Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Python error, debian package, again

by Lars Schimmer

On 11/5/19 6:48 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 11/5/19 7:04 AM, Lars Schimmer wrote: >> >> Abhilash Raj (maxking) mentionend, it maybe a issue with mailman core >> trying to deliver the message to hyperkitty. >> But how can I remove those broken messages, or twitch hyperkitty to >> accept and discard them? > > > Look in Mailman's var/archives/hyperkitty/spool/ directory. This is > where messages that mailman-hyperkitty can't deliver to hyperkitty are > kept for retry. Yeah, there are some in this folder. Can I simply remove those entries from the spool directory? Or do I need to fiddle with any cmdline tool? thank you. MfG, Lars Schimmer -- ------------------------------------------------------------- TU Graz, Institut für ComputerGraphik & WissensVisualisierung Tel: +43 316 873-5405 E-Mail: l.schimmer(a)cgv.tugraz.at Fax: +43 316 873-5402 PGP-Key-ID: 0x4A9B1723

5 years, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: Sanity check of upgrade procedure

by David Newman

On 10/26/22 3:10 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 10/26/22 11:08, David Newman wrote: >> >> For these new releases, is that mistune step still needed? > > > No. That is one of the issues fixed in HyperKitty 1.3.6 which now > requires mistune>=2.0.0,<3.0 and will work with those versions. OK, thanks. Before getting to mistune, this command, run as mailman in a venv: pip install -U mailman postorius django-mailman3 hyperkitty mailman-web uwsgi Mailmanclient produced this error: .. Attempting uninstall: mailman-web Found existing installation: mailman-web 0.0.6.dev9+gc606169 Uninstalling mailman-web-0.0.6.dev9+gc606169: Successfully uninstalled mailman-web-0.0.6.dev9+gc606169 ERROR: Could not install packages due to an OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: 'WHEEL' Check the permissions. The command also said I needed to upgrade pip. Doing that produced a similar error. How to resolve this error? Thanks again. dn

2 years, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: Mailman3 breaking DKIM signatures

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Mark Sapiro writes: > On 1/23/25 12:53 AM, Danil Smirnov via Mailman-users wrote: > > Doesn't this parameter fits better? > > > > https://docs.python.org/3/library/email.policy.html#email.policy.EmailPolic… > > That would be better except Mailman uses the legacy > email.message.Message class whose policy is Compat32 and the Compat32 > policy doesn't accept refold_source. I would welcome a patch, especially if (a) tested on a system offering lists to the general public (or some organization large and diverse enough to support the span of the MUAs cat(1), mutt, Thunderbird, and Outlook), and (b) enabling owners at some level to select policy. I don't promise to apply (it's not my call), but I've personally been interested in a number of issues that can probably be addressed via email.policy tweaks. Steve

5 months, 2 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: config incoming email in my domain cpanel

