Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: MM3 Docker

by Odhiambo Washington

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019, 20:34 Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019, at 5:52 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 03:29, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > > > > On 1/7/19 1:18 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 23:39, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Please help me understand what steps are missing and I will try to > > > >> provide the information. > > > > > > > > > > > > Okay. > > > > > > > > At the installation stage, you say the following: > > > > "I already had some things set up in /opt/mailman including a git > > > > subdirectory containing clones of the GitLab mailman, mailmanclient, > > > > mailman-hyperkitty, hyperkitty, django-mailman3 and > > > > postorius projects. On the third server I have added mailman-suite > > > > because I use the settings.py from that project as the basis for > mine." > > > > > > > > Please assume that the reader is a newbie to python3 virtualenv and > give > > > the > > > > details of the commands they need to execute to (a) clone all the > > > projects > > > > needed > > > > and (b) create the virtualenv. > > > > > > > > The next steps are: > > > > mkdir /opt/mailman/mm > > > > > > > > Then you say "I then created a /opt/mailman/mm directory and within > that > > > a > > > > Python 3.6 virtualenv" > > > > What happens here is something that needs clarification, because you > are > > > > specific about "python3.6". > > > > I have googled and realized that one has to be specific about the > python > > > > version they want to use in their virtualenv > > > > as shown here -> > > > > > > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45293436/how-to-specify-python-version-… > > > > > > > > exact command to execute to create the /opt/mailman/mm/venv > > > > exact command to execute to activate virtualenv > > > > > > > > > I have added a comment to the page which I hope gives you what you > want. > > > > > > I also added a section on templates instead of referring to a prior > > > version of the page. > > > > > > > That makes it better. > > However, as a newbie, something is not yet clear: > > > > "When active in a particular shell, it can be deactivated with the > command > > > > deactivate > > or by exiting that shell." > > > > HI am trying to understand the effect of detaching from a venv. I am > > assuming that a virtualenv is a container that is supposed to be always > > active for the services within to be accessible. Is that right? So, how > do > > I ensure it's always running/up, or that does not matter as the scripts > > which run the services will always refer to the files? > > virtualenv is not actually a container that is supposed to be active. It > is merely a set of settings that are applied to your SHELL when you are > in the virtual environment. > > It is not supposed to be always active, only when you actually want to > run commands in that virtual environment. The services will keep on > running after you deactivate your shell and would function like other > normal services on your machine. > > -- > thanks, > Abhilash Raj (maxking) > Thank you for clarifying. So once I have a venv created, the services will just run as long as the startup scripts are running even when I'm logged out of the system? >

6 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: Avoiding non-members to be saved.

by Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7)

On 7/8/21 20:03, Mark Sapiro wrote: > This is the way MM 3 works. The only reason *_these_nonmembers exists > in MM 3 is to support the legacy regexps from MM 2.1. For non-regexp > addresses the address is a nonmember with the appropriate moderation > action. > > I actually find this convenient. When a nonmember posts spam to a list > and that spam is held, I discard the spam in Postorius and at the same > time set the nonmember's moderation action to discard so I never see > any more from that address. Also, when someone who I recognize as a > list member posts from an alternate nonmember address, I can accept > that post and set the nonmember address moderation action to default > processing. > I find it very convenient too, but it concerns me that spammers, really "profesional" spammers and senders of phising mail change the forged address and sender domain too rapidly to track them. As of it, the non-member database is growing more and more. It could be a "monster" in two or three years... Not a problem now. And I know now how to delete them in one go :) --

4 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: Fresh installation mailman3-suite via "pipx" - any experiences yet?

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Mark Sapiro writes: > But postorius and hyperkitty are dependencies of mailmanweb so only Are they? I'm pretty sure that in my current project which has a pre-existing archiver they wish to keep using I only installed postorius, not hyperkitty. ... oops, HyperKitty *is* there. OK, need to uninstall that. That's actually a bit annoying, since mailmanweb is a friendlier interface for control of either of HyperKitty and Postorius than the underlying Django utilities even if you don't want the other and its unique dependencies (such as Whoosh). (Issue #32 created) OK, so your two-venv approach should actually work. I still don't think it's much of a win since to finish setup you still have to do a lot of work as root and a lot of work outside of pipx's control. Basically it saves one "python3 -m venv", at the cost of "pipx run" to run each program in its own venv. Note, it doesn't save me any venv activationss because I put that in the mailman user's shell .rc. Wikinaut asks: > Has anyone tried that already? Why not you? Steve

1 year, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: Hiding an ML from a site

by Odhiambo Washington

On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 9:45 PM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On February 6, 2024 7:45:14 AM PST, Odhiambo Washington > <odhiambo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >I had this set to True in settings_local.py, but False in settings.py. > >So it seems to not make a difference in my setup. > > In a standard setup, anything set in settings_local.py overrides any > corresponding setting in settings.py. > > That said, FILTER_VHOSTS is not perfect. It only works for Postorius if > the separate web hosts also have different mail hosts. See lines 1051 et > seq at > < > https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/blob/master/src/postorius/views/list… > > > What should I do then? Edit some file? Apply some patch? It's pretty easy for me to create a DNS record for the same server (IP) for use with the web host that I'd like to hide. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

