Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman 3.1 beta coming soon

by Barry Warsaw

Thanks for doing the testing Florian. Btw I fixed the venv problem. It was actually a bug in one of the dependencies. I have another small branch to land before spinning the beta but I think the MySQL docker image on ci is having some problems. I can't double check ATM. Sent from my digital lollipop. > On Dec 3, 2016, at 15:22, Florian Fuchs <f(a)florianfuchs.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:07:24AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> Hello Mailman 3 users and developers! >> >> It's been a long slog but I think we are finally ready to begin the release >> process for Mailman 3.1. I am pretty happy about the state of the Core, and >> Florian is going to do some more integration testing with HyperKitty and >> Postorius. We still have a few issues and a merge proposal or two to address, > > I did some manual integration testing today > (core+mailmanclient+postorius) which looked fine so far. I didn't get > to test HyperKitty and the bundler though, so any help testing those > would be very much appreciated. I will have some more time tomorrow. > > I did all of my testing locally, which has some limitations. So I > started setting up a more realistic environment on one of my dev > machines. But I'm not done yet. Will report back when I'm done... ;-) > >> but I am planning to spin a beta of Core this weekend to facilitate testing. > > I think it's OK to put out a separate beta of the core, because the > version pulled from pypi will still be 3.0 if I'm not terribly mistaken. > > For the real 3.1 we should probably do a coordinated release of all > components, once everything's tested a little more thoroughly. > > Cheers > Florian

8 years, 6 months

Re: invalid parameter response of the rest-api

by Stephen J. Turnbull

gioklr71(a)gmail.com writes: > Dear Jacob did you make any progress on this issue? I've exactly > the same problem.... Is Jacob's problem really exactly the same as yours? Please compare your error message to Jacob's: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… Jacob Sievert writes: > Since a few days we get an error response from our automated membership > script. > > We use the following code to control the membership for some lists: > ``` > def mailinglist_manage(list_address, members): This looks like it should work. > Since Tuesday without any update performed by us we get the following > error from the script when it's running: *Something* changed. It would likely help if one of you can figure out what. > line 339, in subscribe > response, content = self._connection.call('members', data) > File > "/root/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/connection.py", Either mailmanclient is now marshalling the URL and data incorrectly (which is hard to believe, it's hard to imagine this simple call is causing an error without causing both Postorius and HyperKitty to break too), or the REST protocol has changed for that resource, and the resource accessed by the URL that is constructed by self._connection.call() is not the member roster. This also seems unlikely. Your installation seems very old. From the next version of Mailman, we will not target Python 3.6 (that is, we have dropped it from the automated test pipeline), so regressions may occur. I know of at least one that occurs in old versions of core if you upgrade Python from < 3.8 to >= 3.8. Your Mailman installation also seems quite old: the code that the frame above says is on line 339 is on line 491 in git head. Are you sure you haven't applied a batch of security updates or the like that might affect any of Python, mailmanclient, or Mailman core?

