Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Moving existing lists to a new domain

by Jeremy Stanley

On 2024-09-18 16:36:50 -0700 (-0700), Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 9/18/24 10:13, Jeremy Stanley wrote: [...] > > Since all the lists for the given domain will be moving to the same > > unused new domain on the existing server, and can move at the same > > time, I suppose this could be done through (offline if necessary) > > backend database update queries. [...] > ``` > UPDATE mailinglist SET mail_host = 'new.domain' WHERE mail_host = > 'old_domain'; > ``` [...] > ``` > UPDATE mailinglist SET list_id = CONCAT(list_name, '.', mail_host) WHERE > mail_host = 'new_domain'; > ``` > For HyperKitty, similar changes need to be made to the > hyperkitty_mailinglist table. The `name` column entries need to be changed > from `listname(a)old.domain` to `listname(a)new.domain` and the `list_id` column > entries need to be changed from `listname.old.domain` to > `listname.new.domain` Preparing to test this, I poked around the schema a bit and noticed that the domain names are also embedded as strings in the following fields: django_mailman3_maildomain.mail_domain django_site.domain django_site.name domain.mail_host Can anyone think of any additional tables/columns which would need updating for this? I'll see if scanning a dump of the full DB content turns up anything I might be missing too. Thanks again! -- Jeremy Stanley

1 year, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: Mailman notify generating emails for request that aren't visible.

by Abhilash Raj

> On Nov 1, 2021, at 9:07 AM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > On 10/31/21 10:42 PM, Simon Coggins wrote: >> Looking at the code in gitlab it looks like it wasn’t merged until 1.3.6: >> https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/blob/1.3.6/src/postorius/urls.py#L53 >> But it’s not in 1.3.5: >> https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/blob/1.3.5/src/postorius/urls.py#L49 > > > Yes, I was mistaken. That code was merged on 14 Feb 2021 and is not in Postorius 1.3.4 which was released on 2 Feb. It should have been in 1.3.5 and I don't know why it is not at https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/blob/1.3.5/src/postorius/urls.py#L49, but that is moot in any case. > 1.3.5 was a security release with no fixed included. It was branched off from 1.3.4 and only the security fix was applied. One Gitlab pro tip is when you are trying to determine which particular release a particular commit is included in, you can click on the the “…” three dots next to "parent 6096958a master” just under the title and it will show all the tags and branches that this commit is included in. https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/commit/0aba874cae15b1baae2839dca57d3… for example, is included in 1.3.6b1, 1.3.6 and jquery and master branch. -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

4 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Show diplay_name in a list

by Abhilash Raj

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019, at 6:33 AM, Joel Lord wrote: > On 9/29/19 5:59 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> Any idea what I was missing there? > > Often, member.display_name doesn't exist or is "None". > This seems to also be the problem that I submitted a while back (6 > months ago?) that the notification to the moderator of subscription > requests, which should include both display name and email address of > the requestor, only has the email address. We've been trying to track > the problem down in code but it keeps going deeper and deeper... This should be the UI trying to unconditionally convert a Python object to string. Name string transforms correctly, but since the absence of a name is denoted by a None object (as opposed to an empty string ''), the renderer mindlessly converts it to "None". It could be fixed with a simple {% if member.display_name is not None %}{{ member.display_name }}{% endif %} in the right place in the Django template. > > -- > Joel Lord > Web Administrator, Alpha Psi Omega Grand Cast > etc... etc... etc... > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

7 years

[MM3-users] Re: Whitelist non subscriber

by Stephan Krinetzki

Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 08/06/2018 06:43 AM, Stephan Krinetzki wrote: > > > The steps are as follows, right? > > - Add users to the list and give the role "nonmember" > > - Set moderation action ('defer' or 'accept') > > Right. Good. So i understand it :) > > > > The only thing missing in the documentation is a note on how to do > > this via the Admin API. Who can explain that to me? > > Can you be more specific about what you are looking for? If by "Admin > API" you mean the REST API, are you asking how to interact with it or > what specific POST/PUT/PATCH commands to send? > > Or are you asking about the 'mailman shell' command? > With Admin API I mean the REST API from the localhost. Whether it's the REST API, the Mailman shell or the Admin API, I personally don't care. The only important thing is that we can set and use this role. However, I think that's settled anyway, since you're writing > > Also, we want to expose the nonmember role in Postorius and enable > setting moderation action for nonmembers, but we didn't get that in MM > 3.2/Postorius 1.2. So the whitelistening is not working at the moment, right?

