Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: [NON-INTERNAL] Re: Missing Archived emails - Hyperkitty - CERT Issue

by Willie Castillo

Sure. the file was updated and MM3 restarted. Looks like the modification to the /etc/mailman3/mailman-hyperkitty.cfg file did the trick. We are now able to see the July 25th message in the archives. Thank you Odhiambo and Mark for your assistance. ________________________________ From: Odhiambo Washington via Mailman-users <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2025 8:54 AM To: mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> Subject: [MM3-users] Re: [NON-INTERNAL] Re: Missing Archived emails - Hyperkitty - CERT Issue CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. PS: I beg you to put your responses below the last one. Makes the hierarchy look better. Now, have you edited your /etc/mailman3/mailman-hyperkitty.cfg and restarted MM3? On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 3:18 PM Willie Castillo < Willie.Castillo(a)caemilusa.com> wrote: > Odhiambo, long time no hear from you. Hope you are doing well. > > The last archived post for that specific list is July 3rd. 2025. We do not > see the one for July 25th. Also, I just noticed something else in the logs, > apparently the server is still having "SSLCertVerificationError" issues > even after updating the DigiCert, CA-Certificate,etc. I must be missing > something else. > > Based on that, looks like the archiving is failing still due to the > "SSLCertVerificationError". > > The spool directory now has 8 *.pck files in it. However, I do not see the > original ones from 7/25 > > ~# ll -t /opt/mailman/mm/var/archives/hyperkitty/spool/ > -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 14725 Jul 29 08:07 > 1753790859.2498085+320096cb9852779b55a4cbb1e4f9603736ebd78d.pck > -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 15122 Jul 29 08:07 > 1753790859.2437658+7fddf881d592f27be60e32aa5b3c34c7077b9988.pck > -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 6399 Jul 29 08:07 > 1753790859.2370558+ee410eb31691bf2854cca46c64e80e3bf61c3523.pck > -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 26619 Jul 29 08:07 > 1753790859.230345+b2e70f5b65900731895bbee5a3d83401f1500567.pck > -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 15676 Jul 29 08:07 > 1753790859.2225533+82371c8a0202d62eaa046dd3633a23d6837d7a80.pck > -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 98273 Jul 29 08:07 > 1753790859.2136636+8ee9273fbbaf4352d482e69d177e2eb2824078a5.pck > -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 98109 Jul 29 08:07 > 1753790859.2026713+49d82ecd57eda7eaa582ba925449e2343bea5c56.pck > -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 88479 Jul 29 08:07 > 1753790859.191489+162aa89dcac50ca6f5463ce1098c828728af12d1.pck > > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo(a)gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 29, 2025 7:59 AM > *To:* mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org>; Mark > Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> > *Cc:* Willie Castillo <Willie.Castillo(a)caemilusa.com> > *Subject:* Re: [MM3-users] Re: [NON-INTERNAL] Re: Missing Archived emails > - Hyperkitty - CERT Issue > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know > the content is safe. > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 2:25 PM Willie Castillo < > Willie.Castillo(a)caemilusa.com> wrote: > > The issue started right after the site's CERT expired. The CERT expired on > 7/8/25. This is what's in the log... > > Jul 16 15:19:45 2025 (3777209) Connection to HyperKitty failed: > HTTPSConnectionPool(host='XXX.com', port=443): Max retries exceeded with > url: /hyperkitty/api/mailman/urls?mlist=jmats-versions%40XXX.com (Caused by > SSLError(SSLCertVerificatio > nError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: > certificate has expired (_ssl.c:1000)'))) > > The CERT has been updated but the 7/25 message is not archived still. > > > While at it, also edit your /etc/mailman3/mailman-hyperkitty.cfg to what > is documented so that the issue doesn't recur: > ``` > [general] > base_url: https://urldefense.us/v3/__http://127.0.0.1:8000/archives/__;!!E8b8mVbrrfWV… > <https://urldefense.us/v3/__http://127.0.0.1:8000/archives/__;!!E8b8mVbrrfWV…> > api_key: Secret_Hyperkitty_API_Key > ``` > > PS: I haven't seen your responses to @Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net>'s > questions quoted below: > ``` > Did the new post get archived? If so, why is last post at still July 25, > 2025? If no, why not. The post must go to the archiver to cause the > queue to be processed. > > If the post was archived and the July 25 messages are still queued, > what's in Mailman's mailman.log. There should be error messages and > tracebacks indicating the issue. > ``` > > -- > Best regards, > Odhiambo WASHINGTON, > Nairobi,KE > +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 > In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. > "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) > [How to ask smart questions: > https://urldefense.us/v3/__http://www.catb.org/*esr/faqs/smart-questions.ht… > <https://urldefense.us/v3/__http://www.catb.org/*esr/faqs/smart-questions.ht…> > ] > -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: https://urldefense.us/v3/__http://www.catb.org/*esr/faqs/smart-questions.ht… ] _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailma… Archived at: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman… This message sent to willie.castillo(a)caemilusa.com

