Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Mailman3 without Hyperkitty in docker

by Danil Smirnov

Hi Abhilash, Thank you very much - the previous error is fixed now. But I have another one now, which causes the same 500 Server Error: bash-4.3# cat /opt/mailman-web-data/logs/uwsgi-error.log *** Starting uWSGI 2.0.18 (64bit) on [Fri Mar 1 05:42:09 2019] *** compiled with version: 6.3.0 on 01 March 2019 01:52:42 os: Linux-3.10.0-693.11.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 4 23:52:40 UTC 2017 nodename: mailman-web machine: x86_64 clock source: unix detected number of CPU cores: 2 current working directory: /opt/mailman-web detected binary path: /usr/local/bin/uwsgi !!! no internal routing support, rebuild with pcre support !!! setgid() to 101 setuid() to 100 chdir() to /opt/mailman-web your memory page size is 4096 bytes detected max file descriptor number: 1048576 building mime-types dictionary from file /etc/mime.types...1168 entry found lock engine: pthread robust mutexes thunder lock: disabled (you can enable it with --thunder-lock) uwsgi socket 0 bound to TCP address 0.0.0.0:8080 fd 8 uwsgi socket 1 bound to TCP address 0.0.0.0:8000 fd 9 Python version: 3.6.8 (default, Jan 30 2019, 23:58:16) [GCC 6.3.0] Python main interpreter initialized at 0x55a2df7f57e0 python threads support enabled your server socket listen backlog is limited to 100 connections your mercy for graceful operations on workers is 60 seconds mapped 166752 bytes (162 KB) for 2 cores *** Operational MODE: threaded *** Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/utils/module_loading.py", line 20, in import_string return getattr(module, class_name) AttributeError: module 'django.contrib.auth.middleware' has no attribute 'SessionAuthenticationMiddleware' The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception: Traceback (most recent call last): File "wsgi.py", line 38, in <module> application = get_wsgi_application() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/wsgi.py", line 13, in get_wsgi_application return WSGIHandler() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/handlers/wsgi.py", line 136, in __init__ self.load_middleware() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", line 34, in load_middleware middleware = import_string(middleware_path) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/utils/module_loading.py", line 24, in import_string ) from err ImportError: Module "django.contrib.auth.middleware" does not define a "SessionAuthenticationMiddleware" attribute/class unable to load app 0 (mountpoint='') (callable not found or import error) *** no app loaded. going in full dynamic mode *** *** uWSGI is running in multiple interpreter mode *** spawned uWSGI master process (pid: 1) spawned uWSGI worker 1 (pid: 37, cores: 2) --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- As per my investigation, this error possibly caused by Django upgrade: *The SessionAuthenticationMiddleware class is removed. It provided no functionality since session authentication is unconditionally enabled in Django 1.10.* See https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.0/releases/2.0/ After I've removed the line https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman/blob/master/postorius/mailman-web… from settings.py, the container is finally working. I've placed PR in github: https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman/pull/314 Thank you for your help. Danil пт, 1 мар. 2019 г. в 04:33, Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in>: > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, at 5:19 PM, Abhilash Raj wrote: > > On February 27, 2019 11:53:34 PM PST, Danil Smirnov <danil(a)smirnov.la> > wrote: > > >Hi Mark, > > > > > >Actually all this stuff happens inside the container after it's started > > >and > > >initialized without errors. I didn't amend the image anyhow. > > > > > >Also I have the configuration based on docker-compose.yaml provided in > > >the > > >repository which works just fine for mailman-web image. > > > > > >The very same config with postorius image (+ UWSGI_STATIC_MAP param) > > >fails > > >with 500 error... > > > > > >Now answering your questions: > > > > > >ср, 27 февр. 2019 г., 22:56 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net>: > > > > > >> do you have django-q in INSTALLED_APPS in your Django settings and > > >what > > >> is set for Q_CLUSTER? > > >> > > > > > >I've checked settings.py inside the container and I haven't found any > > >of > > >the mentioned configurations there. > > > > > >Does the manage.py that's being run here point to the right > > >settings.py? > > >> > > > > > >No clue. > > > > > >Also I wonder why we have some Hyperkitty-related cronjobs in non-HK > > >configured image? > > > > > > > https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman/blob/master/postorius/mailman-web… > > > > Because I am a dum dum ;-) > > > > Will work on removing those crons and stuff. Would be nice if you > > opened an issue on Github so that I don't forget. > > Should now be fixed in the latest image. > > > > > >Danil > > > > > > > > > > > >> -- > > >> Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > > >> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. > > >Dylan > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > > >> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > > >> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > > >> > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > > >To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > > >https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > > > > > > -- > > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > -- > thanks, > Abhilash Raj (maxking) >