8 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Subscription requires confirmation when list is set as Open

by Joachim Schrod

Mark Sapiro writes: > > > I maintain a mailing list for a private holiday where people don't > > subscribe themselves; I subscribe them. I have vetted their email > > address beforehand. (The subscribers are mostly not able to handle a > > verification email, nor any email-based workflow at all.) Is there a > > configuration option for a mailing list that sets "Pre Verified" to > > true as a default? > > > This is https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/563 it was fixed > by https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/merge_requests/930 which was > later extended by > https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/merge_requests/945 however these > are not available until Postorius 1.3.14 which is not yet released. > > These add a setting, POSTORIUS_DEFAULTS, which can be used to set these > defaults. E.g., setting > > POSTORIUS_DEFAULTS = {'mass_subscription_pre_verify': True} > > will set the default for Pre Verified to True. So far, the only defaults > that can be set in this manner are mass_subscription_pre_confirm, > mass_subscription_pre_approve, mass_subscription_pre_verify and > mass_subscription_invite and those not until Postorius 1.3.14, but more > may be added. Thanks a lot for this info -- I'm looking forward for an upcoming Postorius 1.3.14 release! ;-) :-) Happy holidays and a good new year to everyone, Joachim

1 year, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: Importing config and archives only partially succeeded?

by Eric Broens

Hi Mark, 1.Regarding the repeated access of /archives/api/mailman/urls seems to be related to mailman not being able to open port 25. This is weird because other mails have been distributed. The mailman log shows:Dec 12 22:16:48 2020 (1471) ACCEPT: < message id > Dec 12 22:16:52 2020 (1474) Cannot connect to SMTP server localhost on port 25 webserver logs:<host > - - [12/Dec/2020:22:16:50 +0100] "GET /archives/api/mailman/urls ?mlist=...&key=*** HTTP/1.1" 200 64 "-" "python-requests/2.25.0" <host > - - [12/Dec/2020:22:16:52 +0100] "GET /archives/api/mailman/urls?mlist=...&msgid=< message id >&key=*** HTTP/1.1" 200 105 "-" "python-requests/2.25.0" This last entry is repeated forever (until I stop the mailserver for a few minutes, but later on this happens again for other mails too). 2..Regarding the mails on the archive page, for most of the lists it is solved now. So probably one of the periodic jobs fixed that.The mailinglist which showed 0 participants 0 subscribers, does show now 0 participants 66 discussions.I have checked the member tables, and the members for this mailinglist are included there. 3.What I notice now too is that the hourly runjobs tasks don't seem to finish.I would have to check what they exactly do. Can I somehow activate logging for these? mailman 300042 300016 1 08:00 ? 00:09:18 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/python3 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/django-admin runjobs hourly --pythonpath /opt/mailman/mailman-suite/mailman-suite_project --settings settingsmailman 302158 302149 2 09:00 ? 00:09:10 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/python3 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/django-admin runjobs hourly --pythonpath /opt/mailman/mailman-suite/mailman-suite_project --settings settingsmailman 304513 304506 2 10:00 ? 00:09:38 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/python3 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/django-admin runjobs hourly --pythonpath /opt/mailman/mailman-suite/mailman-suite_project --settings settingsmailman 308631 308620 3 11:00 ? 00:09:29 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/python3 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/django-admin runjobs hourly --pythonpath /opt/mailman/mailman-suite/mailman-suite_project --settings settingsmailman 312847 312832 3 12:00 ? 00:09:15 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/python3 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/django-admin runjobs hourly --pythonpath /opt/mailman/mailman-suite/mailman-suite_project --settings settingsmailman 317343 317332 4 13:00 ? 00:09:20 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/python3 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/django-admin runjobs hourly --pythonpath /opt/mailman/mailman-suite/mailman-suite_project --settings settingsmailman 320079 320072 7 14:00 ? 00:09:08 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/python3 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/django-admin runjobs hourly --pythonpath /opt/mailman/mailman-suite/mailman-suite_project --settings settingsmailman 322618 322610 13 15:00 ? 00:08:54 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/python3 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/django-admin runjobs hourly --pythonpath /opt/mailman/mailman-suite/mailman-suite_project --settings settingsmailman 325205 325198 84 16:00 ? 00:06:56 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/python3 /opt/mailman/venv/bin/django-admin runjobs hourly --pythonpath /opt/mailman/mailman-suite/mailman-suite_project --settings settings Best Regards,Eric On Sunday, December 13, 2020, 06:29:19 AM GMT+1, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: On 12/12/20 7:40 PM, Eric Broens via Mailman-users wrote: > There are no messages in var/archives/hyperkitty/spool/. At this time of the night (4:40 AM local time), there is no incoming mail. I'm not sure what is causing the repeated access of /archives/api/mailman/urls... This call comes from Mailman core in order to request the URL at which a message will be archived. It is called from mailman/src/mailman/handlers/rfc_2369.py when adding the Archived-At: header and from mailman/src/mailman/handlers/decorate.py in order to get the hyperkitty_url replacement value. I don't understand why it would be called repeatedly for the same message. Are there any clues in mailman.log. > I just noticed when clicking on "All Threads" or "Threads by month", the emails are displayed. The statistic however shows that there were no mails in the past month, while there actually are.When clicking "Recent", "Most Active", etc. the page shows "No discussions this month (yet)." What if you look at "threads by month" and select the current month? > Another observation. For one list, which is one of the more active ones, the bar diagram is not empty, while showing 0 participants and 0 discussions (see attached screenshot).This one however shows the mailthreads when opening the list. I think the basic issue is when you see no messages, HyperKitty, for whatever reason thinks there are no current messages. I'm not sure, but if there are recent posts, are they all in threads started more than 30 days ago? As far as all the participants/discussions counts being zero, I think one of the periodic jobs will fix that (possibly the daily recent_threads_cache job) -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

