Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Sending to mangled 'From' addresses.

by hansen

Thank you, Mark. Yes, the problem is with the mail clients which harvest addresses inappropriately (I never asked them to). I just found the header filter option, which I has been looking for under ’Settings'. Sorry for taking your time. It works great! Yours, Allan > On Jun 1, 2024, at 09:49, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > On 5/31/24 22:23, hansen via Mailman-users wrote: >> Due to the DMARC mitigation action ‘Replace From: with list address’, it happens often on my lists that someone sends a message to a mangled address, hoping that the message goes to the person listed as the sender. This happens mostly because the mail clients collect previous addresses and use them when as type-ahead candidates for new messages, which may be unrelated to the lists. > > > DMARC mitigation action ‘Replace From: with list address’ will also place the poster's address in Reply-To: (or Cc: depending on list configuration), so a simple `reply` from a reasonable MUA should go just to the poster. > > >> For example, say the mail client captures my address as >> “Allan Hansen via <listname>” <listaddress> >> then later, when the person wants to send a message to me, the type-ahead puts this string in the ’To:’ field: >> “Allan Hansen via <listname>” >> and, to make it worse, the actual email address, <listaddress>, is often hidden. > > > If this is the result of a `reply` and not `reply-all` the client is not behaving reasonably. > > >> The result is that the email gets sent to the list instead of to me, together with (often) personal and (sometimes) embarrassing information. > > > That is a problem with the client, but I suppose such clients are not uncommon. > >> Is there a way to reject messages sent to recipients where the name part of the recipient is of the above format, i.e., >> "Allan Hansen via <listname>" > > You could add a header filter on the To header with a regexp like `^.*via <listname>` and the desired action. > >> Should I get onto the other list to request this as an enhancement? > > I don't think that's necessary in this case, as Header filters should do it. > > In general, the best way to request an enhancement is to file an issue with the appropriate GitLab project at `https://gitlab.com/mailman` > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > Archived at: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > This message sent to hansen(a)rc.org

1 year, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: Custom templates (was: Re: Re: nginx configuration on a multitasking server)

by David Newman

On 1/14/22 6:35 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 1/14/22 6:11 PM, David Newman wrote: >> On 1/14/22 4:54 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >>> >>> It should work. I suspect you need to go to the list's Settings -> >>> Automatic Responses and set `Admin immed notify` to Yes. >> >> >> It's enabled. I think this triggers notifications only for new >> subscription requests, not pending ones. > > > Yes. That will send a single notification at the time of the request > using the `list:admin:action:subscribe.txt` template. Notices of pending > requests are sent by the `mailman notify` command using the > `list:admin:notice:pending.txt` template. > > ... >>> You can test `mailman notify` at any time by running it by hand. >> >> >> Thanks. This still isn't working as intended. I took these steps: >> >> 1. Created the file >> '/opt/mailman/mm/var/templates/lists/test.lists.domain.tld/en/list:admin:action:pending.txt' > > > The template name is `list:admin:notice:pending.txt`, not > `list:admin:action:pending.txt`. Thats why it didn't work. Bingo. Thanks -- the template works as intended now. > > ... >> 2. Restarted the mailman3 and mailmanweb services > > > You only needed to restart Mailman core. OK > > > ... >> What I'm trying to do here is replicate a feature from MM2.1, where >> pending notifications had URLs embedded in the message. That's not >> available out of the box in MM3, and if there's a place for feature >> requests I'd be glad to ask that this be made the default. > > > The place for feature requests for Mailman core (which this is) is > https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues, however, this is not > straightforward as Mailman core doesn't know if you even have Postorius > or some other web management UI installed or what the URL to access it > might be. Thus it's not just a simple matter of editing templates. It > would also require a configuration setting for the base URL for the web > admin UI and changes in logic to provide an appropriate replacement > depending on whether or not the base URL was configured. Understood, thanks. Although this distinction is very important for server admins, it's likely not meaningful for many list owners and moderators. For them, MM2.1 sent an email saying "go here" and MM3/Django/Postorius/Hyperkitty doesn't, at least not out of the box. There is some pending template in use by default, just not one with a URL included. Is this something better handled in the venv and/or Web installation docs? Or should I file a feature request for core, or Postorious or someplace else? Thanks very much! dn > >

