Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: config incoming email in my domain cpanel

by tlhackque

I think you're confused. You already have mail.labbrands.com set up as the MX record for labbrands.com. And it has an A record with the same address as your webserver. So if you're getting e-mail on that domain, there's another e-mail server running on that IP address. You can't have 2 servers on port 25. In that case, as has been noted before, you'll need to setup a relay in that server, not a firewall redirect. Depending on your MTA, you would need to relay to your internal server. And make sure your firewall setup allows your MTA to do this. We can see it's EXIM: telnet mail.labbrands.com 25 Trying 192.185.51.89... Connected to mail.labbrands.com (192.185.51.89). Escape character is '^]'. help 220-gator4137.hostgator.com ESMTP Exim 4.87 #1 Thu, 03 Aug 2017 15:47:48 -0500 220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, 220 and/or bulk e-mail. 214-Commands supported: 214 AUTH STARTTLS HELO EHLO MAIL RCPT DATA NOOP QUIT RSET HELP quit 221 gator4137.hostgator.com closing connection Connection closed by foreign host. Or, consolidate all your e-mail to one server - which is a lot easier to manage unless you have a really big operation. Postfix is probably the right choice, but requires more setup. Although Mailman3 configuration is not well documented (as you've discovered), you may want to get help from someone with more general network and mail experience. You're now into territory that is, as Simon indicated, not Mailman-specific. On 03-Aug-17 16:28, Rafael Mora wrote: > El jue., 3 ago. 2017 a las 15:26, Mark Sapiro (<mark(a)msapiro.net>) escribió: > >> On 08/03/2017 01:22 PM, Rafael Mora wrote: >>> El jue., 3 ago. 2017 a las 15:18, Mark Sapiro (<mark(a)msapiro.net>) >> escribió: >>>> You need to forward port 25 for SMTP mail delivery and if you want the >>>> web UI (Postorius and HyperKitty) accessible from the outside, port 80 >>>> for http and/or port 443 for https >>>> < >>>> >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-p… >>>>> . >>> I mean for incoming mail redirected from my hostgator hosting, because >> when >>> I suscribe an email address MM3 sends a confirmation email, so I have to >>> reply to be suscribed to the list. >> >> As I said, for mail delivery you need to forward port 25 to the Mailman >> server. >> > Ok so I'll redirect in my zentyal firewall the port 25 to my local centos7 > with postfix and MM3 with IP 192.168.1.42. Thanks Mark. > > >> >> -- >> Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, >> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailman-users mailing list >> mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >> -- This communication may not represent my employer's views, if any, on the matters discussed.

8 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: Hyperkitty 1.1.1 to HyperKitty 1.2.1

by Thomas G

Indeed, it was a domain problem. hatlab.fr is the general domain, mailing, the website to manage our mailinglist. And in this case "FILTER_VHOST" have to be switch on "False". Fixed ! Thanks . Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 à 23:21, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> a écrit : > On 10/04/2018 03:49 AM, Thomas G wrote: > > I tried all job, without result. > > (and they are correctly in the crontab) > > > > [image: image.png] > > > > If I try to find my list in the form, hyperkitty can find it: > > > > [image: image.png] > > > Since you are a gmail user, you probably didn't see that content > filtering removed your screen shots, but see your post at > < > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > >. > > I did in fact see your screen shots in my direct copy, but I am unable > to determine what your issue is except there may be some domain > confusion between mailing.hatlab.fr and hatlab.fr. Are your list > settings set for Public archives and hyperkitty active? > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >

7 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: How to modify system preferences

by Allan Hansen

The other way is to tell all your users to use gmail, as that is how they handle messages from email lists, no matter how much I and others have complained to them about it. :-) Yours, Allan Hansen hansen(a)rc.org > On Feb 19, 2021, at 9:50 , Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > On 2/19/21 5:15 AM, Jack Lenox via Mailman-users wrote: >> >> The documentation states that these are only accessible in a read-only >> format via the REST API, but presumably there is a way of modifying >> these somewhere? I can't find a way of specifying this in my config and >> can't find a relevant example in the sample schema.cfg. >> >> At this stage, all I want to do is set the default for >> "receive_own_postings" to False. Can anyone point me in the right >> direction here? > > > The defaults for settings like this are not directly configurable. You > need to patch the relevant entry in mailman/core/constants.py > > I have just filed <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/832> for > this. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

4 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: Issues with cross posted emails after upgrading to mailman 3.3.6

by Simon Coggins

On 5 Nov 2021, at 6:30 am, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net<mailto:mark@msapiro.net>> wrote: > Yeah it’s not a great solution but it’s the quickest I could come up with that works “for us”. 99% of our lists are announcement lists only with minimal replies so while this will break some. I’m hoping it will give us enough time to wait out a proper fix. I’ve created a new issue #955 with as much detail as I think you’ll need. Let me know if you need any more. Thanks for filing the issue. I'll work on a solution. My current thinking is to add a `count` column to the message table, set the count to 1 when initially adding a message-id, increment the count when adding an existing message-id, decrement the count when deleting a message-id and only delete the entry and message when the count reaches 0. That should work well. I’m happy to do some testing of any patches you create in our test environment if you need extra testing. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net<mailto:mark@msapiro.net>> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org<mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org<mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/<https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org> —Simon

