Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 3 on Ubuntu 18.04

by Odhiambo Washington

On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 at 22:37, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 12/9/18 10:14 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > > In my quest to run Mailman3, I obtained a VM running Ubuntu 18.04 and > > started on getting to run Mailman3. > > I found this link -> https://github.com/iomarmochtar/mailman3_ei > > It has instructions which looked fairly simple to get Mailman3 installed. > > However, I did encounter some hitches since the script is not meant for > > Ubuntu. > > > First, a more appropriate list for Mailman 3 is > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users@mailman3.org/>. > I am shifting to that list, after this. > > Also, we find it very difficult to address issues arising from third > party packages and how-tos. See <https://wiki.list.org/x/12812344>. > > And, there is a Mailman 3 package for Debian/Ubuntu > > apt install mailman3-full > In all my searching, I never found this in any documentation. I must have been searching in the wild, or my FreeBSD-mindedness got me stuck to containers and VENVs. > > With a few runs and observing the logs and modifying the script at every > > step it encountered and error, I finally managed to install Mailman3. It > > seems this is what you guys call a virtual environment in the Linux > world? > > :-) > > > I think the virtual environment in this case is a Python thing, not a > Linux thing. > I agree with you on that. > <snip> > > > Much of what I snipped is specific to > <https://github.com/iomarmochtar/mailman3_ei>, the details of which I'm > not interested in learning. > That is fine. I have put it aside for now. > > > >>From this point now is where I need help - serious help in smoothening > > things up and getting to understand these venv stuff! > > > > So I did run 'service mailman3 start' but this seems to be waiting for > too > > long to drop me back into the CLI. > > I also run 'systemctl start supervisord' and that seems to work. What I > am > > not sure is whether 'systemctl stop supervisord' actually does what it is > > expected to do because after I execute it, I still see processes running > > that I think are related. > > > > So far, I have been able to access the webUI on my VM using > > https://N.N.N.N:9090 > > I created a domain. > > But when I create a test list, I get an error - and I do not have a clue > > which logfile would have the error details - nginx or mailman... (I am > 100% > > new to nginx). > > > The nginx logs generally aren't too useful. Both Mailman core and Django > write logs. Core's log is probably in var/log/mailman.log where is > defined in mailman.cfg as var_dir. Django's log is defined in Django's > settings in the LOGGING setting. > Which file contains Django's settings? > > So now, I am stuck at: > > 1. Creating the mailing list > > 2. Getting to know whether the archiver is installed and running > > 3. Knowing is there are cron jobs to be running (Mailman2 type of > thinking!) > > > See > <http://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/config-core.html#configuring-cron-jobs > > > and > < > http://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/config-web.html#scheduled-tasks-required > > > Great to see that. I'll read and see if I make heads or tails of the writeup. > > Ultimately I need to figure out: > > 1. How the mailman queue runners are started and stopped > > mailman start > Why not systemctl mailman start?? Just wondering, as that is what I am seeing is common in Ubuntu. Does this make the components start after a reboot? > > 2. Migrate s few lists from Mailman2 to this Mailman3 > > mailman import21 > <django management> hyperkitty_import > Please show me where that is documented. I have to pull my lists from an old machine to this new one. > > 3. Mailman3 should use MySQL storage and Exim4 as the MTA (I have > > configured these bits in mailman.cfg) > > > You also need to configure MySQL in Django. See the DATABASES setting in > the Django settings. > So, when you talk about Django settings, you are referring to mailman.cfg file??? :-) I have spent all my weekend till now, trying to figure all this out. Life seems a little easier with mm2.x .... Thank you. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft."

7 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: Message is received but is not sent out. Another, similar message, is processed fine.

