Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: New messages not being archived

by Mark Sapiro

On 7/15/21 12:55 PM, Sarah H wrote: > > The log is mostly these three errors repeatedly with the same above wall of html between them, some of them end with (404) after the last html tag indicating url not found and browsing to them gives the same custom 404 page for postorius. The code is if result.status_code != 200: logger.error("HyperKitty failure on %s: %s (%s)", url, result.text, result.status_code) raise ValueError(result.text) > Jul 15 12:37:08 2021 (471314) HyperKitty failure on http://lists.client.org/hyperkitty/api/mailman/archive: So the above log entry should be followed by result.text and result.status_code. The next entry below is from the `raise ValueError(result.text)` What do you get from curl http://lists.client.org/hyperkitty/api/mailman/archive and what if you change the scheme in the base_url setting to https? > Jul 15 12:37:08 2021 (471314) Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman_hyperkitty/__init__.py", line 154, in _archive_message > url = self._send_message(mlist, msg) > File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman_hyperkitty/__init__.py", line 210, in _send_message > raise ValueError(result.text) > ValueError: And this one below is is because of the above exception. > Jul 15 12:37:08 2021 (471314) Exception in the HyperKitty archiver: > > I was able to find (about 5000 lines up in the log for a single post attempt... it's a bit excessive to print the html response every error) this when I dug through instead of tailing the last 500 lines. > > [15/Jul/2021:12:37:06 -0700] "GET /3.1/addresses/sarah.h@email HTTP/1.1" 200 380 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.2" > > and at the start of the block: > > [15/Jul/2021:12:37:03 -0700] "GET /3.1/lists/admin.lists.client.org/member/sarah.%40email HTTP/1.1" 200 516 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.2" > Jul 15 12:37:05 2021 (471317) ACCEPT: <162637782380.3116.619498070458942231@sysname> These are from the Mailman REST API and are not relevant to your issue. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Hyperkitty no longer archiving

by Mark Sapiro

First, my apologies for not taking note of your MAILMAN_ARCHIVER_FROM setting in your OP. On 11/22/22 08:52, Hirayama, Pat wrote: > Steve wrote: >> 2. Does settings.py have "from settings_local import *" in it? > > Yes. I assume that overrides the MAILMAN_ARCHIVER_FROM and other related settings defined at the top of the settings.py file? Or should I update settings.py based on what is in settings_local.py? Assuming the `from settings_local import *` is at the end of settings.py, anything defined in settings_local.py will override the definition in settings.py. There's no need to change settings.py. >> 3. Are there multiple copies of settings.py lying around? > > Well, there are these: > > ./usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/rest_framework/settings.py > > ./usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/postorius/doc/settings.py > > ./usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/django_q/tests/settings.py > > ./usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/django_extensions/settings.py > > ./usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/mailmanclient/restobjects/settings.py > > ./usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/example_project/settings.py > > > Only the last has MAILMAN_ARCHIVER_FROM defined in it, but I was assuming from the example_project subdirectory name that this was just a sample file, and besides, "from settings_local import *" is also set in it. Yes, those are all samples. The ``` ERROR 2022-11-22 00:25:40,365 7 hyperkitty.views.mailman Access to the archiving API endpoint was forbidden from IP 172.31.0.1, your MAILMAN_ARCHIVER_FROM setting may be misconfigured ``` message comes from https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/-/blob/master/hyperkitty/views/mailma… which only occurs if '172.31.0.1' is not in MAILMAN_ARCHIVER_FROM. Given that it is in MAILMAN_ARCHIVER_FROM as defined in settings_local.py, the only thing I can conclude is that the Django settings actually used is not the settings.py you think it is. I don't know offhand even what wsgi service is used in the docker container or how it is configured, but it needs to set its working directory to the directory containing settings.py. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: cc'd e-mail addresses rewritten with @invalid.domain

by Mark Sapiro

On 9/23/20 12:48 PM, pwilliam(a)fredhutch.org wrote: > Hi Mailman Users, > > I've done some more testing with this issue and have determined that this seems to be an issue with how commas within the display name in cc'd messages are being processed with messages sent from the Outlook client. > > Here are some test scenarios. Note I set the mailing list I was testing with to hold messages in moderation. Once the message was held I copied the information from the headers directly from Postorius held message information into the space below: > > Test Scenario 1: > Display name in Outlook: Williamss, Peterr C > Outcome: Does not work as intended. The CC address is formatted as Williamss(a)invalid.domain in messages received by mailing list members, oddly the "Peterr C" part of the display name is not present anywhere in the CC addresses received by mailing list members. > Header information from held message in Postorius > CC: "os-x-lion(a)lists.test.org" <os-x-lion(a)lists.test.org>, > "Williamss, > Peterr C" <peterbw(a)test.com> "Williamss, Peterr C" <peterbw(a)test.com> is correct for how this address spec should be represented. If in fact, it is split into two lines "Williamss, Peterr C" <peterbw(a)test.com> as it appears above, it looks to me as if the actual header should be > CC: "os-x-lion(a)lists.test.org" <os-x-lion(a)lists.test.org>, "Williamss, Peterr C" <peterbw(a)test.com> but is being folded on the whitespace between Williamss and Peterr. This is <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/725>, fixed at <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/merge_requests/652>. The fix will be in the next (3.3.2) release of Mailman core. This is really an Outlook issue. See <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/725#note_351314868> for why folding within a quoted string is allowed, but in cases like this SHOULD not be done. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Installing mailman 3