7 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: Error after HyperKitty 1.3.x upgrade

by Florian Schulze

On 2 Jul 2020, at 8:38, Florian Schulze wrote: > On 30 Jun 2020, at 8:22, Florian Schulze wrote: > >> On 29 Jun 2020, at 23:40, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >>> On 6/29/20 1:38 AM, Florian Schulze wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> After upgrading to HyperKitty 1.3.x I get the following error for >>>> qcluster: >>>> >>>> File ".../lib/python3.7/site-packages/django_q/cluster.py", line >>>> 300, >>>> in pusher >>>> task = SignedPackage.loads(task[1]) >>>> File ".../lib/python3.7/site-packages/django_q/signing.py", line >>>> 31, >>>> in loads >>>> serializer=PickleSerializer) >>>> File ".../lib/python3.7/site-packages/django_q/core_signing.py", >>>> line >>>> 38, in loads >>>> return serializer().loads(data) >>>> File ".../lib/python3.7/site-packages/django_q/signing.py", line >>>> 44, >>>> in loads >>>> return pickle.loads(data) >>>> AttributeError: Can't get attribute 'process_task_result' on >>>> <module >>>> 'hyperkitty.tasks' from >>>> '.../lib/python3.7/site-packages/hyperkitty/tasks.py'> >>>> >>>> How do I recover from that? It seems like there are still persisted >>>> tasks in the qcluster queue using the old code from 1.2.x with the >>>> old >>>> locking implementation. >>> >>> Have you stopped ans started qcluster since upgrading? >> >> Yes >> >>> Are you running the Django periodic jobs? >> >> They were disabled because of the errors (someone else did the >> upgrade). I have enabled them again and will watch it and report >> back. > > The cronjobs seem to work fine, no errors so far. > > The queue doesn't seem to change at all. In "qmonitor" there is > nothing listed and the statusline remains the same at > ORM default Queued 303(118) > Success 100 Failures > 0 I managed to figure out how to inspect the queue in the admin interface. I just deleted all the repeatedly failing tasks and ran all cron jobs. I hope it is fine now. Regards, Florian Schulze

6 years

[MM3-users] Re: Emergency moderation and clearing out a lot of held messages

by Abhilash Raj

On 12/14/22 03:31, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 12/13/22 10:38, Dan Caballero wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> I ran the commands and it took about 35 seconds for the loop to run. >> >> Here's the result. >> >>>>> count >> 4168 > > > So that's at least part of the issue. How does 35 seconds compare to the > length of time to process one moderated message through Postorius? > Probably should've read more of the thread before previous reply ;-) So, the issue _could_ be due to latency to the remote database vs local database that we have on m.p.o. Mailman3 is not very efficient when it comes to total no. of database queries done per operation, which is something I have been (very slowly) tracking and fixing on a case-by-case basis. So, for example, handling 1 held message in m.p.o made 1.1k postgres database calls in total and even though they were each only few hundred micro-seconds each, the total added up to roughly ~2sec avg response time on the handle message API endpoint. If you handle more than 1, it scales linearly. My suspicion is that in your case Dan, due to a remote instance, the latency per call is higher (maybe in the order of few or 10s of milliseconds is my guess?) and then depending on the total no. of entries you have in pendings and pendedkeyvalue tables (with some filters, not _all_ entries), it adds up to a high value. The no. of database calls here is of order n^2, where n is the entries in pendings of type "held message" and "data" and their respective linked relationships in pendedkeyvalue table. My MR makes it such that we don't need to scan all entries of "type"="data", so that part will become constant time. And the pending of type "held message" will be limited to no. of held messages in a single MailingList(compared to all mailing lists like today), so it will help depending on the distribution of held messages in various lists. I am also exploring ways to make that 2nd query also constant time. -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

