Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: New Mailman 3 installation issues

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/18/21 12:30 PM, sarah.hartt(a)ionica.ca wrote: > I have been trying to get a mailman 3 installation working for longer than I'd like to admit. Core appears to be installed and working as desired but Postorius (and hyperkitty, but I haven't even started troubleshooting it while trying to get the web interface working) is only loading the main page with no lists shown and all remaining links return a server error (specific text is: "Server error > An error occurred while processing your request." with the error text highlighted). I think I followed all of the installation instructions, including the updated pythonpath line in the systemd module, but it's entirely possible that there is an error somewhere along the way. Is there more information in logs? (nginx and django) > I have had to make two minor tweaks, the /static/ location was moved from /opt/mailman/web/static to /var/www/mailman/ (owner mailman:nginx) as nginx was giving permissions errors (even if it owned the files or with the mod set to 777) with the default location and wouldn't load the css, and installed postgres directly from their repo as the method in the guide doesn't create the user. Aside from that everything should be exactly as laid out in the installation guide. The permissions is probably a SELinux or apparmor issue. Which installation guide are you following? I'm guessing https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html. Are you saying that ``` sudo apt install postgresql ``` doesn't create a `postgres` user? It should. > The logs are showing everything running and the DB logs show all the queries going through successfully, there are no errors in the web logs corresponding with the errors being served on the site aside an entry for a 500 in the access logs > > [18/May/2021:12:13:01] "GET /archives/ HTTP/1.1" 500 1102 "http://mailman3/mailman3/lists/" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.91 Safari/537.36" "-" This is a GET of /archives/ which is HyperKitty. Django should log something for this with more detail. > when I took a look in the DB tables many of them appear to be empty, I have a few lists in core that were imported from 2.1 but no new lists created. Empty tables per se is not necessarily a problem depending on which ones. > Mailman: 3.3.4 > Postorius: 1.3.4 > OS: Oracle Linux 8.3 > Python: 3.6 > postgres: 13.2 -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: 500 error on Held Messages page

by Mark Sapiro

On 9/21/22 10:39, Dan Caballero wrote: > I figured out the correct import based on what was done previously. It worked. Why do you think you need to import anything? > ">>> from mailman.app.moderator import handle_message `handle_message` is not referenced in the following and doesn't need to be imported here. ``` >>>> requestdb = IListRequests(m) >>>> for req in requestdb.held_requests: > ... if req.request_type == RequestType.held_message: > ... if not requestdb.get_request(req.id): > ... print(f'Bad request id: {req.id}, deleting') > ... requestdb.delete_request(req.id) > ... > Bad request id: 1694, deleting > Bad request id: 2509, deleting > Bad request id: 2727, deleting > Bad request id: 3251, deleting > Bad request id: 3265, deleting > Bad request id: 3371, deleting > Bad request id: 4844, deleting > Bad request id: 6058, deleting > Bad request id: 6201, deleting > Bad request id: 6432, deleting > Bad request id: 6502, deleting >>>> commit ()" ``` I assume after doing this, you were able to access the held messages view for the list. Note that the only names referenced in the above and not defined there are `IListRequests` and `RequestType`, but these are among the many names implicitly imported by `mailman shell` in interactive mode. ``` $ mailman shell Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell Use commit() to commit changes. Use abort() to discard changes since the last commit. Exit with ctrl+D does an implicit commit() but exit() does not. >>> for name in dir(): ... print(name) ... ALL_TEMPLATES ALT_TEMPLATE_NAMES ALWAYS_REPLY AcceptEvent AcceptOwnerEvent Action AddressAlreadyLinkedError AddressError AddressNotLinkedError AddressVerificationEvent AlreadySubscribedError ArchivePolicy ArchiveRenderingMode BadDomainSpecificationError BounceContext ChainEvent ClobberDate ConfigurationUpdatedEvent ContinueProcessing DMARCMitigateAction DatabaseError DeliveryMode DeliveryStatus DigestFrequency DiscardEvent DiscardMessage DomainCreatedEvent DomainCreatingEvent DomainDeletedEvent DomainDeletingEvent DuplicateStyleError EmailError ExistingAddressError FilterAction FilterType HoldEvent IAPI IAcceptableAlias IAcceptableAliasSet IAddress IArchiver IAutoResponseRecord IAutoResponseSet IBan IBanManager IBounceEvent IBounceProcessor ICLISubCommand ICacheManager IChain IChainIterator IChainLink IConfiguration IContentFilter IDatabase IDatabaseFactory IDomain IDomainManager IEmailCommand IEmailResults IEmailValidator IHandler IHeaderMatch IHeaderMatchList ILanguage ILanguageManager IListArchiver IListArchiverSet IListManager IListRequests IMailTransportAgentAliases IMailTransportAgentDelivery IMailTransportAgentLifecycle IMailingList IMember IMembershipManager IMessage IMessageStore IMutableChain IOneLastDigest IPendable IPended IPendedKeyValue IPendings IPipeline IPlugin IPreferences IRoster IRule IRunner IStyle IStyleManager ISubscriptionManager ISubscriptionService ISwitchboard ITemplate ITemplateLoader ITemplateManager IUser IUserManager IWorkflowState IWorkflowStateManager InvalidConfigurationError InvalidEmailAddressError InvalidListNameError LinkAction ListAlreadyExistsError ListCreatedEvent ListCreatingEvent ListDeletedEvent ListDeletingEvent MailmanError MemberRole MembershipChangeEvent MembershipError MembershipIsBannedError MissingConfigurationFileError MissingPreferredAddressError MissingUserError NewsgroupModeration NoSuchListError NotAMemberError PasswordChangeEvent PendType Personalization RejectEvent RejectMessage ReplyToMunging RequestRecord RequestType Response ResponseAction RunnerCrashEvent RunnerInterrupt SomeRecipientsFailed SubscriptionConfirmationNeededEvent SubscriptionEvent SubscriptionInvitationNeededEvent SubscriptionMode SubscriptionPendingError SubscriptionPolicy TokenOwner TooManyMembersError UnrecognizedBounceDisposition UnsubscriptionConfirmationNeededEvent UnsubscriptionEvent UnverifiedAddressError __builtins__ abort commit config getUtility m >>> ``` -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Counter-intuitive header filter processing

