Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: content filtering in version 3.1

by Simon Handfield

Thanks for your quick reply, Mark. I see, I've retried without the -l switch and the shell returns without error. The --help switch returns: # mailman shell --help usage: mailman shell [-h] [-i] [-r RUN] [--details] [LISTNAME] positional arguments: LISTNAME The 'fully qualified list name', i.e. the posting address of the mailing list to inject the message into. This can be a Python regular expression, in which case all mailing lists whose posting address matches will be processed. To use a regular expression, LISTNAME must start with a ^ (and the matching is done with re.match(). LISTNAME cannot be a regular expression unless --run is given. Thanks once again, Simon. ________________________________ From: Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 2021 14:22 To: mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> Subject: [MM3-users] Re: content filtering in version 3.1 On 5/11/21 8:45 PM, Simon Handfield via Mailman-users wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm sorry to resurrect this thread from so long ago but it appeared to provide exactly the answer I was looking for, trying to manage pass_types in 3.1.1 on Ubuntu 18.04. > > GNU Mailman 3.1.1 (Between The Wheels) > > Unfortunately when I run: > > ./bin/mailman shell -l [list address] > > I receive: > > usage: mailman [-h] [-v] [-C CONFIG] > {help,aliases,conf,create,digests,import21,info,inject,lists,members,qfile,remove,reopen,restart,shell,start,status,stop,unshunt,version,withlist} > ... > mailman: error: unrecognized arguments: -l > > Can anyone advise how I can use the -l switch to manage this setting for a list? Older versions of Mailman core did not support the -l/--listspec option for mailman shell. They expected the listname as an argument as in ``` mailman shell list(a)example.com ``` What does ``` mailman shell --help ``` show in your case? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai… _ [State Library of NSW]<https://www.sl.nsw.gov.au/> Simon Handfield Desktop and Infrastructure Leader simon.handfield(a)sl.nsw.gov.au<mailto:simon.handfield@sl.nsw.gov.au> +61 2 9273 1535 Macquarie Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia www.sl.nsw.gov.au<https://www.sl.nsw.gov.au/> This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of their organisation.

5 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Multi-domain oddities in Hyperkitty and Postorius

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/15/23 07:52, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > Thanks, I'm still doing my best to wrap my brain around how Django > uses database migrations to create sites (seems like a very strange > use of a migration, I'm only accustomed to seeing them applied for > database schema updates). I don't think it does. There are a couple of migrations at django/contrib/sites/migrations, but these are only the initial creation of the model and an update to make the domain field unique. Why do you think it creates sites in this way. > Once I work out how to script site > creation, I'm still not completely finding the explanations I need > for how to map them to domains in Mailman though. > > The Mailman documentation about domains says "Domains are how > Mailman interacts with email host names and web host names" but > doesn't actually go on to say (that I can find anywhere) how it > actually associates them. Mailman core doesn't associate domains with Django sites. Mailman core knows nothing about a web UI. The association between Mailman core domains and Django sites is via Postorius. It doesn't exist in Mailman core. When Postorius sees a new domain from core, it assigns it a web_host based on the current web host accessing Postorius. > I can see in the API docs that a POST to > the domains endpoint will create a new domain with a specific > mail_host FQDN, but there's some association somewhere of that to a > web host (Django site), right? No. The only association is if Postorius is creating the domain in core, vs something else creating it via the REST API, Postorius will assign it a web_host in it's own Domain model, and that web host must be an existing Django site, which is only created via Django. > How is that set or manipulated > through the API? Or is that something which has to be set directly > in Django's data structures instead? Yes, A new site has to be created in Django. Even Postorius doesn't do that. > To recap, on creation of a mailing list server I want to populate it > automatically with multiple lists on different domains and have > dynamic SITE_ID=0 domain guessing performed so that the correct site > name and list filtering is performed depending on which domain name > is used in a URL the client requests. I believe I need to have the > automation perform the following steps: > > 1. Instantiate the Mailman installation and run initial migrations > with SITE_ID=1 in order to avoid the problem mentioned in the docs > about not using SITE_ID=0 until the tables have been populated, then > switch the settings.py to use SITE_ID=0 once done. > > 2. Create the individual sites I need in Django (Mailman web hosts) > by creating and applying database migrations. No. You create the sites via Django, but not by creating and applying database migrations. > 3. Create the individual domains I need in Mailman (Mailman mail > hosts) through its REST API. > > 4. "Somehow" tell Mailman (or Django?) which mail hosts correspond > to what web hosts. Neither Mailman nor Django. It's Postorius which maintains the relationship between Django sites which it calls web_hosts and domains. > As I said, I'm still trying to understand how to make step 2 happen > (Django has a steep learning curve for me), but beyond that I'm > unsure how to do step 4 at all. I can do all of this through the > WebUI of course, and have confirmed that it works as expected when I > do, I'm just trying to work out the automation so that our other > sysadmins don't have to perform these steps by hand the next time we > need to rebuild the server. Step 2. $ django_admin shell ``` >>> from django.contrib.sites.models import Site >>> new_site = Site(id=5, domain='5.example.com', name='display_name') >>> new_site.save() ``` Of course the values are up to you and you can omit the id= to have Django assign the first available.. Once you've done step 2, you need to create a domain in Postorius. Look at the code behind Postorius add new domain. Or you can create the domain in core via REST, but you then have to modify it in Postorius to associate the correct site. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: Main daemon process sticks around after forking

