Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Set Postorius interface locale

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/2/21 7:55 AM, Duane Raymond wrote: > > The problems I've encountered so far are: > 1) Where do I set the local of the Postorius interface? > 2) Individual lists have a language setting, but it doesn't seem to reflect what the Postorius locales are as the only english option is "English (USA)" and none of the other English speaking locales and on the file system there is no en-us PO files....so I suspect I'm looking in the wrong place. Multiple things are required. In order to be able to set the list's preferred_language via Postorius, the language must be included in the LANGUAGES definition in postorius/utils.py. However, you can set the list's preferred_language in Mailman core via `REST` or `mailman shell` or direct update of the database. Then there must be message catalogs for the language in postorius/locale, django_mailman3/locale and hyperkitty/locale and these must be compiled by the Django management command `compilemessages`. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: Missing Base64 encoding from control message reply

by Mark Sapiro

I have now seen a similar instance on one of my servers. I was able to get the raw garbled response from the user. I have asked to get the raw message that was sent, but unfortunately, I haven't gotten it and I suspect I won't. I think it was an attempted post sent by mistake to the LIST-confirm address. I have tried, so far without success, to duplicate this, but I will keep at it. The raw message is attached. This one is worse than the one in the OP in that the Content-Transfer-Encoding is base64, but the content is unreadable in the raw message. It is clearly not a valid base64 encoding. I'm guessing that the original message looked similar to the one in the OP, but Microsoft Exchange garbled it by doing some attempt at base64 decoding the unencoded plain text and placing that result in the message body -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: "From address" for list moderation notification

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/29/23 10:58 AM, ronn.ramirez(a)pge.com wrote: > Hi Mailman Group, > > I noticed that the from address for list moderation notifications are coming from a certain user address. > May you please help me figure out where to change this? > > In this example, I would like to change the From address "listadmin(a)domain.com" > > ================================================================ > -----Original Message----- > From: Admin <listadmin(a)domain.com> > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2023 12:00 AM > To: dummy-list <dummy-list(a)domainx.com> > Subject: The dummy-list(a)domainx.com list has 2 moderation requests waiting. > > The dummy-list(a)domainx.com list has 2 moderation requests waiting. > ... I do not understand "certain user address". I also don't undersatnd the above example. These notices are sent both From: and To: the list owner address. In the above example it would be From: dummy-list-owner(a)domainx.com To: dummy-list-owner(a)domainx.com Is this not what you see? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Setup Question: Disk-Layout (Migrating from Mailman 2.1)

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/17/25 11:35 AM, Mihai Moldovan wrote: > > New incoming messages will have the correct data, of course, but > imported ones wouldn't, so I'll have to use a more sophisticated > approach to handle them, probably by going through mailman's email > wrapper, figuring out how to generate a msgdata object for a message, > using RFC2369.process and maybe more. Here's an example script. You need to run this with /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/python to get access to the mailman imports. ``` from mailbox import Maildir, mbox from mailman.email.message import Message from mailman.handlers.rfc2369 import process from mailman.interfaces.listmanager import IListManager from mailman.utilities.email import add_message_hash from zope.component import getUtility mb = mbox('path/to/mbox', factory=Message, create=False) md = Maildir('path/to/maildir', create=False) mlist = getUtility(IListManager).get_by_list_id('your.list.id') for msg in mb: add_message_hash(msg) process(mlist, msg, {}) md.add(msg) mb.close() md.close() ``` -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: How to Increase outgoing mail volume for Mailman 3

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/10/20 1:22 PM, Mark Dadgar wrote: > > Brian specified: > > verp_personalized_deliveries: no > > Doesn’t that default back to regular mass delivery, as opposed to individualized VERPed envelopes, which mandates individual deliveries? That depends on the setting of verp_delivery_interval. If verp_delivery_interval = 1, every message will be VERPed regardless of verp_personalized_deliveries. If verp_delivery_interval = 0 and verp_personalized_deliveries = no, deliveries won't be VERPed as you note. If verp_delivery_interval = 0 and verp_personalized_deliveries = yes, only personalized deliveries (i.e. individual messages, not digests, from lists with Personalization enabled) will be VERPed. The theory is VERPing has a cost because it requires a separate message sent to each recipient rather than a single message with multiple recipients, but personalization also requires a separate message sent to each recipient, so those can be VERPed at no extra cost. But to be clear, automated bounce processing does not require VERP. It just works a tiny bit more reliably with VERP. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: List mails blocked from GMX - web.de > Spamfolder

