Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Any known limit of number of lists that one can be owner/member of?

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/8/19 3:33 AM, Alan So wrote: > We have just migrated hundreds of lists from Mailman 2 to Mailman 3. It was smooth in most of the cases. However, we just notice that there are some abnormal behaviour of Postorius for particular users who are owner/member of a large number of lists. We further look into a particular user who is owner of 84 lists. When the user login Postorius, only 50 lists are displayed no matter what the number of "Results per page" is chosen. Prev/Next page cannot be clicked as there is only 1 page. See <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/issues/335> > When I use the following mailman client snippet, it also displays the same 50 lists: > > lists = client.find_lists('xxx(a)yyy.com', 'owner') > for m_list in lists: > print(m_list.fqdn_listname) > > Did we hit any limit of find_lists? Is it a bug or are something wrong during the migration? find_lists defaults to count=50. What happens if you do lists = client.find_lists('xxx(a)yyy.com', 'owner', count=100) -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Documentation for transferiering a list between mm3 and mm3

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/26/21 10:09 AM, Brian Carpenter wrote: > On 2/26/21 11:50 AM, Johannes Winter wrote: >> I didn't find any documentation on how to export list data from mm3 and >> import it into another mm3 instance. Have I missed something, or is it >> yet nonexistant? > > If you are referring to List Settings, then I don't think you can. As > Peter pointed out, you can export/import your list roster but I don't > believe that includes moderators/owners which is problematic. If you > wanted to migrate archives, then you can download an entire archive via > Hyperkitty which is exported in mbox format. You can then import that > mbox file into your new Mailman 3 list. Brian is correct. Essentially, you would need to run database queries to get all the relevant data from the database and then add it to the database of the new instance. A tool could be created to do the export and import, but it doesn't currently exist unless some user has developed one and not reported it. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: invalid parameter response of the rest-api

by Mark Sapiro

On 9/21/22 14:12, gioklr71(a)gmail.com wrote: > This is the code that produce the error: > > for mail, nom in email_D.items(): # Loop over new email > print(info.subscribe(mail, nom, pre_verified=True, pre_confirmed=True, send_welcome_message=False, pre_approved=True)) > > THIS IS THE ERROR MESSAGGE: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "./fill_list.py", line 74, in <module> > print(info.subscribe(mail, nom, pre_verified=True, pre_confirmed=True, send_welcome_message=False, pre_approved=True)) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/mailmanclient/restobjects/mailinglist.py", line 492, in subscribe > response, content = self._connection.call('members', data) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/connection.py", line 161, in call > error_msg, response, None) > urllib.error.HTTPError: HTTP Error 400: Invalid Parameter "subscriber": . > > This code works perfectly before security update from provider.... Never changed from client side. > > I've tried update mailman client: Mailman client is not the issue. The issue is the REST endpoint 'members' doesn't like the value of `subscriber` in the post data. In particular, it looks like you have an entry in `email_D.items()` with an empty value for `mail` -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: MM3 Postfix FROM header issue

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/17/23 12:17 PM, eboltz(a)lhtservices.com wrote: > Mark, > > Thanks for the assistance thus far. > > When I create a new Domain within Postorius. If I set the Mail Host to 'example.com' and the Alias Domain to 'lists.example.com', create a new list such as 'staff_test', it'll default to the 'example.com' domain (which is the real domain). Then when I subscribe, I'll get an email from 'staff_test(a)example.com', when I want it to be from 'staff_test(a)lists.example.com' instead, also if I reply back to the 'staff_test(a)example.com' then I"ll get a bounce-back that it doesn't exist, but if I send to 'staff_test(a)lists.example.com' it'll go to the newly created list. I'd like all defaults to be '@lists.example.com', if that makes sense. You want to create the list with Mail Host lists.example.com and no Alias domain. Then in Postfix you want no virtual_alias_maps setting. The rest of what you show for postconf -n at https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… is good. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Django-allauth compatibility (ACCOUNT_AUTHENTICATION_METHOD and ACCOUNT_EMAIL_REQUIRED)