3 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: About to Install MM3 -- Seeking clarification

by Onyeibo Oku

On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 08:00:19 -0700 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 10/22/22 21:29, Onyeibo Oku wrote: > > > > Now Mailman starts, and stops as desired when running as mailman > > user (both in virtual and non-virtual environments). However, > > running the service via systemd still fails. I now get a different > > traceback: > > > > Oct 23 03:43:00 mail.server.tld mailman[19410]: Traceback (most > > recent call last): > ... > > Oct 23 03:43:00 mail.server.tld mailman[19410]: with > > open(self._claimfile, 'w') as fp: Oct 23 03:43:00 mail.server.tld > > mailman[19410]: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: > > '/opt/mailman/mm/var/locks/mailman-cfg.lck|server.tld|19410|619270043958240354' > > Oct 23 03:43:00 mail.server.tld systemd[1]: mailman3.service: > > Control process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE > > What are ownership and permissions on /opt/mailman/mm/var/locks/ > > Assuming they are > > drwxr-xr-x mailman mailman > > it must be the case that systemd is not running the > `/opt/mailman/venv/bin/mailman start` command as the `mailman` user. > I suspect this is a Fedora issue. I note that > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/understanding-and-administe… > does not mention User or Group. You might try replacing > ``` > ExecStart=/opt/mailman/venv/bin/mailman start > ExecReload=/opt/mailman/venv/bin/mailman restart > ExecStop=/opt/mailman/venv/bin/mailman stop > > with > > ExecStart=sudo -u mailman /opt/mailman/venv/bin/mailman start > ExecReload=sudo -u mailman /opt/mailman/venv/bin/mailman restart > ExecStop=sudo -u mailman /opt/mailman/venv/bin/mailman stop > ``` > This does not work. Systemd says it cannot find sudo (file). After updating in the commands "sudo" to "/bin/sudo" afterwards Systemd throws a different error message: PermissionError on /bin/sudo This is tiring. At this moment I am left with the possibility that SELinux may be in the way. I cannot think of a way to prove this hypothesis. This is speculation. Perhaps I should try another installation method other than Virtual. I found Mailman3 in Fedora repository. Yes, it is packaged. May be I should try that or perhaps I should try the git version. I'd be happy to have a functioning Mailman before Friday. Regards Onyeibo

3 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: Archive search failing on one list