by Allan Hansen

Thank you, Mark. I see this in mailman.log. I had looked there for her email address, but it does not appear, so I moved on to the smtp.log. In Jun 26 17:18:11 2023 (1243315) ACCEPT: ^M <CH3PR12MB82593801A1DF2E329E977046BE27A(a)CH3PR12MB8259.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> Jun 26 17:18:11 2023 (1243319) Uncaught runner exception: unknown encoding: iso-8859-8-i Jun 26 17:18:11 2023 (1243319) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mailman/core/runner.py", line 179, in _one_iteration self._process_one_file(msg, msgdata) File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mailman/core/runner.py", line 272, in _process_one_file keepqueued = self._dispose(mlist, msg, msgdata) File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mailman/runners/pipeline.py", line 37, in _dispose process(mlist, msg, msgdata, pipeline) File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mailman/core/pipelines.py", line 53, in process handler.process(mlist, msg, msgdata) File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mailman/handlers/mime_delete.py", line 382, in process process(mlist, msg, msgdata) File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mailman/handlers/mime_delete.py", line 151, in process reset_payload(msg, firstalt) File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mailman/handlers/mime_delete.py", line 202, in reset_payload msg.set_payload(subpart.get_payload(decode=True).decode( LookupError: unknown encoding: iso-8859-8-i Jun 26 17:18:11 2023 (1243319) SHUNTING: 1687825091.8457294+478565324778f2eb6f0fecaeccbd29596edaef53 I also see this in queue/shunt: mailman@list:~/var/queue/shunt$ ls -ltr total 88 -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 7168 Feb 17 23:03 1676703781.903885+fdcba88c680f50a0799c672cd0abe82e4bfe19b3.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 19821 Apr 2 07:08 1680444501.0831451+e110b8c5c20ba3f87c1cea1c5f38e74a6cf8f1c5.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 19489 Jun 18 11:52 1687114364.41209+1684717da96ff76d1ce773a0cf39c5f8b63e9078.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 20274 Jun 18 19:01 1687140067.64057+7f77c1ebca490831f58ef9cfde06109081a4e7d6.pck -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 20085 Jun 26 17:18 1687825091.8457294+478565324778f2eb6f0fecaeccbd29596edaef53.pck The three last entries coincide with the captured messages. Finally, in the captured message source (the last which was Cc'd to me) I do see this: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-8-i" Which matches the complaint in the mailman log. In the message that did get accepted, I see this: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Another difference: The posted message shows Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 The shunted message shows Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It appears that the two messages are, indeed, different, despite the similar looks when rendered. My question thus changes to: a. Should she be doing something special when sending to the lists? b. If not, is my setup in need of change? Yours, Allan On 6/26/23, 20:44, "Mark Sapiro" <mark(a)msapiro.net <mailto:mark@msapiro.net>> wrote: On 6/26/23 8:09 PM, Allan Hansen wrote: > Hi all, > > One of my subscribers is trying to send a message to a list, but it is not being posted. > The smtp.log shows that her first message was posted, but a second message (with 2 retries) was not: > > mailman@list:~/logs$ grep herName smtp.log > Jun 18 11:22:05 2023 (1243316) ('127.0.0.1', 56686) >> b'MAIL FROM:<herName(a)hotmail.com <mailto:herName@hotmail.com>> SIZE=40109' > Jun 18 11:22:05 2023 (1243316) ('127.0.0.1', 56686) sender: herName(a)hotmail.com <mailto:herName@hotmail.com> > Jun 18 11:25:01 2023 (1243318) <CH3PR12MB82593510B90D8F05177C606BBE5EA(a)CH3PR12MB8259.namprd12.prod.outlook.com <mailto:CH3PR12MB82593510B90D8F05177C606BBE5EA@CH3PR12MB8259.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>> post to theList(a)domain.tlc <mailto:theList@domain.tlc> from herName(a)hotmail.com <mailto:herName@hotmail.com>, 40061 bytes > Jun 18 11:52:42 2023 (1243316) ('127.0.0.1', 48448) >> b'MAIL FROM:<herName(a)hotmail.com <mailto:herName@hotmail.com>> SIZE=18343' > Jun 18 11:52:42 2023 (1243316) ('127.0.0.1', 48448) sender: herName(a)hotmail.com <mailto:herName@hotmail.com> > Jun 18 19:01:04 2023 (1243316) ('127.0.0.1', 59550) >> b'MAIL FROM:<herName(a)hotmail.com <mailto:herName@hotmail.com>> SIZE=19123' > Jun 18 19:01:04 2023 (1243316) ('127.0.0.1', 59550) sender: herName(a)hotmail.com <mailto:herName@hotmail.com> > Jun 26 17:18:11 2023 (1243316) ('127.0.0.1', 44732) >> b'MAIL FROM:<herName(a)hotmail.com <mailto:herName@hotmail.com>> SIZE=18930' > Jun 26 17:18:11 2023 (1243316) ('127.0.0.1', 44732) sender: herName(a)hotmail.com <mailto:herName@hotmail.com> > > At the second retry she copied me and I saw nothing untowards in her message. > She's not getting any error return messages and her subscription is OK. > Both messages were multipart/alternative and both contained Hebrew text. > > I told her I'd look at this, but I'm at a loss. smtp.log is not very useful for diagnosing things like this. It only says a message was received, not why it didn't result in a post from the list as in the first case. What's in mailman.log with those timestamps? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net <mailto:mark@msapiro.net>> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/> Archived at: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org>/message/F4K7HYUYSWEKF6LT35UCT3KBJX6GHY4I/ This message sent to hansen(a)rc.org <mailto:hansen@rc.org>

2 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: old usernames appearing in mailman.log

by Ken Alker

--On Monday, June 26, 2023 5:03 PM -0700 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 6/25/23 10:57 PM, Ken Alker wrote: >> >> I have studied the output, looked at the code lines referenced in the >> Traceback, and I can't figure out the problem (I feel like the sad guy >> on the side of the street with his hood up staring into the engine bay >> with stream pouring out and not knowing what to do next). I did some >> analyses on the log file and determined that there are 71 messages it is >> having problems processing and there are 71 messages "stuck" in >> /opt/mailman/mm/var/archives/hyperkitty/spool/ (and that it has tried to >> process each message about 20 times). > > > Each time there is a new post, it retries all the messages in the spool/ > directory. > > >> Since upgrading to V3.3.8 I've >> not seen new messages get stuck like this (although it's only been >> running smoothly for 24 hours now and there hasn't been much activity). >> But I'm suspecting there was something awry between the conversion from >> V2 to V3 in February and me installing V3.3.8 that caused this (based on >> message time stamps). It is HIGHLY likely these messages are in the >> archiving spool as a result of me unshunting the shunt queue and that >> they are copies of the messages that got delivered to the subscribers >> when I did that... but are now hung up in the archiving process. > > > Are new messages being archived OK. If so, that is a real mystery. It > says mailman-hyperkitty can talk to hyperkitty and archive new messages, > but it can't talk to hyperkitty when attempting to process a queued > message. Ahhh! I had convinced myself that new messages were being archived, but now that you ask, they ARE NOT. I may have said they were at some point, and I apologize if I did. Now I feel less confused. It appears that archiving stopped when I did the migration from "Debian package layout" to "source layout" and upgraded to V3.3.8. I'll bet I munged a config file or two. I was struggling with what to keep from Debian layout and what to bring over from the source install instructions and I haven't gone back through to clean them up. I had previously figured it could not be a configuration issue since some messages were making it into the archive and some were not, but now that I see NONE are making it, this makes the problem less daunting. >> Following is an excerpt from mailman.log. Note that the "first >> section" (from DOCTYPE at top to 404 at bottom) is repeated four times >> (maybe not identical; but similar) (so I did not include it to save >> room) before the Traceback appears. >> >> Jun 25 00:13:04 2023 (386086) No cached copy of the public suffix list >> found >> Jun 25 00:13:04 2023 (386086) ACCEPT: >> <7500f0e2-1ae1-309d-60d7-6e592c7abf7a(a)west.net> >> Jun 25 00:13:04 2023 (386090) HyperKitty failure on >> https://lists.netlojix.com/hyperkitty/api/mailman/urls: > > I just went to that URL and got a 404. This is a serious problem. > https://lists.netlojix.com/hyperkitty/api/ also returns a 404. It should > return some documentation of the API. > > https://lists.netlojix.com/archives/api/ does work and returns the > expected information. > > Your urls.py file probably contains in its urlpatterns list > ``` > re_path(r'^mailman3/', include('postorius.urls')), > re_path(r'^archives/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), > ``` > The simplest fix is to add > ``` > re_path(r'^postorius/', include('postorius.urls')), > re_path(r'^hyperkitty/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), > ``` > to that list. I see many ursl.py files all over the system, but none that appear to be where I'd expect them to be for processing by any executables. Is this a file I should have copied over and edited, or created from scratch and somehow missed? I don't see anything about it in the instructions at <https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html> (although I do see a post from last July from someone stating it got missed in the instructions back then). > Another way to fix this is in your mailman-hyperkitty.cfg, you have > ``` > base_url: https://lists.netlojix.com/hyperkitty > ``` > Change that to > ``` > base_url: https://lists.netlojix.com/archives > ``` Done, and restarted both services, but I'm not seeing a difference when I go to <https://lists.netlojix.com/hyperkitty/api/> (I was getting a "Page not found", and still get that). > but it wouldn't hurt to add the `^postorius/` and `^hyperkitty/` patterns > to urls.py anyway.

