Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Can't remove footer(s)

by Henrik Rasmussen

Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 10/02/2018 12:14 AM, Henrik Rasmussen wrote: > > Did I miss something in order to remove the footers? > > Removing the files won't work because Mailman will fall back the the > built-in footer. You have to create empty files. The easiest thing is > just to 'cp /dev/null' to the footer files created by import21 Copying /dev/null doesn't help. It seems to be the same old content of the footer files before I removed the files and restarted Mailman, as if Mailman keeps the cache. I've just (again) ran # docker exec -it mailman-core mailman shell -l [LISTNAME_FQDN] >>> getUtility(ITemplateManager).delete('list:member:digest:footer', m.list_id) >>> getUtility(ITemplateManager).delete('list:member:regular:footer', m.list_id) after copying /dev/null to the files in /opt/mailman/core/var/templates/lists/[LISTNAME_FQDN]/da/list_member_digest_footer.txt and list_member_regular_footer.txt ,but that doesn't change anything. -- Henrik Rasmussen

7 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: Link in the top-left corner of Hyperkitty

by Seth Seeger

On May 8, 2020, at 10:58 AM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > On 5/8/20 7:34 AM, Seth Seeger wrote: >> >> There is a link to the root of Hyperkitty in the top left corner of my Hyperkitty pages. It links to the correct domain, but the text isn’t right - it’s the first domain name I was using at the beginning of my install for testing. I’d like to update it, but can’t find what to change. > > > You have to edit the display name for the domain in the Django web admin > Sites section. Huh. I had it properly set for the domain that is active, but it wasn’t taking affect. I changed it for the (old) test site, and it changed it. So the name that is showing doesn’t match the domain name that I was changing it for. Thanks, Seth

5 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: hyperkitty.views.mailman Could not archive the email with message-id '<snip>': A string literal cannot contain NUL (0x00) characters

by Gilles Filippini

Mark Sapiro a écrit le 12/03/2021 à 00:59 : > On 3/11/21 3:10 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote: >> >> Looking at the offending message with 'mailman qfile', it appears it is >> a legitimate one actually, sent from an Android phone. >> >> Couldn't hyperkitty be a bit less strict? > > > Possibly. It looks like this may be > <https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/-/issues/271>, fixed? by > <https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/-/merge_requests/215>. What > HyperKitty version is this? > <https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/-/merge_requests/215> is in 1.3.2. > > If your HyperKitty is >= 1.3.2, please file a new issue at > <https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/-/issues> This is Hyperkitty 1.3.4. I'll file an issue tomorrow. Thanks, _g.

4 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Django: An error occurred while processing your request.

by Florian Sukup

Thank you both very much. On 5/26/25 18:30, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 5/26/25 12:08 PM, Florian Sukup wrote: >> >> When I received emails from postorius, then it came from example.com >> which is nonsense as I worked with the real lists. So I deleted >> example.com. > > > Set DEFAULT_FROM_EMAIL and SERVER_EMAIL appropriately in your Django > settings. > seem to produce reasonable results >> When I call https://.../mailman3/admin or any of the lists, the result >> is: >> Server error >> An error occurred while processing your request. > > You need to set SITE_ID appropriately in your Django settings. See > https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/faq.html#the-domain-name-displayed-in-h… > This made the difference. I set it to 0 now as I have more than one site/domain. Thanks again, Florian.

8 months, 3 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: Deleting messages from HyperKitty archive

by Mark

On 2024-03-26 08:45, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 3/25/24 13:00, Mark wrote: >> >> Regarding updating, the Hyperkitty docs say to (a) update the code >> base; and (b) update the database schemas. >> >> Although updating the database is mentioned, there isn't anything >> about updating the code base. > > Updating the code base just means installing an updated version. E.g. > upgrading from 1.3.8 to 1.3.9. > Thanks Mark. Was another case of "If all else fails, read the instructions..." $ sudo systemctl stop mailman3 $ sudo systemctl stop mailmanweb (venv) $ pip install -U mailman postorius django-mailman3 hyperkitty mailman-web (venv) $ mailman-web migrate (venv) $ mailman-web compress (venv) $ mailman-web collectstatic (venv) $ mailman-web compilemessages $ sudo systemctl start mailman3 $ sudo systemctl start mailmanweb https://www.mailman3.org/en/latest/upgrade-guide.html Successfully upgraded to Hyperkitty 1.3.9 and the delete message link now shows for the list owners. Best, Mark