2 years, 9 months

Re: sqlite3 Database "read only" error on mailman_sync job

by Abhilash Raj

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, at 1:49 PM, Ugnius wrote: > > Thank You. This is very valuable information. According documentation I understood that "runserver" should run on some internal port and uwsgi just works like proxy connects to the same as runserver port and serves content to apachi. Because when I was playing with the setup without "runserver" Web interface didn't work. > Yes, I have stopped "runserver" and page still works fine. :) This didn't solve me database RO issue, but this information was important. Thank You. I am thinking what to do now... Maybe to recreate database (make initiation once again). It could take 2-3 hours. I did not noticed option to export/import lists setting. Or to try find solution how to make sqlite3 multiple > writable. I think your problem about locked database might be solved. Like I mentioned, it is possible that those two running server could be stepping over each other toes. After removing the "runserver" process, I think you shouldn't fall into anymore of those locking issues. FWIW, it is also highly recommended to not use sqlite for any production use cases. Either postgres or mysql is preferred. > SQLite version 3.16.2 2017-01-06 16:32:41 > Enter ".help" for usage hints. > > BR > Ugnius > > On 5 Sep 2019, at 23:31, Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, at 1:15 PM, Ugnius wrote: >>> >>> I do not know... In the setup example settings was something like process number = 2. But I understand at least 1 uwsgi and 1 run server should run? >> >> No, only uwsgi needs to run. It is fine if there are two of those, since it probably forks to have 2 worker process. There shouldn't be any "python manage.py runserver" processes running at all, it is meant only for testing purposes. >> >> The doc mentions that it is "development" server[1][2]. >> >> [1]: # Run the Django's "development" server at localhost:8000 >> [2]: http://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/prodsetup.html#setting-up-django-project >> >> Perhaps it should be more descriptive about what does it mean. >> >>> >>> On 5 Sep 2019, at 23:08, Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> wrote: >>>> 6644 ? S 0:12 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini >>>> 6645 ? S 0:00 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 >>>> 6653 ? Sl 636:28 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 >>>> 6656 ? Sl 0:27 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini >>>> >>>> This fishy, why do you have both uwsgi and "python manage.py runserver" running? >>>> >>>> You only need one of those, since they both do the exact same thing. Please remove >>>> whatever is running the "python manage.py runserver" part and only use uwsgi. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, at 1:02 PM, Ugnius S wrote: >>>>> Thank You, Abhilash, to helping. I have checked the processes, but also I have read, that sqlite3 can run in multi writing mode. >>>>> May mailman processes are next: >>>>> >>>>> 6644 ? S 0:12 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini >>>>> 6645 ? S 0:00 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 >>>>> 6653 ? Sl 636:28 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 >>>>> 6656 ? Sl 0:27 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini >>>>> 6643 ? S 0:00 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/master -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg >>>>> 659 ? S 0:46 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=in:0:1 >>>>> 6660 ? S 0:42 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=nntp:0:1 >>>>> 6661 ? S 0:42 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=digest:0:1 >>>>> 6662 ? S 0:48 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=pipeline:0:1 >>>>> 6663 ? S 0:44 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=archive:0:1 >>>>> 6664 ? S 0:41 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=command:0:1 >>>>> 6665 ? S 0:01 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=retry:0:1 >>>>> 6666 ? S 0:45 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=virgin:0:1 >>>>> 6667 ? Sl 0:16 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=lmtp:0:1 >>>>> 6668 ? Sl 1:30 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=rest:0:1 >>>>> 6669 ? S 0:42 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=bounces:0:1 >>>>> 6670 ? S 0:49 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=out:0:1 >>>>> >>>>> Looks like there are no double. Nothing more is running. >>>>> >>>>> 2019-09-05, kt, 03:16 Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> rašė: >>>>>> __ >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019, at 2:05 PM, Ugnius S wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have installed using documentation. My linux distribution version has no full package available. I have installed step by step: >>>>>>> $ sudo pip3 install mailman >>>>>>> $ sudo pip3 install postorius >>>>>>> $ sudo pip3 install hyperkitty >>>>>>> $ sudo pip3 install mailman-hyperkitty >>>>>>> And of course all mandatory components... Everything without errors, I can drop db files and I can download mailman-suite again and start from empty page again. But it will not guarantee that DB will not become READ ONLY again. Here should be logic. No developing support here? >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you be running two separate processes such that the database is locked by one and so other finds it as READ Only? When you find a read only database, can you check if it is open in some other process? >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2019-09-03, an, 19:36 Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> rašė: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019, at 3:22 AM,ugniusviln(a)gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>> > Hi. All the project installation is under the same user / path and >>>>>>>> > it works. Archiving working as well, (just one remark: no matter what >>>>>>>> > to set in postorius, hyperkitty shows list as public) >>>>>>>> > I have found work around - it is possible to change list as private in >>>>>>>> > "admin" page. >>>>>>>> > I started to get issues with runjobs after I have created couple of >>>>>>>> > new lists with "no archive" option. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How did you install all these components. It seems there the installation is broken in weird ways. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > If as owner user from project home I run: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > django-admin mailman_sync >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Traceback (most recent call last): >>>>>>>> > File >>>>>>>> > "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", >>>>>>>> > line 84, in _execute >>>>>>>> > return self.cursor.execute(sql, params) >>>>>>>> > File >>>>>>>> > "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/db/backends/sqlite3/base.py", >>>>>>>> > line 383, in execute >>>>>>>> > return Database.Cursor.execute(self, query, params) >>>>>>>> > sqlite3.OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > "django-admin runjob sync_mailman " - makes read only errors as well. >>>>>>>> > "django-admin runjob new_lists_from_mailman" >>>>>>>> > django.db.utils.OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database >>>>>>>> > END TRACEBACK >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > I did not find information how to fix this. It was worked without errors >>>>>>>> > before. >>>>>>>> > I noticed, that if I stop mailman, "django-admin mailman_sync" starts >>>>>>>> > to work. >>>>>>>> > If I start "mailman start", then "django-admin mailman_sync" failing >>>>>>>> > again. >>>>>>>> > I did not check other jobs, but I think what is related to database, >>>>>>>> > will get errors. >>>>>>>> > Seems mailman locking the database. It is not a file permissions issue. >>>>>>>> > Mailman db location is: /project_directory/var/data/mailman.db >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > if to rename /project_directory/var/data/mailman.db to something, >>>>>>>> > mailman creates database file size 0, django-admin runjobs start >>>>>>>> > working, but of course postorius stops working. I did it for testing. >>>>>>>> > I have returned this database file back, postorius started to work >>>>>>>> > again, but django-admin runjobs does not work, error: "database read >>>>>>>> > only". >>>>>>>> > Please help me how to fix this issue. >>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >>>>>>>> > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >>>>>>>> > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> thanks, >>>>>>>> Abhilash Raj (maxking) >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> thanks, >>>>>> Abhilash Raj (maxking) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> thanks, >>>> Abhilash Raj (maxking) >>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> thanks, >> Abhilash Raj (maxking) >> >> -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