by Mark Sapiro

On 09/18/2018 01:04 PM, Jonas Meurer wrote: > > Maybe then the description for chain "accept" in postorius needs to be > adjusted. Currently it says "Accept immediately (bypass other rules)". > This gives the impression, that it will overrule the default action. Yes, I agree it's confusing. > A related followup question: what configuration is recommended for an > announcement list where only specific senders (e.g. sender(a)example.org) > should be allowed to post and mail from all (other) subscribers should > be rejected? > > The only way I see to achieve this currently is: > > * Set default action for member posts to "Default processing" > * Add a header filter to accept "sender(a)example.org" > * Add a header filter to reject ".*" > > In my eyes, that's very counter-intuitive and cumbersome to configure. > But maybe I just missed a more obvious and elegant solution to achieve > the same? The way to do that is to set the default action for member posts to Reject and set Member Options -> Administration options -> Moderation for the authorized posters to Accept or Default processing as desired. However, this allows anyone to post by spoofing an authorized address. To avoid that, leave everyone's Moderation setting at List default and post using "pre-approval" (see <https://mailman.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/mailman/rules/docs/approved.ht…>. The downside of this is it requires the poster to send a cleartext password in a header or body line of the post. It will be removed from the post delivered to list members, but sending it in cleartext in an email may be an issue. We will eventually do something with PGP signatures instead, but that isn't here yet. > And one more comment: if I make the list an "anonymous list" (i.e. "hide > the sender of a message, replacing it with the list address"), then > header filters for the "from" header don't work any longer. That's kind > of unexpected as well. I would have expected mailman to process the > header filters at reading the incoming mail, not after rewriting headers > of the outgoing mail? Your expectation is correct. All the applicable rules are applied to the incoming message before any message alterations such as anonymizing are applied. Possibly you were confused because some other rule's action took precedence over your header rule. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