by Rafael Mora

El jue., 3 ago. 2017 a las 16:07, tlhackque via Mailman-users (< mailman-users(a)mailman3.org>) escribió: > You've said you're working with labbrands.com. > > labbrands.com has address 192.185.51.89 > mail.labbrands.com has address 192.185.51.89 > www.labbrands.com is an alias for labbrands.com. > > telnet proves that Exim is running on that IP address. Either you're > running it, or hostgator is redirecting the SMTP ports. > > You added: > lists.labbrands.com has address 190.145.27.66 > > Presumably that's a different machine. > > So that now needs an MX record, and a firewall routing. I added the MX record on our hostgator hosting like this: [image: image.png] Is it correct??? > And the SPF > records ... and spam and virus filters, and all the other stuff you need > to setup an independent, public-facing smtp server. > > But at least you won't have to relay. > > Good luck. > > On 03-Aug-17 16:55, Rafael Mora wrote: > > El jue., 3 ago. 2017 a las 15:49, tlhackque via Mailman-users (< > > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org>) escribió: > > > >> I think you're confused. > >> > >> You already have mail.labbrands.com set up as the MX record for > >> labbrands.com. And it has an A record with the same address as your > >> webserver. > >> > > I'm working with the hostgator mailserver, we are not running a local > > mailserver. > > > > As suggested I added an A record like this: > > [image: image.png] > > > > Is it correct? is it redirecting to my Ip so I can redirect it to my > > postfix/mm3 server? > > > > > >> So if you're getting e-mail on that domain, there's another e-mail > >> server running on that IP address. You can't have 2 servers on port > >> 25. In that case, as has been noted before, you'll need to setup a > >> relay in that server, not a firewall redirect. Depending on your MTA, > >> you would need to relay to your internal server. And make sure your > >> firewall setup allows your MTA to do this. > >> > >> We can see it's EXIM: > >> > >> telnet mail.labbrands.com 25 > >> Trying 192.185.51.89... > >> Connected to mail.labbrands.com (192.185.51.89). > >> Escape character is '^]'. > >> help > >> 220-gator4137.hostgator.com ESMTP Exim 4.87 #1 Thu, 03 Aug 2017 > 15:47:48 > >> -0500 > >> 220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, > >> 220 and/or bulk e-mail. > >> 214-Commands supported: > >> 214 AUTH STARTTLS HELO EHLO MAIL RCPT DATA NOOP QUIT RSET HELP > >> quit > >> 221 gator4137.hostgator.com closing connection > >> Connection closed by foreign host. > >> > >> Or, consolidate all your e-mail to one server - which is a lot easier to > >> manage unless you have a really big operation. Postfix is probably the > >> right choice, but requires more setup. > >> > >> Although Mailman3 configuration is not well documented (as you've > >> discovered), you may want to get help from someone with more general > >> network and mail experience. You're now into territory that is, as > >> Simon indicated, not Mailman-specific. > >> > >> On 03-Aug-17 16:28, Rafael Mora wrote: > >>> El jue., 3 ago. 2017 a las 15:26, Mark Sapiro (<mark(a)msapiro.net>) > >> escribió: > >>>> On 08/03/2017 01:22 PM, Rafael Mora wrote: > >>>>> El jue., 3 ago. 2017 a las 15:18, Mark Sapiro (<mark(a)msapiro.net>) > >>>> escribió: > >>>>>> You need to forward port 25 for SMTP mail delivery and if you want > the > >>>>>> web UI (Postorius and HyperKitty) accessible from the outside, port > 80 > >>>>>> for http and/or port 443 for https > >>>>>> < > >>>>>> > >> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-p… > >>>>>>> . > >>>>> I mean for incoming mail redirected from my hostgator hosting, > because > >>>> when > >>>>> I suscribe an email address MM3 sends a confirmation email, so I have > >> to > >>>>> reply to be suscribed to the list. > >>>> As I said, for mail delivery you need to forward port 25 to the > Mailman > >>>> server. > >>>> > >>> Ok so I'll redirect in my zentyal firewall the port 25 to my local > >> centos7 > >>> with postfix and MM3 with IP 192.168.1.42. Thanks Mark. > >>> > >>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > >>>> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Mailman-users mailing list > >>>> mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > >>>> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > >>>> > >> -- > >> This communication may not represent my employer's views, > >> if any, on the matters discussed. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mailman-users mailing list > >> mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > >> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > >> > > -- > This communication may not represent my employer's views, > if any, on the matters discussed. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- Atentamente / Best Regards Ing. Rafael Mora

7 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Google Summer of Docs

by Terri Oda

On March 24, 2019 10:51:07 p.m. PDT, "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull.stephen.fw(a)u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote: >Ralph Seichter writes: > > * Mark Sapiro: > > >> > If you post an issue at ><https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/issues>, > > > one of our GSOC aspirants may pick it up. > > > > Done, although I wonder if any GSOC participant would want to write > > documentation instead of code... ;-) > >For their actual, Google-supported, project, Google explicitly >excludes documentation. > They do for Google Summer of **Code** but they've just announced Google Summer of **Docs** which sounds really neat and we might want to participate. (It's my personal opinion that our docs have really suffered since I finished my PhD and stopped using them as a warmup exercise when I was procrastinating on writing my thesis. *grin*)

