Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

including a template failed

by Wolfgang Bock

Hi, I created a new mailinglist and got during the test-process the following errormessage in my mailman.log after: ... Sep 19 22:55:08 2020 (1433) ACCEPT: <000001d68ec7$2553e6e0$6ffbb4a0$(a)domain-01.de> Errors: Sep 19 22:55:09 2020 (1436) Cannot connect to SMTP server localhost on port 25 HTTPSConnectionPool(host='webmail.domain-02.de', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /mailman3/postorius/api/templates/list/mylist.lists.domain-03.de/list:member :regular:footer (Caused by NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connec tion.VerifiedHTTPSConnection object at 0x7fc8380f1748>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno -2] Name or service not known')) ... domain02.de isn't involved in mailman3 either as a user domain nor as a list-domain. After deleting the template mailman3/postorius/api/templates/list/mylist.lists.domain-03.de/list:member: regular:footer the mail to the list is processed without problems: Sep 19 22:56:22 2020 (1436) <000001d68ec7$2553e6e0$6ffbb4a0$(a)domain-01.de> smtp to mylist(a)list.domain-03.de for 1 recips, completed in 0.21389174461364746 seconds Sep 19 22:56:22 2020 (1436) <000001d68ec7$2553e6e0$6ffbb4a0$(a)wbock.de> post to mylist(a)list.domain-03.de from user(a)domain-01.de, 1331 bytes Please help to solve this problem? Thanks and regards Wolfgang

5 years, 7 months

Bulk changes to delivery mode and moderation action

by David Newman

I fat-fingered a command in the Postorius UI and accidentally unsubcribed all members of a list. Oops. Have added them back using Mass operations/Mass subscribe but this raised three questions: 1. In Users/Members, moderation action for the newly resubscribed users shows as "None". Is there a method, either in the UI or the command line, to change this to "Default processing" for all users? 2. Although Delivery Mode shows as "Regular" for all users in Users/Members list, clicking on a member's name shows all options such as delivery status, delivery mode, etc., as undefined. Similar question: How to set subscriber options for all members in one go? 3. As a subscriber to this list, I received email notification that I'd been unsubscribed. Where is the control for enabling/disabling subscription notifications? Settings/Member Policy/Un-subscription Policy is set to Confirm, but I don't think that's relevant here since I unsubscribed users as the Django superuser. Thanks. dn, chastened

4 years, 4 months

Re: Mailman Suite installation on CentOS 7

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/8/21 4:18 AM, Kimmo L wrote: > Hello! > > I want to install fresh Mailman, which is combined with hyperkitty+postorius. After checking documentation i found, that Mailman Suite is perfect for me. > But i have some misunderstandings about installation. I only found this part in documentation, which explains how to clone and start using Mailman Suite (https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/devsetup.html#run-the-mailman-suite-com…) > > But am i correct, that before doing so, i need to install mailman core, mailman client, django-mailman3 ? > Or what would be the correct steps to build up my first Mailman Suite on CentOS? The docs you want to look at are https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/#the-pre-installation-guide and https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/install.html. There is also information at https://wiki.list.org/x/17891998 and in docs linked from thefirst paragraph thereof. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 5 months

Re: Removing the footer from mailing list messages

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/7/25 14:00, MegaBrutal via Mailman-users wrote: > > What I already tried: define a custom template for > list:member:regular:footer. The result was that the mailing list stopped > operating altogether, no messages passed through until I deleted this > template. After I deleted it, all delayed e-mails were forwarded at once. How did you create the footer? If you created a file at Mailman's var/templates/whatever/list:member:regular:footer.txt, it probably was not readable by the Mailman user. If you created it via Postorius there is probably and issue with your setting for POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL. > What would be the right way to remove the footer? For all lists sudo -u mailman cp /dev/null var/templates/site/en/list:member:regular:footer.txt For a single list sudo -u mailman cp /dev/null var/templates/lists/LIST-ID/en/list:member:regular:footer.txt -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 months