4 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Pkl files with ".last" extension

by Keith Christian

Mark, Alright, sounds logical, appreciate your reply, On Fri, Jul 12, 2024, 15:50 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 7/12/24 2:20 PM, Keith Christian via Mailman-users wrote: > > In the MM2 to MM3 migration project I'm involved with, I see files with > > names like config.pkl.last along with config.pkl. > > > > Is there a special reason for the ".last" extension and if so, what is > it? > > > A Mailman 2.1 list has possibly as many as 4 configuration files. > > - config.pck (not pkl) is the current list configuration. > - config.pck.last is the immediately prior configuration > used in case config.pck is corrupt or missing. > > In addition there may be config.db and config.db.last files. These only > exist if the list predates MM 2.1 and should be removed because they're > old and could be used as a fallback if both config.pck and > config.pck.last are missing or corrupt. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > Archived at: > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > This message sent to keith1christian(a)gmail.com >

1 year, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Changing default message limit (max_message_size)

by Abhilash Raj

On Mon, May 27, 2019, at 8:23 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 5/27/19 12:05 AM, roger(a)reasonal.com wrote: > > I found the field in settings that would appear to do this, but it just throws an error for whatever I give it ("An error occured**: Unknown attribute: max_message_size"). > > This should be fixed at > <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/merge_requests/329>. > > Perhaps you need to update your Docker images > <https://asynchronous.in/docker-mailman/> That's right. You are probably using a new version of Postorius but not of Mailman Core. Please make sure the container images you have are updated. > > Also, see > <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/issues/246#note_69323948> for a > not about changing this via `mailman shell` (withlist), but see the > subsequent comment about `quit()` > > > > PS As a suggestion, may be a good idea to indicate what units it's expecting... bytes? kB? Nybbles? > > Reported at <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/issues/362>, thanks. > > > PPS ** Psst: occurred with two r's... > > Reported at <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/issues/361>, thanks. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

6 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: Apache Conf

by Thomas G

Hi tried both. Same result. xxxx - - [19/Oct/2018:21:14:22 +0200] "GET /static/postorius/js/script.js HTTP/1.1" 404 4051 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0" Le ven. 19 oct. 2018 à 18:59, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> a écrit : > On 10/19/18 10:29 AM, Guiseppin Thomas wrote: > > Hi, > > Currently, I use a nginx configuration for mailman. It's work perfectly. > > > > I tried to do the same with Apache, but the statics files are not > > delivered (404). > ... > > <VirtualHost *:80> > > ServerName mailing.ddd.fr > > > > ErrorLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/mailing.error.log > > CustomLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/mailing.access.log combined > > > > <Location /static/> > > Alias "/opt/mailman/static/" > > </Location> > > > > <Location /> > > ProxyPass http://localhost:8000/ > > ProxyPassReverse http://localhost:8000/ > > ProxyPreserveHost On > > </Location> > > </VirtualHost>/ > > > In Apache, location > <http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/core.html#location> is not > appropriate for resources in the file system. > > Try > > Alias /static/ /opt/mailman/static/ > > not within a location block. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >

7 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Link in the top-left corner of Hyperkitty

by Gelpi Andrea

Il 08/05/20 17:13, Mark Sapiro ha scritto: > On 5/8/20 8:06 AM, Seth Seeger wrote: >> On May 8, 2020, at 10:58 AM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: >> >>> You have to edit the display name for the domain in the Django web admin >>> Sites section. >> >> Huh. I had it properly set for the domain that is active, but it wasn’t taking affect. I changed it for the (old) test site, and it changed it. So the name that is showing doesn’t match the domain name that I was changing it for. > > > It should show the display name corresponding to the domain name that > matches the domain in the URL that you go to. If this doesn't seem > correct, perhaps there is some issue with the way you are proxying in > your web server. > Also in debian there is the some problem. The domain name is that of the installation site (example.com) and does not change if you change the webserver and the domian. It seems to be static. You can change it changing the site name in django admin console, but it doesn't change if you change the webserver name. Which file does provide it? Thanks -- Gelpi ing. Andrea -------------------------------------------------------------- It took the computing power of three C-64s to fly to the Moon. It takes a 486 to run Windows 95. Something is wrong here. --------------------------------------------------------------

5 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Problems with New MM3 Installation