7 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: [ERROR] Error handling request List archivers

by Mark Sapiro

On 7/23/20 12:39 AM, Shashikanth Komandoor wrote: > Thank you Mark for guiding me to the benefit of putting the list and so I > have added the list. > > Along with the [archiver.hyperkitty], [mta] and [database], few lines of my > mailman.cfg look like below: > > > > [webservice] > workers = 4 > timeout = 900 > > The above block of webservice is added yesterday for testing or trail as I > am getting the above issue. > > And there is no line that is calling *gunicorn* in my mailman.cfg. As I tried to explain to you in an off-list reply: You can't configure Mailman's REST gunicorn workers directly in the [webservice] section of mailman.cfg. The only thing you can configure there is: configuration: /path/to/gunicorn.cfg That file, which is separate from your web server gunicorn.cfg, is where you put things like [gunicorn] timeout = 900 It also will not work to put a gunicorn section in mailman.cfg. It must be in a separate file pointed to by webservice.configuration. Increasing the number of workers won't help this issue. > Apart from that I tried to locate and see the content of the gunicorn.cfg > file as below : > > *(venv3) [root@lsmgr mailman]# cat /var/lib/mailman/mailman/src/mailman/config/gunicorn.cfg > [gunicorn] > # All the options that can be put here are available at > # http://docs.gunicorn.org/en/stable/settings.html#settings > > # No of seconds to wait before killing the worker processes. > graceful_timeout = 30 > > Please confirm the time I have to change is *graceful_timeout *in > *gunicorn.cfg* and if I have changed how do I restart the *gunicorn*. I > have never used or never known about this *gunicorn* but still running the > service in production. First, the file you reference above is the default gunicorn configuration for the REST server. You don't want to edit this file because your changes will be overridden in an upgrade. You want to create your own gunicorn.cfg file and point to it by adding configuration: /path/to/your/gunicorn.cfg to the webservice section in your mailman.cfg. Your gonicorn.cfg does not need to contain the graceful_timeout = 30 setting as that is a gonicorn default, and that is not what you need to increase. What you need is [gunicorn] timeout = 900 (actually 900 seconds is probably way overkill. 90 seconds would probably be enough.) -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: Clean-up of non-members

by Odhiambo Washington

On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 8:58 PM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 12/23/24 02:16, Odhiambo Washington via Mailman-users wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 1:37 AM Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > > >> Isn't this just `mailman members --role nonmember LISTSPEC`? > >> > > > > I didn't know that the option was right in front of me, but it seems > there > > is a problem: > > GNU Mailman 3.3.10 (Tom Sawyer), Mailman Core API Version 3.1 > ... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'display_name' > > > I saw that too. Reported > https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/1187 and fixed > https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/merge_requests/1297 It isn't clear to me what I should do to mitigate the error. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

1 year, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: member appears twice in list - how?

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/5/24 11:09, Jose Bernal via Mailman-users wrote: > I've got a list member showing up twice in a list (same email address). > Can't use the GUI to remove the member from this list (get a 503 error) > Screenshots attached, underlying database query reveals no duplicates. > Wondering how this is possible or where else I should be looking to resolve > this duplicate before I simply remove their entry from the members table > altogether. I'm not sure how this could have happened, I need more info for that, but to deal with this use `mailman shell` as in ``` $ mailman shell -l list(a)example.com Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell Use commit() to commit changes. Use abort() to discard changes since the last commit. Exit with ctrl+D does an implicit commit() but exit() does not. The variable 'm' is the list(a)example.com mailing list >>> x = m.memberships('user(a)example.com') This should set x to a list of that users memberships You can then examine x[0] and x[1] to determine which to delete. e.g. >>> dir(x[0]) ['__abstract__', '__class__', '__delattr__', '__dict__', '__dir__', '__doc__', '__eq__', '__format__', '__ge__', '__getattribute__', '__getstate__', '__gt__', '__hash__', '__implemented__', '__init__', '__init_subclass__', '__le__', '__lt__', '__mapper__', '__module__', '__ne__', '__new__', '__providedBy__', '__provides__', '__reduce__', '__reduce_ex__', '__repr__', '__setattr__', '__sizeof__', '__str__', '__subclasshook__', '__table__', '__tablename__', '__weakref__', '_address', '_lookup', '_mailing_list', '_member_id', '_reset', '_sa_class_manager', '_sa_instance_state', '_sa_registry', '_user', 'acknowledge_posts', 'address', 'address_id', 'bounce_score', 'delivery_mode', 'delivery_status', 'display_name', 'id', 'last_bounce_received', 'last_warning_sent', 'list_id', 'mailing_list', 'member_id', 'metadata', 'moderation_action', 'preferences', 'preferences_id', 'preferred_language', 'receive_list_copy', 'receive_own_postings', 'registry', 'role', 'subscriber', 'subscription_mode', 'total_warnings_sent', 'unsubscribe', 'user', 'user_id'] This gives the list of attributes which can be examined with, e.g. >>> x[0].delivery_mode <DeliveryMode.regular: 1> You can then remove the one you don't want, e.g. >>> x[0].unsubscribe() >>> commit() ``` Just to be sure, you should ensure that x[0].member_id and x[1].member_id are different. These are the _member_id column in the member table in the database. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: Installing mailman 3