5 years, 9 months

Re: Mailman 3 localization

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Daniel writes: > FYI: I did translate some strings a while ago. Have a look > https://gitlab.com/dadosch/mailman3-german-translation-foo > > The reason I didn't made a PR or similar was, that I didn't know where > :D I think you attach those messages in mailman/src/mailman/messages/de/LC_MESSAGES/de.po, and add a README.de at mailman/src/mailman/messages/de/README.de. The README contains information about how to participate in the German translation, such as who is the coordinator (or at least someone willing to read email about it and bring it to our attention), if you're using a translation management site, etc. Then submit the PR at http://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman. If you are willing to coordinate the German translation, I bet Simon would be willing to cooperate in merging his translation. It would certainly be helpful in getting the process going to have an example of a translation effort for other languages to follow, and it looks like there's a lot of interest in German. So German may be a good place to start. As I mentioned before, the core developers are not particularly focused on any translation effort. The policy issue about whether to centralize translation management and/or allow use of sites based on non-free software is delicate, as mentioned elsewhere, and there is the issue of coordinating the translation community with release management. Finally, there is the task of translation for Postorius and HyperKitty, which may benefit from a use of Django-specific tools (I'm not familiar with localizing Django applications so that may be completely stupid :-). So this is going to take time to plan. Please feel free to lobby us, here and on mailman-developers. Contribution of effort (planning or coordination) is not necessary but of course would be welcome. Also, anybody who has participated in translation efforts who can describe a process that results in accurate translations while minimizing core developer and translator pain would be very welcome. Steve

