Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Subscribing users stuck in pending hell

by Quanah Gibson-Mount

--On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 6:11 PM -0700 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 5/24/23 16:07, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >> >> Package: mailman3 >> Version: 3.2.1-1 > > For that version pendings don't have a token_owner. This script will > delete all pending subscriptions, even those waiting moderator approval, > so if there are any of those, they should be handled first. > ``` > >>> pendings = getUtility(IPendings) > >>> for token, data in pendings.find( > ... pend_type=subscription): > ... pendings.confirm(token, expunge=True) > ... > >>> commit() > ``` Thanks Mark! I had to change it to pend_type='subscription' but other than that it worked! :) Regards, Quanah

2 years, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: Issues with cross posted emails after upgrading to mailman 3.3.6

by Simon Coggins

On 4 Nov 2021, at 11:57 pm, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net<mailto:mark@msapiro.net>> wrote: On 11/4/21 1:02 AM, Simon Coggins wrote: > > All I’m doing is literally appending a subset of a hash of the mailing list rcpt address to the front of the message-id, so that if it gets moderated, each instance of the email has a different message-id and each moderation action has it’s own copy of the email to operate on. This seems to have gotten us out of the immediate issues. But I’m eager to find a better solution that might be more permanent. As you have seen, this is new in 3.3.5. I recognize this is a problem. Previously, attempts to accept the message on the second and subsequent lists would throw an uncaught exception - see https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/914<https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/914> and this was a fix for that. Yeah I’m seriously amazed we’ve not had complaints in the year we’ve been running mailman3 that people have lost emails to multiple lists. Only now that you fixed the exception have people seen missing emails :) Please file an issue for this at https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues<https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues> and I will try to find a better solution. Your approach of munging Message-IDs will create other issues. Consider a post to a list with direct CC to userx. userx replies-all to the message received directly. the In-Reply-To of this reply is the unmunged Message-ID which will affect threading in the archives and other recipient's MUAs. I realize this is preferable to losing the message, but I hope we can do better. Yeah it’s not a great solution but it’s the quickest I could come up with that works “for us”. 99% of our lists are announcement lists only with minimal replies so while this will break some. I’m hoping it will give us enough time to wait out a proper fix. I’ve created a new issue #955 with as much detail as I think you’ll need. Let me know if you need any more. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net<mailto:mark@msapiro.net>> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org<mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org<mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/<https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org> --- [https://www.cqu.edu.au/] Mr Simon Coggins Principal Systems Engineer | Digital Services Directorate CQUniversity Australia, Level 6.14, 160 Ann Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000 P +61 7 3295 1182 | X 51182 | M +61 408 115 861 | E s.coggins(a)cqu.edu.au<mailto:s.coggins@cqu.edu.au> [https://www.cqu.edu.au/social-media] I respectfully acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land on which we work and learn, and pay respect to the First Nations Peoples and their Elders, past, present and future. This communication may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this in error, please return to sender and delete. CRICOS: 00219C | RTO Code 40939 ___________________________________________ Mailman's content filtering has removed the following MIME parts from this message. Content-Type: image/png Name: attachment.png Content-Type: image/png Name: attachment.png Replaced multipart/alternative part with first alternative.

4 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: integrating mm3 with postfix / lmtp

by Fabian A. Santiago

On October 26, 2017 10:05:11 PM EDT, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: >On 10/26/2017 06:49 PM, Fabian A. Santiago wrote: >... >> To: >test123-confirm+b7322edad83ae7ec99cfc5100161c7062d2c7685(a)gjb-online.com > > >There is an issue in Mailman 3.1 with regexp tables not working for >addresses of this form. As I posted at ><https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message…>, >see <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/issues/401> and ><https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/merge_requests/323>. That was it. Perfect. I manually modified my regexp map and it works now. Excellent and Thank you. You're the man. Does mm3 ever refresh those maps or only as I add new domains / lists? -- Thanks, Fabian S. OpenPGP: 3C3FA072ACCB7AC5DB0F723455502B0EEB9070FC