by Jérôme Charaoui

Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 8/6/25 18:17, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > On 8/6/25 09:03, Jérôme Charaoui wrote: > > I'm running a (rather large) mailman3 instance on Debian 13 (trixie) > > using the distribution packages. > > To manage the mailman3 daemon, the package installs this systemd > > service unit: > > https://sources.debian.org/src/mailman3/3.3.10-2/debian/mailman3.service/ > > It has been working fine until recently: after a reboot, we noticed > > the mailman3 unit consistently failing to start due to a timeout error. > > I figured out that the timeout was related to the service unit type > > (Type=forking) and the fact that the main/parent process was forking > > subprocesses (and running normally), writing a PID file, but it wasn't > > exiting, so systemd identifies this as an error and aborts the service. > > The master is not supposed to exit. It continues to run and monitor the > > child runner processes and will under some circumstances restart a > > runner that dies. > > Further, our recommended systemd configuration is at > https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#starting-mailman... > and includes Type=forking and this is the first I've heard of an issue > with that. I ended up figuring out the problem by myself: I needed to create a list, and via the web interface it would return a 502 error after a small delay. On the command-line, the "create" operation was hanging forever, never completing. I used strace to check out what the process was doing and saw it was in a loop attempting to get a lock on "/var/lib/mailman3/locks/mta". There were a number of files in that locks directory that also seemed stale, so I stopped the mailman3 daemons, removed all the lock files manually, and started them again. That fixed both creating a new list and the fact that the startup process was not exiting as systemd was expecting. [0] It seems to me like this all might be caused by some code path that will retry forever to get a lock without ever timing out or logging some error. Furthermore, I suspect the stale lock file themselves could have been a side-effect of the extremely frequent OOMs we were suffering from before disabling HYPERKITTY_MBOX_EXPORT, due to scrapers continuously hitting /export/ endpoints. [1] [2] [0] https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/42255 [1] https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/41957 [2] https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/-/issues/385

1 year, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: Bulk delivery status change?

by Stephen Daniel

If I run >>> for mlist in getUtility(IListManager): ... print(mlist) ... <mailing list "testlist1(a)chapelwoodhoadev.org" at 0x7f83f593fba8> I get only one list. Permissions? Where are the other lists? On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 11:52 AM Stephen Daniel <swd(a)pobox.com> wrote: > OK. Ran the script. No errors while running it, but when I look at the > users through Postorius GUI, they still show as 'Disabled by Bounces' > > ?? > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 11:42 AM Stephen Daniel <swd(a)pobox.com> wrote: > >> Thanks all! I will use these pronto. >> >> On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 11:42 AM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: >> >>> On 11/10/24 08:34, Odhiambo Washington via Mailman-users wrote: >>> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 7:16 PM Stephen Daniel <swd(a)pobox.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Mistakes were made, and for while every single outbound email bounced. >>> >> I've fixed the mistakes, but now in my largest and most active email >>> list, >>> >> every single user's delivery status is "Disabled by Bounces". >>> >> >>> >> Is there a way to bulk fix this? Or do I have to go into each user, >>> one at >>> >> a time, and fix them? >>> > >>> > Please see this thread: >>> > >>> https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… >>> >>> The script in that post does all lists. For a single list see >>> >>> https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… >>> but note that the command line >>> ``` >>> $ shell -l list(a)example.com >>> ``` >>> should be >>> ``` >>> $ mailman shell -l list(a)example.com >>> ``` >>> >>> -- >>> Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, >>> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >>> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >>> Archived at: >>> https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… >>> >>> This message sent to swd(a)pobox.com >>> >>

