Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Problems configuring hyperkitty

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/18/24 09:29, Alain D D Williams wrote: > > I am running Debian 12 - Bookworm and have installed the Debian packages. The > database is Mysql. This is not a virtualenv setup. There is no documentation in > the hyperkitty package so I am following: > > https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/hyperkitty/en/latest/install.html The primary support resource for Debian packages is Debian. See https://wiki.list.org/x/12812344 > I read the following: > > "The database can be created with the following command: > > django-admin migrate --pythonpath example_project --settings settings > " > > I assume that that will create some database tables. Hopefully this will have > been done by installing package python3-mailman-hyperkitty. > > • What database & tables will that be ? It would be really useful to be told so > that I can check. The database is configured in the DATABASES setting in your Django settings. The HyperKitty tables all have names beginning with `hyperkitty_`. > • The config file is: /etc/mailman3/mailman-hyperkitty.cfg > This does not contain any comment about databases. Where does hyperkitty get > its database parameters from ? Django, see above. > • I have several different maildomains each with several lists. Some lists in > different domains have the same name. Do I need a different > example_project/settings.py for each domain, if so what changes ? I can't really speak to Debian, but you should be using the Django settings provided as part of Django's mailman-web package, not the ones in hyperkitty/example_project/settings.py as those don't include settings necessary for Postorius. > One of the next things that I will need to do is to import archives from > mailman2. How does the command below change for the different domains ? > > django-admin hyperkitty_import --pythonpath example_project --settings settings -l ADDRESS mbox_file [mbox_file ...] In the `-l ADDRESS` argument the ADDRESS is the fully qualified list address and includes the domain. > > Is there some better documentation that I have failed to find ? Ask Debian. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: Change the default value for the General Archive Policy

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/23/25 08:03, Markus Grandpré wrote: > Dear list, > > currently, when I create a new mailing list with MM3 the value for > "Archive policy" is always set to "Public archives". I'd like to change > the default value for "Archive policy" to "Do not archive this list". > How can I do this? In Debian 12 I find in > </usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/postorius/forms/list_forms.py>: ... > but have no idea how to change the settings here. Your help is very > appreciated. Are you creating the list in Postorius. If so, you have a choice for list style. Currently those choices are: ``` Announce only mailing list style. Ordinary discussion mailing list style. Discussion mailing list style with private archives. ``` There is currently no style for a list without archives, but you can implement one. See the thread at https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… for hints on how to do this with a plugin. Alternatively, you can do it with a patch like: ``` --- a/src/mailman/styles/default.py +++ b/src/mailman/styles/default.py @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ """Application of list styles to new and existing lists.""" from mailman.core.i18n import _ +from mailman.interfaces.archiver import ArchivePolicy from mailman.interfaces.styles import IStyle from mailman.styles.base import ( Announcement, @@ -91,3 +92,25 @@ class PrivateDefaultStyle( Private.apply(self, mailing_list) Discussion.apply(self, mailing_list) Moderation.apply(self, mailing_list) + + +@public +@implementer(IStyle) +class PublicNoArchiveStyle( + + Identity, BasicOperation, Bounces, Public, Discussion, Moderation): + + """The legacy default style with no archives.""" + + name = 'legacy-default-no-archive' + description = _('Ordinary discussion mailing list style with no archive.') + + def apply(self, mailing_list): + """See `IStyle`.""" + Identity.apply(self, mailing_list) + BasicOperation.apply(self, mailing_list) + Bounces.apply(self, mailing_list) + Public.apply(self, mailing_list) + Discussion.apply(self, mailing_list) + Moderation.apply(self, mailing_list) + mailing_list.archive_policy = ArchivePolicy.never ``` If you are creating lists from the command line `mailman create`, there is a --style-name option to specify the style. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 months

[MM3-users] Re: How to turn off Emergency Moderation for imported MM2 lists?