Re: Issues with @gmail.com addresses

by Allan Hansen

Once this gets handled, Mohsen, Google has another issue with list servers: If a subscriber who uses GMail posts a message to a list, then that subscriber will not get his/her own message from the server - Google eats it. All other subscribers will get it, but not the author. My subscribers run into this all the time and are up in arms over it. I tell them to complain to Google. Yours, Allan On 9/5/23, 13:18, "Mark Sapiro" <mark(a)msapiro.net <mailto:mark@msapiro.net>> wrote: On 9/5/23 12:59, Mohsen Masoudfar wrote: > Hi, > > since 8/1/2023 I get complains from users with @gmail.com addresses, that they are not getting any emails. > I checked the logs and I see that the emails are going out: > > to=<xxxx(a)gmail.com <mailto:xxxx@gmail.com>>, relay=email-smtp.us-east-1.amazonaws.com[35.169.171.20]:587, delay=0.46, delays=0.03/0.06/0.13/0.24, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Ok xxx ) > > But it seems the users are getting email delivered to them. > I’ve advised them to check their spam, promotions, and social folders and to add the list address to their email safe-senders lists, but still no success. > Is there any way to help this list members? Even though gmail publishes a DMARC policy of none, it has recently started enforcing a stricter policy for mail From: the gmail.com domain. You need to apply DMARC mitigations to mail From: the gmail.com domain. There are two ways to do this. One way is to set DMARC Mitigations -> DMARC Mitigate unconditionally to Yes (and set DMARC mitigation action appropriately) The other way requires upgrading Postorius and Mailman core to the heads of the GitLab branches (core=3.3.9b1, postorius=1.3.9b1). Doing this enables a DMARC Addresses setting which can be set to `^.*(a)gmail\.com$` to apply DMARC mitigatations to mail From: the gmail.com domain regardless of it's published policy. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net <mailto:mark@msapiro.net>> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/> Archived at: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org>/message/WZY5IC3OVHVBHIGDT4TE3EWSSGMF6CYI/ This message sent to hansen(a)rc.org <mailto:hansen@rc.org>

2 years, 8 months

Re: how to become member of mailman-users list

by Shashikanth Komandoor

Thank you Steve for your response. On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:46 PM Stephen J. Turnbull < stephenjturnbull(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Shashikanth Komandoor writes: > > > One of my colleagues is trying to become a member of the > > mailman-users list but she is not able to become so even after sending > > multiple emails to the list. > > Your colleague needs to either sign up via Postorius at > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > or send mail to mailman-users-subscribe(a)mailman3.org to subscribe. > She then needs to respond to the mail that the system sends her by > visiting the URL in that mail. > > Without a subscription, mail to the list will be discarded silently, I > believe. > > Once her subscription is active, her first post will be held for > moderation. After that, help posts will be unmoderated. > > Steve > -- Thanks & Regards, Shashi Kanth.K 9052671936

4 years, 8 months

Equivalent of listadmin Perl script for Mailman 3?

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Philip Colmer writes: > We're preparing to migrate about 4 Mailman 2 servers to Mailman 3. In doing > so, one of our list administrators has informed us that he uses "listadmin" > Does anyone know if there is an equivalent tool that works with Mailman 3? I don't know of one, but perhaps someone does. It probably wouldn't be hard to write a bare-bones workalike if the admin has shell access to the mailman host. UIn theory, shell access could be restricted to running the tool by using a 'command' option in the sshd authorized_keys file for the user's key. But I'm not competent to judge how secure that could be in principle, and of course if the tool is buggy in certain ways, all bets are off.) I can't estimate how hard it would be to write one without shell access, as I'm not sure how amenable the Postorius web UI is to scripting. Steve

4 years, 5 months

Re: captcha for subscription and account registration forms

by Peter Chubb

>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull <steve(a)turnbull.jp> writes: Stephen> Johannes Rohr via Mailman-users writes: >> Last time I tried, [captchas worked well], but maybe that was >> before AI became ubiquitous. Stephen> What we saw was that 2005-level machine learning technology Stephen> was producing character recognition good enough to beat the Stephen> distorted character CAPTCHAs in a small number of tries. Stephen> This was readily available to the most persistent spammers, Stephen> so CAPTCHAs were not very successful at reducing such attacks Stephen> to tolerable levels. I've enabled CAPTCHA in Postorius and Django using the patches in https://github.com/pbiering/mailman3-rpm and have seen a massive reduction in sign-up spam. Just adding an extra step has made us less attractive than other sites. >> Is there another approach that you would recommend? We haven't used it on Mailman, but Anubis has helped with signup spam on our Mattermost server. https://github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis Peter C