6 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: Link in the top-left corner of Hyperkitty

by Seth Seeger

> On May 8, 2020, at 11:13 AM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > It should show the display name corresponding to the domain name that > matches the domain in the URL that you go to. If this doesn't seem > correct, perhaps there is some issue with the way you are proxying in > your web server. Here is my proxy entry in Nginx: location / { include uwsgi_params; uwsgi_pass 172.19.199.3:8080; uwsgi_read_timeout 300; } My uwsgi_params file: uwsgi_param QUERY_STRING $query_string; uwsgi_param REQUEST_METHOD $request_method; uwsgi_param CONTENT_TYPE $content_type; uwsgi_param CONTENT_LENGTH $content_length; uwsgi_param REQUEST_URI $request_uri; uwsgi_param PATH_INFO $document_uri; uwsgi_param DOCUMENT_ROOT $document_root; uwsgi_param SERVER_PROTOCOL $server_protocol; uwsgi_param REQUEST_SCHEME $scheme; uwsgi_param HTTPS $https if_not_empty; uwsgi_param REMOTE_ADDR $remote_addr; uwsgi_param REMOTE_PORT $remote_port; uwsgi_param SERVER_PORT $server_port; uwsgi_param SERVER_NAME $server_name; Is there something I’ve missed? I followed a tutorial for this (which is no longer available). Seth

5 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: Welcome message template errors

by Mark

> On 2024-04-24 03:58, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> What do you get if you do >> ``` >> sudo -u mailman curl >> https://lists.mydomain.com/mailman3/api/templates/list/mytestlist.lists.myd… >> ``` >> with the template set in Postorius? > ******************* > The welcome message is returned. > > root@hel:~# sudo -u mailman curl > https://LISTS.MYDOMAIN.COM/mailman3/api/templates/list/MYTESTLIST.LISTS.MYD… > Test Welcome message for new subscribers.root@hel:~# ******************* Making progress... I edited settings file again, replacing the domain name with the IP address () POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL = 'http://12.34.56.78' (no SSL) The URI in the template table now has this. http://12.34.56.78/mailman3/api/templates/list/MYTESTLIST.MYDOMAIN.COM/list… Now, when Mass subscribing a new member, a Welcome email is sent to the new member with the correct Subject and From, but the message is blank.

1 year, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: Mailman shutting down Hyperkitty: Request too large

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Mark Sapiro writes: > Not if we're collapsing alternatives. If we're collapsing a > multipart/alternative part with text/plain and text/html > alternatives to just the first alternative we don't keep the > text/html part. I understand that's what we currently do. But I think that when the MUA provides an empty plain text part and a non-null HTML part, that's a mark of lazy MUA developers, not author intent. I think that it's very likely that the author would prefer the reader get converted HTML rather than a blank. Of course if the list owner wants to inhibit conversion, that's fine. But I would expect that list owners who enable conversion would also want to present a converted alternate rather than the blank plain text. Steve

5 months, 1 week

[MM3-users] Re: Unknown attribute: max_message_size

by Alexander Klotz

Hi, unfortunately we still have problems configuring a list so that it allows a message size larger than 40 KB. Neither the workaround described here: https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/commit/f86ab7fb5cc6edeb23c43336b677c24… (required was already set to false) nor this docker setup by yova https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/issues/246 worked. Are there any other options we could try? Thanks! Regards, Alex Klotz (CultureBase editorial staff) Am 28.05.18 um 17:16 schrieb Mark Sapiro: > On 05/28/2018 08:05 AM, Alexander Klotz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> just encountering the same problem in postorious, how are the chances of >> a fix being released soon? > > > It is fixed in the current branch heads. We plan a new release very > soon. There are still a few things we want to get in the release, so > it's not quite ready yet, but we're working on it. >

7 years

[MM3-users] Re: 404 on fresh install (Debian11)

by David Newman

On 3/28/23 5:00 PM, comprepair_jimberg--- via Mailman-users wrote: > Can you setup Mailman3 for me? I can't. But I previously provided a pointer to setup instructions using virtualenv, which is MUCH preferable to the older, buggier version packaged with Debian 11. Mark Sapiro also provided a link to a list of providers who help with setup for a fee. If it's any consolation, I practiced with test VMs about 4 or 5 times before attempting a production migration from Mailman 2. Much of my misery was caused by the initial Debian install setting the wrong ownership on some files. For that reason, things got much better when I snapshotted a brand-new Debian 11 VM and rolled back to there each time. I still made mistakes, multiple times, but at least I was no longer fighting with two installations that do things differently. dn

2 years, 3 months

Search results for query "sapiro"