by Mark Sapiro

On 7/19/23 05:31, itservice--- via Mailman-users wrote: > How can I configure Mailman3 so that Mails from the list will not be blocked by gmx.net > I tried to send with the same user (mailman.cf) at my mail server, which will not be blocked by gmx. > unfortunately, I get no bounce back message. They do just not appear in the mail folder of gmx. Unfortunately, there are some ESPs that will silently discard mail without giving any clue as to the reason. I think this is wrong, but there's nothing we can do about it. > At web.de they go to the SPAM folder. Is your mail server properly configured with a fixed IP and full circle DNS? Is it on any block lists (check at http://mxtoolbox.com/blacklists.aspx)? Are you DKIM signing your outgoing mail? Are you applying DMARC mitigations to your list mail? All these things are important. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Bounces address spammed

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/28/19 9:15 AM, Enrique Terrazas wrote: > Greetings, > I hope everyone is having a good day. We have a highly visible list that is being spammed with join requests from spoofed addresses. Web or email? > When the confirmation email is sent a bounce is received by the list owner. The count is in the 100’s of bounced emails/hour. We noticed they are all coming from one particular domain, this may help if we are able to filter/block the domain. What would be the best way to handle this? Is there a way to handle this granularly at the list level? If the requests are coming by email, you can block the domain in your MTA., E.g. with postfix in main.cf: header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre in /etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre: /^From:.*[@.]bad.domain\w/ DISCARD or /^From:.*[@.]bad.domain\w/ REJECT We don't accept mail from bad.domain. For web requests, adding a pattern like '^.*[@.]bad.domain$' to the lists "Banned addresses" might help. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

7 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: [Mailman-Users] Web interface for users (not admins)?

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/7/21 6:21 AM, skip.montanaro(a)gmail.com wrote: > I am now signed up for the MM3 list. I'm trying out this posting interface. I like the basic interface, but others will want to attach images, tweak fonts, that sort of thing. Having the "email" button above makes that a reasonable (to me) alternative, but might not work for some tech-challenged people (odd, I know) who barely know how to get a picture out of their phone. Is there an "enhanced" editor? No, Posting from HyperKitty without using the "Use email software" button is plain text only. There is no plan to add any sort of rich text capability. Further, the HTML and image parts of archived messages containing them are just available in HyperKitty as links and not nicely rendered. See for example the signature links at https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… and https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Whitelist non subscriber

by Mark Sapiro

On 08/10/2017 07:12 AM, Mark Ziranski wrote: > > I want to whitelist an email address on all lists to bypass moderation. > The email address is not a subscriber. On google I > found accept_these_nonmembers but I do not know how to use it. > Please show me some examples how to whitelist someone(a)example.org. Since this is a Mailman 3 list, I assume you are asking about MM 3. Mailman 3 defines the list attribute accept_these_nonmembers, but it is not currently implemented to actually have any effect, nor is it exposed in Postorius. At the present, I think you would have to create a user record with the address and add that user to all lists with role nonmember and moderation_action 'defer' to apply subsequent tests or 'accept' to unconditionally accept posts from that address. (In MM 2.1, accept_these_nonmembers is a list of addresses and regexps matching addresses whose posts are to be accepted, subject to subsequent tests, and is exposed in the web admin UI) -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 years, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: integrating mm3 with postfix / lmtp

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/26/2017 06:16 PM, Fabian A. Santiago wrote: > > But in my testing, I replied to a subscription confirmation message and received back an undeliverable looping email error message from postfix. Any clues there you can offer? I can post to the list from any email added via the admin console. The test subscriber address was local to my server. From an outside address, same error. This usually means that postfic is trying to deliver to an address and the message already has a Delivered-To: header with that address. What are the headers of the "looping" message in the report? What are the Postfix log messages related to that message? > Once I registered the new email domain, I reverted my postfix config back to the default suggested by maxking's docker instructions. > > https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman I have essentially no knowledge of the docker container images, so I can't be much help with issues specific to them. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 years, 7 months

Search results for query "sapiro"