by Abhilash Raj

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020, at 6:12 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Mark Sapiro wrote: > > On 7/28/20 5:40 AM, Brian Carpenter wrote: > > > > > > This is the client that I asking about in my post. > > > She said what I > > > did, did not work. This is what I did: > > > > > > Get into a venv as user mailman > > > > > > #mailman shell > > > from mailman.model.mailinglist import MailingList > > > mlist = MailingList('listname(a)listdomain.org') > > > mlist.emergency = False > > > commit() > > > ctrl-d (just to be on the safe side) > > I half understand why this didn't work. Instantiating the list via > ``` > from mailman.model.mailinglist import MailingList > mlist = MailingList('listname(a)listdomain.org') > ``` > for some reason (that's the half I don't understand) does not get the > actual list object so changes you make to it don't affect the actual > list. It is because when you simply instantiate that class, it will create a new model instance, that you would need to persist by adding to database using `store.add(mlist)`. If you instead want to read that instance from database, you have to do `store.query()`, which is what the `.get()` method of IListManager does. > In `mailman shell` you need to do > ``` > mlist = getUtility(IListManager).get('listname(a)listdomain.org') > ``` > `getUtility` and `IListManager` are in the namespace in `mailman > shell`, but outside of that, e.g. just in `python` in your virtualenv, > you also need > ``` > from mailman.interfaces.listmanager import IListManager > from zope.component import getUtility > ``` > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

5 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: User account issue after importing data from Mailman 2.x server

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/24/24 11:01, dgoldsmith--- via Mailman-users wrote: > We finally migrated from Mailman 2.x to a Mailman 3.x several months ago. We have had some issues with people who are active list members not being able to login with their user creds and when trying to use the 'Forgot Password' link to reset, being told their user account does not exist. They can submit email to the list and get copied on other list traffic. Mailman's import21 process creates Mailman users for the list memberships, but it does not create the Django user used for access to HyperKitty and Pustorius. Your users can't reset their Django (web UI) login password because they don't have a Django account. They need to `Sign up` rather than `Sign in`. > Should Mailman 3.x have created user accounts for everyone when importing the data from the old server? It did create Mailman users, but these have nothing to do with the users that can log min to the web UI. It doesn't create these Django users. > To correct the issue on a case by case basis, can I as a server admin do something via the web UI or CLI or do we need to remove the email address from the list and ask the person to create a new account using that address and to resubscribe to the specific list or other? Just tell the users to go to the web UI and `Sign up` rather than `Sign in`. Removing and resubscribing a user will not help. The users that are members of mailing lists are completely separate from the users that can log in to the web UI. This is in part due to the modular nature of Mailman 3 and the fact that a Mailman 3 installation doesn't necessarily even have a Django based web UI. You may also be interested in the thread at https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: mailman_web/urls.py changes in Postorius 1.3.10

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/5/23 09:52, Lieuallen, Thomas Otis wrote: > The latest release of Postorius includes these lines in mailman_web/urls.py: > > > # Include alternate Postorius and HyperKitty URLs. > > path('postorius/', include('postorius.urls')), > > path('hyperkitty/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), > > > It appears that these paths override the originals (/mailman3 & /archive). They were intended as optional additions, but it appears they do function as overrides for some purposes. > I’m using apache and have had to add ProxyPass lines for these new alternate URLs, as /mailman3 and /archive don’t appear to be presented anymore by mailman-web. All the links at the top (Postorious, lists, domains, bans, system info, users, and archives) – all have /postorius or /hyperkitty as the start of their URLs. This is apparently a side effect of this change that wasn't considered in making the change. The change was made because some docs and/or example projects used the /postorius and /hyperkitty URLs and some used the /mailman3 and /archives URLs. This was an attempt to make either set work. > If I make a copy of that urls.py in /etc/mailman3 and point to it with ROOT_URLCONF – and comment out those alternate lines, the links go back to the way they were (/mailman3 and /archives). > > Or, as I mentioned, I can add the ProxyPass lines for /postorius and /hyperkitty to apache. > > One way or another, it doesn’t seem to be behaving as an alternate. Or have I overlooked something? It was intended to just add the /postorius and /hyperkitty URLs as alternates. I had assumed the links on various pages would reflect the URL used to access the page, but this is apparently wrong. I could change the order of the path lines in the distributed urls.py, but at this point it just may cause more confusion. However, since the sample config at https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#apache-configur… shows only the /mailman3 and /archives URLs, I will change the order. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: Handling of (un)subscribe mails for already (un)subscribed users