2 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Postorius no connection to REST API

by Richard Rosner

Mark Sapiro wrote: > > You are in a better position to answer that than am I. > What does sudo netstat -lntp show? A lot. But since most of that isn't relevant here: Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:465 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 20241/master tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:8024 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 14076/python3 tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 20241/master tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:8001 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 14080/python3 tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:587 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 20241/master tcp6 0 0 :::80 :::* LISTEN 13882/apache2 tcp6 0 0 :::465 :::* LISTEN 20241/master tcp6 0 0 :::25 :::* LISTEN 20241/master tcp6 0 0 :::443 :::* LISTEN 13882/apache2 tcp6 0 0 :::587 :::* LISTEN 20241/master > What does ps -fwwa|grep rest show? root 15055 14843 0 12:58 pts/1 00:00:00 grep rest So whatever it's supposed to find, it's not there > > mailman3-web.service must also run as list. I changed that. It didn't like it. systemctl status mailman3-web.service ● mailman3-web.service - Mailman3-web uWSGI service Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/mailman3-web.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2021-08-11 13:05:39 CEST; 32s ago Docs: file:///usr/share/doc/mailman3-web/README.rst Process: 15570 ExecStart=/usr/bin/uwsgi --plugin python3 --ini /etc/mailman3/uwsgi.ini (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Main PID: 15570 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Status: "initializing uWSGI" Aug 11 13:05:39 mail systemd[1]: Starting Mailman3-web uWSGI service... Aug 11 13:05:39 mail systemd[1]: mailman3-web.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Aug 11 13:05:39 mail systemd[1]: mailman3-web.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. Aug 11 13:05:39 mail systemd[1]: Failed to start Mailman3-web uWSGI service. Aug 11 13:05:39 mail systemd[1]: mailman3-web.service: Service RestartSec=100ms expired, scheduling restart. Aug 11 13:05:39 mail systemd[1]: mailman3-web.service: Scheduled restart job, restart counter is at 5. Aug 11 13:05:39 mail systemd[1]: Stopped Mailman3-web uWSGI service. Aug 11 13:05:39 mail systemd[1]: mailman3-web.service: Start request repeated too quickly. Aug 11 13:05:39 mail systemd[1]: mailman3-web.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. Aug 11 13:05:39 mail systemd[1]: Failed to start Mailman3-web uWSGI service. > > So, what do you have in your apache config for proxying to uwsgi and > what's your uwsgi configuration. lists-ssl.conf: <VirtualHost *:443> ServerAdmin admin(a)domain.de ServerName lists.domain.de Alias /mailman3/favicon.ico /var/lib/mailman3/web/static/postorius/img/favicon.ico Alias /mailman3/static /var/lib/mailman3/web/static <Directory "/var/lib/mailman3/web/static"> Require all granted </Directory> <IfModule mod_proxy_uwsgi.c> ProxyPass /mailman3/favicon.ico ! ProxyPass /mailman3/static ! ProxyPass "/mailman3" "unix:/run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://localhost:8001/" </IfModule> # SSL Engine Switch: # Enable/Disable SSL for this virtual host. SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/certs/lists.domain.de.cert.pem SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/private/lists.domain.de.private.pem SSLCertificateChainFile /etc/ssl/certs/dfnca.pem SSLCACertificateFile /etc/ssl/certs/rwthcert.pem SSLProtocol all -SSLv3 -TLSv1 -TLSv1.1 Protocols h2 http/1.1 SSLCipherSuite ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 SSLHonorCipherOrder off #RewriteEngine on #RewriteRule ^/$ https://lists.domain.de/listinfo Header always set Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=15768000; includeSubDomains; preload" Header always set X-Frame-Options: "SAMEORIGIN" Header always set X-Xss-Protection "1; mode=block" Header always set X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff" Header always set Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'self' *.domain.de; script-src 'self' *.domain.de; connect-src 'self' *.domain.de; img-src 'self' *.domain.de; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' *.domain.de; object-src 'self' *.domain.de; frame-src 'self' *.domain.de;" Header always set Referrer-Policy "no-referrer-when-downgrade" </VirtualHost> <VirtualHost *:80> RewriteEngine On RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}$1 [R=301,L] </VirtualHost> I guess with uwsgi config you mean the /etc/mailman3/uwsgi.ini file? [uwsgi] # Port on which uwsgi will be listening. uwsgi-socket = /run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock #Enable threading for python enable-threads = true # Move to the directory wher the django files are. chdir = /usr/share/mailman3-web # Use the wsgi file provided with the django project. wsgi-file = wsgi.py # Setup default number of processes and threads per process. master = true process = 2 threads = 2 # Drop privielges and don't run as root. uid = www-data gid = www-data plugins = python3 # Setup the django_q related worker processes. attach-daemon = python3 manage.py qcluster # Setup hyperkitty's cron jobs. #unique-cron = -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 ./manage.py runjobs minutely #unique-cron = -15 -1 -1 -1 -1 ./manage.py runjobs quarter_hourly #unique-cron = 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 ./manage.py runjobs hourly #unique-cron = 0 0 -1 -1 -1 ./manage.py runjobs daily #unique-cron = 0 0 1 -1 -1 ./manage.py runjobs monthly #unique-cron = 0 0 -1 -1 0 ./manage.py runjobs weekly #unique-cron = 0 0 1 1 -1 ./manage.py runjobs yearly # Setup the request log. #req-logger = file:/var/log/mailman3/web/mailman-web.log # Log cron seperately. #logger = cron file:/var/log/mailman3/web/mailman-web-cron.log #log-route = cron uwsgi-cron # Log qcluster commands seperately. #logger = qcluster file:/var/log/mailman3/web/mailman-web-qcluster.log #log-route = qcluster uwsgi-daemons # Last log and it logs the rest of the stuff. #logger = file:/var/log/mailman3/web/mailman-web-error.log logto = /var/log/mailman3/web/mailman-web.log