8 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Transaction failed: Duplicate header 'DKIM-Signature'

by Mohsen Masoudfar

________________________________ From: Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 1:11 PM To: mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> Subject: [MM3-users] Re: Transaction failed: Duplicate header 'DKIM-Signature' Thank you Mark, please see below the responses to your questions. On 4/13/23 07:25, Mohsen Masoudfar wrote: > I am observing the following error message in the logs for one specific list: > > = = = > relay=email-smtp.us-east-1.amazonaws.com[35.168.84.210]:587, delay=0.27, delays=0.05/0.04/0.12/0.06, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host email-smtp.us-east-1.amazonaws.com[35.168.84.210] said: 554 Transaction failed: Duplicate header 'DKIM-Signature'. (in reply to end of DATA command)) > = = = This is non-compliant. Various parts of RFC6376, e.g. sections 5.6 and 6.1 clearly anticipate that a message can contain multiple DKIM-Signature: headers. > As I mentioned, this happens for one single list only and this list has not been able to send any email for a week now. After checking mailman-users, I came across the following setting, which seems kind of related to my issue: Is email-smtp.us-east-1.amazonaws.com the outgoing MTA for Mailman. I.e the value reported by `mailman conf -k smtp_host` or perhaps smtp_host is a local MTA which is configured to relay via email-smtp.us-east-1.amazonaws.com? > > # mailman conf -k smtp_host > > [mta] smtp_host: localhost In what log is that message? > > in /var/log/mail.log Presumably this error occurs on Mailman's attempt to deliver the mail to `smtp_host`. Otherwise, I don't see how it affects all mail from this list, but I also don't understand why this list's delivery would be different from other lists. Postfix is running on the local host and in /etc/postfix/main.cf, this is defined: relayhost = [email-smtp.us-east-1.amazonaws.com]:587 > = = = > To distribute messages with valid DKIM signatures, I set > remove_dkim_headers: yes > in /etc/mailman3/mailman.cf > = = = > > Here are my questions: > 1 - I have around 100 lists and this happens for this one list only, so, I am not sure, if the issue might be solved with this change. This setting will remove all DKIM headers from the message as Mailman receives it. Then, it depends on how and how many DKIM signatures are added to the outgoing mail. > > could this have any side effects? Is there a reason that this is NOT set per default? > 2 - Because this happens for this one list only, I would rather change it for this one list only, is there any option available changing it for one list only and not for the whole server? No, there is no such option. The fact that this happens for only one list is very strange. I would need more information to understand why. Do these messages get queued in Mailman's retry queue? If so, if you examine one such message with `mailman qfile`, what are the complete headers from that message. > > /var/lib/mailman3/queue/retry is empty Thanks again. M -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai…<https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/> Archived at: https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai…<https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message…> This message sent to mmasoudf(a)aaas.org

2 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: migration

by Dave McGuire

On 7/30/21 4:25 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> I am not at all fluent in django interactions (I'm still not entirely >> sure of what django actually *is*) so I have some reading to do. Any >> pointers on "django wrangling for n00bs" would be great. As I >> mentioned, I've not been hacking on mm3, just using it. I'm an >> accomplished programmer, but embedded C and assembler are a few >> galaxies away from python and web services! > > > Django is a Python based web framework. It is the framework used to > support HyperKitty and Postorius. To learn more, start at > https://www.djangoproject.com/ I'll get to reading. Thanks! -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

4 years, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: Starting new thread in Postorius -> disappears

by Cameron Smith

Mark, My apologies for not investigating more thoroughly before opening my mouth (so to speak). You are, of course, correct in your analysis of what happened to my emails, and this is not the first time that my email setup has caused me problems. I’ve added my alternate email address to my lists.mailman3.org user profile, so hopefully it won’t happen again. > On 2017.11.29, at 18:09 , Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > On 11/29/2017 05:05 PM, Cameron Smith wrote: >> >> On November 21, I sent the message below, as a part of this very thread, to Thor and cc’d the mailman 3 list. But the message never showed up in HyperKitty [1]. I don’t know if other list members received it in their email inboxes or not. > > > Your post was received: > > Nov 21 14:31:20 mailman postfix/cleanup[15735]: 2B3798008D: > message-id=<836BFAB0-4879-4EDF-9026-FEC17D4A2BEC(a)mail2.cetsi.com> > Nov 21 14:31:20 mailman postfix/qmgr[20545]: 2B3798008D: > from=<ccsmith(a)mail2.cetsi.com>, size=10048, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > > delivered to Mailman core: > > Nov 21 14:31:20 mailman postfix/lmtp[15737]: 2B3798008D: > to=<mailman-users(a)mailman3.org>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:8024, > delay=0.31, delays=0.28/0/0/0.02, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Ok) > > and immediately discarded: > > Nov 21 14:31:21 2017 (19106) DISCARD: > <836BFAB0-4879-4EDF-9026-FEC17D4A2BEC(a)mail2.cetsi.com> > > >> Thor obviously received the message (it was addressed to him directly), because he referenced it in a message that is in the archives [1]. However, I never received an email copy of his message from the list. > > > Possibly you never received a list copy of his message because you were > directly addressed and your list option "Receive list copies (possible > duplicates)" is set to No. > > >> So, what’s going on? > > > As to why your post was discarded, unfortunately, the logs don't give > more info. There are a couple of possibilities. If your post contained > an attachment with Content=Type: application/subtype where sub-type > doesn't contain 'signature' it would have been discarded by a header > filter rule. Also it looks like you sent the message From: > <ccsmith(a)mail2.cetsi.com>. If that is not an address on your > <ccsmith(a)cetsi.com> account, it would have been discarded as a > non-member post. > > >> What baffles me is that more people are not complaining about this. Is it just that no one has noticed? Or is it some subtle misconfiguration in my system? And in Thor’s apparently. And maybe in the lists.mailman3.org system as well. > > > I see nothing so far to indicate anything at lists.mailman3.org is > broken in this respect. The only "unusual" thing is this is now a new > thread > <https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/…>, > but presumably that is because your post was in reply to your earlier > post which wasn't archived. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ Cameron Smith Nanaimo, BC tel:1.604.803.0051