1 year, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: Handling of SPAM mails in mailman3 - Check for X-Spam Header

by Torge Riedel

Am 16.01.20 um 21:43 schrieb Mark Sapiro: > On 1/16/20 10:51 AM, Torge Riedel wrote: >> Such SPAM mails are currently hold for moderation with reason "not from >> a list member". Is there no check for the "X-Spam: Yes" header or is >> this check done later? > > If you set a Header Filter (in Postorius the Header filters tab) those > checks are done before non-member moderation. > > This won't work for posts from members because the header checks are > done between member moderation checks and non-member moderation checks, > but if you create a Header Filter for header 'x-spam' and pattern 'yes' > with action hold, a message from a non-member which has an X-Spam: Yes > header should be held for that reason. > > Hi Mark, thank you for your answer. Just to understand that right: In case a posting with an "X-Spam: Yes" header comes from a member, it will not be held? It will be directly forwarded to the list? If yes, is there any chance to change or extend this? Best regards Torge

5 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: postfix malformed address with confirm replies

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Mark Sapiro writes: > On 2/27/21 4:36 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > is legal, and I think that most servers will accept it, but RFC > > 5321 sets a limit of 64 octets on mailboxes[1], and your > > confirmation mailbox is 67 octets. > > Since the -confirm+<token> part is fixed at 49 octets, this would imply > a limit in list names of 15 octets. Ouch! I'm pretty sure we would have run into this before, if there were a lot of servers out there imposing this limit. 15 octets is pretty darn short, there are probably quite a few list names out there longer than that. Not to mention that the RFC itself says "you SHOULD NOT be a jerk about this". :-) So I don't think this is a big problem in practice, and I hope Steve can reconfigure the obstructive server to not be so picky. For Mailman, I doubt we need a full SHA1 (?) for the purpose. We can truncate the thing, probably opportunistically (ie, so the whole confirmation mailbox fits in 64 octets, or we could even parse the bounce message and resend only if we run into a problem). Steve

4 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: External MTA incoming mail: configuration

by Odhiambo Washington

On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 6:44 PM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 8/2/24 08:12, Roland Giesler via Mailman-users wrote: > > > > It seems though that since I'm not running a local MTA, when then mail > > arrives at the mailman3 server, there's nothing that can process it. So > > should I run postfix in it's most basic setup to allow mail to be > > received or what is the best way to deal with it? Mailman3 has to > > receive mail like signup confirmations, etc after all, not? > > If you use transport_maps on the remote MTA to relay the list mail to > port 8024 on the Mailman server, Mailman's LMTP runner will receive the > mail and you don't need a local MTA. > Nice one! I'd love to know how this config is done in Postfix. Heading to ask Uncle G. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

1 year, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: Auth question

by Simon Hanna

On March 31, 2017 6:34:18 PM GMT+02:00, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: >On 03/31/2017 01:06 AM, David Krantz wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Simon Hanna ><simon.hanna(a)serve-me.info> wrote: >>> On 03/31/2017 08:10 AM, David Krantz wrote: >>>> I think that would correspond to this line in urls.py >>>> >>>> url(r'^$', >RedirectView.as_view(url=reverse_lazy('hyperkitty.views.index.index'))), >>> Yes, that's the culprit. Replace it with the following: >>> >>> url(r'^$', RedirectView.as_view(url=reverse_lazy('hk_root'))), >>> You can also update whatever guide you were using... >> >> Great, will try that! I don't know whether I can update the guide. >> It's the one referenced earlier in this thread named something like >> setup experience of mailman 3 in production. > > >Yes, that comes from >"https://wiki.list.org/DOC/Mailman%203%20installation%20experience", >specifically the attachment urls.py. > >The interesting thing is that works for me both at ><https://lists.mailman3.org/> and <https://mail.python.org/mm3/>. Are you using the latest version of django? -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

8 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: lmtp runner not starting

by Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7)

El 1/4/23 a las 20:44, Mark Sapiro escribió: > ... > lmtp runner did not start because at some point it had died and > restarting Mailman won't restart a runner that died and was marked to > not restart. > > You need to stop Mailman and make sure when mailman is stopped that > there are no files in mailman's var/locks/ directory (remove any that > are there) and then start Mailman and lmtp runner should start. > I stopped mailman and removed all that was in there (there were many locked registers). Restarted mailman, and it shows the same error that in my previous mail. Now there is two new locked files, one (master.lck) which its content is the name of the other file. And the second one has the same content: master.lck|www.proteccion-civil.eu|9389|7022761192045613065 will try deleting the content of var/locks and restarting the server > As to why it died in the first place, there should be something in > mailman.log from the time it died. > -- ___________________________________________ Mailman's content filtering has removed the following MIME parts from this message. Content-Type: image/png Name: firma-GHP-emails.png Replaced multipart/alternative part with first alternative.

2 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: Welcome message template errors

by Mark

On 2024-04-23 11:33, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 4/22/24 17:06, Mark wrote: >> >> There was no line POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL in >> /etc/mailman3/settings.py > So presumably you were getting the default > > POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL = 'http://localhost:8000' > > from mailman-web/settings/mailman.py because of > from mailman_web.settings.mailman import * > in your settings.py. Yes. # Mailman Web configuration file. # /etc/mailman3/settings.py # Get the default settings. from mailman_web.settings.base import * from mailman_web.settings.mailman import * ... > >> Then, as site-owner, creating a new custom Welcome template (again via >> the WebUI) I can see it correctly added to the database in >> mailman.template.uri >> >> - >> https://lists.mydomain.com/mailman3/api/templates/list/lists.mydomain.com/l… That URI should have been; https://lists.mydomain.com/mailman3/api/templates/list/mytestlist.lists.myd… If I go to the above URL, the text of the list's Custom welcome message displays on an otherwise empty webpage. > > > And what happens if you go to that URL in a web browser? Also what do > you get when going to https://lists.mydomain.com/mailman3? I get the Postorius page "Mailing Lists" that displays the table of lists.

1 year, 6 months

Search results for query "sapiro"