[MM3-users] Re: About the path forward [was: ... regarding message acceptance]

Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

...

Any plans to implement message acceptance based on another list? I think that most Mailman 2.1 features are plausible proposals for Mailman 3. While we don't make decisions based on user voting, we do care about user requests. If you want to make a formal request, post a request for enhancement (ie, issue) on our GitLab issue tracker, and post a link here so other interested people can follow it.

I am also quite interested in sibling lists feature for mailman 3 (regular_include_lists in mailman 2).

Pawel, did you ever posted a request for enhancement in gitlab, as Stephen suggested?

Thanks a lot for your answer!