5 years, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: Enable delivery

by Hirayama, Pat

Apologies, I should've said my "Mailman 3" server, not listserv. MTA logs do not show messages being sent to the member(s) in question, even though other members are being sent messages. Nothing out of the mailman server, and nothing received by our outbound Postfix MTAs. As for the CLI commands, I keep getting Attribute Error when I try them, like: /opt/mailman # mailman shell -l listname(a)mailman.tld Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell Use commit() to commit changes. Use abort() to discard changes since the last commit. Exit with ctrl+D does an implicit commit() but exit() does not. The variable 'm' is the listname(a)mailman.tld mailing list >>> from mailman.core.constants import system_preferences >>> mbr = m.members.get_member('user(a)domain.com.') >>> print(mbr.delivery_status) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<console>", line 1, in <module> AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'delivery_status' >>> Thanks, -p Pat Hirayama Pronouns: he/him/his Systems Engineer IT | Systems Engineering Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center O 206.667.4856 phirayam(a)fredhutch.org ________________________________ From: Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 18:38 To: mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> Subject: [MM3-users] Re: Enable delivery CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. On 12/9/24 17:35, Hirayama, Pat wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm finding something a bit odd with our listserv. Please see https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://wiki.list.org/DOC/Mailman*20is*20not*20… > Some of the members of some of the lists are reporting that they aren't receiving messages sent to the list. When I review the member options for the person in question, I see that Delivery Status shows nothing selected (i.e. neither radio button is selected for Enabled or Disabled). If you look in the MTA logs is mail being sent to them. As far as the Delivery Status showing nothing, that means the member's delivery_status is None. The ultimate delivery status is determined by checking first the member's delivery_status, then the address's delivery_status, then the user's delivery_status and finally Mailman's global preferences. The first non-None value is what's used. See https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/maste… Also see the various tabs at https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.example.com/mailman3/accounts/subsc… > If I select Enabled and Save, then delivery starts working for that user. This should only happen if the users address or user based preference or the global preference is Disabled. > There are other members of the list that have neither Enabled or Disabled selected, but they are working. Which also seems to mean that when I run: > > mailman members --nomail any listname@listserv > > Nothing is returned. Because all members ultimately have delivery enabled. > If anyone has any ideas about why this might be the case, or how I might proactively identify other members who aren't receiving mail, that would be appreciated. Alternately, any thoughts on how I might force all members to Delivery Status Enabled, that would also be great. It shouldn't be necessary to do that. For one of these members, e.g. user(a)example.com, that isn't getting mail, do this in mailman shell ``` mailman shell -l list(a)example.com Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell Use commit() to commit changes. Use abort() to discard changes since the last commit. Exit with ctrl+D does an implicit commit() but exit() does not. The variable 'm' is the list(a)example.com mailing list >>> from mailman.core.constants import system_preferences >>> mbr = m.members.get_member('user(a)example.com') >>> print(mbr.delivery_status) (this will print the ultimate delivery_status, for the components do) >>> print(mbr.preferences.delivery_status) (output) >>> print(mbr.address.preferences.delivery_status) (output) >>> print(mbr.address.user.preferences.delivery_status) (output) >>> print(system_preferences.delivery_status) (output) >>> ``` The first of the (output) lines which is not None should be the same as the output from print(mbr.delivery_status). -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailm… Archived at: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailma… This message sent to phirayam(a)fredhutch.org