8 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: Problem replying via Hyperkitty

by Jeff

I am finally getting around to revisiting the problems I have been having with replying or posting through the web of my Mailman 3 installation. Posts or replies simply disappear. Here is the Django log section from when I did a test post today: [26/Jul/2022:10:19:22 -0400] "GET /3.1/users/30a0c1ee3d8c4c9681cc73ad25c9b00b HTTP/1.1" 200 388 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.3" [26/Jul/2022:10:19:22 -0400] "GET /3.1/users/30a0c1ee3d8c4c9681cc73ad25c9b00b/addresses HTTP/1.1" 200 824 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.3" [26/Jul/2022:10:19:22 -0400] "POST /3.1/members/find HTTP/1.1" 200 90 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.3" [26/Jul/2022:10:19:22 -0400] "POST /3.1/members/find HTTP/1.1" 200 1195 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.3" [26/Jul/2022:10:19:22 -0400] "GET /3.1/addresses/address(a)domain.com HTTP/1.1" 200 348 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.3" [26/Jul/2022:10:19:22 -0400] "GET /3.1/addresses/address(a)domain.com HTTP/1.1" 200 348 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.3" [26/Jul/2022:10:19:22 -0400] "GET /3.1/lists/listname.lists.domain.org HTTP/1.1" 200 480 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.3" [26/Jul/2022:10:19:22 -0400] "GET /3.1/lists/listname(a)lists.domain.org/config HTTP/1.1" 200 3878 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.3" [26/Jul/2022:10:19:22 -0400] "GET /3.1/lists/listname.lists.domain.org/member/address%40domain.com HTTP/1.1" 200 544 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.3" Nothing at all appeared in the Mailman log or the MTA log. Does anyone have any idea what is happening to the posts or what I can do to troubleshoot? Thanks much! > On Jun 30, 2022, at 6:44 PM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > On 6/30/22 10:07 AM, Jeff wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> A few of my users read our mailing list through Hyperkitty. Whenever they reply through the web, their replies simply disappear. One example from today was logged as follows: >> [pid: 2287|app: 0|req: 116007/153551] xxx.xx.xx.xx () {72 vars in 1992 bytes} [Thu Jun 30 11:26:16 2022] POST /archives/list/listname(a)domainname.org/message/46WUOPZITVMKJN4TXR6CP3WMFUEAVJKD/reply => generated 3213 bytes in 70 msecs (HTTP/1.1 200) 6 headers in 188 bytes (3 switches on core 0) > > > This looks like the post of the reply to HyperKitty. What does the user see in response to that? > > There should be a brief alert popup indicating the message was sent. > > >> A couple of basic questions: >> 1) when a users replies in this manner, does their response go to the list or to the subscriber to whom they are replying? > > To the list. > > >> 2) what log files could I check to see what — if anything — happens to these emails? > > Mailman's var/logs/mailman.log, The MTA logs and the Django logs. > > >> 3) Are there any settings that need to be set to make this work? > > There shouldn't be as long as the list and archiving work. > > Note, a user can select 'Use email software' when replying which should open a composition dialog in their email client to post a reply yto the list. > > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

3 years, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: Whitelist non subscriber

by Barry Warsaw

On Aug 10, 2017, at 13:05, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > Mailman 3 defines the list attribute accept_these_nonmembers, but it is > not currently implemented to actually have any effect, nor is it exposed > in Postorius. Yes, that attribute is deprecated and (almost) completely removed. > At the present, I think you would have to create a user record with the > address and add that user to all lists with role nonmember and > moderation_action 'defer' to apply subsequent tests or 'accept' to > unconditionally accept posts from that address. That’s the way it should be done. Those actions may not be exposed yet in Postorius or the CLI, so you might have to do it with a `wishlist` script. -Barry