3 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Reply w/Email Clients - From: vs. Reply-To:

by Jay Hamilton-Roth

On Nov 17, 2020, at 5:31 PM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 11/17/20 2:34 PM, j(a)manygoodideas.com wrote: >> I'm setting up a new list, and a number of new list members are reporting a problem with replying to the thread. Their email clients seem to ignore the Reply-To: field and instead use from From: field. > > > Are you saying that a 'reply' , not 'reply-all' will reply to the From: > only and ignore Reply-To:? If so, the email clients that are doing that > are badly behaved. I can't say they are non-compliant as RFC 5322 > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5322.html#section-3.6.2> only says: > > The originator fields also provide the information required when > replying to a message. When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it > indicates the address(es) to which the author of the message suggests > that replies be sent. > > > I.e., Reply-To: is only a 'suggestion', but well behaved clients will > follow it. That's exactly what I'm saying. And there's more than a few of these badly behaved clients. >> When they use Reply All, the email is addressed to both the From: and Reply-To:. > > Reply All should reply to the Reply-To:, To: and Cc: addresses and to > From: if there is no Reply-To:. Whether Reply All should include From: > if there is a Reply-To is not well defined. > > >> Reading through previous threads here, I've tried a number of things: >> >> 1) DMARC mitigation action is "Replace From: with list address" >> 2) For Alter Messages - Set "Reply goes to list" >> >> The goal is that we want a reply to go to the list, not the person posting. Since Reply-To seems to be ignored by some clients, I'm hoping there's a way to force the "From" field to become the list address. Thanks in advance for your suggestions! > > If Alter Messages -> Reply goes to list is set to Reply goes to list, > Reply-To: will include the list posting address. What are the clients > that ignore this? Complaints should go to the providers of those. Complaints sent. > > Tf DMARC mitigation action is "Replace From: with list address", that > will happen to messages to which DMARC mitigation action applies. If you > want it to apply to all messages, set DMARC Mitigate unconditionally to > Yes. That fixed it. Thanks again, Mark! > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

5 years

[MM3-users] Re: Adding Mass Subscribe custom template error

by Arte Chambers

Thanks! Looks resolved however I'm not 100% sure which steps fixed it: My Steps: ``` cat /etc/hosts 127.0.1.1 list.louisvillecommunitygrocery.com list 127.0.0.1 localhost ``` Updated ``` POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL = 'http://localhost:8000/' POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL = 'https://example.com' ``` Restarted mailman3 AND mailmanweb service Updated /etc/mailman3/gunicorn.conf adding workers=9 Restarted mailman3 AND mailmanweb service Deleted custom template from Postorious Created new custom template from Postorious Added test user to list User was added with no errors and also received the custom Template. Thanks Mark, Gerald Bonus question: how should I calculate how many workers I should have on my system? Thank you, Paul 'Arte Chambers' Robey 502-408-6922 On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:36 PM <vogt(a)spamcop.net> wrote: > > Sounds somewhat like the problem I have had: > > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… > > The problem for me was that I am using gunicorn but did not increase the number of workers… > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > Archived at: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > This message sent to paul.m.robey(a)gmail.com Thank you, Paul 'Arte Chambers' Robey 502-408-6922 On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:54 PM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > On 1/29/25 11:20, Arte Chambers via Mailman-users wrote: > > Ok I did install using the > > https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html > > > > I added > > ``` > > POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL='https://www.example.com/' > > ``` > > I hope you didn't add the above literally without replacing > www.example.com with your actual host name. > > It should be > ``` > POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL = 'list.louisvillecommunitygrocery.com' > ``` > > > to /etc/mailman3/settings.py and restarted mailman services > > > > However I'm still getting the same error from mailman.log > > > > requests.exceptions.ReadTimeout: HTTPConnectionPool(host='localhost', > > port=8000): Read timed out. (read timeout=5) > > I don't understand why it should still be trying to connect to > localhost:8000. Also, I don't understand why localhost:8000 times out. > What is your setting for localhost in /etc/hosts? it should be > `127.0.0.1`. If it is `::1` that could be the issue. > > > Not sure if I'm editing the correct config file. > > /etc/mailman3/settings.py should be correct. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > Archived at: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > This message sent to paul.m.robey(a)gmail.com