by Rafael Mora

Ok, I screwed the mailman install ..... I reinstalled mailman core. How do I do a Python2 virtualenv? Thanks El vie., 21 jul. 2017 a las 15:03, Mark Sapiro (<mark(a)msapiro.net>) escribió: > On 07/21/2017 12:44 PM, Rafael Mora wrote: > > I did this: > > > > (env) [mailman@localhost mailman-suite_project]$ pip install Django > > Requirement already satisfied: Django in > > /var/lib/mailman/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages > > Requirement already satisfied: pytz in > > /var/lib/mailman/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages (from Django) > > > > > > Does Django is already installed?? with python3.6 ??? > > > Your 'env' vitrualenv is a Python 3 virtualenv. You need this for > Mailman core, but Django and mailman-suite are Python 2. They need to be > installed and run in a Python 2 virtualenv. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- Atentamente / Best Regards Ing. Rafael Mora

8 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: Hyperkitty 1.1.1 to HyperKitty 1.2.1

by Thomas G

I tried all job, without result. (and they are correctly in the crontab) [image: image.png] If I try to find my list in the form, hyperkitty can find it: [image: image.png] Le mer. 3 oct. 2018 à 17:59, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> a écrit : > On 10/03/2018 02:30 AM, Thomas G wrote: > > > I have just a problem with statistics not available. > > > If cron is running all the periodic django jobs, this gets fixed > eventually. The one thing you may need to run manually is > > manage.py runjob thread_order_depth > > as that helps with some things and is a 'yearly' job. I think the > 'hourly' and 'daily' jobs fix most other issues. See > > manage.py runjob --list > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >

7 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: re-sending confirmation mails (was Re: Re: pending subscriptions lost?)

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/15/22 03:04, IEM Network Operation Center (IOhannes m zmölnig) wrote: > > afaiu, this snippet allows me to purge outdated pending subscriptions. > > modifying it slightly, also allows me to just list the pending > subscriptions along with their tokens and print them out. That is correct. > is it still possible to just use these tokens to confirm the pending > subscription (even though it is long overdue)? Yes. > while investigating this a bit, i also noticed that it seems that with > mailman3 the only option to confirm a pending subscription is via email > ("leaving the subject intact") - at least that is the only option that > is listed in the confirmation mail. > > now i would like to massage this into what i think is a bit more > user-friendly. > first of all: most email confirmation systems allow me to either "reply > by email" or "click this link". > is there a way to do this for mailman3? that is: is there a (hidden) URL > that would accept the token in order to confirm a subscription? See https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/901 You can add something like ``` Alternatively, you can confirm by going to the URL https://$domain/mailman3/lists/$list_id/confirm/?token=$token ``` to the list:user:action:subscribe template. Note that `$domain` may not be appropriate here because it is the email domain which may not be the web domain. > also: the confirmation mail says that the subject must be kept intact. > however, i noticed that the actual "From" address of the confirmation > mail already contains the token. The current template https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/master/src/mailman/templates/en/l… doesn't say that. > would it be enough if people just sent an email to this special > email-address (that contains the token), regardless of the subject? Yes. > i'm thinking of sending a rather personalized email that has a more > attractive subject than "confirm flkdsajfsalkjflsajfsoisjdl". The current mail has Subject: Your confirmation is needed to join the <fqdn_listname> mailing list > finally: what else is required to approve the confirmation? will the > sender's email-address be taken into account? (e.g. if they subscribed > "foo+mylist(a)example.com" but send the confirmation-reply from > "foo(a)example.com", will that still work? Yes. Only the token is required. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Huge performance issue: Mailman doesn't (seem to) receive any mails.