1 year, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Running mailman3 on AWS and dealing with SES email verification

by Mohsen Masoudfar

Thank you Mark, this is really very helpful. I am going to work on the details. It would be breat, if there were a way to set some of this options as default, like DMARC mitigation is default to no, I changed it to unconditionally and replace From to with list address and got good results, but the default is no. How may I changed the default, do that the list owner/creator does not need to update these fields. Thanks Mohsen -----Original Message----- From: Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 1:15 PM To: mailman-users(a)mailman3.org Subject: [MM3-users] Re: Running mailman3 on AWS and dealing with SES email verification [EXTERNAL EMAIL] On 4/30/20 9:25 AM, Mohsen Masoudfar wrote: > Hi, > > This seems to be a very basic question and/or issue, but I could not find a reliable for it: > > Assume a list member with the email address like (just as an example) > joe.student(a)university.edu sends an email to a list, Mailman gets the > email, processes it and would try to send that email to all members > with a sender field as: 'joe.student(a)university.edu'. plus > listname(a)listserver.TLD Are you referring to the envelope sender or to the From: header? The envelope sender will be listname-bounces(a)listserver.TLD or if VERP is enabled, listname-bounces+recipient=recipient.domain(a)listserver.TLD. The From: header will be unchanged from the incoming message. If yo want the From: to be the list, you can apply DMARC "Replace From with list address" unconditionally and the From: will look like From: joe.student via listname <listname(a)listserver.TLD> ... > I found some solution: > > > * Asking the members to add their email to the signature > * manipulating the from field and add the name of the sender as a comment, not that easy, needs some Python code > * manipulating the from files and replacing the @ with something else, not that easy, needs some Python code > * . . . The DMARC mitigations will do these thing for you. > More important: None of these would allow a simple click on the reply bottom to send the email to the original sender. And they will add the poster's original From: address to Reply-To: -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai…

6 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: MTA setup

by Arte Chambers

I'm not sure how to check mailmans shunt queue. I'm not seeing any errors in mailman logs There are several .pck files in Mailman's var/archives/hyperkitty/spool/ I can send email from the server using mail utilities as long as the "from email address" contains the server's domain name. I also notice that in this MM3-Users list the "from" email shows senders(a)emailaddress.com VIA mailman3.org. I'm wondering if I've missed something that would allow my server to behave this way. Thank you, Paul 'Arte Chambers' Robey 502-408-6922 On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 11:31 PM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 11/17/24 19:32, Arte Chambers via Mailman-users wrote: > > > > Mailman is successfully sending invite emails however user messages sent > to > > the list are not being sent to subscribers. Also in Hyperkitty none of my > > test messages to the list are showing up in the archive. > > > Are there messages in Mailman's shunt queue? Check for errors in > mailman.log. Are there messages for hyperkitty queued in Mailman's > var/archives/hyperkitty/spool/ directory? > > > I am using Postfix with an SMTP relay hosted at Brevo.com (formally > > sendinblue). Brevo's logs show the message getting rejected > > > > > > Log from brevo.com (SMPT Relay) > > Sent on 17-11-2024 21:49:16 > >>From listmember(a)gmail.com > > To listmember(a)gmail.com > > Message ID<CAPesOD1y0fEaG=GFodz=Lgs1m_hqRErPnQcpXCNtKsBbJ= > > BJ7Q(a)mail.gmail.com> > > > > 17-11-2024 21:49:16 > > Sending has been rejected because the sender you used > listmember(a)gmail.com > > is not valid. Validate your sender or authenticate your domain > > > This appears to be something you need to do for the MTA at > smtp-relay.sendinblue.com, or possibly something more is needed in > /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd. > > > #SMPT Relay Brevo > > relayhost = [smtp-relay.sendinblue.com]:587 > > smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes > > smtp_sasl_security_options = noanonymous > > smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd > > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > Archived at: > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > This message sent to paul.m.robey(a)gmail.com >

1 year, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: I have issue where it does not send emails on to people in the list I create.