10 months, 2 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: redirecting -bounces replies

by Hirayama, Pat

Thanks, Mark. I (finally) started working on this ... and in trying to implement your suggestion — ran into a problem, I think. The current postfix_vmap has entries like: list-bounces(a)lists.domain.info lmtp:[mailman-core]:24 So, when I try adding entries to a separate vmap file, like: list-bounces(a)lists.domain.info lmtp:[mailman-core]:24, user(a)gmail.com It only goes through normal bounce processing. If I do: list-bounces(a)lists.domain.info user(a)gmail.com, lmtp:[mailman-core]:24 Then it goes to the gmail address, and no bounce processing happens. I'm thinking that I can't combine two methods of delivery (LMTP + email address). Do you know if that is correct? Thanks, -p Pat Hirayama Pronouns: he/him/his Systems Engineer IT | Systems Engineering Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center O 206.667.4856 phirayam(a)fredhutch.org ________________________________ From: Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2024 21:18 To: mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> Subject: [MM3-users] Re: redirecting -bounces replies CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. On 10/31/24 16:17, Hirayama, Pat wrote: > > Is it possible to redirect the -bounces alias of a specific list so that it also goes to a person, in addition to the normal bounces processing for that list? > > In Mailman2, I know that I could do that by modifying the aliases table. You can do the same in MM3 if you want to just deliver to a person and not to normal bounce processing, but if you want to do both, and your MTA is Postfix, you would need to add and alias domain to your lists domain and configure Postfix according to https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/l… . Then for example if your list domain is example.com and its alias domain is x.example.com, you could modify one line in the postfix_vmap file for the `listname` mappings from ``` listname-bounces(a)example.com listname-bounces(a)x.example.com ``` to ``` listname-bounces(a)example.com listname-bounces(a)x.example.com, person(a)example.com ``` and then run postmap on the file. The problem is any time you create or delete a list or run `mailman aliases` or run `mailman start` with the --generate-alias-file option, the file is regenerated and you will have to edit it again. To avoid that issue, you can create a separate vmap file containing only the ``` listname-bounces(a)example.com listname-bounces(a)x.example.com, person(a)example.com ``` entry and then add that file to virtual_alias_maps in Postfix main.cf, being sure to add it ahead of the postfix_vmap entry. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailm… Archived at: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailma… This message sent to phirayam(a)fredhutch.org

5 months, 2 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: Installing mailman 3