4 years, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: LTMP to Postfix problem

by Brian Carpenter

On 6/18/20 7:36 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Check your system logs to see if there's anything about the OS killing > the process. Also check the Postfix log for deliveries to mailman just > before it died. Just stabbing in the dark, but maybe some huge message > caused it to grow beyond some memory limit and get killed by the OS. I am replying off list at this point. It is definitely a OOM issue. Here are the log entries right before ltmp crashed: Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.158382] postgres invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x6200ca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE), nodemask=(null), order=0, oom_score_adj=0 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.160719] postgres cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.161524] CPU: 0 PID: 7243 Comm: postgres Not tainted 4.19.0-6-amd64 #1 Debian 4.19.67-2 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.163047] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.0-0-ga698c8995f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.164885] Call Trace: Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.165402] dump_stack+0x5c/0x80 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.166097] dump_header+0x6b/0x283 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.167019] ? do_try_to_free_pages+0x2ec/0x370 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.167864] oom_kill_process.cold.30+0xb/0x1cf Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.168760] ? oom_badness+0x23/0x140 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.169534] out_of_memory+0x1a5/0x430 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.170174] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0xbd8/0xcb0 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.171060] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x28b/0x2b0 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.171973] filemap_fault+0x3bd/0x780 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.172643] ? alloc_set_pte+0xf2/0x560 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.173369] ? filemap_map_pages+0x1ed/0x3a0 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.174404] ext4_filemap_fault+0x2c/0x40 [ext4] Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.175259] __do_fault+0x36/0x130 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.175930] __handle_mm_fault+0xe6c/0x1270 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.176765] handle_mm_fault+0xd6/0x200 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.177644] __do_page_fault+0x249/0x4f0 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.178407] ? async_page_fault+0x8/0x30 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.179156] async_page_fault+0x1e/0x30 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.179915] RIP: 0033:0x55d875a3fe10 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.180569] Code: Bad RIP value. Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.181181] RSP: 002b:00007ffcad32f248 EFLAGS: 00010206 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.182132] RAX: 000055d877d512b0 RBX: 000055d877d60b93 RCX: 00007ffcad32f2c0 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.183365] RDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: 000055d877d60b93 RDI: 000055d877d512b0 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.184712] RBP: 00007ffcad32f270 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007ffcad32f388 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.186338] R10: 00007f2585002d40 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000005 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.187583] R13: 000055d877d4b3a0 R14: 00007f2581ad05b8 R15: 0000000000000000 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.188952] Mem-Info: Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.189468] active_anon:197899 inactive_anon:206498 isolated_anon:0 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.189468] active_file:253 inactive_file:278 isolated_file:23 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.189468] unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.189468] slab_reclaimable:21867 slab_unreclaimable:55017 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.189468] mapped:17008 shmem:24450 pagetables:4890 bounce:0 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.189468] free:13184 free_pcp:340 free_cma:0 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.195739] Node 0 active_anon:791596kB inactive_anon:825992kB active_file:1012kB inactive_file:1112kB unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):92kB mapped:68032kB dirty$ Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.200559] Node 0 DMA free:8152kB min:352kB low:440kB high:528kB active_anon:1056kB inactive_anon:5048kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB writepending:0kB prese$ Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.204993] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 1950 1950 1950 1950 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.205877] Node 0 DMA32 free:44584kB min:44700kB low:55872kB high:67044kB active_anon:790540kB inactive_anon:820944kB active_file:1012kB inactive_file:1112kB unevictable:0kB wri$ Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.211109] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 0 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.211826] Node 0 DMA: 8*4kB (UE) 31*8kB (UME) 20*16kB (UME) 22*32kB (UME) 13*64kB (UME) 5*128kB (UME) 5*256kB (UM) 4*512kB (UM) 2*1024kB (UM) 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 8152kB Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.214414] Node 0 DMA32: 378*4kB (UMEH) 472*8kB (UEH) 412*16kB (UEH) 196*32kB (UMEH) 63*64kB (UMEH) 63*128kB (UE) 16*256kB (UE) 4*512kB (ME) 0*1024kB 2*2048kB (M) 1*4096kB (M) =$ Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.217336] Node 0 hugepages_total=0 hugepages_free=0 hugepages_surp=0 hugepages_size=1048576kB Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.218937] Node 0 hugepages_total=0 hugepages_free=0 hugepages_surp=0 hugepages_size=2048kB Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.220513] 39729 total pagecache pages Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.221286] 14715 pages in swap cache Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.222022] Swap cache stats: add 10809560, delete 10794845, find 18524127383/18527544787 Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.223482] Free swap = 0kB Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.224081] Total swap = 524284kB Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.224712] 524154 pages RAM Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.225222] 0 pages HighMem/MovableOnly Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.225894] 13385 pages reserved Then there was this little bit of info: Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.442555] Out of memory: Kill process 29676 (python3) score 37 or sacrifice child Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.444508] Killed process 29676 (python3) total-vm:192224kB, anon-rss:93084kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB Jun 18 00:00:12 mm4 kernel: [19548549.464907] oom_reaper: reaped process 29676 (python3), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB I suspect the above process was ltmp. So the server has 2 gig of ram with about a dozen MM3 lists on it. Is this an issue with tuning performance of the Postgresql server or do I need to add more memory. I am curious how much ram your server is running and if you had run into any OOM of problems. If you want me to post this to the list, I will. -- Please let me know if you need further assistance. Thank you for your business. We appreciate our clients. Brian Carpenter EMWD.com -- EMWD's Knowledgebase: https://clientarea.emwd.com/index.php/knowledgebase EMWD's Community Forums http://discourse.emwd.com/

