Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Default moderation for new members

by Seth Seeger

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019, at 9:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > > I’d like to have new members who join my lists have their posting ability set to moderated. (After their first legitimate post, they would set to be unmoderated.) I haven’t been able to find this, though I’m suspecting the language has changed. > > > In Postorius set Settings -> Message Acceptance -> "Default action to > take when a member posts to the list" to Hold for moderation. > > This is the action which will be taken for a post from a member whose > individual Moderation is List Default as it is for all new members. > > Then when a post from that member is held, if you click the subject in > the held messages view, a dialog opens showing the message content with > Accept, Reject and Discard buttons and a dropdown list you can use to > set that member's Moderation to Default processing. > > Default processing is generally what you want as it bypasses the > moderation hold but still applies other tests such as header filters, > administrivia, implicit-dest, max-recipients, max-size, etc. So I've set my "Default action to take when a member posts to the list" to "hold". I'm just unclear on what I want to set each member's moderation action to... defer or accept? (I've been reading the docs, but I'm not clear on the difference.) Thanks, Seth

5 years, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: Creating superuser - problem with documentation or it's just me?

by Odhiambo Washington

On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 07:03, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 7/27/20 6:48 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > So now I have tried to see if there is such option from django-admin, > but: > > > > (venv) [root@gw /opt/mailman/mm]# django-admin --help > > > You must run /opt/mailman/mm/bin/django-admin. If you run these commands > in your venv, you run the ones in /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin which dont > have all the pointers to configuration and settings. It's OK to run > /opt/mailman/mm/bin/* with your venv active, but if you just give the > command name, you get the wring one. > So, I should run /opt/mailman/mm/bin/django-admin with a valid argument, right? Like /opt/mailman/mm/bin/django-admin createsuperuser ... How do I get all the available arguments for django-admin? That is what I was attempting to do by passing --help to it. > You also must have the empty /opt/mailman/mm/__init__py so that imports > of /opt/mailman/mm*.py modules will work as I said at > < > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > > This is quite clear now. Thank you. It wasn't clear at what point in the installation process this file needs to be created. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", grep ^[^#] :-)

5 years

[MM3-users] Re: using SSH/TLS with external MTA

by Odhiambo Washington

On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 11:34 PM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 7/27/24 13:05, Odhiambo Washington via Mailman-users wrote: > > > > ASMTP works on the premise of "we can relay mail for you if we can > > authenticate you with certain credentials" > > Adding the IP to "hosts we can relay mail for" negates the need to > > authenticate, IMHO. > > So I am still waiting for how MM3 does ASMTP. Does it? > > > If by ASMTP, you mean SMTP AUTH, Mailman does it if smtp_user: and > smtp_pass: are provided in mailman.cfg. > > > I agree that an authenticated user should be able to submit mail to be > relayed. Just guessing here, but perhaps the issue is the OP is > submitting to the deprecated port 465 instead of 587. > Port 465 is not quite depreciated. It's the decision of the Admin to decide to listen on/and accept SMTP AUTH on which port. On the servers I run, and based on Exim as the MTA, I accept SMTP AUTH On ports 465, 587 and 2525 (this is meant to subvert some ISPs!). But let's await Roland's response. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

1 year

[MM3-users] Re: Adding members to a mailman3 mailing list

by Onyeibo Oku

On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:53:23 -0700 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > #!/bin/bash > exec /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/mailman \ > -C "/opt/mailman/mm/mailman.cfg" \ > $@ > Greetings Mark, I gave up on setting up mailman using option #2 while following https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/install.html (there are lots of unknowns on that route. Certainly, the packagers are considering a lot of things that are not immediately apparent to users). Perhaps, we will see elaborate guides/docs soon. In the meantime, I moved to option #3 (recommended for production). I hit a grey area when setting up the virtual environment. At https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#virtualenv-inst…, I see: $ cd /opt/mailman $ python3 -m venv venv The documentation imply that a 'user' creates the virtual environment but is not explicit about that 'user'. OUTPUT: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/opt/mailman/venv' This is expected. Which makes me wonder ... hmm, how did you do it? (1) Is it better to have a dedicated user (say 'mailman') then use that while following the docs? I see a lot of docs referring to a 'mailman' user. Installing mailman3 from distribution repository introduced a 'mailman' user to my box (with special UID). There has to be reasons for that. (2) Should the setup proceed with 'root'? (why do I get the feeling that this is not the design?) (3) How about using an already existing local user? What are the implications? Regards Onyeibo

