use commit() to commit changes. > Use abort() to discard changes since the last commit. > Exit with ctrl+D does an implicit commit() but exit() does not. > The variable 'm' is the test.msapiro.net mailing list > > This > >>>> list(getUtility(IPendings).find(mlist=m, pend_type='unsubscription', > token_owner=TokenOwner.moderator)) > > will return something like > > [('a8df55f557b5718505280d2613937e25a3109252', {'type': 'unsubscription', > 'list_id': 'list.example.com', 'email': 'user(a)example.com', > 'display_name': 'Mark S', 'when': '2020-11-18T22:56:53', 'token_owner': > 'moderator'})] > > What you want is the token, in this case > 'a8df55f557b5718505280d2613937e25a3109252' > > Then do > > ISubscriptionManager(m).confirm('a8df55f557b5718505280d2613937e25a3109252') > > which will return > > (None, <TokenOwner.no_one: 0>, None) > > and finally: > >>>> commit() > > >> I do recommend removing such choices for Postorius for Member policy. I >> will be doing this for Affinity until issue 768 is resolved. > The correct thing to do is fix > <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/768>. We almost certainly > will do that rather than remove the moderate and confirm then moderate > unsubscription policies. > > Worked like a charm Mark. Thank you! I forget you guys have a slower process than I when it comes to implementing gui changes. For me, once you have fixed that issue (768), it will be easy for me to reintroduce those two policies for unsubscribing. -- Brian Carpenter Harmonylists.com Emwd.com

4 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Postorius fails to show list because of a large message being held

by Brian Carpenter

On 7/14/20 1:06 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > It's confusing, but after adjusting that setting, you need to restart > Mailman core, not gunicorn. > > If you are running a gunicorn service, that is what is providing WSGI > support for Django (Postorius and/or HyperKitty). You may be using > gunicorn for this or uWSGI or Apache mod_wsgi, but is any case, that is > not the gunicorn we are considering here. > > Regardless of what you use to provide WSGI support for Django, Mailman > core uses gunicorn to support the REST API, and that is the gunicorn > affected by the settings in the gunicorn.cfg pointed to by > > [webservice] > configuration: /opt/mailman/mm/gunicorn.cfg > > If, with the above configuration, you do `ps -fwwA|grep runner=rest` you > will see something like: > > mailman 20582 20561 0 01:21 ? 00:00:16 > /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/python /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/runner -C > /opt/mailman/mm/deployment/mailman.cfg --runner=rest:0:1 > mailman 20722 20582 0 01:21 ? 00:01:19 > /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/python /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/runner -C > /opt/mailman/mm/deployment/mailman.cfg --runner=rest:0:1 > mailman 20725 20582 0 01:21 ? 00:01:18 > /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/python /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/runner -C > /opt/mailman/mm/deployment/mailman.cfg --runner=rest:0:1 > mailman 20726 20582 0 01:21 ? 00:01:18 > /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/python /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/runner -C > /opt/mailman/mm/deployment/mailman.cfg --runner=rest:0:1 > mailman 20727 20582 0 01:21 ? 00:01:50 > /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/python /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/runner -C > /opt/mailman/mm/deployment/mailman.cfg --runner=rest:0:1 > > The first of these, pid 20582, is Mailman's actual REST runner. The > other 4 with parent pid 20582 are the 4 gunicorn worker processes forked > from the REST runner. > > It's the REST runner or Mailman core that needs to be restarted to pick > up that change. Thanks Mark. I knew that once but forgot it. -- Please let me know if you need further assistance. Thank you for your business. We appreciate our clients. Brian Carpenter EMWD.com -- EMWD's Knowledgebase: https://clientarea.emwd.com/index.php/knowledgebase EMWD's Community Forums http://discourse.emwd.com/