6 years

[MM3-users] Re: search this list searches more then just this list

by Marco van Tol

Op 26 jan 2024, om 22:55 heeft Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> het volgende geschreven: > On 1/26/24 02:44, Marco van Tol wrote: >> Op 25 jan 2024, om 14:16 heeft Marco van Tol <mvantol(a)ripe.net> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> Okay, so, I got a bit further, but something still gets stuck. >>> >>> Here’s what I did. >>> Keep in mind I’m using containers that are built from some CI/CD pipeline, so I updated the pipeline to apply the patch attached to this email to `/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xapian_backend.py`. >>> >>> Before I had 2 list servers with the “Term too long” issue, 1 got resolved by this, and the other did not. >>> I opened a shell in the newly deployed container to confirm the patch was applied in it. >>> >>> The other attachment to this email is a copy/paste from the full error from `./manage.py rebuild_index`. >>> >>> Is there something else special in the email that makes it choke that evades the xapian patch? >>> >>> Thank you very much in advance! > > The message above with the attached "full error" never got to the list. What is the error report? Hm, I see. Not sure why. The reply I got from mail.mailman3.org <http://mail.mailman3.org/> at 2024-01-25 13:16:25.486 UTC was: "250 2.0.0 Ok: 12772 bytes queued as 55AFD105C02” I’m pasting it at the bottom of this email. Sorry it didn’t come through. >> I tried to change to ‘hash’, but the code in that bit of the function has not been tested enough. >> For example `hole = sha224(hole.encode('utf8')).hexdigest()` comes back with that the bytes object hole does not have an encode() method. >> When I change it to `hole = sha224(hole).hexdigest()`, the following error is: > > That's only part of it. You need > > hole = sha224(hole).hexdigest().encode('utf8') I ended up changing it to this, which fixed that bit, and led to the next issue. :) >> text = text[:match.start()] + hole + text[match.end():] >> TypeError: can't concat str to bytes >> The ‘hash’ part of that function needs some debugging. > > > Yes, presumably because no one sets `XAPIAN_LONG_TERM_METHOD=hash` in the environment. Do you have a reason for this? I wanted to check and see if I could avoid the “Term too long (>245)" issue this way, but I haven’t gotten to the point where xapian is successful. Right now I’m back at the original issue as I see no other solution than to go back to whoosh. Thanks! Marco van Tol Paste: ---- Indexing 194620 emails [ERROR/MainProcess] Failed indexing 156001 - 157000 (retry 5/5): Term too long (> 245): XSUBJECThttp://www.google.com/url?q=%68%74%74%70%73%3a%2f%2f%68%64%72%65%64… (pid 32): Term too long (> 245): XSUBJECThttp://www.google.com/url?q=%68%74%74%70%73%3a%2f%2f%68%64%72%65%64… Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/haystack/management/commands/update_index.py", line 119, in do_update backend.update(index, current_qs, commit=commit) File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xapian_backend.py", line 98, in wrapper func(self, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xapian_backend.py", line 505, in update database.replace_document(document_id, document) xapian.InvalidArgumentError: Term too long (> 245): XSUBJECThttp://www.google.com/url?q=%68%74%74%70%73%3a%2f%2f%68%64%72%65%64… [ERROR/MainProcess] Error updating hyperkitty using default Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/haystack/management/commands/update_index.py", line 297, in handle self.update_backend(label, using) File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/haystack/management/commands/update_index.py", line 342, in update_backend max_pk = do_update( ^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/haystack/management/commands/update_index.py", line 119, in do_update backend.update(index, current_qs, commit=commit) File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xapian_backend.py", line 98, in wrapper func(self, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xapian_backend.py", line 505, in update database.replace_document(document_id, document) xapian.InvalidArgumentError: Term too long (> 245): XSUBJECThttp://www.google.com/url?q=%68%74%74%70%73%3a%2f%2f%68%64%72%65%64… Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/mailman-web/./manage.py", line 10, in <module> execute_from_command_line(sys.argv) File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 446, in execute_from_command_line utility.execute() File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 440, in execute self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv) File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 402, in run_from_argv self.execute(*args, **cmd_options) File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 448, in execute output = self.handle(*args, **options) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/haystack/management/commands/rebuild_index.py", line 65, in handle call_command("update_index", **update_options) File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 198, in call_command return command.execute(*args, **defaults) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 448, in execute output = self.handle(*args, **options) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/haystack/management/commands/update_index.py", line 297, in handle self.update_backend(label, using) File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/haystack/management/commands/update_index.py", line 342, in update_backend max_pk = do_update( ^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/haystack/management/commands/update_index.py", line 119, in do_update backend.update(index, current_qs, commit=commit) File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xapian_backend.py", line 98, in wrapper func(self, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xapian_backend.py", line 505, in update database.replace_document(document_id, document) xapian.InvalidArgumentError: Term too long (> 245): XSUBJECThttp://www.google.com/url?q=%68%74%74%70%73%3a%2f%2f%68%64%72%65%64… ----