6 years, 11 months

Re: MM3 Postfix FROM header issue

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/17/23 9:10 AM, eboltz(a)lhtservices.com wrote: > Mark, > > Here is my postconf -n > > alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases > alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases > always_add_missing_headers = yes > append_dot_mydomain = no > biff = no > compatibility_level = 2 > default_destination_concurrency_limit = 15 > default_destination_recipient_limit = 30 > header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks > header_size_limit = 409600 > inet_interfaces = all > inet_protocols = ipv4 > local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps hash:/var/lib/mailman3/data/postfix_lmtp > mailbox_size_limit = 0 > mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost, $mydomain > myhostname = lists.example.com > mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 [::fff:127.0.0.0]/104 [::1]/128 > myorigin = /etc/mailname > readme_directory = no > recipient_delimiter = + > relay_domains = hash:/var/lib/mailman3/data/postfix_domains > relayhost = [mail.smtp2go.com]:587 > smtp_always_send_ehlo = yes > smtp_sasl_security_options = noanonymous > smtp_tls_CApath = /etc/postfix/o365_smtp_cert.pem > smtp_tls_security_level = may > smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtp_scache > smtp_use_tls = yes > smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Debian/GNU) > smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks permit_sasl_authenticated defer_unauth_destination > smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem > smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key > smtpd_tls_security_level = may > transport_maps = hash:/var/lib/mailman3/data/postfix_lmtp > unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550 > virtual_alias_maps = hash:/var/lib/mailman3/data/postfix_vmap It looks like you are now following <https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/docs/mta.h…>. > What would I have to do to ensure that MM3 and postfix (same new server) use the newly created lists.example.org domain, which only exists within Postfix when setting up the Postorius domain and lists? > I want to have it so that whatever the list name is, for example 'Staff(a)lists.example.org' will route through Postfix correctly. Have you set an alias_domain for the lists.example.org domain? What are the contents of /var/lib/mailman3/data/postfix_vmap and /var/lib/mailman3/data/postfix_lmtp? If you feel it is necessary to anonymize the domains in these, please only change the tld so we can see the actual subdomains. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 6 months

Re: Docker mailman3 delete social logins, did something change?

by Abhilash Raj

On 9/15/21 7:37 AM, bob B wrote: > I want to remove the social logins from mailman3 in docker. Which version tag are you using? > > I found this info > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… > > but the link to the default shows > *************** > INSTALLED_APPS = [] > DEFAULT_APPS = [ > 'hyperkitty', > 'postorius', > 'django_mailman3', > # Uncomment the next line to enable the admin: > 'django.contrib.admin', > # Uncomment the next line to enable admin documentation: > # 'django.contrib.admindocs', > 'django.contrib.auth', > 'django.contrib.contenttypes', > 'django.contrib.sessions', > 'django.contrib.sites', > 'django.contrib.messages', > 'django.contrib.staticfiles', > 'rest_framework', > 'django_gravatar', > 'compressor', > 'haystack', > 'django_extensions', > 'django_q', > 'allauth', > 'allauth.account', > 'allauth.socialaccount', > ] > ***************** The link to default is a dynamic one, so it changes as the changes are made in the repo, unfortunately, this is basically the new stuff that isn't out yet. > > > However when I go to the bug https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman/issues/283 > > it shows > > ********* > INSTALLED_APPS = ( > 'hyperkitty', > 'postorius', > 'django_mailman3', > # Uncomment the next line to enable the admin: > 'django.contrib.admin', > # Uncomment the next line to enable admin documentation: > # 'django.contrib.admindocs', > 'django.contrib.auth', > 'django.contrib.contenttypes', > 'django.contrib.sessions', > 'django.contrib.sites', > 'django.contrib.messages', > 'django.contrib.staticfiles', > 'rest_framework', > 'django_gravatar', > 'paintstore', > 'compressor', > 'haystack', > 'django_extensions', > 'django_q', > 'allauth', > 'allauth.account', > 'allauth.socialaccount', > 'django_mailman3.lib.auth.fedora', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.openid', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.github', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.gitlab', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.google', > ) > > ******** > > > The two examples are different so what should it be? If you want to remove social auth applications, you basically want to override INSTALLED_APPS configuraiton in your settings_local.py. In the list above, you want to remove everything after 'django_mailman3.lib.auth.fedora' and set that as INSTALLED_APPS in your settings_local.py. > > I tried to add it in both ways and when I do I get bad gateway and he mailman website is broke. I have not setup any domains yet, just setup the admin password,. Bad gateway usually will emit some sort of logging error in the mailman logs at /opt/mailman/web/logs/, what kind of exception are you seeing there? The configuration above, while enables social auth, shouldn't *break* the website. There must be errors/exceptions in logs to point in the direction of what the error might be. > > > For example this breaks my website > > cat /opt/mailman/web/settings_local.py > > ALLOWED_HOSTS = ['127.0.0.1','localhost','REDACTED','REDACTED','REDACTED','REDACTED','REDACTED'] > #ALLOWED_HOSTS = ['*'] > DEBUG = True > #DEBUG = False > EMAIL_BACKEND = 'django.core.mail.backends.smtp.EmailBackend' > EMAIL_HOST = 'REDACTED' > EMAIL_PORT = 25 > INSTALLED_APPS = ( > 'hyperkitty', > 'postorius', > 'django_mailman3', > # Uncomment the next line to enable the admin: > 'django.contrib.admin', > # Uncomment the next line to enable admin documentation: > # 'django.contrib.admindocs', > 'django.contrib.auth', > 'django.contrib.contenttypes', > 'django.contrib.sessions', > 'django.contrib.sites', > 'django.contrib.messages', > 'django.contrib.staticfiles', > 'rest_framework', > 'django_gravatar', > 'paintstore', > 'compressor', > 'haystack', > 'django_extensions', > 'django_q', > 'allauth', > 'allauth.account', > 'allauth.socialaccount', > 'django_mailman3.lib.auth.fedora', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.openid', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.github', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.gitlab', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.google', > ) > ************************************************************************* > And I have even removed anything? > > What should my /opt/mailman/web/settings_local.py look like? -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