by Mark

On Sat, 2023-09-23 at 20:28 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > What if you do something like the following where django-admin is > whatever command you use for the Django admin command. > ``` > $ django-admin shell > Python 3.9.16 (main, Dec 11 2022, 12:49:23) > [GCC 9.4.0] on linux > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more > information. > (InteractiveConsole) > >>> from hyperkitty.models.mailinglist import MailingList > >>> mlist_name = 'listname(a)domain.com' > >>> mlist = MailingList.objects.get(name=mlist_name) > >>> mlist > <MailingList listname(a)domain.com (listname.domain.com)> > >>> > ``` Hi Mark, I'm still on this problem of one list's archive-search not returning any results. I created a new list today and it also has the same problem. In short, the older lists all seem fine -- their search results are up- to-date so that tells me the cron is okay. It's just these 2 newer lists that have the problem. It's taken me while to get my head around the Django admin command you have suggested, as I kept getting an error when starting: #django-admin shell >>> from hyperkitty.models.mailinglist import MailingList ... django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured ... That sent me down a rabbit hole which I haven't emerged from yet. But instead, starting with # python3 manage.py shell ... # python3 manage.py shell Python 3.9.2 (default, Feb 28 2021, 17:03:44) [GCC 10.2.1 20210110] on linux Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. (InteractiveConsole) >>> from hyperkitty.models.mailinglist import MailingList >>> mlist_name = 'thepost(a)example.com' >>> mlist = MailingList.objects.get(name=mlist_name) >>> mlist <MailingList: <MailingList thepost(a)example.com>> >>> The format of my final line is different to yours ... Mine: <MailingList: <MailingList thepost(a)example.com>> Yours: <MailingList listname(a)domain.com (listname.domain.com)> Does this (missing list_id) give any clue as to why the archive-search isn't working, or is just that starting with "# python3 manage.py shell" is the wrong thing to do? By the way, the list_id shows correctly in the SQL query result. select * from hyperkitty_mailinglist where name like 'thepost(a)example.com'; ... name | thepost(a)example.com | list_id | thepost.example.com ... Any ideas appreciated. Mark

2 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: Templates

by David Krantz

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > Have you tried restarting/reloading whatever dbm (MySQL, PostgreSQL, ?) > you are using? No, that would have been strange to me; the table in the database was up to date. But now I tried that, I got no effect this time but I probably could set up a better test. I also had another problem [solved]: I get the error message "Multiple rows were found for one_or_none" when I try TemplateManager.get(name, context) for the list. There is only one matching row in the templates table so something is fishy with the ORM. This occured when I changed to the previous uri value. As the database does not have any duplicates in the templates table I suspect either a broken join or that the cache retains the old value. The traceback looks like this in the mailman shell: >>> tm.get('list:member:regular:footer', 'test.example.com') Traceback (most recent call last): File "<console>", line 1, in <module> File ".../venv-3.5/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mailman-3.2.0a1-py3.5.egg/mailman/database/transaction.py", line 85, in wrapper return function(args[0], config.db.store, *args[1:], **kws) File ".../venv-3.5/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mailman-3.2.0a1-py3.5.egg/mailman/model/template.py", line 98, in get contents = cache_mgr.get(actual_uri) File ".../venv-3.5/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mailman-3.2.0a1-py3.5.egg/mailman/database/transaction.py", line 85, in wrapper return function(args[0], config.db.store, *args[1:], **kws) File ".../venv-3.5/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mailman-3.2.0a1-py3.5.egg/mailman/model/cache.py", line 125, in get CacheEntry.key == key).one_or_none() File ".../venv-3.5/lib/python3.5/site-packages/SQLAlchemy-1.2.0b2-py3.5-linux-x86_64.egg/sqlalchemy/orm/query.py", line 2814, in one_or_none "Multiple rows were found for one_or_none()") sqlalchemy.orm.exc.MultipleResultsFound: Multiple rows were found for one_or_none() Workaround: Delete cached files in .../var/cache and run delete from file_cache in postgresql. Then that works again. The culprit was that the file got cached twice so there is a bug in the cache function. I used the ITemplateManager-util in the shell to cause the problem. >> 2. the $user_delivered_to and $user_email do not expand for some >> reason. Known problem? > > > These require that the list delivery be personalized. See > <http://mailman.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/mailman/runners/docs/outgoing.h…>. > That explains things. Thank you! Now I got two footers, first one without personalisation and one personalised. Interesting. best regards // David