2 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: External MTA incoming mail: configuration

by Odhiambo Washington

On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 10:46 AM Roland Giesler via Mailman-users < mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> wrote: > On 2024/08/05 19:59, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > I see this reply is now moot as you have now configured list mail to > > go directly to the Mailman server, but ... > > > > On 8/5/24 03:44, Roland Giesler via Mailman-users wrote: > >> > >> In the logs of the MTA I see this however: warning: do not list > >> domain fast.za.net in BOTH virtual_mailbox_domains and relay_domains > >> > >> Mailman creates these entries, but postfix doesn't like it. I don't > >> see any mail delivered to the mailman yet. Is this the problem? > > > > Probably not. It is telling you that mail to the fast.za.net domain > > cannot both be delivered to local mailboxes (virtual_mailbox_domains) > > and relayed to foreign hosts (relay_domains) > > > Thanks, yes, I have since assumed that to be the case. > > > >> In the MTA postfix main.cf: > >> > >> relay_domains = hash:/etc/mailman3/data/postfix_domains > > > > >> cat /etc/mailman3/data/postfix_domains > >> ... > >> > >> and also > >> > >> local_recipient_maps=$virtual_mailbox_maps, > >> hash:/etc/mailman3/data/postfix_lmtp > >> > >> cat /etc/mailman3/data/postfix_lmtp > >> ... > > > > How about > > > > transport_maps = hash:/etc/mailman3/data/postfix_lmtp > I can't remove the $virtual_mailbox_maps entry, since Power-mailinbox > (PMiaB) uses that. It may make Mailman3 work, but break PMiaB). > > > > > >> > >> Then there's: > >> virtual_mailbox_domains=sqlite:/etc/postfix/virtual-mailbox-domains.cf > >> > >> cat /etc/postfix/virtual-mailbox-domains.cf > >> dbpath=/home/user-data/mail/users.sqlite > >> query = SELECT 1 FROM users WHERE email LIKE '%%@%s' UNION SELECT 1 > >> FROM aliases WHERE source LIKE '%%@%s' UNION SELECT 1 FROM > >> auto_aliases WHERE source LIKE '%%@%s' > >> > >> When I run that query in sqlite3, it returns no records, so I'm not > >> sure how this is supposed to work. %s to me means that first > >> argument, so is this used in python and then %s is the argument sent > >> to this query? > > > > > > See https://www.postfix.org/sqlite_table.5.html > > > > `%%` is replaced with `%` which is a SQL wildcard matching anything > > and `%s` is replaced by the key postfix is looking for, i.e. the > > domain that it is asking about. > > > > So, that query becomes > > > > SELECT 1 FROM users WHERE email LIKE '%(a)fast.za.net' UNION SELECT 1 > > FROM aliases WHERE source LIKE '%(a)fast.za.net' UNION SELECT 1 FROM > > auto_aliases WHERE source LIKE '%(a)fast.za.net' > > > > I.e, it returns true if any user or alias or auto_alias has an address > > ending in '@fast.za.net' and if that's true the mail to any > > '@fast.za.net' address including list mail will be stored locally. > > Ah, thank you! I created a ticket at MiaB about this, so I'll post your > response there. The %s had be stumped at first, but now it's clear. > > > > > > If you really have local users on box2.gtahardware.co.za with > > addresses '@fast.za.net' and you want to relay list mail to lists > > '@fast.za.net', you need to see > > > https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/docs/mta.h… > . > > Thank you for that! From that it seems it may still be possible to use > PMiaB as my MTA after, but I'll work through that reference and test it > and report back. > I think that ALL MTAs have the concept of local domains (for which mails are delivered to 'local mailboxes') and remote domains (aka relay domains) for which mail is relayed to another host which has the mailboxes. So in your case box2.gtahardware.co.za (this is FQDN) could be handling local emails, e.g roland(a)gtahardware.co.za, johndoe(a)gtahardware.co.za, etc. Those are local, and so gtahardware.co.za is a local domain. However, fast.za.net is a relay domain and all mail to XXX(a)fast.za.net should be relayed to the MM3 server. If your MTA does not have this concept, then it's either not ready for prime time or it wasn't intended to have such ability. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

1 year, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: Subscription Request asking for Confirmation instead of Moderation