1 year, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: Rejection Reason for refusing a subscription request

by Abhilash Raj

> On Mar 27, 2021, at 3:03 PM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > On 3/27/21 2:08 PM, Brian Carpenter wrote: >> I was testing out the process of rejecting an incoming subscription >> request. Choosing the reject option for a moderated subscription request >> does send out a rejection notice but it gives no reason for the >> rejection. > ... >> Is there a place somewhere in Postorius to provide a rejection reasons >> for moderated subscription requests? Does Mailman 3 core provide this >> via its REST api but it is just not revealed in Postorius yet? > > > It's in Postorius since 1.3.3. If in the held message view, you click > the subject of a held message, you get a popup dialog the shows the > message with options to also show headers or the raw message. There is > also a dropdown t=o set the poster's moderation action and a box for a > reject reason if you click the reject button in the dialog. > > Do you not see this? I guess Brian was asking about Subscription Requests. Support for specifying reason when rejecting subscription requests has been added in master and will be a part of next release, 1.3.5 most probably. -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

5 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: mailman3 postorius cannot retrieve template

by Andreas Barth

* Quanah Gibson-Mount (quanah(a)symas.com) [211104 22:59]: > > > --On Thursday, November 4, 2021 8:25 AM -0700 Mark Sapiro > <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > >On 11/4/21 5:04 AM, Wolfgang Bock via Mailman-users wrote: > >> > >>My conclusion: > >>I ask you to consider these experiences in an update for the mailman3 > >>packages in debian bullseye. It would save time, questions and nerves. > > > > > >Issues with Debian packaging should be directed to Debian. > > Or as previously discussed, the debian packages should be avoided entirely. I strongly disagree with that statement. Distribution packages have their own up- and downsides. Of course, how they are done is to be discussed with the distribution, so: if something is wrong with a debian package, please follow the instructions on bugs.debian.org on reporting bugs. However, they have the advantage that they're integrated with the distribution. They have the disadvantage that they're stable for some time - that is why it's called a stable release. If they have all the features someone wants, they usually work fine (and my first mm3-installation was the default debian package). If one looks for bleeding edge, of course that's not what one can expect from a distribution package - but that's also a feature. Andi

4 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Error after HyperKitty 1.3.x upgrade

by Florian Schulze

On 29 Jun 2020, at 23:40, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 6/29/20 1:38 AM, Florian Schulze wrote: >> Hi! >> >> After upgrading to HyperKitty 1.3.x I get the following error for >> qcluster: >> >> File ".../lib/python3.7/site-packages/django_q/cluster.py", line >> 300, >> in pusher >> task = SignedPackage.loads(task[1]) >> File ".../lib/python3.7/site-packages/django_q/signing.py", line >> 31, >> in loads >> serializer=PickleSerializer) >> File ".../lib/python3.7/site-packages/django_q/core_signing.py", >> line >> 38, in loads >> return serializer().loads(data) >> File ".../lib/python3.7/site-packages/django_q/signing.py", line >> 44, >> in loads >> return pickle.loads(data) >> AttributeError: Can't get attribute 'process_task_result' on <module >> 'hyperkitty.tasks' from >> '.../lib/python3.7/site-packages/hyperkitty/tasks.py'> >> >> How do I recover from that? It seems like there are still persisted >> tasks in the qcluster queue using the old code from 1.2.x with the >> old >> locking implementation. > > Have you stopped ans started qcluster since upgrading? Yes > Are you running the Django periodic jobs? They were disabled because of the errors (someone else did the upgrade). I have enabled them again and will watch it and report back. Regards, Florian Schulze

6 years, 3 months

Search results for query "sapiro"