3 years, 9 months

start_chain not present in migrated lists

by Paul Honig

Hi, Please let me know where I can post my question if this list is not the right place. I'm configuring a mailing list server, migrating from Mailman 2.1 to 3.2.2, and I can't get the migrated mailing lists to work. When I create new mailing lists there is no problem. Here are the versions of Mailman I run : mailman 3.2.2 mailman-hyperkitty (1.1.0) django-mailman3 (1.2.0) postorius (1.3.2) mailmanclient (3.2.2) HyperKitty (1.2.2) The command line I use the migrate the mailing list: /opt/mailman_venv/bin/mailman -C /opt/mailman_venv/var/etc/mailman.cfg import21 mltest(a)test.domain /var/vmail/mig/data/lists/mltest/config.pck When I send an email to a migrated list, of which I made myself a member, no mail is sent, and I get the following stack trace in the log: ==> /var/log/mailman/mailman.log <== Jan 21 15:02:37 2020 (15948) Uncaught runner exception: None Jan 21 15:02:37 2020 (15948) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/mailman_venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/core/runner.py", line 173, in _one_iteration self._process_one_file(msg, msgdata) File "/opt/mailman_venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/core/runner.py", line 266, in _process_one_file keepqueued = self._dispose(mlist, msg, msgdata) File "/opt/mailman_venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/runners/incoming.py", line 79, in _dispose process(mlist, msg, msgdata, start_chain) File "/opt/mailman_venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/core/chains.py", line 40, in process chain = config.chains[start_chain] KeyError: None Jan 21 15:02:37 2020 (15948) SHUNTING: 1579615357.5331464+c5918e305ec281d47ef0caaed070c8c4bde26ee3 It seems like the start_chain has value 'None' and that prevents the mail from processed, but I can't find where to correctly set the start_chain. Please let me know how I can remedy this issue. Kind regards, Paul Honig This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo(a)esa.int)

5 years, 4 months

Re: New year releases!