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/30/20 8:30 AM, john_warland(a)hotmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > I am quite new to Mailman3 and have been trying to get a working local test setup on a single VM (Centos07) > > I have issue where if I send an email to the list. it does not send emails on to the people subscribed to that list. > > Note the steps below were put together from memory after a few days of repeatably trying different things so there will be some inaccuracies > > > I have mailman running on same local box as postfix, postorius and hyperkitty. > > I have root as the superuser in Postorius and have tried the following: > > In unix shell created new user 'developer' > In unix shell created new user 'tester' > > In shell send an email from developer user to tester: > echo 'Hello' | mailx -s 'Hello Subject line' tester(a)sandbox.mytest.com > > Confirmed user tester received email in cat /home/tester/Maildir/new/ folder: > > Return-Path: <developer(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com> > X-Original-To: tester(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com > Delivered-To: tester(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com > Received: by cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) > > In Postorius web frontend: > > Signed up as root > Received confirmation email in /root/Maildir/new/ folder so cut and pasted the Url in the email to activate account. > Created new list called testlist(a)sandbox.mytest.com > Logged out > > Signed up as tester > Received confirmation email in /home/tester/Maildir/new/ folder so cut and pasted the Url to activate account. > Subscribed tester to the testlist. > > Next in unix shell su as developer and send an email to testlist(a)sandbox.mytest.com > > The root user gets the following email > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Subject: Your message to testlist(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com awaits moderator approval > From: testlist-bounces(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com > To: developer(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com > Message-ID: <158824480291.3035.17408340520496115243(a)localhost.localdomain> > Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:06:42 +0000 > Precedence: bulk > X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.0 > > Your mail to 'testlist(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com' with the subject > > hello there 2 > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The message is being held because: > > The message is not from a list member > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. > > Once I have gone back into Postorius as root and approved the message, root user gets a second email: > > Return-Path: <testlist-bounces(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com> > X-Original-To: root(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com > Delivered-To: root(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com > Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [IPv6:::1]) > by cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E056A84CE4 > for <root(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:09:10 +0000 (UTC) > Received: by cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) > id 8F1B684CE4; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:06:41 +0000 (UTC) > Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:06:41 +0000 > To: testlist(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com > User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Message-Id: <20200430110641.8F1B684CE4(a)sandbox.mytest.com> > From: developer(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com > X-MailFrom: developer(a)cloud7.sandbox.mytest.com > X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation > X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation > Message-ID-Hash: FAPTJKJRZG2ELSOSBRBIDOBWXP3Y5QAY > X-Message-ID-Hash: FAPTJKJRZG2ELSOSBRBIDOBWXP3Y5QAY > X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:09:10 +0000 > X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.0 > Precedence: list > > Subject: [Testlist] hello there 2 > > List-Id: A test list <testlist.sandbox.mytest.com> > List-Help: <mailto:testlist-request@sandbox.mytest.com?subject=help> > List-Post: <mailto:testlist@sandbox.mytest.com> > List-Subscribe: <mailto:testlist-join@sandbox.mytest.com> > List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:testlist-leave@sandbox.mytest.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > A test email 2 > _______________________________________________ > Testlist mailing list -- testlist(a)sandbox.mytest.com > To unsubscribe send an email to testlist-leave(a)sandbox.mytest.com > > > At no point does the email appear in the tester(a)sandbox.mytest.com Maildir Why does root get the list post? Is root also a member of the list. What's in logs? Mailman's logs and the MTA logs > > Configs as follows.. tl;dr and mostly irrelevant. What do the following shell commands show mailman members testlist.sandbox.mytest.com mailman members -r testlist.sandbox.mytest.com mailman members -n any testlist.sandbox.mytest.com -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Mailman REST API not available. Please start Mailman core.