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/14/25 11:50, Jan Eden via Mailman-users wrote: > > – and solved them with the additions to /etc/mailman3/settings.py > suggested by Mark: > > del ACCOUNT_AUTHENTICATION_METHOD > ACCOUNT_LOGIN_METHODS = {'email', 'username'} I suggested the above. > del ACCOUNT_EMAIL_REQUIRED > ACCOUNT_SIGNUP_FIELDS = ['email*', 'username*', 'password1*', 'password2*'] I didn't suggest these. That was from another poster in that thread. We don't set ACCOUNT_SIGNUP_FIELDS = ['email*', 'username*', 'password1*', 'password2*'] in mailman_web/settings/mailman.py because the default is ACCOUNT_SIGNUP_FIELDS = ['username*', 'email', 'password1*', 'password2*'] and that plus ACCOUNT_EMAIL_REQUIRED = True is the same thing. However, it appears that there is a deprecation warning with django-allauth >= 65.5. I haven't seen this because the sites I manage are all using django-allauth 65.4.1 So to avoid the deprecations with django-allauth >= 65.5 it is appropriate to drop ACCOUNT_EMAIL_REQUIRED and set ACCOUNT_SIGNUP_FIELDS = ['email*', 'username*', 'password1*', 'password2*'] However, that setting doesn't exist in django-allauth < 65.5 so we also need to require django-allauth >= 65.5. I will do this. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Issues sending to gmail and yahoo e-mails

by Mark Sapiro

On 9/10/25 14:59, jkoral(a)luc.edu wrote: > OK, we successfully set this up on our mail domain and are able to send to gmail now, but we ran into another issue. After making those changes, when I create a new thread, instead of the e-mail coming from the list e-mail, it is now coming from my personal work e-mail. Can this be changed? You said in a prior post > I added DMARC mitigation to this list with "Replace From: with list address" and "DMARC Mitigate unconditinally - Yes" The DMARC Address I have in there is ^.*(a)gmail\.com$ Setting DMARC Addresses to ^.*(a)gmail\.com$ does no harm but is redundant as DMARC Mitigate unconditinally = Yes applies the DMARC mitigation action to all mail. How are you starting a new thread? Is this in HyperKitty? In any case, with those settings all mail from the list should be From: the list address. If that is not the case, I don't know why it would happen. If you posted by email, perhaps you are looking at a message received directly rather than from the list. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 months

[MM3-users] Re: [EXTERNAL] [Mailman-Users] Re: Help with 'The message has no valid senders'

by Mark Sapiro

Putting this back on the list. On 5/19/21 9:46 AM, McGuire, Tommy M. (MSFC-IS90)[EAST2] wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> ... >> Have you set >> ``` >> [mailman] >> sender_headers: ... >> ``` >> in mailman.cfg?, and if so, to what? > > We have not changed it: > > [mailman] sender_headers: from from_ reply-to sender > > According to the smtp.log, there was an envelope sender ("MAIL FROM:.."), which matched the From header. In the example I'm looking at right now, the sender was not a member of the list, but the Accept these non-members box in the list settings has a regexp that matches the sender's domain. In another example from this morning, to a different list, the envelope sender and From header match, and is a member of the list. > > I don't see any obvious reason or configuration setting that would make either address invalid. First of all, the discard has nothing to do with whether the sender has any connection to the list. It only says the message had no sender at all. Assuming the message had a From: with a syntactically valid email address, this discard should not occur. Also, if the envelope (MAIL FROM:) was a syntactically valid email address, this discard should not occur. The address is validated by mailman/email/validate.py by first splitting it into `local_part`, `@`, `[domain_parts]` where domain_parts are the `between dots` parts of the domain and then validating the local_part and domain with regexps defined per > # What other characters should be allowed? > _valid_local = re.compile("[-0-9a-z!#$%&'*+./=?@_`{}~]", re.IGNORECASE) > # Strictly speaking, both ^ and | are allowed and others are allowed in quoted > # local parts, but this can open the door to certain web exploits so we don't > # allow them. > _valid_domain = re.compile('[-a-z0-9]', re.IGNORECASE) > # These are the only characters allowed in domain parts. Does the From: local part or the MAIL FROM: contain any characters not in the [-0-9a-z!#$%&'*+./=?@_`{}~] class? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] mail stuck in "out" queue