by Henry Hartley

> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 21:10 > > On 8/27/25 09:22, Henry Hartley via Mailman-users wrote: > > > > 1. Are there particular headers that are causing the email to go to the > Confirmation page instead of the Approval page? Or are there particular > headers we can add that will help with this? > > 2. Is there any way for us to move an address from the Confirmation > Pending page to confirmed on the backend (preferably through the web > interface, but on the server itself, if necessary)? > > > > Here are the headers sent with the subscriber's email address changed to > FirstLast(a)SCHOOL.edu and our BCC mailbox domain changed to COMPANY.com. > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit > > X-Mailer: Drupal > > Return-Path: FirstLast(a)SCHOOL.edu > > Sender: FirstLast(a)SCHOOL.edu > > From: FirstLast(a)SCHOOL.edu > > Bcc: mailman-noreply(a)COMPANY.com > > Are these all the headers? If so, you need a To: header. sending the envelope to > the list-join address is not sufficient. The message must either have a To: to the > list-join address or a To: to the list-request address with a Subject: or body of > `join` That's what I was given and I didn't look at it carefully enough. My apologies. There was indeed a To: header, so it wasn't that. I got a copy of the actual email and was able to see all the headers, which I've pasted below (with the exception of two X-Microsoft-Antispam-xxx headers, which are fairly long). I've anonymized it similarly to the above as well as changing the IP address to 192.169.0.0, which is not what's really there. Note also that the mailto: links above (and below, if applicable) are not in the text I'm pasting but have been added somewhere along the line. Received: from CO1PR05MB8586.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:ed::5) by LV8PR05MB10549.namprd05.prod.outlook.com with HTTPS; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:57:54 +0000 Received: from DM6PR02CA0123.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:1b4::25) by CO1PR05MB8586.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:ed::5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.9009.18; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:57:52 +0000 Received: from DS3PEPF0000C37A.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:1b4:cafe::9e) by DM6PR02CA0123.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:5:1b4::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.9009.15 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:57:52 +0000 Authentication-Results: spf=fail (sender IP is 192.168.0.0) smtp.mailfrom=SCHOOL.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=fail action=oreject header.from=SCHOOL.edu;compauth=fail reason=000 Received-SPF: Fail (protection.outlook.com: domain of SCHOOL.edu does not designate 192.168.0.0 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=192.168.0.0; helo=esa2.COMPANY.iphmx.com; Received: from esa2.COMPANY.iphmx.com (192.168.0.0) by DS3PEPF0000C37A.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.23.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.9009.8 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:57:52 +0000 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 6gzl16giR+OI2R+uEItzYA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: N0dF+IkxQxqpO1VcWOCK3A== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,274,1747713600"; d="scan'208";a="40347776" Received: from ex2019-3.COMPANY.com ([74.119.60.23]) by esa2.COMPANY.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 08 Aug 2025 12:57:50 -0400 Received: from EX2019-1.COMPANY.com (10.1.146.19) by EX2019-3.COMPANY.com (10.1.146.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1748.26; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 12:57:50 -0400 Received: from COmailout.COMPANY.com (10.1.146.69) by EX2019-1.COMPANY.com (10.1.146.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.2.1748.26 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 12:57:50 -0400 Received: from WEBSERVER.COMPANY.com ([10.115.9.208]) by COmailout.COMPANY.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(10.0.17763.1697); Fri, 8 Aug 2025 12:57:50 -0400 Received: by WEBSERVER.COMPANY.com (Postfix, from userid 33) id 998892A0BDB; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 12:57:48 -0400 (EDT) To: <MAILINGLIST-join(a)DOMAIN.org> Subject: Subscribe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Drupal Sender: <FIRSTLAST(a)SCHOOL.edu> From: <FIRSTLAST(a)SCHOOL.edu> Message-ID: <20250808165748.998892A0BDB(a)WEBSERVER.COMPANY.com> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 12:57:48 -0400 Return-Path: FIRSTLAST(a)SCHOOL.edu X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Aug 2025 16:57:50.0067 (UTC) FILETIME=[92CA3430:01DC0885] X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationStartTime: 08 Aug 2025 16:57:52.4416 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationStartTimeReason: OriginalSubmit X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationInterval: 1:00:00:00.0000000 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationIntervalReason: OriginalSubmit X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: ba671e8c-86f5-429d-8c2d-08ddd69cb6ab X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-EOPTenantAttributedMessage: a066de23-9711-4de4-8725-431a39ebcafb:0 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-MessageDirectionality: Incoming X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DS3PEPF0000C37A:EE_|CO1PR05MB8586:EE_|LV8PR05MB10549:EE_ X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: DS3PEPF0000C37A.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: ba671e8c-86f5-429d-8c2d-08ddd69cb6ab X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationInterval: 0:12:30:00.0000000 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationIntervalReason: TenantCustomized X-MS-Exchange-AtpMessageProperties: SA|SL X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;ARA:13230040; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:192.168.0.0;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:-1;SRV:;IPV:CAL;SFV:SKN;H:esa2.COMPANY.iphmx.com;PTR:esa2.COMPANY.iphmx.com;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230040);DIR:INB; X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Aug 2025 16:57:52.2718 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ba671e8c-86f5-429d-8c2d-08ddd69cb6ab X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: a066de23-9711-4de4-8725-431a39ebcafb X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DS3PEPF0000C37A.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR05MB8586 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-EndToEndLatency: 00:00:02.2435910 X-MS-Exchange-Processed-By-BccFoldering: 15.20.8989.011 -- Henry Hartley Westat RB 2151

9 months, 3 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: Custom templates (was: Re: Re: nginx configuration on a multitasking server)

by David Newman

On 1/14/22 4:54 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 1/14/22 11:56 AM, David Newman wrote: >> >> I created a pending subscription request on a test list. Here is the >> text I'm using in a file called 'list:admin:action:subscribe.txt' >> (minus the rows of hypens): >> >> ---------- >> >> >> As list administrator, your authorization is required for a mailing >> list subscription request approval: >> >> For: $member >> List: $listname >> >> At your convenience, visit: >> >> https://${domain}/mailman/admindb/lists/${short_listname}.${domain}/ > > This looks like a Mailman 2.1 URL. Are you sure you don't want something > like > > https://${domain}/mailman3/lists/${short_listname}.${domain}/ Yes. The server redirects MM3-style requests to MM2.1 URLs. I need to determine why, but that may be a different issue than the templates one. There's nothing obvious in this vhost's nginx config that would generate the redirect. Will check, if I can't resolve this I'll open a different thread. > >> >> to approve or deny the request. >> >> ---------- >> >> Instead the message that goes out at midnight daily reads like this: > > > That's a different message. It is sent from the `mailman notify` command > run by cron. It's built from the list:admin:notice:pending template. OK, wrong template then. > >> >> On successive nights I have placed copies of the >> 'list:admin:action:subscribe.txt' file above in these locations: >> >> mm/var/templates/lists/test.lists.domain.tld/en > > I hope you mean > > /opt/mailman/mm/var/templates/lists/test.lists.domain.tld/en Yes > >> /opt/mailman/mm/var/templates/site/en > > > Either of those should work. The lists one will take priority over the > site one for that list. > > >> and then in Postorius, with the same contents as above. > > If you set a template in Postorius, it takes priority. If you later > decide you want to use one in /opt/mailman/mm/var/templates/ you have to > delete the postorius one. > > >> The file versions are owned by the mailman user, and have 0644 >> permissions. Not sure this is necessary but I've restarted the >> mailman3 and mailmanweb services each time after a change. >> >> There is no sign of trouble in the MM3 or web logs. The only thing I >> see is in the Postfix log, where the shorter and less helpful message >> goes out each night. I don't see anything in the template docs about >> this. >> >> Questions: >> >> 1. What to do to get the custom message working? > > > It should work. I suspect you need to go to the list's Settings -> > Automatic Responses and set `Admin immed notify` to Yes. It's enabled. I think this triggers notifications only for new subscription requests, not pending ones. > > >> 2. Is there a way to trigger a subscribe reminder for one list only? > > > If by subscribe reminder you mean the `list:admin:action:subscribe.txt` > message, yes that's the above list setting. If you mean the one sent > from the `mailman notify` command, see `mailman notify --help` for the > options. You can specify one or more lists (default is all lists) via > options and put them in your cron. > > >> Asking because there are other lists on this server with other >> requests pending, and I don't want to bother other moderators with >> multiple reminders per day. Not a big deal, but it would be nice to >> test this with one list rather than waiting up to 24 hours after each >> change. > > > You can test `mailman notify` at any time by running it by hand. Thanks. This still isn't working as intended. I took these steps: 1. Created the file '/opt/mailman/mm/var/templates/lists/test.lists.domain.tld/en/list:admin:action:pending.txt' with these contents (minus the hyphens top and bottom): ---------- The $listname list has $count moderation requests waiting. $data At your convenience, visit: https://${domain}/mailman3/lists/${short_listname}.${domain}/ to approve or deny the request. ---------- 2. Restarted the mailman3 and mailmanweb services 3. As the mailman user, ran the command 'mailman notify -l test.lists.domain.tld -v' This generated an email message but its contents were the same as in my previous post: ---------- The test(a)lists.domain.tld list has 1 moderation requests waiting. Held Subscriptions: User: letmein(a)domain.tld Please attend to this at your earliest convenience. ---------- What I'm trying to do here is replicate a feature from MM2.1, where pending notifications had URLs embedded in the message. That's not available out of the box in MM3, and if there's a place for feature requests I'd be glad to ask that this be made the default. For now, though, I'm looking to get this customization working. Thanks. dn