by Christian

That worked. Now on https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#starting-mailman -automatically it says "Pay attention to the config file output above and make sure that you see /etc/mailman3/mailman.cfg there. If the config path is different, you should make sure to create a new config file at /etc/mailman3/mailman.cfg and re-run the command." Well...mailman info yields GNU Mailman 3.3.5 (Tom Sawyer) Python 3.7.3 (default, Mar 23 2024, 16:12:05) [GCC 8.3.0] config file: /opt/mailman/mm/mailman.cfg db url: postgres://mailman:5DqTHnv8hUQSdd@localhost/mailman devmode: DISABLED REST root url: http://localhost:8001/3.1/ REST credentials: restadmin:restpass Should I create a new config file at /etc/mailman3/mailman.cfg ? Lastly, when I ran this command it says "loaded failed failed" (venv) mailman@lists:/opt/mailman/mm$ systemctl list-units | grep -i mailman gunicorn.service loaded active running GNU Mailman web interfaces ● mailman.service loaded failed failed GNU Mailing List Manager Please advise. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 10:33 AM To: mailman-users(a)mailman3.org Subject: [MM3-users] Re: Mailman REST API not available. Please start Mailman core. On 2/12/25 09:24, Christian via Mailman-users wrote: > Running Debian 4.19.316-1 > Python 3.7.3 > > I am unable to start mailman core > > > mailman@lists:~$ /opt/mailman/mm/bin/mailman start > Usage: mailman start [OPTIONS] > Try 'mailman start -h' for help. > > Error: A previous run of GNU Mailman did not exit cleanly > (stale_lock). Try using --force mailman@lists:~$ > > > I try using --force and it did not work. So how do I start it? In Mailman's var/locks directory (maybe /opt/mailman/mm/var/locks/) you will see at least two files. The ones of interest are: ``` master.lck master.lck|<host_name>|<pid>|<random_integer> ``` First verify that pid is not running or if it is, that it's not Mailman's `master` process. Then remove all the files from the var/locks/ directory and Mailman should start. > Bottom line: I would like for Mailman core to start when I reboot the > server. How can this be achieved please? See https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#starting-mailman -automatically -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ Archived at: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message/ LV5WTFTNRZ455KPDESRQHFV67SJ5VOFH/ This message sent to csa(a)web-analysts.net

1 year, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: Splitting hosts: mta&core vs postorius

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/22/20 12:23 PM, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote: > >> I agree with this, we need a setting for which interface for Gunicorn >> to listen on, and what Mailman Core sends out in the self_link >> attribute when responding to REST requests. >> > Exactly! :-) Except if there were a `bind_host` setting to specify the host to bind the REST API to and you set that to `0.0.0.0` you would have exactly what leads to the situation below, so we need to understand what's happening there (although I think I do - see below). On 6/22/20 12:21 PM, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote: > > I did try with the gunicorn patch Mark mentioned (host = "0.0.0.0") and > changing the cfg file hostname back to the full name of the host, and > that now works!! -- in that the problem I showed earlier is gone. > > > However I then get another issue. From the mailman.log file I now see in > the last few lines. For clarity I've numbered them like this "{1}": > > {1} [22/Jun/2020:00:58:24 +0000] "GET /3.1/domains HTTP/1.1" 200 320 "-" > "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.1" > {2} [22/Jun/2020:00:58:24 +0000] "GET /3.1/domains/ch-bc.org.uk > HTTP/1.1" 200 215 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.1" > {3} [22/Jun/2020:00:58:24 +0000] "GET > /3.1/domains/greyarea-web1.cam.ivimey.org/lists?advertised=true&count=0&page=1 > HTTP/1.1" 404 26 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.1" > > At this point the browser screen reports "Something went wrong" and the > message "HTTP Error 404: {"title": "404 Not Found"}" Tracebacks would really help. You should be able to find them in the log configured as LOGGING['handlers']['file']['filename'] in your Django settings. > Previously, the process stopped at line {1}. Now that and line {2} is > executed (AFAIK) correctly, but then line {3} is isssued. I have no idea > why something is looking for "domains/greyarea-web1": > > - Only the "ch-bc.org.uk" domain is listed in the reply to line {1}, as > expected; Go to your Django admin web UI and look at your Django Mailman 3 Mail domains. This will be at a URL like https://greyarea-web1.cam.ivimey.org/admin/django_mailman3/maildomain/ Do you see this domain there? If so, delete it. > - "greyarea-web1" doesn't appear in any lists I can show with the > "mailman" cli command (and I think I tried them all); But that's looking at Mailman core which is not where Postorius is getting this list. > - "greyarea-web1" doesn't appear anywhere in the source or config other > than as the name of the host its running on or as an ALLOWED_HOST; > > - I tried using "curl -X DELETE" (from the api docs) to delete a domain > called that and it says no such list exists. Again, you're talking to core, not Django. > My only possible clue is that I think, at some point in the journey of > configuring mailman, I might have created a list called that on the > host. However since then I have wiped the install files and reinstalled. > I cannot make sense of this being the answer given the checks just listed. Did you wipe the database on greyarea-web1? > I went looking through the python source and can see that the get() > function does indeed throw a 404 exception if the domain isn't found, > but I cannot see which code is parsing the reply from the first line > > So I have two questions: > > 1) How can I fix this problem? See above. > 2) why does getting an 404 reply here cause the postorius web page to > produce a "something went wrong" /404 and nothing else, when it could > have simply reported that something had gone wrong with one specific > domain; Because the code isn't robust enough :( ... > Ideally, and this is icing on the cake, a listen address specification > should allow multiple IPs to be passed in, in which case the server > listens on all of them. I expect the python libraries already support this. We could implement a bind_address setting that would pass to gunicorns --bind parameter anything acceptable to gunicorn, although multiple values are tricky as they apparently require multiple -b/--bind options and a single -b/--bind doesn't support a list of values. But, I'm not convinced that this is something anyone needs. I'm still waiting for a response to <https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message…>. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: unrequested unsubscription