8 years, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: templates

by Odhiambo Washington

On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 12:38 AM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 5/4/23 13:13, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > Isn't that the same thing as not having them in the FS? > > If your installation is in a venv for example, the base templates are in > venv/lib/python3.x/site-packages/mailman/templates/. Isn't that part of > the FS? > <Confession> This is new knowledge that I did not posses previously as I have never seen it mentioned anywhere in the documentation that I have read. Maybe I was going to come to it one day. In the documentation that I have read, even the one from this <https://wiki.list.org/DOC/Mailman%203%20installation%20experience>, I never imagined about the presence of some defaults so I copied the ones that you shared and edited them. I had made a point of asking a question around this statement: "There are several default templates that have incorrect or generic URLs for the web UI. To make these better, I installed these templates in /opt/mailman/mm/var/templates/site/en/ as follows.." from the above link, but it kinda escaped me. I had wondered where they were. In those days, MM3 installation process was still as scary as hell for many people, me being one of them, or was it the scare of the snake (Python) :-) True story - also one that can be gleaned from the myriad stupid questions I asked on the MM3 list over the years - it took me years to get to wrap my head around MM3! I find it hard to imagine that I have become a great supporter for this thing that scared me for ages, since the days when it was in BETA. The venv example has made the process very easy. In fact, after you and Abhilash helped me internalize what a venv is, I have been able to comfortably run other projects in virtualenv. These days I can install MM3 in just a few hours - getting all the components running - Core, Web, MTA, and Apache (whether with uWSGI, mod-wsgi or Gunicorn). </Confession> And I continue to learn new things everyday. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

3 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: Huge performance issue: Mailman doesn't (seem to) receive any mails.

by Henrik Rasmussen

Henrik Rasmussen wrote: > Abhilash Raj wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019, at 8:14 AM, Mark Sapiro > > wrote: > > each other, but Postfix is trying to deliver > > mail via lmtp to > > [172.19.199.2]:8024. Mailman's lmtp runner should be running and > > listening on port 8024. Either that is not the case or that port is not > > exposed to Postfix on IP 172.19.199.2. > > Right, that is what I was wondering, you verify that by using telnet > > on the specified IP and Port (172.19.199.2:8024). > > Yes, the postfix container listens on 172.19.199.2:8024 > [root@postfix /]# nc -v 172.19.199.2 8024 > Ncat: Version 7.50 ( https://nmap.org/ncat ) > Ncat: Connected to 172.19.199.2:8024. > 220 mailman-core GNU Mailman LMTP runner 2.0 > > > docker-compose ps lists all the running containers, > > do you see all > > the containers running? > > That also seem to be okay > [root@lstapp01pl ~]# docker ps > CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED > STATUS PORTS > NAMES > bddc80799b8c maxking/mailman-web:0.2 "docker-entrypoint.sh" 16 hours ago > Up 16 hours 8000/tcp, 8080/tcp > mailman-web > be098b18aeca maxking/mailman-core:0.2 "docker-entrypoint.sh" 16 hours ago > Up 16 hours 8001/tcp, 8024/tcp > mailman-core > c47fd8ccf19d postgres:9.6 "docker-entrypoint.sh" 16 hours ago > Up 16 hours 5432/tcp > mailman_database_1 > 699264501acd mailman3-mime_htmlizer "container-entrypoint" 16 hours ago > Up 16 hours 8080/tcp > postmime > 90f381a74709 mailman3-postfix:v1.1 "./entrypoint.sh" 16 hours ago > Up 16 hours 0.0.0.0:465->465/tcp, 0.0.0.0:587->587/tcp, > 0.0.0.0:26->25/tcp postfix > > And netstat in the mailman-core container shows: > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State > tcp 0 0 172.19.199.2:8024 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN` > > > You mentioned that Mailman is not receiving enough > > emails, do you get > > any emails from Mailman? I am trying to see if this is a perf problem > > or if Mailman's LMTP isn't reachable at all. > > Mailman do send out mails like when someone signs up for an account. > Thanks to both. And the runner is running: `Sep 19 06:55:06 2019 (36) b'220 mailman-core GNU Mailman LMTP runner 2.0`