1 year, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: Extracting mailing list users

by Jan Eden

On 2022-12-30 10:29, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 12/30/22 03:25, Jan Eden via Mailman-users wrote: > > On minor issue: All user names with > > non-ASCII characters appear with quoted-printable encoding (e.g. > > =?utf-8?q?J=C3=BCrgen?=). Is there a way to output UTF-8 instead of QP? > > I just created https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/1048 for this. I > think this patch > ``` > --- a/src/mailman/commands/cli_members.py > +++ b/src/mailman/commands/cli_members.py > @@ -104,10 +104,10 @@ def display_members(ctx, mlist, role, regular, digest, > if nomail is not None: > if member.delivery_status not in status_types: > continue > - if email_only: > + if email_only or not address.display_name: > print(address.original_email, file=outfp) > else: > - print(formataddr((address.display_name, > address.original_email)), > + print(f'{address.display_name} <{address.original_email}>', > file=outfp) > > ``` > (line may be wrapped) will fix it. Excellent – thank you! - Jan

3 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Your Dashboard

by Allan Hansen

All, Our site has over 50 lists and several moderators are responsible for multiple lists. In addition to a dashboard like described here I would like to have a ‘comment’ field next to each request, so tha the moderator can keep track of the status of each. Our approval process involves multiple steps. Time to visit gitlab? Yours, Allan Hansen hansen(a)rc.org > On Feb 11, 2020, at 12:26 , Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > On 2/11/20 11:00 AM, Mark Dadgar wrote: >> On Feb 11, 2020, at 10:32 AM, Torge Riedel <torgeriedel(a)gmx.de> wrote: >>> everytime I receive a mail for moderation it says: >>> >>> At your convenience, visit your dashboard to approve or deny the >>> request. >>> >>> So, I am wondering where this "dashboard" might be. We are managing 11 different lists (small scenario I think) and currently we have to navigate to each list and its page of mails to moderate. > > > There's no overall dashboard per se. The message actually refers to > whatever web UI you use to manage the list. The default template for > this message is non-specific because it comes from Mailman core, and > core doesn't know if you are using Postorius or some other web > management system or non at all, and even if it were to assume > Postorius, it doesn't know the URL. > > >>> I like the idea of a "dashboard" were you can see a summary of mails to moderate and other stuff to have an eye on. And directly do this from this dashbard. Which is convenience. >>> >>> If it is already there, where do I find it? If not, do others also find such a dashboard helpful? > > > As I said, there is no overall dashboard in Postorius, just the > individual list management pages. > > >> This is actually a regression from Mailman 2.x. That train included a link to the relevant dashboard in the email, which I miss terribly. > > > I explained above why this is the case, but you can fix it. You do so by > making a sitewide template for this message. In the case of this list, > we have a template in Mailman's var/templates/site/en/ directory (the > default directory for sitewide english templates. This template is named > list:admin:action:post.txt and its content on this site is: > >> As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the >> following mailing list posting: >> >> List: $listname >> From: $sender_email >> Subject: $subject >> >> The message is being held because: >> >> $reasons >> >> At your convenience, visit >> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/$list_id/held_messages > > > Of course, in your case the <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/> part > of the URL will be different. > > See > <https://wiki.list.org/DOC/Mailman%203%20installation%20experience#Templates> > for the other templates I also install. > > You can also put domain specific templates in > var/templates/domains/$domain/$lc/ which override site templates for the > domain and list specific templates in var/templates/lists/$list_id/$lc/ > which override site and domain templates for the list, and you can also > set list templates via Postorius. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

6 years

[MM3-users]Re: Request for assistance for fresh install of Mailman 3.0.3 and Python 3.4