4 months, 1 week

[MM3-users] Re: Table 'mailmansuite.django_q_ormq' doesn't exist ("Delete this thread" -> 'HTTP-500 -> NoneType' object has no attribute 'all')

by Abhilash Raj

Excerpts from Simon Liebold via Mailman-users's message of May 29, 2017 2:16 pm: > Am 28.05.2017 um 22:24 schrieb Mark Sapiro: >> 'Delete this message' is in the 'message' view. "Delete this thread" is >> in the 'thread' view. > > Now found the message view. Thanks. > >> HyperKitty requires Django<1.11. The comment in the requirements in >> setup.py implies this is only a django-haystack requirement >> >> "Django>=1.8", >> # Don't upgrade to 1.11 until django-haystack supports it: >> # https://github.com/django-haystack/django-haystack/pull/1499 >> "Django<1.11", >> >> but since it works for me with Django 1.10, you might want to try that. > > OK, I was still running an RC version. Silly me. > >> In particular, this looks like Django 1.11 bug >> <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27975>. > > Which was closed in the release version that I initially upgraded to > (1.11.1). > > Now, I get to see the confirmation view and upon confirming I see these > (luckily different) errors like below (same with Django 1.10): > > Could not delete message P2GJLK4JPDU2K6ZKBSDUWASF2TVHCJTT: (1146, "Table > 'mailmansuite.django_q_ormq' doesn't exist") > Could not delete message 4I2TRZTFXMMH2XRQAS73IAEIYROFE5YM: (1146, "Table > 'mailmansuite.django_q_ormq' doesn't exist") > You may have to do `python manage.py makemigrations` after adding a new INSTALLED_APPLICATIONS and before running `python manage.py migrate` Hope that helps! -- thanks, Abhilash Raj

8 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: FILTER_VHOST fix - was: Postorius & multi domain

by Gelpi Andrea

Il 23/04/20 19:02, Mark Sapiro ha scritto: > On 4/23/20 2:48 AM, Gelpi Andrea wrote: >> >> I saw the change in the file. >> >> As I'm not a programmer How can I test your fix? >> >> My system was installed via Debian 10 stable repository. >> >> I upgrade with testing repository postorius, django and mailmanclinet >> >> Postorius V 1.3.2 >> Django V. 2.2.12 >> Django filters V 2.1.0 >> Djanog mailman V 1.3.2 >> mailmanclient V 3.3.0 > > > I don't know where the Debian package puts things, but you have to find > the location of postorius/views/list.py. Something like > > locate views/list.py > > should find it. Then you need to download > <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/merge_requests/500.diff> and > edit it to remove the first 15 lines so the first remaining line is the > > diff --git a/src/postorius/views/list.py b/src/postorius/views/list.py > > line. Then make a backup copy of postorius/views/list.py and run the command > > patch postorius/views/list.py path/to/500.diff > > where postorius/views/list.py is actually the full path to > postorius/views/list.py and 500.diff is the edited file you downloaded. > > Then restart uWSGI. If anything goes wrong, restore your backup copy of > postorius/views/list.py and restart uWSGI. > > I can confirm that the fix works. Thank You so much. -- Gelpi ing. Andrea ************************************************** I documenti vitali dimostreranno la loro vitalita' spostandosi spontaneamente da dove li avevate lasciati a dove non riuscirete a trovarli. **************************************************