by Rafael Mora

content of the file maillog-20170723 (I didn't find mail.log in /var/log): [root@localhost log]# cat maillog-20170723 Jul 17 10:29:19 localhost postfix/postfix-script[1702]: warning: not set-gid or not owner+group+world executable: /usr/sbin/postqueue Jul 17 10:29:19 localhost postfix/postfix-script[1760]: warning: not set-gid or not owner+group+world executable: /usr/sbin/postdrop Jul 17 10:29:19 localhost postfix/postfix-script[1781]: starting the Postfix mail system Jul 17 10:29:20 localhost postfix/master[1791]: daemon started -- version 2.10.1, configuration /etc/postfix Jul 21 15:19:31 localhost postfix/postfix-script[9273]: refreshing the Postfix mail system Jul 21 15:19:31 localhost postfix/master[1791]: reload -- version 2.10.1, configuration /etc/postfix Jul 21 15:34:54 localhost postfix/postfix-script[9327]: fatal: cannot execute /usr/sbin/postconf! Jul 21 16:30:03 localhost postfix/postfix-script[9471]: refreshing the Postfix mail system Jul 21 16:30:03 localhost postfix/master[1791]: reload -- version 2.10.1, configuration /etc/postfix Jul 21 16:52:46 localhost postfix/postfix-script[9528]: refreshing the Postfix mail system Jul 21 16:52:46 localhost postfix/master[1791]: reload -- version 2.10.1, configuration /etc/postfix Jul 21 16:52:46 localhost postfix/qmgr[9532]: error: open database /var/lib/mailman/var/data/postfix_domains.db: No such file or directory Jul 21 16:10:47 localhost postfix/postfix-script[2099]: warning: not set-gid or not owner+group+world executable: /usr/sbin/postqueue Jul 21 16:10:47 localhost postfix/postfix-script[2105]: warning: not set-gid or not owner+group+world executable: /usr/sbin/postdrop Jul 21 16:10:47 localhost postfix/postfix-script[2112]: starting the Postfix mail system Jul 21 16:10:47 localhost postfix/master[2114]: daemon started -- version 2.10.1, configuration /etc/postfix Jul 21 16:10:47 localhost postfix/qmgr[2116]: error: open database /var/lib/mailman/var/data/postfix_domains.db: No such file or directory output command 'postconf -n': [root@localhost log]# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases command_directory = /usr/sbin config_directory = /etc/postfix daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix data_directory = /var/lib/postfix debug_peer_level = 2 debugger_command = PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin ddd $daemon_directory/$process_name $process_id & sleep 5 html_directory = no inet_interfaces = localhost inet_protocols = all local_recipient_maps = hash:/var/lib/mailman/var/data/postfix_lmtp mail_owner = postfix mailq_path = /usr/bin/mailq.postfix manpage_directory = /usr/share/man mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost newaliases_path = /usr/bin/newaliases.postfix owner_request_special = no queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.10.1/README_FILES recipient_delimiter = + relay_domains = hash:/var/lib/mailman/var/data/postfix_domains sample_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.10.1/samples sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail.postfix setgid_group = postdrop transport_maps = hash:/var/libmailman/var/data/postfix_lmtp unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550 What's wrong? Thanks El sáb., 22 jul. 2017 a las 22:33, Mark Sapiro (<mark(a)msapiro.net>) escribió: > On 07/22/2017 05:29 PM, Rafael Mora wrote: > > > > How can I config Mailman/Postfix to send the confirmation email for the > > superuser I created this morning??? > > > What is in Postfix's logs relevant to the attempt to send the mail > (probably /var/log/mail.log)? > > What is the output from 'postconf -n' > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- Atentamente / Best Regards Ing. Rafael Mora

8 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: The message is larger than the 40 KB maximum size

by Mohsen Masoudfar

Thank you so much Mark. I appreciate your help! I dropped the list and recreated it, the default value worked for the new list. Using Mailman shell is very helpful. I checked the mailman.log and found the issue. Thanks Mohsen -----Original Message----- From: Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 9:42 PM To: mailman-users(a)mailman3.org Subject: [MM3-users] Re: The message is larger than the 40 KB maximum size [EXTERNAL EMAIL] On 9/21/20 9:23 AM, Mohsen Masoudfar wrote: > > 1- I tried to set up the max_message_size in WUI under: listname > settings > Message Acceptance > Maximum message size to 0. > After hitting save button, I got the error message: " An error occured: Unknown attribute: max_message_size" This is <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.co…> fixed by <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.co…> in Mailman core 3.2.0. Either upgrade Mailman core or set it via `mailman shell` > 2- I checked the python files and found this file, where, it seems, the default value is defined: > /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mailman/styles/base.py : mlist.max_message_size = 40 > > I changed this value to 0, saved the file, restarted the mailman and postgresql (not sure if needed) and sent an email with a large attachment to my test list with just two members. I got the response email: > The message is being held because: The message is larger than the 40 KB maximum size Changing that file only affects the default setting for new lists. It doesn't affect any existing list. To change this you can either update Mailman's database to set max_message_size = 0 in the entry for the list in the mailinglist table or do something like $ /opt/mailman/mm/bin/mailman shell -l list.example.com Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell Use commit() to commit changes. Use abort() to discard changes since the last commit. Exit with ctrl+D does an implicit commit() but exit() does not. The variable 'm' is the list.example.com mailing list >>> m.max_message_size 40 >>> m.max_message_size = 0 >>> commit() > 3- I totally agree that the most important issue is the fact that the message vanished with the production list. > I repeated the same with a (test) list which has two members, I got the email mentioning the 40 KB limit and I could release it. This is how I am running my tests now. I repeated it with the original list (with 197 members) the message disappeared again. I can send an email to the list with 197 members, without this attachment and it works. > > 4- I checked the folders, under /var/lib/mailman3/queue/, all folders > are empty: archive/ bad/ bounces/ command/ digest/ in/ nntp/ > out/ pipeline/ retry/ shunt/ virgin/ OK, but what if anything is in Mailman's mailman.log? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai…