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/29/19 2:28 PM, Dmitry Makovey wrote: > I've had encountered this situation now twice: mail is being stuck in > "out" queue and nothing in the logs indicates the issue. Is there a way > to ask mailman-core politely to attempt delivery (perhaps with increased > debugging in the logs) *without* restarting the core (which does solve > *this* problem but creates other problems, like availability of the > mailman as a whole) Is the "out" runner running? ps -fwwA |grep runner=out If not, you should be able to start it as the Mailman user with a command like /path/to/python3 /path/to/mailman/bin/runner -C /path/to/mailman.cfg --runner=out:0:1 See 'ps -fwwA|grep runner' for examples. If the out runner is running, is there a file named *.bak along with all the *.pck files in queue/out/ And if it's not, is there anything in Mailman's logs to indicate why it died? Also, 'mailman restart' should only take a matter of seconds, but if the out runner is running but not processing its queue, I think sending it a SIGINT should restart it. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: Fwd: [Django] ERROR (EXTERNAL IP): Internal Server Error: /mailman3/hyperkitty/api/mailman/archive

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/20/20 8:24 AM, Gordon Dickens wrote: > My mailman3 installation has now been up and running successfully for > several weeks without any issues and then the following error message > was emailed to me by my server. > What's up with this error message and what do I need to do? > Thanks, > Gordon > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: [Django] ERROR (EXTERNAL IP): Internal Server Error: > /mailman3/hyperkitty/api/mailman/archive > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 01:25:41 -0000 > From: [1]root(a)host2.mailhub4u.com > To: [2]gordon(a)mailhub4u.com > Internal Server Error: /mailman3/hyperkitty/api/mailman/archive > OperationalError at /hyperkitty/api/mailman/archive > (1366, "Incorrect string value: '\\xF0\\x9F\\xA4\\xA3\\xF0\\x9F...' for > column `mailman3web`.`hyperkitty_email`.`content` at row 1") '\xF0\x9F\xA4\xA3' is a utf-8 encoding for the emoji '🤣'. For MySQL and MariaDB, 4-byte encodings require the database allow utf8mb4. If your Django database settings use the mysql database engine as in ``` DATABASES = { 'default': { 'ENGINE': 'django.db.backends.mysql', ``` You need to add ``` 'OPTIONS': {'charset': 'utf8mb4'} ``` -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years

[MM3-users] Re: Mailman3 not working following distribution upgrade from Debian 10 to 11.

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/4/22 14:54, gordon(a)dickens.com wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Thanks very much for your prompt and helpful reply! > > I made the change to the mailman3 configuration for Apache that you recommended since I am using uwsgi. Now, I am able to start/status/stop the mailman3-web service without errors. However, now, when I then attempt to access the mailman installation on my server with my browser, I get the following message in the browser window: > > Internal Server Error > > I am unable to find any errors in the mailman3 logs or in the Apache error logs. However the Apache access logs have the following: > > 173.165.166.34 - - [04/Feb/2022:17:06:20 -0500] "GET /mailman3 HTTP/1.1" 500 21 > > Do you have any idea as to what is going on now? Any suggestions for troubleshooting this? Without more log info, I don't know what the issue is. Have you looked in /var/log/mailman3/mailman.log and /var/log/mailman3/web/mailman-web.log? Possibly there is a uwsgi log somewhere in /var/log that might have something relevant. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 10 months

Search results for query "sapiro"