by Mark Sapiro

On 9/20/19 1:54 AM, Henrik Rasmussen wrote: > Mark Sapiro wrote: >> What other log entries relate to attempts to send to 172.19.199.2:8024? >> You may have to go back to when this first started to see them. > > Docker deleted it's log when restaring, as the container is deleted and removed, but the starte of the current log says: > ``` > Sep 18 13:28:57 postfix rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="7.4.7" x-pid="20" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com"] start > Sep 18 13:29:00 postfix postfix/postfix-script[94]: starting the Postfix mail system > Sep 18 13:29:00 postfix postfix/master[96]: daemon started -- version 2.10.1, configuration /etc/postfix > Sep 18 13:29:02 postfix postfix/smtpd[102]: connect from incoming.gateway.example.com[192.168.111.222] > Sep 18 13:29:04 postfix postfix/smtpd[102]: EFF017E9D65AE: client=incoming.gateway.example.com[192.168.111.222] > Sep 18 13:29:04 postfix postfix/cleanup[106]: EFF017E9D65AE: message-id=<2E40950170CA0A4A8D0F0C0CF1C0630601B8B9F412(a)P1KITMBX03WC02.unicph.domain> > Sep 18 13:29:04 postfix opendkim[19]: EFF017E9D65AE: incoming.gateway.example.com [192.168.111.222] not internal > Sep 18 13:29:04 postfix opendkim[19]: EFF017E9D65AE: not authenticated > Sep 18 13:29:04 postfix postfix/smtpd[102]: disconnect from incoming.gateway.example.com[192.168.111.222] > Sep 18 13:29:18 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: 0E53F7E9D7D8D: from=<>, size=212010, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Sep 18 13:29:18 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: C51DE7E9920B8: from=<>, size=212004, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Sep 18 13:29:18 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: 2923A7E99B41F: from=<>, size=212040, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Sep 18 13:29:18 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: D0A1E7E981E26: from=<quarantine(a)messaging.microsoft.com>, size=14542, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Sep 18 13:29:18 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: 95FA77E9815A5: from=<>, size=211977, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Sep 18 13:29:18 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: 208777E993635: from=<sender(a)example.com>, size=9826184, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Sep 18 13:29:18 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: 757C27E9BD45C: from=<>, size=211997, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Sep 18 13:29:18 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: 738C87E9B94BE: from=<>, size=212141, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > [SLIP] > Sep 18 13:32:24 postfix postfix/anvil[103]: statistics: max cache size 1 at Sep 18 13:29:02 > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/smtpd[992]: connect from gateway[172.19.199.1] > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/smtpd[992]: 9E0D37E9D65AF: client=gateway[172.19.199.1] > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/cleanup[996]: 9E0D37E9D65AF: message-id=<3e08121bcdf5b0ebeb779a26ab2fe6ef(a)mailing.einnews.com> > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix opendkim[19]: 9E0D37E9D65AF: DKIM-Signature field added (s=default, d=sendergateway.example.com) > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/smtpd[992]: disconnect from gateway[172.19.199.1] > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: 9E0D37E9D65AF: from=<sender(a)example.com>, size=59393, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: warning: mail for [172.19.199.2]:8024 is using up 7863 of 7863 active queue entries > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: warning: you may need to reduce lmtp connect and helo timeouts > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: warning: so that Postfix quickly skips unavailable hosts > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: warning: you may need to increase the main.cf minimal_backoff_time and maximal_backoff_time > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: warning: so that Postfix wastes less time on undeliverable mail > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: warning: you may need to increase the master.cf lmtp process limit > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: warning: please avoid flushing the whole queue when you have > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: warning: lots of deferred mail, that is bad for performance > Sep 18 13:43:48 postfix postfix/qmgr[98]: warning: to turn off these warnings specify: qmgr_clog_warn_time = 0 So we see that Postfix is trying to send 9E0D37E9D65AF, but the subsequent log entries are only the "warning: mail for [172.19.199.2]:8024 is using up 7863 of 7863 active queue entries" ones. If this happens again, look in the log before restarting the container for connection refused, lost or timed out types of entries. You verified that Postfix could connect and receive the greeting from Mailman's LMTP runner, but that was after the queue was full. Maybe when it started and the queue filled up, this wasn't the case, but then if Postfix can connect, the queue should eventually drain. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 7 months

Search results for query "sapiro"