4 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: messages stuck in the bad queue

by Ken Alker

--On Sunday, June 25, 2023 9:18 AM -0700 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 6/24/23 9:54 PM, Ken Alker wrote: >> I am working on a mail server that was migrated from mailman V2 to >> mailman V3 in February. I just noticed that there are over 1000 >> messages in the bad queue. All of the messages in the bad queue are >> dated 2/2/23 and all have a timestamp within a one-hour window of each >> other. >> >> I used mailman qfile to inspect five random emails in the bad queue and >> so far they are all "successfully subscribed" emails, > > This is a bit strange. See below. > >> but I presume >> there are no guarantees there aren't others mixed in there that might be >> legitimate emails (ie. I just unshunted 140 emails in the shunt queue >> and they were all good emails and all got processed). > > > Presumably these were shunted due to some issue that was subsequently fixed. That is my assumption. I didn't unshunt them until I had V3.3.8 completed, figuring the previous version/install had some bug/mistake. Fortunately, they all got processed (with one problem, which I brought up in another thread). >> I figure that the easiest way to inspect these 1000 emails is just to >> have them re-delivered. I tried moving one from the bad queue to the >> shunt queue and I ran "mailman unshunt" but nothing happened. > > What does nothing happened mean? "mailman unshunt" should move the > message to the original queue which was stored in the 'whichq' attribute > in the msgdata when the message was shunted. Since this wasn't a shunted > message, there's no 'whichq' attribute so it goes to the 'in' queue. > I.e., "mailman unshunt" would have moved the message from the 'shunt' > queue to the 'in' queue. If the message wound up back in the shunt queue, > there should be messages in mailman.log indicating why. I moved the .psv file from the bad queue into the shunt queue. I then ran "mailman unshunt" (as user 'mailman' while in the virtual environment). I tailed mailman.log during this process and no logs were spit out. The date stamp on the .psv file never changed (maybe it does not when being moved between queues?) and, AFAICT, the file never moved from the shunt queue. I waited maybe five minutes, tops. >> Is there a way to reprocess the bad queue? > > You could just move the messages to the 'in' queue. I just now tried moving the same message into the 'in' queue but, again, nothing happened. I left it in there for five minutes. Do I have to run a program to get it to act on the 'in' queue (I presume that there is a "runner" that is always looking and taking care of this already as I presume this is the queue where all 'normal' traffic is handled). Here are the (obfusacted) results of "mailman qfile /opt/mailman/mm/var/queue/shunt/1675389793.6945386+2aeaf0015558c9d8380c96142c3fa9d03a8142bc.psv" (the message I was experimenting with): [----- start pickle -----] <----- start object 1 -----> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: THE-list subscription notification From: email(a)obfuscated.com To: the-list-owner(a)lists.obfuscated.com Message-ID: <167538979369.2390432.521344217673230839(a)obfuscated.net> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 18:03:13 -0800 Precedence: bulk user(a)domain.tld has been successfully subscribed to THE-list. <----- start object 2 -----> { '_parsemsg': False, 'envsender': 'email(a)obfuscated.com', 'listid': 'the-list.obfusacted.com', 'nodecorate': True, 'recipients': {'person(a)domain.tld'}, 'reduced_list_headers': True, 'version': 3} [----- end pickle -----] >> Also, what exactly is the bad queue? > > If Mailman's content filtering is enabled and Filter Action is Preserve, > messages which have no remaining content after content filtering are put > in the 'bad' queue. These are the only messages put there. When this > happens there should a log message like > > <message-id> preserved in file base <queue_file> > > It is unclear to me how these 1000+ messages wound up in the 'bad' queue. > If you have logs from Feb 2, they might help. My guess is there was some > MTA misrouting that caused these list welcome messages (from some mass > subscribe?) to be rerouted to the list posting address combined with some > bad content filtering settings that removed all the content, but that > seems pretty far fetched. Unfortunately, I don't have logs going that far back. I don't think your concept is far fetched. I'm 99% sure this was the day that the migration from V2 to V3 took place so this was certainly the result of some type of mass-subscription-import into V3. The V3 that was installed or the install itself definitely had problems, which is why I just did an upgrade/overhaul to V3.3.8 this past week. Many/most of the strange issues that were occurring seem to be cleared up.

2 years, 11 months

Search results for query "sapiro"