6 years, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: Mailman installation results in KeyError: 'env_py'

by Marvin Gülker

Am 22. October 2017 um 07:49 Uhr -0700 schrieb Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net>: > or you can install the fix at Thanks. Applying this patch makes it work. Now I've got a different problem, though. I can't get it to connect to Postfix for sending emails it appears. After I created a superuser account using $ python manage.py createsuperuser as described on <http://postorius.readthedocs.io/en/latest/setup.html>, I tried to login using this credentials into Postorius. It then reported it sent a confirmation email to me (for an account I created on commandline?!), but Postfix' logs reveal that it didn't; there's not even a sign of an attempted delivery in /var/log/mail.log. I've configured the Postfix configuration in mailman.cfg like this: [mta] incoming: mailman.mta.postfix.LMTP outgoing: mailman.mta.deliver.deliver lmtp_host: 127.0.0.1 lmtp_port: 8024 smtp_host: localhost smtp_port: 25 configuration: python:mailman.config.postfix as was outlined on <http://mailman.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/mailman/docs/mta.html>. mailman-suite's settings.py contains: # Change this when you have a real email backend EMAIL_BACKEND = 'django.core.mail.backends.smtp.EmailBackend' EMAIL_HOST = 'localhost' EMAIL_PORT = 25 which was described on <http://docs.list.org/en/latest/config-web.html>. For completeness, the following is in Postfix' main.cf, but is not the cause of the problem as it affects the incoming direction, whereas I refer to the outgoing one: transport_maps = hash:/home/mailman/var/data/postfix_lmtp local_recipient_maps = hash:/home/mailman/var/data/postfix_lmtp I failed to locate any kind of logging information about the failed email, so I don't even know where I should start looking for the problem. var/logs/smtp.log is empty in the mailman directory, and likewise is logs/mailmansuite.log in the mailman-suite_project directory. That being said, the enormous number of configuration files to consider and dozens of cross-references to other pages in the docs make the installation guide hard to follow; it also lacks logical structure in my opinion, when it refers to parts of the configuration which are later explained. For someone like me who never programmed a Django application (Ruby dev) this is all pretty cryptic. Especially, that some parts of information are on <http://docs.list.org/en/latest/index.html> whereas other parts are scattered over readthedocs.io makes it very complicated. Greetings Marvin -- Blog: https://www.guelkerdev.de PGP/GPG ID: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F

8 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: Subscription issue with ghost confirmations

by Brian Carpenter

On 10/29/20 11:33 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 10/29/20 5:23 AM, Brian Carpenter wrote: >> I have a list owner who had his subscription policy set to confirm. >> Apparently that was too hard for his list members to handle so he >> changed it to moderate only. If someone sent a subscription request that >> needed to be confirm, did not respond to it, and then tried subscribing >> again after the member policy changed to moderate, their 2nd >> subscription attempt still shows up in the confirmation queue. Is that >> normal behavior. My understanding is it is. Please let me know if I am >> wrong here. > > Are you certain that the request waiting confirmation is the second one > and not the first? Good point and I am not sure. I will try to note that if this pops up again. > > >> The real mystery here is when someone tried subscribing again >> (listname-subscribe@listdomain) hours after the subscription policy was >> changed to moderate and they still showed up in the confirm queue. How >> is that possible? I tested the list with two of my addresses and both >> showed up in the moderation queue as expected. As far as I can tell from >> the mailman logs, this was the person's first attempt at subscribing. > > I suspect it was not the first attempt and that the subscription waiting > confirmation was requested when the policy was confirm. The confirmation moderation notice had the date-time stamp that came a few hours AFTER the subscription policy was changed. Also I only saw one confirmation request sent out via Postfix' mail.log. I saw no other for this subscriber. Same thing with the smtp.log. I cannot duplicate this behavior when I try to subscribe. My subscription attempts went straight to moderation. > > The real question is if a user has a subscription waiting confirmation > and the policy is changed to moderate, is a second request rejected > because of the request waiting confirmation. If so, I think this is a > bug which should be fixed. > Do you think this is a bug with Mailman core or my system? -- Brian Carpenter Harmonylists.com Emwd.com

5 years, 8 months

Search results for query "sapiro"