4 years, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: How to delete non-users

by Allan Hansen

Sure: >>> lm = getUtility(IListManager) >>> for l in lm: ... print(l.posting_address) ... >>> Nothing here, either. Yours, Allan On 9/17/22, 10:30 , "Mark Sapiro" <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: On 9/17/22 10:03, Allan Hansen wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Yes, the users can be subscribed, but they think that they can't because it seems they are until the moderator accepts them. > > I tried your script again, with nothing happening. So I tried this: > >>>> >>>> a = 1 >>>> b = 1 >>>> for l in lm: > ... print(a) > ... a = a+1 > ... for nm in l.nonmembers.members: > ... print(b) > ... b = b + 1 > ... nm.unsubscribe() > ... >>>> commit() >>>> print(a) > 1 >>>> print(b) > 1 > > > It appears that lm can't see the lists (I have 50+ of them). Did you start with lm = getUtility(IListManager) ? What if you do ``` >>> lm = getUtility(IListManager) >>> for l in lm: ... print(l.posting_address) ... ``` That should print the posting address for all the lists. What does `mailman info` show? In particular, for `config file:` -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

2 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Change digest frequency and default threshold

by Henrik Rasmussen

Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 9/21/18 6:21 AM, Henrik Rasmussen wrote: > > When Digest Size Threshold is not reached, mails seems to be sent > > according to digest_volume_frequency': which is set to 'monthly'. The web > > interface doesn't seem to have a setting for this. > > No. digest_volume_frequency only controls how often the digest volume > number increments (and issue number resets). > > In order to send periodic digests, you need to run 'mailman digests > --periodic' via cron. Currently I am running Mailman version 3.2.0a1 which doesn't seem to have a --periodic option. When running "docker exec mailman-core mailman digests --send --verbose -l listname(a)lists.example.com", output is "listname.lists.example.com sent volume 11, number 4" and this increases each time, but even I do approve held mails, none are sent (according to the smtp.log and docker logs posrfix). As I understand, using --sent should send a digest immediately (except when used with --dry-run). As the default Digest size threshold was 30KB, making very small digests being sent, I increased this (for test) to 5000 KB (or is it Kilo bits, as the text says "How big in Kb should a digest be before it gets sent out?"? Could Digest size threshold have any impact on why no digests are sent even I run "docker exec mailman-core mailman digests --send --verbose -l listname(a)lists.example.com" or is this an issue in the version I am using? -- Henrik Rasmussen

6 years, 10 months

[MM3-users] Getting connection timed out

by blackout69

Il 22/05/21 23:52, Mark Sapiro ha scritto: > It's probably not blacklisting. It's not getting that far. Your `glugct` > is attempting to connect to port 25 at mail.simail.it and the connect is > not being answered. Normal blacklisting will not occur until after the > remote MTA answers the connect and determines the IP of the caller. And > in any case, if it is some kind of blacklisting it is your `glugct` > server that is blacklisted by mail.simail.it. > > I just did the following > ``` > $ telnet mail.simail.it 25 > Trying 217.27.113.30... > Connected to mail.simail.it. > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 mail.simail.it ESMTP ready. > quit > 221 mail.simail.it closing connection > Connection closed by foreign host. > ``` > so it did answer my connect. In any case, this is not a Mailman issue. > It is between Postfix on your server and the remote server at > mail.simail.it. Thanks Mark for the reply, I had already checked with the telnet command on port 25 and everything is fine. The suspicion of the blacklist came to me, but now, after checking https://mxtoolbox.com/blacklists.aspx I saw that the mail.simail.it server is in the SORBS SPAM blacklist. Because my lists work fine on any other mailing address. I also checked my email server reputation at https://www.mail-tester.com and I get 10/10 Apparently it doesn't depend on my postfix server. In this case, what strategy do you recommend? Thank you -- blackout69