5 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Non-ascii characters missing from Pipermail archive txt and gz downloads

by Mark Dale

Hi Ruth, Apologies for the late response. I posted my message to the MM3 list in error and have since reposted it to the MM2 list. However, thank you for taking the trouble to reply. The problem lies outside the choice of editor as both files are being viewed in the same editor -- with one correct and the other not. Mark Sapiro has explained (on the MM2 list) what is causing the problem. Armed with that information I just have to now find a way .... Regards, Mark -------- Original Message -------- From: Ruth Ivimey-Cook [mailto:ruth@ivimey.org] Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021, 15:24 UTC To: mark(a)postmark.io, Mailman users Subject: [MM3-users] Non-ascii characters missing from Pipermail archive txt and gz downloads > Hi Mark > > I'm not sure, but I think the problems are to do with the program you are using to view the txt file. > > A modern mail reader understands the Content-type: header and will adjust its character processing accordingly, but a .txt file has no default character encoding, so any text editor will have to "use its best judgement". Some will default to utf-8, because that is compatible with 7-bit ASCII (NOT Latin1) while others will just put characters out and hope for the best (esentially leaving the result to the encoding of the font). > > In theory, a UTF-encoded text file can begin with the "BOM" marker, a sequence of characters which is supposed to indicate which variety of Unicode is in use, but this is rarely present, especially for UTF-8. > > Try looking at your text file with a UTF-8 capable text editor **and ensure that you tell the editor to use the UTF-8 encoding**. I expect it will look ok then. > > > Hope this helps, > > Ruth > > > On 09/04/2021 13:52, Mark Dale via Mailman-users wrote: >> Mailman 2.1.34 >> Debian 10 >> Postfix >> >> Hi >> >> I'm hoping someone can shine a light on character encoding issue I've encountered. >> >> A plain-text email with non-ascii characters in the body gets posted to the list. >> >> As per Mark Sapiro's guide I've captured the incoming message to file. >> >> - https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/msg73469.html >> >> The message is received by Mailman with the non-ascii characters displaying correctly. >> >> The header of that message has: >> >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 >> Thunderbird/78.9.0 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >> Content-Language: en-AU >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >> >> In the list's mbox file and archive webpage, the message displays the non-ascii characters correctly. >> >> In the archive's downloaded .txt (and also .gz) file, the non-ascii characters are missing and displayed as "?". >> >> I've copied the message text in below, from both the correct one from the email and the erroneous .txt file. Hopefully they won't get scrambled up when I send this. >> >> Any advice on getting the non-ascii characters written into the archive .txt file would be gratefully received. >> >> Thanks, >> Mark >> >> >> === Message text as okay in mbox and as shown on the archive webpage === >> >> If one goes by the definition of veḷippaṭai as given in the Tamil Lexicon that the meaning of an ambiguous word should be disambiguated by a qualifying word, then aruvi āmpal does not conform to that definition since in the case of aruvi āmpal in Patiṟṟuppattu 63, aruvi is really made up of aru+vi, a compound. Moreover, the expression aṭai aṭuppu aṟiyā is already there to clarify that āmpal is a number and not a flower. Thus, aruvi simply provides information in addition to aṭai aṭuppu aṟiyā that āmpal is not a flower. The modern commentator Aruḷampalavaṉār also does not call it veḷippaṭai. >> >> === >> >> === Message text with missing characters in te archive's txt and gz downloads == >> >> If one goes by the definition of ve?ippa?ai as given in the Tamil Lexicon that the meaning of an ambiguous word should be disambiguated by a qualifying word, then aruvi ?mpal does not conform to that definition since in the case of aruvi ?mpal in Pati??uppattu 63, aruvi is really made up of aru+vi, a compound. Moreover, the expression a?ai a?uppu a?iy? is already there to clarify that ?mpal is a number and not a flower. Thus, aruvi simply provides information in addition to a?ai a?uppu a?iy? that ?mpal is not a flower. The modern commentator Aru?ampalava??r also does not call it ve?ippa?ai. >> >> === >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >