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/10/20 11:51 AM, Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that a mail to -subscribe for an already subscribed user > doesn't get any response (about line 225 in > mailman/src/mailman/app/subscriptions.py). Same but different for > unsubscribe for users not on the list. I tested and I see this, so there is a bug, but I don't know what the issue is. The code you point to should raise AlreadySubscribedError and <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/master/src/mailman/commands/eml_m…> should catch it and report, but this doesn't seem to be happening.. Also, <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/master/src/mailman/commands/eml_m…> should report an attempt to unsubscribe a non-member, but the issue here is <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/master/src/mailman/runners/comman…> which supresses sending the response because it is redundant if the user gets a 'you have been removed' email, but in this case there isn't one. > I'd need these kind of mails however in hope that users complain less. > > Would that be generally interessting, and if so, any special > requirements for submitting patches, or should I just do that locally? These things should be fixed, but it's more involved than just a patch to fix the error. For all but trivial fixes, the workflow should be something along the lines of the following. There should be an issue on GitLab for the appropriate project; in this case at <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues>. Then to develop a fix, there needs to be a fix, a test for the fixed code and a note in the NEWS.rst file about the fix. I generally prefer to start with a local clone of the GitLab branch and first create a test for the desired behavior. This test should fail. Then I create the fix, and now the test should pass. Finally, I create the NEWS item and commit those changes and create a merge request. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: user mail not accepted

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/26/21 5:16 AM, Christian Stalberg via Mailman-users wrote: > I have a user whose moderation rule is 'Accept immediately' yet when they > send a message for distribution to the list, they only receive it and it is > not distributed via the list. Logfile entries below. Please advise. Btw I > have another list on this same instance which is running fine. Thank you. > > [26/Apr/2021:12:06:25 +0000] "GET /3.1/lists/ssan.lists.ccalternatives.org > HTTP/1.1" 200 453 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.2" > [26/Apr/2021:12:06:25 +0000] "POST > /3.1/members/find?list_id=ssan.lists.ccalternatives.org&subscriber=christian > %40sewagesludgeactionnetwork.com HTTP/1.1" 200 1257 "-" "GNU Mailman REST > client v3.3.2" > [26/Apr/2021:12:06:25 +0000] "PATCH > /3.1/members/7186cd45bde34d4fa7e7b5ab36b97272 HTTP/1.1" 204 0 "-" "GNU > Mailman REST client v3.3.2" > [26/Apr/2021:12:06:26 +0000] "GET /3.1/lists/ssan.lists.ccalternatives.org > HTTP/1.1" 200 453 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.2" > [26/Apr/2021:12:06:26 +0000] "POST > /3.1/members/find?list_id=ssan.lists.ccalternatives.org&subscriber=christian > %40sewagesludgeactionnetwork.com HTTP/1.1" 200 1288 "-" "GNU Mailman REST > client v3.3.2" > [26/Apr/2021:12:06:26 +0000] "GET > /3.1/lists/ssan(a)lists.ccalternatives.org/requests/count?token_owner=moderato > r HTTP/1.1" 200 73 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.2" > [26/Apr/2021:12:06:26 +0000] "GET > /3.1/lists/ssan(a)lists.ccalternatives.org/held/count HTTP/1.1" 200 73 "-" > "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.2" > [26/Apr/2021:12:06:26 +0000] "GET > /3.1/members/7186cd45bde34d4fa7e7b5ab36b97272/preferences HTTP/1.1" 200 295 > "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.2" These entries don't tell anything about a post to the list. They are all from Mailman's REST API relating to Postorius interactions with core. However the absence of messages like Apr 26 07:32:39 2021 (17860) ACCEPT: <message_id> and Apr 26 07:32:41 2021 (17857) HyperKitty archived message <message_id> to https://example.com/archives/list/list_adderss/message/message_id_hash/ assuming you are looking at the correct time span, says there wasn't an accepted list post. Mailman's smtp.log may have more info, but the complete, raw message that the user receives may be more helpful. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: Sending to mangled 'From' addresses.