4 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: Mailman3 reinstall fail, need some help

by Yvan ♞

Maybe an idea of my problem as I have pgadmin app installed, it could be in conflict to create a postgresql db? Le 13/03/2022 à 13:46, Yvan ♞ a écrit : > Yes, always this folder file problem, if I create the folder, when > trying install > answer is "mailman allready installed" > https://paste.yunohost.org/raw/avaweyiqom > Still searching... But I'm really not an expert... > Yvan > > Le 12/03/2022 à 21:32, Mark Sapiro a écrit : >> On 3/12/22 08:38, Yvan ♞ wrote: >>> Yes it's debian and I have root access but it's a more "user >>> friendly" server release. >>> I tryed this but it block >>> https://github.com/YunoHost-Apps/mailman3_ynh/blob/master/README.md >>> >>> https://yunohost.org/en/administrate/whatisyunohost >>> Sincerely >> >> I don't read French very well, but your original logs at >> https://paste.yunohost.org/raw/xiqoyajegi and >> https://paste.yunohost.org/raw/hujesebita show installation failing >> because it fails to create /etc/mailman3/mailman.cfg. >> >> This is either an issue with the Debian package or the YunoHost >> installer or an incompatibility between them. >> >> I would go first to YunoHost for help and then to Debian if necessary. >> > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

3 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: applying patch 1130

by David Newman

On 8/21/23 7:57 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 8/21/23 12:45 PM, David Newman wrote: >> >> I'm looking to patch an existing production server running 3.3.8 so >> it will be able to start under Python 3.11 on Debian 12. Thanks in >> advance for additional clues on what seems like a fairly standard >> problem. > > Since !1130 is merged, just `pip install` from the gitlab head. > ``` > pip install git+https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman@head Perhaps something else is needed first? This is on a Debian 12 system upgraded from 11, with MM3 3.3.8 installed in a venv. (venv) mailman@x12:~$ pip install git+https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman@head Collecting git+https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman@head Cloning https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman (to revision head) to /tmp/pip-req-build-wjge_v67 Running command git clone --filter=blob:none --quiet https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman /tmp/pip-req-build-wjge_v67 warning: redirecting to https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman.git/ WARNING: Did not find branch or tag 'head', assuming revision or ref. Running command git checkout -q head error: pathspec 'head' did not match any file(s) known to git error: subprocess-exited-with-error × git checkout -q head did not run successfully. │ exit code: 1 ╰─> See above for output. note: This error originates from a subprocess, and is likely not a problem with pip. error: subprocess-exited-with-error × git checkout -q head did not run successfully. │ exit code: 1 ╰─> See above for output. note: This error originates from a subprocess, and is likely not a problem with pip. Thanks dn

2 years

[MM3-users] Re: Can't post to my own list from HyperKitty

by MegaBrutal

Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. ápr. 7., H, 19:23): > What is the exact email address that you are logging on to the web UI > with. Does it match exactly with the address of a list member or are > there mixed-case differences? You might try an interaction like this: > ``` > mailman-web shell > Python 3.12.8 (main, Dec 21 2024, 12:52:28) [GCC 9.4.0] on linux > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. > (InteractiveConsole) > >>> from django_mailman3.lib.mailman import get_mailman_client > >>> client = get_mailman_client() > >>> list_id = 'test.example.com' # your actual list_id > >>> rest_list = client.get_list(list_id) > >>> email = 'user(a)example.com' # your actual email > >>> member = rest_list.get_member(email) > >>> member > This should print something like > <Member 'user(a)example.com' on 'test.example.com' with role 'member'> > ``` > This is exactly what HyperKitty is doing except in your case > rest_list.get_member(email) is throwing a ValueError exception instead > of returning the member. I get: <Member 'megabrutal(a)gmail.com' on 'the.correct.list.address' with role 'member'> So it's even weirder – however, I'm really not sure if this is the address HyperKitty is checking for, as I have 3 attached to my account! How may I know which one it's trying to use?

4 months, 2 weeks

Search results for query "sapiro"