4 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Verification emails 'helo' rejected

by Thomas Ward

On 10/16/24 13:52, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 10/14/24 12:42, Greg Newby via Mailman-users wrote: >> >> Here are the corresponding logfile entries from mailmanweb.log: >> smtplib.SMTPRecipientsRefused: {'redacted(a)gmail.com': (504, b'5.5.2 >> <mail>: >> Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname')} >> >> and from mail.log: >> Oct 14 12:06:26 domain postfix/smtpd[722764]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from >> localhost[127.0.0.1]: 504 5.5.2 <mail>: Helo command rejected: need >> fully-qualified hostname; from=<root(a)lists.domain.tld> >> to=<root@localhost> >> proto=ESMTP helo=<mail> >> >> lists.domain.tld is the domain for Mailman3. I don't know why it's >> trying >> to send email from root@. > > > I think the mail.log entry is for the DSN for the failure. The issue > is the HELO/EHLO command. Try the following in your venv > ``` > (venv) ...:~$ python > Python 3... > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. > >>> import socket > >>> socket.getfqdn() > ``` > If that returns `localhost`, that's the issue. I think you can fix it > by putting a fully qualified domain name in /etc/hostname. > This is actually a postfix misconfiguration. By default, Postfix uses the `myhostname` variable to define your HELO/EHLO. In your /etc/postfix/main.cf change your `myhostname` to be an FQDN. If your mail server's FQDN is actually mail.example.com on the rDNS and forward DNS side, then set this in /etc/postfix/main.cf: myhostname = mail.example.com Then restart your Postfix. That will solve your issue. Thomas

1 year, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: MM3+Python3.11

by Odhiambo Washington

On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 7:10 PM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 3/6/23 03:38, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > Has MM3 been tested with Python3.11? > > Yes, but not with uWSGI which is not part of Mailman per se. > Oh. I can easily switch between uWSGI, Gunicorn, or mod_wsgi. > I updated a Debian VM to Python3.11, installed MM3 and migrated the > > configs. However, I am unable to get past the following error: > > > ... > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File > > "/opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/mailman_web/wsgi.py", > line > > 10, in <module> > > from django.core.wsgi import get_wsgi_application > > File > "/opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/django/__init__.py", > > line 1, in <module> > > from django.utils.version import get_version > > File > > "/opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/django/utils/version.py", > > line 1, in <module> > > import datetime > > File "/usr/lib/python3.11/datetime.py", line 12, in <module> > > import math as _math > > ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'math' > > unable to load app 0 (mountpoint='') (callable not found or import error) > > > This error says /usr/lib/python3.11/datetime.py can't import math. math > is part of the python 3.11 standard library > <https://docs.python.org/3/library/math.html>. There is something wrong > with your Python 3.11 installation. > So I will redo the venv by invoking the python binaries explicitly, in case I have conflicts. Thanks. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-)

2 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: Apple Mail encoding again

by tlhackque

On 21-Apr-22 13:09, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 4/21/22 04:53, tlhackque via Mailman-users wrote: >> >> Note that MailMan is encapsulating a multipart/signed message in a >> multipart/mixed in order to append it's footer, and reports that it >> removed the signature part of the multipart/signed. This makes the >> signed message format invalid. So at least, MM3 needs to handle >> signed messages better: either include the signature or remove the >> signature headers (an unwrapping exercise to convert the message to >> unsigned)... Note that this can be recursive where a signed message >> contains a message/rfc822 part that contains a signed message, that.... > > This was an issue with Mailman's content filtering for the > mailmanusers(a)mailman3.org list. Pass types was: > > multipart > message/rfc822 > text > application/pgp-signature > > So the application/x-pkcs7-signature part was removed. I have just > updated Pass types to: > > multipart > message/rfc822 > text > application/pgp-signature > application/x-pkcs7-signature > > to not remove application/x-pkcs7-signature parts going forward. > That's what I expected to be behind the behavior. Thanks for fixing it on this list. But as I noted, it would be better if the application/*signature parts were automagically passed when a multipart/signed is present. Ideally those that correspond to the multipart/signed, but it's probably less work to allow them anywhere. I've seen variations of this misconfiguration on a number of lists, all of whose administrators had to learn by experience. Seems like a good case for Mailman becoming smart enough to do the right thing...

