Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Problems with mailman core translation and other details

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/6/24 2:41 PM, celi--- via Mailman-users wrote: > It´s the case below: the pair msgid/msgstr seems to be OK, but this particular sentence is not being translated. > > #: templates/postorius/lists/summary.html:88 > #, python-format > msgid "" > "\n" > " To subscribe you can send an email with 'subscribe' in the" > "subject to\n" > " <a href=\"mailto:%(address)s?subject=Subscribe\">" > "%(address)s</a>\n" > " or use the form below:\n" > "" > msgstr "" > "\n" > " Para se inscrever você pode enviar um e-mail com o assunto" > "'subscribe' para\n" > " <a href=\"mailto:%(address)s?subject=Subscribe\">" > "%(address)s</a>\n" > " ou use o formulário abaixo:\n" > > What am I doing wrong? Or what can I do to make things suitable? Is the rest of that page translated appropriately? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years

[MM3-users] Re: Moderation of held emails vs. spam

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/11/25 7:09 AM, ricola(a)poivron.org wrote: > > The problem is when spam is held for moderation and forwarded to the list owner, the mail provider of the list owner sometimes flags the moderation request as spam because it includes the original spam message. > > Sounds much safer to only forward a summary of the subject line, sender and size to the list owners and not the full message. This is https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/670. https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/merge_requests/1332 and https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/merge_requests/1334 introduce a new admin_notify_held_with_attachment list attribute which if set False will not include the message in the admin notice. This will be in the next release. In the mean time, you can set the list's `Admin immed notify` setting to No to not send the immediate notice and only send the daily summary, but this doesn't completely solve the issue as sometimes the Subject: of the held message contains things that will trigger spam/malware filters. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

11 months, 2 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: content filtering in version 3.1

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/12/19 6:36 AM, Dieter Leupold via Mailman-users wrote: > Hi, > > I'm new to MM3. I installed version 3.1.1 on Ubuntu 18.04. All looks > fine. But i miss the setting "pass_mime_types" at content filtering. The settings are there in Mailman core but not exposed in Postorius. You can set them via `mailman shell`. MM 2.1 settings map to MM 3 as: filter_mime_types -> filter_types pass_mime_types -> pass_types filter_filename_extensions -> filter_extensions pass_filename_extensions -> pass_extensions collapse_alternatives -> collapse_alternatives * convert_html_to_plaintext -> convert_html_to_plaintext * filter_action -> filter_action * in Postorius Settings -> Alter Messages The mailman import21 command will properly import these settings when importing a Mailman 2.1 list. > Also i don't find the settings for bounce processing. Are these features > no longer supported at version 3.1.1? Bounce processing is not yet implemented in MM 2.1. See <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/issues/343>. There was a recent GSOC project to address this. See <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/merge_requests/538>. I don't know how close this is to being ready. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: HyperKitty failure

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/30/21 1:30 PM, William Oliver wrote: > On Thu, 2021-12-30 at 21:19 +0000, horvath.arpad.szfvar(a)gmail.com > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I try to connect mailman3 to hyperkitty, but there is no success so >> far. You can see the details below. How can I solve the problem? >> >> As I have several domain name (like lists.xxx.hu, xxx.hu, yyy.hu) on >> the same server, so I guess localhost won't work. >> >> In mailman-hyperkitty.cfg there is a line: >> >> base_url: http://lists.xxx.hu/hyperkitty/ As noted in the thread that William references and also the thread at https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… the issue is probably that the above http url is being redirected to https and losing POST data. Set the above to base_url: https://lists.xxx.hu/hyperkitty/ > [snip] > > I'm no expert, but here's a previous discussion I found: > > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Request for help with configuring "from" headers in mailman3 list

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/6/22 12:52 PM, Stephen Daniel wrote: > > Sendgrid requires that the "From:" address on any email reference an > authenticated domain. > > In the old mailman2 implementation, emails sent by mailman are listed as > > From: <human name via LISTNAME> LISTNAME(a)LISTDOMAIN.org > > Reply-to: <human name> sender(a)senderdomain.com (the original email's sender) > > Sendgrid would be happy with this, because LISTDOMAIN.org is a > validated domain. > > However, in my mailman3 implementation, the From: header lists the original > email's sender. Sendgrid rejects this because the original email's > sender's address is not one of the validated domains. > > How do I configure mailman3 to generate headers in the same style as the > old mailman2 implementation? In the list's Settings -> DMARC mitigations, set DMARC mitigation action to Rrplace From: with list address and DMARC Mitigate unconditionally to Yes. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Lost posting in archives