4 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Clearing webserver cache - Nginx

by Odhiambo Washington

On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:55 PM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 8/5/24 12:45, Odhiambo Washington via Mailman-users wrote: > > > > Yes, those are Cloudflare IPs and I don't know why 2! > > All I know is that in DNS, I created an A record for the hostname and > chose > > the "proxy" option in the cloudflare DNS management interface. > > OK, I know nothing about how cloudflare proxying works, so ignoring that > and assuming it's OK, ... > ... > > I don't know. However, those IPs you see in the Nginx logs, none belong > to > > me! I have two possible IPs - one domiciled in KE and another domiciled > in > > the US (when I use VPN). > > I think I've misunderstood. Is it the case that the messages you report > like /opt/mailman/mm/static/CACHE/css/output.6dab123e4897.css" failed > (2: No such file or directory) ... are in the nginx log on the mailman > server. That's correct. > If so, see > https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#nginx-configura…. > > Is that what you have? > Yes. > If not, post your nginx configuration. > In any case, here is my virtualhost config: ``` server { if ($host = mm3-lists.kictanet.or.ke) { return 301 https://$host$request_uri; listen 80; server_name mm3-lists.kictanet.or.ke; return 301 https://mm3-lists.kictanet.or.ke$request_uri; include snippets/letsencrypt.conf; } server { listen 443 ssl http2; listen [::]:443 ssl http2; server_name mm3-lists.kictanet.or.ke; ssl_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/ mm3-lists.kictanet.or.ke/fullchain.pem; ssl_certificate_key /etc/letsencrypt/live/ mm3-lists.kictanet.or.ke/privkey.pem; ssl_trusted_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/ mm3-lists.kictanet.or.ke/chain.pem; include snippets/ssl.conf; include snippets/letsencrypt.conf; access_log /var/log/nginx/mm3-lists_access.log; error_log /var/log/nginx/mm3-lists_error.log; location = /favicon.ico { log_not_found off; access_log off; } location = /robots.txt { allow all; log_not_found off; access_log off; } location /static/ { alias /opt/mailman/mm/static/; } location / { proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:8010; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $remote_addr; } } ``` -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

10 months, 3 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: Hyperkitty list overview error: thread matching query does not exist

by Darren Hart

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 08:10:39AM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 5/23/22 11:11, Darren Hart via Mailman-users wrote: > > When attempting to visit the hyperkitty archives list overview for one of my two lists: > > > > Https://lists.mydomain.com/hyperkitty/list/mylist@mydomain.com/ > > > > The area where the threads should appear shows the loading spinner (but the activity summary bar chart and most active posters post counts do eventually load). > > > > The following appears in /var/log/mailman3/web/mailman-web.log: > > > > > > ERROR 2022-05-23 17:50:50,201 1694 django.request Internal Server Error: /hyperkitty/list/mylist(a)mydomain.com/posted-to > > Traceback (most recent call last): > ... > > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 406, in get > > raise self.model.DoesNotExist( > > hyperkitty.models.thread.Thread.DoesNotExist: Thread matching query does not exist. > > > > Viewing “All Threads” or Threads by month (any month) work as expected, displaying the appropriate threads. > > > > The archives for this list worked previously. There was an incident that resulted in DNS not working and the archiver failing for a few days. The mail that came in during that time does show up in the other views. > > > > The hyper kitty archives for a second list on this Mailman3 instance is working correctly. > > > > How can I fix this view of the archives? Or how can I get more information on what might be failing? > > > I'm not sure if this will help, but try running your django management > command with arguments `runjob recent_threads_cache`. Note that this will be > run daily if you are running the Cron Jobs for Mailman Web. See https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html?highlight=perio… Thank you Mark. These are in cron, but I ran this (and all the runjobs hourly,daily, etc. options), checking after each. The failure persisted until I restarted mailman3-web, and then it started working again. I'm not sure what combination of cron jobs and restarting resolved the issue, but it's running again. Thanks again. -- Darren Hart Ampere Computing / OS and Kernel