3 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: using SSH/TLS with external MTA

by Roland Giesler

On 2024/07/27 22:58, Odhiambo Washington via Mailman-users wrote: > On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 11:34 PM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > >> On 7/27/24 13:05, Odhiambo Washington via Mailman-users wrote: >>> ASMTP works on the premise of "we can relay mail for you if we can >>> authenticate you with certain credentials" >>> Adding the IP to "hosts we can relay mail for" negates the need to >>> authenticate, IMHO. >>> So I am still waiting for how MM3 does ASMTP. Does it? >> >> If by ASMTP, you mean SMTP AUTH, Mailman does it if smtp_user: and >> smtp_pass: are provided in mailman.cfg. >> >> >> I agree that an authenticated user should be able to submit mail to be >> relayed. Just guessing here, but perhaps the issue is the OP is >> submitting to the deprecated port 465 instead of 587. >> > Port 465 is not quite depreciated. It's the decision of the Admin to decide > to listen on/and accept SMTP AUTH on which port. > On the servers I run, and based on Exim as the MTA, I accept SMTP AUTH On > ports 465, 587 and 2525 (this is meant to subvert some ISPs!). > But let's await Roland's response. The server runs power-mailinabox, which uses Postfix indeed. All my mail, and quite a few others' mail is sent from the using SMTP-Auth on port 465. Actually, this message is sent via that server too. So it's clear to me that MM3 is not authenticating for some reason. > >

1 year, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: Help needed to create filters that were working in Mailman 2.

by Mark London

Mark - I'm an idiot. I previously had modified some of the text in Postorius to be shorter, and somehow had deleted the Accept feature! I hope not to ever have to upgrade our email server ever again. It took much years off my life. In any event, here's one of the text that I modified to be briefer. Perhaps you can see why I shortened it. Besides which, who goes on vacation these days, and disables emails from any source? I have users that literally have tens of thousands of unread email. They don't bother to delete it. Grrr... - Mark help_text=_( 'Set this option to Enabled to receive messages posted to this ' 'mailing list. Set it to Disabled if you want to stay subscribed, ' "but don't want mail delivered to you for a while (e.g. you're " "going on vacation). If you disable mail delivery, don't forget " 'to re-enable it when you come back; it will not be automatically ' 're-enabled.' On 6/21/2023 4:21 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 6/21/23 11:36 AM, mrl(a)psfc.mit.edu wrote: >> I'm using version 1.3.8 Which I installed on Ubuntu 22 on April >> 18. I'm guessing this feature was installed in 1.3.9? > > The attached screenshot (which may not make it to the list but should > be in your direct copy) is from Postorius 1.3.8 installed via pip. If > you don't see this, possibly you have installed the Debian/Ubuntu > package and this is a Debian issue. >

2 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Hiding an ML from a site

by Odhiambo Washington

On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 1:21 AM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On February 7, 2024 1:34:32 PM PST, Odhiambo Washington < > odhiambo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >What should I do then? Edit some file? Apply some patch? > >It's pretty easy for me to create a DNS record for the same server (IP) > for > >use with the web host that I'd like to hide. > > > In the Domains view in postorius, you need separate mail hosts. Then you > need to change the domain of one of the lists to the 'new' mail host. This > implies changing its address which may not be acceptable. > Looking at Postorius, they do have different mail hosts. See the screenshot at: https://imgur.com/a/GsiiEjP Or, you can just live with it as is. > The problem with this is that those who go to the site have been trying to subscribe to the other ML. Note, I have been without power at my house for almost 3 days now, so I > don't have access to all my usual resources. > In Kenya, the blackouts can last equally long at times - and there is nothing we can do about it because the power distributor is a monopoly. Sorry for all the loss you've incurred from the foods getting spoilt in the fridge :-( -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

1 year, 10 months

Search results for query "sapiro"