by Rubén Rivero Capriles

Thanks Mark for your time. I will follow your recommendation and try mailman bundler again, with care so that new conflicts won't occur as happened yesterday. Mailman bundler docs, in the first paragraph, refer to combined installation of GNU Mailman, Postotius, and Hyperkitty. Does that mean that mailman.client will be installed later separately? My CentOs 7 distribution does not offer python3.4.pip. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pip offers pip 8.1.2 in two versions: Python Wheel pip-8.1.2-py2.py3-none-any.whl (md5, pgp) Source pip-8.1.2.tar.gz (md5, pgp) Which one should I choose? I also notice that postfix is required. yum offers the following options: pcp-pmda-postfix.x86_64 : Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) metrics for the Postfix (MTA) postfix.x86_64 : Postfix Mail Transport Agent postfix-perl-scripts.x86_64 : Postfix utilities written in perl postfix-sysvinit.noarch : SysV initscript for postfix spamass-milter-postfix.noarch : Postfix support for spamass-milter postgrey.noarch : Postfix Greylisting Policy Server pypolicyd-spf.noarch : SPF Policy Server for Postfix (Python implementation) sqlgrey.noarch : Postfix grey-listing policy service Which of these options are useful? Which ones are unnecessary? Again, thanks very much for your time and hope that the other subscribers in this list find this thread adequate. Haven't found the link on our distribution list profile settings for uploading an avatar. Best regards, Rubén Rivero Capriles http://www.rubenrivero.net (blog global - español) http://www.rroopstr.com (global blog - English) http://www.riverocooper.com (art & mining) Rubén Rivero Capriles http://www.rubenrivero.net (blog global - español) http://www.rroopstr.com (global blog - English) http://www.riverocooper.com (art & mining) 2016-05-28 14:06 GMT-04:00 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net>: > On 05/28/2016 09:51 AM, Rubén Rivero Capriles wrote: > > > > In order to avoid compatibility issues, I reinstalled CentOs 7. > Firewalld, Apache and BIND are operational. I also installed Python 3.4 at > http://www.codeghar.com/blog/install-latest-python-on-centos-7.html; > however I understand that Python 2.7 is still available and am confused > about usage of each version. > > > Mailman 3 consists of several pieces. There is a core engine which is > Python 3. The core does the basic email list management and exposes many > options and settings via a RESTful API. > > There is also mailman.client which provides Python bindings for the REST > API. This is Python 2. > > We also provide a web management UI, Postorius and an archiver, > HyperKitty. These are Django applications and all of this is Python 2. > > There are other pieces as well. > > > > I downloaded the tarball for mailman 3.0.3. I will greatly appreciate if > you quickly let me know how to install it. I do not wish to use mailman > bundler. > > > This is only the core. You can install it with > > python3 setup.py install > > either in a python 3 virtualenv or not, but this will only give you the > core. > > I suggest you see the docs at <http://docs.list.org/en/latest/>, and if > you don't want to use bundler, see > <https://wiki.list.org/DEV/SetupDevEnvironment>, although bundler is the > recommended way to set up a working, non-development Mailman suite. > > In short, the core requires Python 3.4, most of the rest of the suite > requires Python 2.7 because of dependencies not yet ported to Python 3. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >

9 years, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: uncaught bounce messages

by David Bremner

David Bremner <david(a)tethera.net> writes: > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> writes: >> >> Thank you. I tested that DSN with current flufl.bounce and it is >> recognized as a temp failure for the reported address and that in turn >> should just be ignored by Mailman's bounce runner and not reported as >> unrecognized. >> >> What version of Mailman core is this and what version of flufl.bounce? >> > > Sorry, meant to reply on list with the rest of the details, but got > distracted by making dinner. So it sounds like the problem is old > versions of flufl.bounce. > > This particular machine is running debian oldstable, so things are a bit > out of date. mailman-core is 3.2.1 and flufl.bounce is 3.0. I'll look > into upgrading at least flufl.bounce. Oh. It's actually 3.0.1. Still not new enough, but 3 years newer. d

4 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: emails to list missing from archive after upgrade

by Quanah Gibson-Mount

--On Thursday, January 18, 2024 8:13 PM -0800 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 1/18/24 19:57, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >> >> Ok, I've found them in /var/lib/mailman3/archives/hyperkitty/spool, so >> it does seem like the issue is the indexer hasn't run. Not sure what >> process controls that. > > > That's not the issue. There was an exception in mailman-hyperkitty's > communication with HyperKitty. You will find the errors and tracebacks in > mailman.log. Once you fix the issue, whatever it is, the messages will be > archived. mailman-hyperkitty retries all the messages in > /var/lib/mailman3/archives/hyperkitty/spool with each new post. Thanks Mark! The debian upgrade munged the hyperkitty config. Once that was fixed and a new message posted to the list, everything got archived as it should have been. Regards, Quanah

2 years, 1 month

Search results for query "sapiro"