5 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: CSS Hyperkitty ERROR

by Johan Alsina

Johan Alsina wrote: > Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > Hi, i installed mailman3 with virtualenv, all is working fine, the > > admin site works fine, the mailman(postorious) site works fine, but > > when im in hyperkitty the site shows without the css style.. in my > > web browser dev tool it shows like they loaded ok.. > > I think you need to figure out why the dev tool can see the CSS files > > but other environments can't. It sounds exactly like all the other > > Any ideas? :/ > > My static files are loading from > > /static/CACHE/css/output.a0f71925131b.css and > > /static/hyperkitty/libs/fonts/font-awesome/css/font-awesome.min.css > > I've run into the "no styles" issue on a number of new hosts where the > > Johan Alsina via Mailman-users writes: > > problems I couldn't diagnose. :-/ > > problem was that somewhere on the path to the CSS files was a > > directory, typically owned by root, without "x" permissions for > > "other" users. That difference across trees is weakly consistent with > > a "somewhere in between" permissions problem. > > Steve > > Hi Steve, thanks for answer, i tried all about permissions and paths and i thins all its ok.. here you can see my paths/permissions.. > General: https://freeimage.host/i/3ok1LDN > Django project: https://freeimage.host/i/3ok1ZxI > Mark Sapiro wrote: > > On 3/17/25 6:46 PM, Johan Alsina via Mailman-users wrote: > > Hi, i installed mailman3 with virtualenv, all is working fine, the admin site works fine, the mailman(postorious) site works fine, but when im in hyperkitty the site shows without the css style.. in my web browser dev tool it shows like they loaded ok.. > > Have you run mailman-web collectstatic and mailman-web compress? See > > https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#collect-static-f... > > If you have, try running them again as mailman-web collectstatic --clear and mailman-web compress. > > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > > Hi Mark, thanks for the answer. Yes, i tried all variations about collectstatic, clear_cache, etc.. comands with no difference. I dont get any error and the files are collected ok.. > Like i said before, i think the problem comes with the css files in /static/CACHE.. because the ones that are in /static/hyperkitty are loading ok.. > css files in /static/CACHE not loading: https://freeimage.host/i/3okk6CJ > img files in /static/hyperkitty loading: https://freeimage.host/i/3okkPEv > I tried to move /static/CACHE inside of /static/hyperkitty but when i run collectstatic the files goes again to the default path.. > Thanks in advance.. Sorry, the links about css files and img files are in the wrong order css files in /static/CACHE not loading: https://freeimage.host/i/3okkPEv img files in /static/hyperkitty loading: https://freeimage.host/i/3okk6CJ