3 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: new list not working

by Christian

See below please... -----Original Message----- From: Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 7:02 AM To: mailman-users(a)mailman3.org Subject: [MM3-users] Re: new list not working On 3/10/23 05:07, Christian via Mailman-users wrote: > There are no such messages as you describe. > > After turning on debugging I got this from a test message sent to the > new > list: > > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) Available AUTH mechanisms: LOGIN(builtin) > PLAIN(builtin) > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) Peer: ('127.0.0.1', 51982) Mar 10 04:39:51 > 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) handling connection Mar 10 04:39:51 > 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) >> b'LHLO > zarathustra.ccalternatives.org' > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) >> b'MAIL > FROM:<christian(a)naturalintelligence.us> SIZE=3499' > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) sender: > christian(a)naturalintelligence.us > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) >> b'RCPT > TO:<redlatinleg(a)lists.ccalternatives.org>' > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) recip: > redlatinleg(a)lists.ccalternatives.org > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) >> b'DATA' > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) >> b'QUIT' > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) connection lost Mar > 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) Connection lost during > _handle_client() Again, that's only the post being delivered to Mailman. What comes after that in the log? Mar 10 08:39:28 2023 (1005) Available AUTH mechanisms: LOGIN(builtin) PLAIN(builtin) Mar 10 08:39:28 2023 (1005) Peer: ('127.0.0.1', 55662) Mar 10 08:39:28 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 55662) handling connection Mar 10 08:39:28 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 55662) >> b'LHLO zarathustra.ccalternatives.org' Mar 10 08:39:28 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 55662) >> b'MAIL FROM:<christian(a)naturalintelligence.us> SIZE=3498' Mar 10 08:39:28 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 55662) sender: christian(a)naturalintelligence.us Mar 10 08:39:28 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 55662) >> b'RCPT TO:<redlatinleg(a)lists.ccalternatives.org>' Mar 10 08:39:28 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 55662) recip: redlatinleg(a)lists.ccalternatives.org Mar 10 08:39:28 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 55662) >> b'DATA' Mar 10 08:39:28 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 55662) >> b'QUIT' Mar 10 08:39:28 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 55662) connection lost Mar 10 08:39:28 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 55662) Connection lost during _handle_client() Mar 10 08:44:05 2023 (1005) Available AUTH mechanisms: LOGIN(builtin) PLAIN(builtin) Mar 10 08:44:05 2023 (1005) Peer: ('127.0.0.1', 54800) Mar 10 08:44:05 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 54800) handling connection Mar 10 08:44:05 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 54800) >> b'LHLO zarathustra.ccalternatives.org' Mar 10 08:44:05 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 54800) >> b'MAIL FROM:<> SIZE=1139191' Mar 10 08:44:05 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 54800) sender: <> Mar 10 08:44:05 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 54800) >> b'RCPT TO:<medialist-bounces+kkeys=courier-tribune.com(a)lists.ccalternatives.org>' Mar 10 08:44:05 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 54800) recip: medialist-bounces+kkeys=courier-tribune.com(a)lists.ccalternatives.org Mar 10 08:44:05 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 54800) >> b'DATA' Mar 10 08:44:05 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 54800) >> b'QUIT' Mar 10 08:44:05 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 54800) connection lost Mar 10 08:44:05 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 54800) Connection lost during _handle_client() Mar 10 08:45:15 2023 (1005) Available AUTH mechanisms: LOGIN(builtin) PLAIN(builtin) Mar 10 08:45:15 2023 (1005) Peer: ('127.0.0.1', 38820) Mar 10 08:45:15 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 38820) handling connection Mar 10 08:45:15 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 38820) >> b'LHLO zarathustra.ccalternatives.org' Mar 10 08:45:15 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 38820) >> b'MAIL FROM:<> SIZE=1155595' Mar 10 08:45:15 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 38820) sender: <> Mar 10 08:45:15 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 