1 week

Re: My list has been switched from public to private archives, but they are still visible

by Enrique Terrazas

Thank you Abhilash, I appreciate your prompt response. What about the once private archives becoming public after setting a list to “Do not archive this list”? Regards, Enrique On Sep 19, 2019, at 1:38 PM, Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in<mailto:maxking@asynchronous.in>> wrote: On Thu, Sep 19, 2019, at 11:15 AM, Enrique Terrazas wrote: I am having a very similar issue. Here is what I have found: There are basically three archive settings we can select via the postorious web front end for archives. These can be found in: Settings Archiving and they are: Public archives Private archives Do not archive this list This is interface of Mailman to set the archives. In the Django administrative interface we can find those same(?/similar?) settings here: Main Page > Hyperkitty > Mailing lists Mailing List object(x) > Archive policy: never private public This is basically a hotline to the database. You can change these values, but they would be overriden with the values that are in Mailman Core on the daily cron job run. I would suggest not to tinker with values there since you could leave database in a corrupted state. Since there is an ORM layer there, chances are less but still a possibility :) I’m not sure which of the two takes precedence. My guess is postorius since that is a list owner accessible setting and the Django administrative interface would typically not be accessible to list owners. We have noticed the following odd behavior, not sure if it is a bug. For existing lists with private archives, when switching to “Do not archive this list” in postorious, the desired effect of no longer archiving the list is instantaneous. However, after the daily cron job that syncs with Mailman Core happens, the existing archives now become publicly accessible. Is this behavior based on the assumption that the list will no longer be archived and will therefore be purged? Source of truth is Mailman Core's database. Postorius is a front-end to change that and owners have permissions to do that. Hyperkitty only syncs back that information daily. I have a fix in the master which makes such that this information is synced synchronously and is available immediately to Hyperkitty. For now, you could either run the "python manage.py runjobs --daily" or wait for a day if that is possible. Enrique On Sep 19, 2019, at 1:08 PM, Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in<mailto:maxking@asynchronous.in>> wrote: On Thu, Sep 19, 2019, at 3:31 AM, Paul Arenson wrote: Can anyone help with this? I set my list to private archives today. Up until then, it was pubic. And yet, if you go to the list page, you will see that if you click archives (top left), you can see them. (Filled with a bunch of tests posts for now) This change takes a bit of time to sync up Hyperkitty. THere is a daily cron job which syncs this information from Mailman Core. I have made a change which should fix this problem and the process would become synchronous. You can run `python manage.py runjobs --daily` command to force sync that information. https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist.toky… Am I misunderstanding what a private archive is? Not really, your expectation is right. Is something wrong with my setup (which is hosted)? Thank you. _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org<mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org<mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai… -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking) _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org<mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org<mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai… -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking) _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org<mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org<mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai…

6 years, 7 months

Re: "Private archives" aren't private

by Simon HANNA

On July 28, 2017 10:55:43 AM GMT+02:00, cyp(a)trojina.si wrote: >Hi, > >I'm having the same problem: changes to the "Archive policy" settings >in postorius are not reflected in hyperkitty. Trying to use >mailman_sync to fix this gave me the same BaseCommand traceback as >above, but "mlist_object.update_from_mailman()" works. So luckily we >have a workaround, thanks. But I suspect that there's some >misconfiguration or permission problem on our server that's blocking >the automatic synchronisation from taking place. Any advice to >resolving this would be appreciated. :) It's fixed in master, and just needs a release. https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/issues/135 @abompard what's the policy on bug fix releases? If mailman 3 should get adopted, I guess pushing such fixes quickly shows people that even if they encounter bugs, they get fixed right away... Otherwise they would just wait for it to "mature" cheers Simon -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

8 years, 9 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"