8 months, 3 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: Apache Conf

by Thomas G

Yes, of course. Nginx and Apache works on the same server. (Nginx is stopped) I would like switch to Apache to add in front of hyperkitty a ldap connection. I need to re-compile nginx for this feature. It's directly available in apache with a module. In fact, a tried directly to integrade LDAP with django ( https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/issues/132) without results. Le ven. 19 oct. 2018 à 20:18, Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> a écrit : > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, at 12:17 PM, Thomas G wrote: > > Hi tried both. > > > > Same result. > > > > xxxx - - [19/Oct/2018:21:14:22 +0200] "GET /static/postorius/js/script.js > > HTTP/1.1" 404 4051 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) > > Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0" > > > And, you have verified that the files exist at `/opt/mailman/static` on > your host? > > > > > > > Le ven. 19 oct. 2018 à 18:59, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> a écrit : > > > > > On 10/19/18 10:29 AM, Guiseppin Thomas wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Currently, I use a nginx configuration for mailman. It's work > perfectly. > > > > > > > > I tried to do the same with Apache, but the statics files are not > > > > delivered (404). > > > ... > > > > <VirtualHost *:80> > > > > ServerName mailing.ddd.fr > > > > > > > > ErrorLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/mailing.error.log > > > > CustomLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/mailing.access.log combined > > > > > > > > <Location /static/> > > > > Alias "/opt/mailman/static/" > > > > </Location> > > > > > > > > <Location /> > > > > ProxyPass http://localhost:8000/ > > > > ProxyPassReverse http://localhost:8000/ > > > > ProxyPreserveHost On > > > > </Location> > > > > </VirtualHost>/ > > > > > > > > > In Apache, location > > > <http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/core.html#location> is not > > > appropriate for resources in the file system. > > > > > > Try > > > > > > Alias /static/ /opt/mailman/static/ > > > > > > not within a location block. > > > > > > -- > > > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > > > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > > > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > > > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > > > -- > thanks, > Abhilash Raj (maxking) >

7 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Installing mailman 3

by Rafael Mora

I´m getting this: (env) [mailman@localhost etc]$ mailman stop Shutting down Mailman's master runner (env) [mailman@localhost etc]$ mailman start Starting Mailman's master runner (env) [mailman@localhost etc]$ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/asyncio/base_events.py", line 1043, in create_s erver sock.bind(sa) OSError: [Errno 98] Address already in use During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/mailman/env/bin/runner", line 11, in <module> sys.exit(main()) File "/var/lib/mailman/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/bin/runner.py", line 198, in main runner.run() File "/var/lib/mailman/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/runners/lmtp.py ", line 242, in run self.lmtp.start() File "/var/lib/mailman/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/aiosmtpd/controller.py" , line 55, in start raise self._thread_exception File "/var/lib/mailman/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/aiosmtpd/controller.py" , line 35, in _run ssl=self.ssl_context)) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/asyncio/base_events.py", line 466, in run_until _complete return future.result() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/asyncio/base_events.py", line 1047, in create_s erver % (sa, err.strerror.lower())) OSError: [Errno 98] error while attempting to bind on address ('127.0.0.1', 8024 ): address already in use Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/mailman/env/bin/runner", line 11, in <module> sys.exit(main()) File "/var/lib/mailman/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/bin/runner.py", line 194, in main runner = make_runner(*args.runner, once=args.once) File "/var/lib/mailman/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/bin/runner.py", line 94, in make_runner return runner_class(name, slice) File "/var/lib/mailman/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/runners/rest.py ", line 53, in __init__ self._server = make_server() File "/var/lib/mailman/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/rest/wsgiapp.py ", line 234, in make_server handler_class=AdminWebServiceWSGIRequestHandler) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/wsgiref/simple_server.py", line 153, in make_se rver server = server_class((host, port), handler_class) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/socketserver.py", line 453, in __init__ self.server_bind() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/wsgiref/simple_server.py", line 50, in server_b ind HTTPServer.server_bind(self) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/http/server.py", line 136, in server_bind socketserver.TCPServer.server_bind(self) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/socketserver.py", line 467, in server_bind self.socket.bind(self.server_address) OSError: [Errno 98] Address already in use Why does it say Address already in use? El mar., 1 ago. 2017 a las 15:10, Mark Sapiro (<mark(a)msapiro.net>) escribió: > On 8/1/17 12:52 PM, Rafael Mora wrote: > > I made a change for test purpose on the mailman.cfg file and I got this: > > > > > > (env) [mailman@localhost etc]$ mailman restart > > Restarting the Mailman runners > > PID unreadable in: /var/lib/mailman/var/etc/var/master.pid > > [Errno 2] No such file or directory: > > '/var/lib/mailman/var/etc/var/master.pid' > > Is the master even running? > > > > How do I solve this? > > > Try > > mailman stop > mailman start > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- Atentamente / Best Regards Ing. Rafael Mora

8 years, 4 months

Search results for query "sapiro"