38820) >> b'RCPT TO:<medialist-bounces+john.harbin=blueridgenow.com(a)lists.ccalternatives.org> ' Mar 10 08:45:15 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 38820) recip: medialist-bounces+john.harbin=blueridgenow.com(a)lists.ccalternatives.org Mar 10 08:45:15 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 38820) >> b'DATA' Mar 10 08:45:15 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 38820) >> b'QUIT' Mar 10 08:45:15 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 38820) connection lost Mar 10 08:45:15 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 38820) Connection lost during _handle_client() And have you checked if Mailman's out runner is running? Note that if it died for some reason and wasn't restarted or used up its restarts, restarting Mailman core won't start it. You need to stop Mailman core and then start it. OK I DID THAT Are there files in mailman's var/queue/out/ or var/queue/shunt/ directories? root@zarathustra:/opt/mailman/mm/var# ls -la queue/out total 4416 drwxrwx--- 2 mailman mailman 4096 Mar 10 04:44 . drwxr-xr-x 14 mailman mailman 4096 Mar 8 12:07 .. -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 1126829 Mar 10 04:39 1678316345.5510073+678e72d483278a233b12cc38ebc3786fbfd50a44.bak -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 1083682 Mar 8 20:00 1678334445.1113052+b43224b03f1ba2aa2610301331195b0cbaa151b7.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 1083744 Mar 8 20:00 1678334445.1324928+10c5ec711b7a4364407685b7899a9e8ea25a1a8b.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 1083680 Mar 8 20:00 1678334445.1501603+f2d2895ae7fa80ad387df77ffa17361294fe781c.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 2922 Mar 9 07:49 1678376944.9032273+9923c3da8724cff6ff71b585d1971a90a0ae65cb.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 2862 Mar 9 07:49 1678376944.9125621+2635b96fc6cd2ebb98a2c60a269d07517c1f5046.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 2886 Mar 9 07:57 1678377458.4585488+73f68f6f05d6ee64020e05c8ba2569378e4238f0.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 6600 Mar 9 07:59 1678377564.335885+63793d373c7668947ce4ef2c4a89644ba288d775.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 8290 Mar 9 08:25 1678379122.8619912+bfba87ac1c5e97473ea9c9645a99719d11179308.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 5966 Mar 9 08:48 1678380525.743866+d6f70271750015293a249f9ffae8200367eee509.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 6124 Mar 9 13:01 1678395691.1910245+9e087862cd317d77af8586d5390d60d483af8123.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 2789 Mar 9 13:31 1678397516.4386168+14bb385ad36166aef4a23e1d2b9dd92b50af254d.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 2752 Mar 9 13:31 1678397516.4514658+00546161e5310c988ca3b4d0be4c4a96d3295969.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 2321 Mar 9 13:58 1678399097.1614358+b7b3bfa9cdef9ada94045eed945862664aff065e.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 2390 Mar 9 13:58 1678399097.172284+7188ab4729863b3781c0890ec3b1be7de642454a.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 6031 Mar 9 14:07 1678399672.4968731+2caeb7c82672c9051be407b1cdb7a8b21a87d348.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 2095 Mar 9 14:08 1678399689.8167183+199b2da6cd1f8a00d10c1cd79ccc6cbcb4bdd503.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 7179 Mar 9 14:08 1678399689.8327854+a8d1dc73e5979bde43dccf48caa9bc58de575f41.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 8357 Mar 9 14:19 1678400356.5360696+62b6dce2428e420d6cb53c337c61db69a6fe4d44.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 5939 Mar 9 14:28 1678400903.3894706+d3f5dad6c67057edd0f2888e193dd71de14d2bf9.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 2096 Mar 10 04:43 1678452191.4875023+2e00a89aa5454f965d35a7b8be6a4f620944b8a1.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 7181 Mar 10 04:43 1678452191.4984088+1fd6f3aff9ef79aff269f4edc920f2424a8b35b7.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 6036 Mar 10 04:44 1678452252.847286+552f758b7fca32c2f082bd922f68de1f850dec2d.pck root@zarathustra:/opt/mailman/mm/var# ls -la queue/shunt total 12 drwxrwx--- 2 mailman mailman 4096 Mar 8 12:07 . drwxr-xr-x 14 mailman mailman 4096 Mar 8 12:07 .. -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 447 Apr 26 2021 1619433583.1513886+2626ca223f3fc4368f6cf90fecc1e0e50705c36a.pck You say that only the new list and one other have this issue, but I wonder if the issue is not with specific lists, but rather with posts after a certain time. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ Archived at: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message/ JNZIPCHBZIUUAO5KAQEWQX3UPZ7CZYPV/ This message sent to csa(a)web-analysts.net