8 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Installation Wooes

by Samir Faci

@Marc disregard the direct email I sent you. Okay, so just to clarify both postfix and mailman are running on the same host. In theory, everything should be able to connect to localhost on port 25 to be able to send any emails it needs. 198.199.98.177 resolves is already added to my networks, but I added it explicitly. mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.localdomain, localhost, $mydomain, lists.domain.org, 198.199.98.177 I tried setting the values to the dns name which resolves to the public IP and the 127.0.0.1 and right now I keep on seeing these errors: connect to lists.geekbeacon.org[198.199.98.177]:8024: Connection refused So, I ended up having to tweak my /etc/hosts file a bit as well as ``` smtp_host: lists.domain.org smtp_port: 25 smtp_user: smtp_pass: # Where the LMTP server listens for connections. Use 127.0.0.1 instead of # localhost for Postfix integration, because Postfix only consults DNS # (e.g. not /etc/hosts). lmtp_host: lists.domain.org lmtp_port: 8024 ``` So, now it's finally working but here's a question. Does 8024 need to be publically accessible from the outside? On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 8:32 PM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 5/3/20 8:13 PM, Samir Faci wrote: > > > > Postfix Failed Logs. > > > > May 4 03:07:36 lists postfix/smtpd[1968155]: disconnect from > > unknown[198.199.98.177] ehlo=1 mail=1 rcpt=0/1 rset=1 quit=1 commands=4/5 > > May 4 03:07:36 lists postfix/smtpd[1968155]: connect from > > unknown[198.199.98.177] > > May 4 03:07:36 lists postfix/smtpd[1968155]: 745B31473C6: > > client=unknown[198.199.98.177] > > May 4 03:07:36 lists postfix/cleanup[1968158]: 745B31473C6: > > message-id=<158856165549.136760.840427238489827082@lists> > > May 4 03:07:36 lists postfix/qmgr[1964759]: 745B31473C6: > > from=<booh-bounces(a)lists.domain.org > > So mailman and Postfix are on different machines. That may complicate > things, but > > > > <mailto:booh-bounces@lists.domain.org>>, size=5474, nrcpt=1 (queue > active) > > May 4 03:07:36 lists postfix/smtpd[1968155]: disconnect from > > unknown[198.199.98.177] ehlo=1 mail=1 rcpt=1 data=1 quit=1 commands=5 > > May 4 03:07:36 lists postfix/lmtp[1968159]: 745B31473C6: > > to=<booh-owner(a)lists.domain.org <mailto:booh-owner@lists.domain.org>>, > > relay=lists.domain.org <http://lists.domain.org>[198.199.98.177]:8024, > > delay=0.03, delays=0/0/0/0.02, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Ok) > > This was a successful delivery. > > > > May 4 03:07:36 lists postfix/qmgr[1964759]: 745B31473C6: removed > > May 4 03:07:38 lists postfix/smtpd[1968155]: connect from > > unknown[198.199.98.177] > > May 4 03:07:38 lists postfix/smtpd[1968155]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from > > unknown[198.199.98.177]: 554 5.7.1 <csgeek(a)domain.com > > <mailto:csgeek@domain.com>>: Relay access denied; > > from=<booh-bounces+csgeek=domain.com(a)lists.domain.org > > <mailto:domain.com@lists.domain.org>> to=<csgeek(a)domain.com > > <mailto:csgeek@domain.com>> proto=ESMTP helo=<[127.0.1.1]> > > You are sending from a remote machine 198.199.98.177 to a presumably > remote domain domain.com so relay access is denied as it should be. > > You need to add 198.199.98.177 to mynetworks in Postfix. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- Thank you Samir Faci https://keybase.io/csgeek

5 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Issues with cross posted emails after upgrading to mailman 3.3.6

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Mark Sapiro writes: > Thanks for filing the issue. I'll work on a solution. My current > thinking is to add a `count` column to the message table, set the count > to 1 when initially adding a message-id, increment the count when adding > an existing message-id, decrement the count when deleting a message-id > and only delete the entry and message when the count reaches 0. Are we guaranteed to get a separate LMTP delivery for each list? That is, if the MTA receives 2 RCPT TOs to lists for one transaction, won't it do the same in LMTP when it sends forwards the message to Mailman? Steve

4 years, 5 months

Search results for query "sapiro"