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/21/22 3:06 PM, Axel Rau wrote: > I created a list, did migration from 2.1 and run update_index_one_list. > Then I posted a test mail to the list and it got distributed and was seen in the archive. > Now 2 days later it does no longer show up in the archive. > > What is going on here? > May this have to do with > HYPERKITTY_RENDER_INLINE_IMAGE > which I have turned on meanwhile. It may. Is there anything in Django's log about this? If you have the original message from the list, can you go to the URL in the Archived-At: header? is the message in the hyperkitty_email table in the database? E.g., SELECT * FROM hyperkitty_email WHERE message_id_hash ='xxx'; (xxx is the value of the Message-ID-Hash: header from the message) If the prototype archiver is enabled for the list, the message should be in Mailman's var/archives/prototype/list(a)example.com/new directory and that message will have the Archived-At: and Message-ID-Hash: headers. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: MM2.1 -> MM3.3 migration. To hold or not hold

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/18/24 04:12, mark(a)suburbia.org.au wrote: > > For the list I am talking about: > - Default action to take when a member posts to the list is set to "Hold for moderation" > - Default action to take when a non-member posts to the list is set to "Hold for moderation" > - When I am viewing all users, the migrated ones are set to Moderation Action: "Hold for moderation". The mass-added ones post-migration are set to Moderation Action: "None" > - When a mass-added post-migration user sent an email to the list it passed through without being held. This should not happen. In the message as delivered to the list what do you see in the X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: header and the X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: header if any? > Happy to check any logs if there might be something to hunt for. What if anything is in the lists Accept these non-members setting? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: Patch/kludge suggestion and a question on adding accepted addresses

by Mark Sapiro

On 04/24/2017 07:07 AM, David Krantz wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry(a)list.org> wrote: >> On Apr 23, 2017, at 10:33 PM, David Krantz wrote: > >>> I have another question: In the old mailman you could add accepted >>> senders without adding them to the list. Is that possible in Mailman >>> 3/Postorius? >> >> You do this by creating a "nonmember" subscription for the sender, and then >> setting that member's moderation_action to Action.accept. > > Okay. I see no way of doing that in my instance of Postorius but in > this case it is okay to do it in the command prompt. Yes. There are still quite a few things that aren't yet exposed in Postorius and probably some not yet exposed in the rest API. In these cases you have to resort to mailman shell (aka mailman withlist). -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 years, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: Installing mailman 3

by Rafael Mora

Installing mailman-suite for web ui. I did this: (env) [mailman@localhost ~]$ git clone https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman-suite/ Cloning into 'mailman-suite'... error: RPC failed; result=22, HTTP code = 404 fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly but it returned an error, what should I do?? Thanks El vie., 21 jul. 2017 a las 13:02, Mark Sapiro (<mark(a)msapiro.net>) escribió: > On 07/21/2017 10:29 AM, Rafael Mora wrote: > > Can we modify the docs? > > > > El vie., 21 jul. 2017 a las 12:25, Mark Sapiro (<mark(a)msapiro.net>) > > escribió: > >> > >> However, that said, the doc is wrong. The lines should be added to > >> main.cf, not master.cf. See > >> <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman-suite-doc/issues/14>. > > > That's what the above issue and associated MR are for. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- Atentamente / Best Regards Ing. Rafael Mora

8 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: LMTP not listening

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/24/2017 04:40 AM, Bartosz Sawicki wrote: > > But messages send to the list address are not delivered to the list :( I've > started to investigate whats happening and realize that Postfix can not > connect to mailman using LMTP. It seems that mailman is not listening on > port 8024. > > Nov 24 13:12:31 lists postfix/lmtp[2737]: connect to > 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:8024: Connection refused > > I've checked log files, but haven't realize anything unusual . Any ideas > where I could try to find cause of the problem ? Is Mailman, particularly the lmtp runner, running? $ ps -fwwu mailman|grep lmtp mailman 19107 19085 0 Nov16 ? 00:00:44 /usr/local/bin/python3 /usr/local/bin/runner -C /opt/mailman/mailman-bundler/deployment/mailman.cfg --runner=lmtp:0:1 If so, where is it listening $ sudo netstat -lntp|grep 19107 tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:8024 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 19107/python3 where the 19107 in the grep is the PIP of the lmtp runner. If that's all OK, is there a firewall (iptables or ??) thats not allowing access to localhost:8024? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 years, 3 months

Search results for query "sapiro"