by Odhiambo Washington

Funny thing is that if you take your time and go over the changelog as posted you end up nipping the issues in the bud. It just happens that we are not thorough. Breaking changes are always documented. Many years ago I used to go through changelog with a toothcomb, even to see what new features were there. I'm heading back there. I was also bitten by the same wasps that bit you, because the release announcement did not lay bare these issues in the mail. They obviously expected us to 'behave' like people running critical infrastructure 😂 On Sun, Feb 12, 2023, 17:16 Torge Riedel <torgeriedel(a)gmx.de> wrote: > Dears, > > I like to know and discuss ideas to get the update process more stable! > > Today I updated core and web of mailman3 and ran into all the issues you > can have: > - Dependencies are not updated properly > - In case you use "--force-reinstall" Django gets also updated in web and > you need to update the urls.py file accordingly > - Enhancement of settings file required (DEFAULT_AUTO_FIELD = ...) > > Finally I got it working, but there is always the fear for breaking > something on update. > > I know it is open source and no one gets paid for the work. But I think > there is space for improvement here. > > Kind regards > Torge > > Am 04.01.23 um 10:59 schrieb Abhilash Raj: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > Happy new year! > > > > I am pleased to announce several new releases for GNU Mailman project. > > > > 1. Mailman Core 3.3.8 [1] > > 2. Postorius 1.3.8 [2] > > 3. Hyperkitty 1.3.7 [3] > > 4. Mailmanclient 3.3.5 [4] > > 5. Django-mailman3 1.3.9 [5] > > 6. Mailman-hyperkitty 1.2.1 [6] > > > > All the releases are published to PyPI and you can find links to all the > PyPI projects: > > > > https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/ > > > > A full list of change logs are available below: > > > > [1]: > https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/docs/NEWS.… > > [2]: > https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/postorius/en/latest/news.html#news-1-3-8 > > [3]: > https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/hyperkitty/en/latest/news.html#news-1-3-7 > > [4]: > https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailmanclient/en/latest/src/mailmanclien… > > [5]: https://gitlab.com/mailman/django-mailman3/-/blob/master/README.rst > > [6]: > https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman-hyperkitty/-/blob/master/README.rst > > > > Finally, the minimum Python version required is 3.7, and all the > components now support Python 3.7 to 3.11. > > > > Thanks to all the contributors for making this release possible! > > > > If you find any issues, you can report them at the respective bug > tracker for the projects. The links to issue trackers are available > > here: https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/ > > > > Installation documentation is available at > > > > https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/install.html > > > > and if you are upgrading an existing virtualenv install you can refer > > > > https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/upgrade-3.2.html > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > > Archived at: > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > > > This message sent to torgeriedel(a)gmx.de > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > Archived at: > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > This message sent to odhiambo(a)gmail.com >