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/31/24 22:23, hansen via Mailman-users wrote: > > Due to the DMARC mitigation action ‘Replace From: with list address’, it happens often on my lists that someone sends a message to a mangled address, hoping that the message goes to the person listed as the sender. This happens mostly because the mail clients collect previous addresses and use them when as type-ahead candidates for new messages, which may be unrelated to the lists. DMARC mitigation action ‘Replace From: with list address’ will also place the poster's address in Reply-To: (or Cc: depending on list configuration), so a simple `reply` from a reasonable MUA should go just to the poster. > For example, say the mail client captures my address as > > “Allan Hansen via <listname>” <listaddress> > > then later, when the person wants to send a message to me, the type-ahead puts this string in the ’To:’ field: > > “Allan Hansen via <listname>” > > and, to make it worse, the actual email address, <listaddress>, is often hidden. If this is the result of a `reply` and not `reply-all` the client is not behaving reasonably. > The result is that the email gets sent to the list instead of to me, together with (often) personal and (sometimes) embarrassing information. That is a problem with the client, but I suppose such clients are not uncommon. > Is there a way to reject messages sent to recipients where the name part of the recipient is of the above format, i.e., > > "Allan Hansen via <listname>" You could add a header filter on the To header with a regexp like `^.*via <listname>` and the desired action. > Should I get onto the other list to request this as an enhancement? I don't think that's necessary in this case, as Header filters should do it. In general, the best way to request an enhancement is to file an issue with the appropriate GitLab project at `https://gitlab.com/mailman` -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: Mailman/Django-allauth integration with Yahoo

by Mark Sapiro

On 8/4/24 03:35, Дилян Палаузов wrote: > > Then I get a site, partially in English, partially localized. It is in my domain at address /mm3/accounts/confirm-email/ , and states: > > Messages: Confirmation of email address sent to ...(a)yahoo.com > Menu: Entrance \r\n New registration > > Confirm your email address: > > We have sent an email to you for verification. Follow the link provided to finalize the signup process. If you do not see the verification email in your main inbox, check your spam folder. Please contact us if you do not receive the verification email within a few minutes. I'm not certain, but it looks like you are signing in to a new account and django-allauth is creating the account with the address from yahoo and is asking you to confirm. > I have indeed received an email, which states: > New signin from … Hi, Your Yahoo account … was just used to sign in on …. If you did this, you’re all set. If not, please use this link to stop sharing, and create a new password. Have a great day! Thanks,Yahoo > > So, the /account/confirm-email states I have received an email for verification, but the email sent says no verification is needed, I am all set up. > > Any idea what can I improve? This appears to be a glitch in the new account verification process. In any case, it's a django-allauth issue, not a Mailman issue. Once you have gone through this dance, what happens the next time you sign in via Yahoo. > In addition https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman-suite/-/blob/master/mailman-suite_projec… suggests adding in settings.py: > > SOCIALACCOUNT_PROVIDERS = {'openid': {'SERVERS': [dict(id='yahoo', name='Yahoo', openid_url='http://me.yahoo.com')]}} > > which I have not done. That is, I do not use the “openid” provider, but the “yahoo” provider. Do I have to use the OpenID provider when using Yahoo? I don't think it would matter. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: Installing mailman 3

by Rafael Mora

I'm logging with the mailman user and it says that it sent a confirmation email to my email account, but I don't see any activity in postfix with 'tail -f /var/log/maillog' command What do you suggest??? El mar., 1 ago. 2017 a las 23:18, Mark Sapiro (<mark(a)msapiro.net>) escribió: > On 08/01/2017 02:40 PM, Rafael Mora wrote: > > Why isn't it sending emails? > > > > What do you think? > > > What exactly are you doing that you think should result in sent mail? > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- Atentamente / Best Regards Ing. Rafael Mora

8 years, 6 months

Search results for query "sapiro"