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/11/21 7:46 PM, Jeff wrote: > > I really appreciate your assistance. New messages are now being archived as expected, but I still have a few small remaining issues to work out with my MM3 installation: > > 1) some emails that arrived before I got the archive working are still sitting in: > > /usr/local/mailman3/mm/var/archives/prototype/[listname]@[domain]/new > > Strangely this includes at least one email that was archived. Should this directly be cleared as messages are archived? Is there a way to force it to be cleared? /usr/local/mailman3/mm/var/archives/prototype/[listname]@[domain] is a collection of messages in maildir format. This is how the prototype archiver stores messages. This has nothing to do with HyperKitty. It is a separate archiver. If you don't want messages to be stored there, you can disable the prototype archiver for the list by unchecking prototype in Postorius -> Settings -> Archiving -> Active archivers or disable it entirely for the installation by setting ``` [archiver.prototype] enable: no ``` in mailman.cfg > 2) Some messages that arrived while I was having other problems with the setup have been stored in: > > /usr/local/mailman3/mm/var/queue/shunt > > What should I do to get these messages processed? Assuming the issues that caused them to be shunted have been fixed, just run the command ``` mailman unshunt ``` > 3) Similar to above, some messages are in: > > /usr/local/mailman3/mm/var/queue/bad > > How can I get these messages processed? First examine the messages with ``` mailman qfile /usr/local/mailman3/mm/var/queue/bad/<file> ``` To be sure you want them. Also examine mailman.log for the times they were stored in the `bad` queue. You are looking for 'Skipping and preserving unparseable message: <file>' and/or 'SHUNTING FAILED, preserving original entry: <file> messages and you want to determine which runner preserved the message. There may be a 'whichq' entry in the message's metadata in which case, that's the answer. Once you have determined the queue, you can just move the .psv file from the bad queue to the appropriate queue, renaming it from .psv to .pck in the process. > 4 Modified the template for “list:admin:action:post” through Postorious and emails that arrived after that were put in the “shunt” queue. I traced this problem to POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL. By default, it is set to "http://localhost:8000 <http://localhost:8000/>” which is where uwsgi is listening. However, uwsigi is listening for uwsgi:/ not http://. Should I change POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL to “uwsgi://localhost:8000 <uwsgi://localhost:8000>” or keep http but make it something else? I know little about uwsgi. setting it to `uwsgi://localhost:8000` might work. You could also set it to the base URL that a user would use to access the web UI, e.g. `https://example.com` and that would presumably be proxied to uwsgi. For example, on the server for this list we have ``` POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL = 'https://lists.mailman3.org' ``` which gets proxied to gunicorn, but the idea is the same. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: old usernames appearing in mailman.log

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/25/23 10:57 PM, Ken Alker wrote: > > I have studied the output, looked at the code lines referenced in the > Traceback, and I can't figure out the problem (I feel like the sad guy > on the side of the street with his hood up staring into the engine bay > with stream pouring out and not knowing what to do next). I did some > analyses on the log file and determined that there are 71 messages it is > having problems processing and there are 71 messages "stuck" in > /opt/mailman/mm/var/archives/hyperkitty/spool/ (and that it has tried to > process each message about 20 times). Each time there is a new post, it retries all the messages in the spool/ directory. > Since upgrading to V3.3.8 I've > not seen new messages get stuck like this (although it's only been > running smoothly for 24 hours now and there hasn't been much activity). > But I'm suspecting there was something awry between the conversion from > V2 to V3 in February and me installing V3.3.8 that caused this (based on > message time stamps). It is HIGHLY likely these messages are in the > archiving spool as a result of me unshunting the shunt queue and that > they are copies of the messages that got delivered to the subscribers > when I did that... but are now hung up in the archiving process. Are new messages being archived OK. If so, that is a real mystery. It says mailman-hyperkitty can talk to hyperkitty and archive new messages, but it can't talk to hyperkitty when attempting to process a queued message. > Following is an excerpt from mailman.log. Note that the "first section" > (from DOCTYPE at top to 404 at bottom) is repeated four times (maybe not > identical; but similar) (so I did not include it to save room) before > the Traceback appears. > > Jun 25 00:13:04 2023 (386086) No cached copy of the public suffix list > found > Jun 25 00:13:04 2023 (386086) ACCEPT: > <7500f0e2-1ae1-309d-60d7-6e592c7abf7a(a)west.net> > Jun 25 00:13:04 2023 (386090) HyperKitty failure on > https://lists.netlojix.com/hyperkitty/api/mailman/urls: I just went to that URL and got a 404. This is a serious problem. https://lists.netlojix.com/hyperkitty/api/ also returns a 404. It should return some documentation of the API. https://lists.netlojix.com/archives/api/ does work and returns the expected information. Your urls.py file probably contains in its urlpatterns list ``` re_path(r'^mailman3/', include('postorius.urls')), re_path(r'^archives/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), ``` The simplest fix is to add ``` re_path(r'^postorius/', include('postorius.urls')), re_path(r'^hyperkitty/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), ``` to that list. Another way to fix this is in your mailman-hyperkitty.cfg, you have ``` base_url: https://lists.netlojix.com/hyperkitty ``` Change that to ``` base_url: https://lists.netlojix.com/archives ``` but it wouldn't hurt to add the `^postorius/` and `^hyperkitty/` patterns to urls.py anyway. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 5 months

Search results for query "sapiro"