2 years, 4 months

Re: About to Install MM3 -- Seeking clarification

by Onyeibo Oku

On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 17:27:13 +0100 Onyeibo Oku <onyeibo(a)schemefusion.com> wrote: > [Reviving this thread]. > > I abandoned the hyperkitty setup for a while and returned to it again > today. I made progress. It turns out that I needed the > uwsgi-logger-file rpm package and It wasn't installed with the uwsgi > server. I adapted the settings also, since I was using Emperor mode > (recall that there are other Django projects on the box). Currently, > mailman, uwsgi and nginx are all running. They all seem to be happy > until I assess the mailman-web home URL (e.g. http://my.server.com) > > The outcome: > "502 Bad Gateway" > > Nothing shows in the logs except at /var/log/nginx/error.log: > > 2022/12/08 15:35:10 [error] 5879#5879: *7 upstream prematurely closed > connection while reading response header from upstream, client: > 105.113.33.89, server: my.server.com, request: "GET /favicon.ico > HTTP/1.1", upstream: "http://127.0.0.1:8000/favicon.ico", host: > "my.server.com", referrer: "https://my.server.com/". > > Something seems to be wrong between uwsgi and mailman, but I don't > know where to look. > > Regards Onyeibo Happy New Year to all the Mailman People here (nice rhyme). I pulled the plugs on uwsgi and installed Gunicorn. Gunicorn gave more mileage but something is still not right. When I visit the mailmanweb home with a browser, I see the following: "Server Error. An error occurred while processing your request." Mailmanweb and mailman3 services are running. I perused the log file at /opt/mailman/web/logs/mailmanweb.log and found the following: raise MailmanConnectionError( mailmanclient.restbase.connection.MailmanConnectionError: ('Could not connect to Mailman API: ', 'ConnectionError(MaxRetryError("HTTPConnectionPool(host=\'localhost\', port=8001): Max retries exceeded with url: /3.1/lists?advertised=true&count=0&page=1 (Caused by NewConnectionError(\'<urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object at 0x7f7f4b128c40>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111] 0x7f7f4b128c40>Connection refused\'))"))') During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/core/handlers/exception.py", line 55, in inner response = get_response(request) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", line 199, in _get_response response = self.process_exception_by_middleware(e, request) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", line 362, in process_exception_by_middleware response = middleware_method(request, exception) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/postorius/middleware.py", line 48, in process_exception return utils.render_api_error(request) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/postorius/utils.py", line 36, in render_api_error return render(request, 'postorius/errors/generic.html', File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/shortcuts.py", line 24, in render content = loader.render_to_string(template_name, context, request, using=using) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/template/loader.py", line 62, in render_to_string return template.render(context, request) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/template/backends/django.py", line 62, in render return self.template.render(context) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line 173, in render with context.bind_template(self): File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/contextlib.py", line 135, in __enter__ return next(self.gen) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/template/context.py", line 254, in bind_template updates.update(processor(self.request)) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django_mailman3/context_processors.py", line 32, in common context["site_name"] = get_current_site(request).name File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/contrib/sites/shortcuts.py", line 16, in get_current_site return Site.objects.get_current(request) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/contrib/sites/models.py", line 59, in get_current return self._get_site_by_id(site_id) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/contrib/sites/models.py", line 30, in _get_site_by_id site = self.get(pk=site_id) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py", line 85, in manager_method return getattr(self.get_queryset(), name)(*args, **kwargs) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 650, in get raise self.model.DoesNotExist( django.contrib.sites.models.Site.DoesNotExist: Site matching query does not exist. Can someone point me in the right direction please? Regards Onyeibo

2 years, 5 months

Re: Importing config and archives only partially succeeded?

by Eric Broens

Thanks for your prompt reply.To import the config and archives I ran the commands as outlined in Migrating from Mailman 2.1 to Mailman 3 — Mailman Suite 3.3 documentation : mailman import21 foo-list(a)example.com /path/to/mailman2/foo-list/config.pck python manage.py hyperkitty_import -l foo-list(a)example.com $var_prefix/archives/private/foo-list.mbox/foo-list.mbox After running these commands the archives became available for most of the mailinglists. I didn't run the Django admin command with arguments "update_index_one_list" to build the indices for each mailinglist seperately. After everything was imported, and I noticed that the mails were not shown in the archives for half of the mailinglists, I ran "manage.py update_index" to index the mails for all mailinglists.This command is still running for hours.Since it builds the search index, I don't expect that this would make the mails available on the webpage. Best regards,Eric On Sunday, December 13, 2020, 12:12:46 AM GMT+1, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: On 12/12/20 2:33 PM, Eric Broens via Mailman-users wrote: > Today I have migrated about 30 mailinglists from mailman 2.1 to mailman 3.3.2 & Hyperkitty 1.3.3. > Although no error responses were given when importing the 2.1 pck files, and neither for importing the archives, for about half of the mailinglists the hyperkitty webpage doesn't show any subscribers, nor archived emails. > The imported members and other settings are correctly shown in the postorius page. > Is there anything that I can verify why the archive is not shown on the hyperkitty page?The hyperkitty_email database table does contain the emails. Did you specify --no-sync-mailman when you ran hyperkitty_import? If so did you run the django sync_mailman job when you finished importing? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

4 years, 6 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"