by Mike Wertheim

Thanks. Here are the log lines that correspond to the emails to the "-leave" address in /var/log/mailman3/smtp.log... Jun 14 10:10:29 2023 (199628) Available AUTH mechanisms: LOGIN(builtin) PLAIN(builtin) Jun 14 10:10:29 2023 (199628) Peer: ('127.0.0.1', 35610) Jun 14 10:10:29 2023 (199628) ('127.0.0.1', 35610) handling connection Jun 14 10:10:29 2023 (199628) ('127.0.0.1', 35610) Data: b'LHLO mydomain.com ' Jun 14 10:10:29 2023 (199628) ('127.0.0.1', 35610) Data: b'MAIL FROM:< someone-i-know(a)gmail.com>' Jun 14 10:10:29 2023 (199628) ('127.0.0.1', 35610) sender: someone-i-know(a)gmail.com Jun 14 10:10:29 2023 (199628) ('127.0.0.1', 35610) Data: b'RCPT TO:< mylist-leave(a)mydomain.com>' Jun 14 10:10:29 2023 (199628) ('127.0.0.1', 35610) recip: mylist-leave(a)mydomain.com Jun 14 10:10:29 2023 (199628) ('127.0.0.1', 35610) Data: b'DATA' Jun 14 10:10:29 2023 (199628) ('127.0.0.1', 35610) Data: b'QUIT' Jun 14 10:10:29 2023 (199628) ('127.0.0.1', 35610) connection lost The IP address is 127.0.0.1. Would that imply that the messages were really sent from the localhost, or could that mean that the real sender IP address just wasn't captured for some reason? On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:29 PM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 6/14/23 19:40, Mike Wertheim wrote: > > I have a Mailman 3 email list, running on Mailman 3.3.3 on Debian 11. > > > > A few of the list members are reporting that they received Email Address > > Unsubscription Confirmation emails, but claim that they never requested > to > > be unsubscribed. (All are Gmail users. but they might be coincidental, > > since most list members are Gmail users.) > > > > Has anyone seen this behavior before? Any ideas on what might be > happening? > > > Yes. This is someone sending an email `leave` or `unsubscribe` command > for the user in question. This may be malicious, i.e. someone doesn't > like a user's posts and tries to unsubscribe them, or it may be just > spam of some sort. > > the user should just ignore the email. Beyond that, there's not much you > can do unless you can identify from mail logs the source of the requests. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > Archived at: > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > This message sent to mike.wertheim(a)gmail.com >

3 years, 4 months

Search results for query "sapiro"