2 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: Error after HyperKitty 1.3.x upgrade

by Florian Schulze

On 2 Jul 2020, at 8:38, Florian Schulze wrote: > On 30 Jun 2020, at 8:22, Florian Schulze wrote: > >> On 29 Jun 2020, at 23:40, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >>> On 6/29/20 1:38 AM, Florian Schulze wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> After upgrading to HyperKitty 1.3.x I get the following error for >>>> qcluster: >>>> >>>> File ".../lib/python3.7/site-packages/django_q/cluster.py", line >>>> 300, >>>> in pusher >>>> task = SignedPackage.loads(task[1]) >>>> File ".../lib/python3.7/site-packages/django_q/signing.py", line >>>> 31, >>>> in loads >>>> serializer=PickleSerializer) >>>> File ".../lib/python3.7/site-packages/django_q/core_signing.py", >>>> line >>>> 38, in loads >>>> return serializer().loads(data) >>>> File ".../lib/python3.7/site-packages/django_q/signing.py", line >>>> 44, >>>> in loads >>>> return pickle.loads(data) >>>> AttributeError: Can't get attribute 'process_task_result' on >>>> <module >>>> 'hyperkitty.tasks' from >>>> '.../lib/python3.7/site-packages/hyperkitty/tasks.py'> >>>> >>>> How do I recover from that? It seems like there are still persisted >>>> tasks in the qcluster queue using the old code from 1.2.x with the >>>> old >>>> locking implementation. >>> >>> Have you stopped ans started qcluster since upgrading? >> >> Yes >> >>> Are you running the Django periodic jobs? >> >> They were disabled because of the errors (someone else did the >> upgrade). I have enabled them again and will watch it and report >> back. > > The cronjobs seem to work fine, no errors so far. > > The queue doesn't seem to change at all. In "qmonitor" there is > nothing listed and the statusline remains the same at > ORM default Queued 303(118) > Success 100 Failures > 0 I managed to figure out how to inspect the queue in the admin interface. I just deleted all the repeatedly failing tasks and ran all cron jobs. I hope it is fine now. Regards, Florian Schulze

4 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Emergency moderation and clearing out a lot of held messages

by Abhilash Raj

On 12/14/22 03:31, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 12/13/22 10:38, Dan Caballero wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> I ran the commands and it took about 35 seconds for the loop to run. >> >> Here's the result. >> >>>>> count >> 4168 > > > So that's at least part of the issue. How does 35 seconds compare to the > length of time to process one moderated message through Postorius? > Probably should've read more of the thread before previous reply ;-) So, the issue _could_ be due to latency to the remote database vs local database that we have on m.p.o. Mailman3 is not very efficient when it comes to total no. of database queries done per operation, which is something I have been (very slowly) tracking and fixing on a case-by-case basis. So, for example, handling 1 held message in m.p.o made 1.1k postgres database calls in total and even though they were each only few hundred micro-seconds each, the total added up to roughly ~2sec avg response time on the handle message API endpoint. If you handle more than 1, it scales linearly. My suspicion is that in your case Dan, due to a remote instance, the latency per call is higher (maybe in the order of few or 10s of milliseconds is my guess?) and then depending on the total no. of entries you have in pendings and pendedkeyvalue tables (with some filters, not _all_ entries), it adds up to a high value. The no. of database calls here is of order n^2, where n is the entries in pendings of type "held message" and "data" and their respective linked relationships in pendedkeyvalue table. My MR makes it such that we don't need to scan all entries of "type"="data", so that part will become constant time. And the pending of type "held message" will be limited to no. of held messages in a single MailingList(compared to all mailing lists like today), so it will help depending on the distribution of held messages in various lists. I am also exploring ways to make that 2nd query also constant time. -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

2 years, 6 months

Search results for query "sapiro"