by Rafael Mora

As Abhilash said I checked the django configuration for email but nothing happens when the program sends the confirmation email. Is there any other configuration file for django emails? On Tue, Aug 1, 2017, 23:18 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 08/01/2017 02:40 PM, Rafael Mora wrote: > > Why isn't it sending emails? > > > > What do you think? > > > What exactly are you doing that you think should result in sent mail? > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- Atentamente / Best Regards Ing. Rafael Mora

8 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: Adding user - Error 409 Subscription request already pending

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/19/19 6:33 PM, kevin(a)coastalaska.org wrote: > We have a couple of people trying to subscribe to our list but receive an error similar to: > {"title": "409 Conflict", "description": "Subscription request already pending"} > > If I try to Mass Subscribe them in Postorius I get this error: > HTTP Error 409: b'{"title": "409 Conflict", "description": "Subscription request already pending"}' > > In Postorius I don't see them hung up in Subscription requests. Postorius since 1.2.3 does not show subscription requests waiting user confirmation, only those waiting moderator approval. Thus, if the list's subscription policy is confirm or confirm then moderate, the subscribing user will be sent an email requesting confirmation. If the user hasn't answered that email, the request is pending user confirmation, and since 1.2.3, you won't see it in Postorius. [Update: this is fixed in 1.2.4] > What to do? 1) have the user find the confirmation request email and confirm, or 2) wait for the request to expire (default 3 days) 3) using mailman shell or the REST api or direct interaction with the database, find the token and confirm it. A shell example is ``` mailman shell -l your.list.id Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell The variable 'm' is the your.list.id mailing list >>> util = getUtility(IPendings) >>> list(util.find(mlist=m,pend_type='subscription')) ``` This returns a list of items like ('hex_token'), {'token_owner': 'subscriber', 'email': 'user(a)example.com', 'display_name': 'Jane User', 'when': '2019-04-09T01:26:08', 'type': 'subscription', 'list_id': 'your.list.id'}) You then do ``` >>> util.confirm('hex_token') ``` Note that https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/issues/314 which was responsible for removing the subs waiting user confirmation from the Postorius listing suggested "there could be a different place to see the ones pending user approval, so that a moderator can look and/or delete those.", but that hasn't been done. [Update: this is fixed in 1.2.4] -- Mark Sapiro mark(a)msapiro.net The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: Subscription request cannot be moderated: 404 Not Found

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/16/21 7:49 AM, Eric Broens via Mailman-users wrote: > Hi Mark, > I can't find any log entry which indicate a problem with this subscription request. > The _request table does not contain a request for the specific mailinglist, but I am not sure if subscription requests are included in this table. It is unclear and confusing, but the requests are not in the _request table. See <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/768#note_415536043>. So this is normal. > The token is found in the pended table: > > +-----+------------------------------------------+---------------------+ > | id | token | expiration_date | > +-----+------------------------------------------+---------------------+ > | 115 | 4d6b4b11266c7332684c5a492eb3f92c531f761b | 2031-01-04 16:17:38 | > +-----+------------------------------------------+---------------------+ > > These are the relevant entries in the pendedkeyvalue table: > +------+--------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+ > | id | key | value | pended_id | > +------+--------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+ > | 1130 | type | subscription | 115 | > | 1131 | list_id | "********************" | 115 | > | 1132 | email | "***********************@*********" | 115 | > | 1133 | display_name | "" | 115 | > | 1134 | when | "2021-01-06T16:17:38" | 115 | > | 1135 | token_owner | "moderator" | 115 | > +------+--------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+ > > Can I workaround this problem for this specific subscriber by adding entries in the _request table, and if so what do I need to add? Adding to the _request table won't help. Try confirming by emailing listname-confirm+4d6b4b11266c7332684c5a492eb3f92c531f761b(a)list.domain You could also try confirming via mailman shell mailman shell -l list.example.com Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell Use commit() to commit changes. Use abort() to discard changes since the last commit. Exit with ctrl+D does an implicit commit() but exit() does not. The variable 'm' is the list.example.com mailing list >>> ISubscriptionManager(m).confirm('4d6b4b11266c7332684c5a492eb3f92c531f761b') Traceback (most recent call last): File "<console>", line 1, in <module> File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailman-3.3.3b1-py3.7.egg/mailman/app/subscriptions.py", line 570, in confirm raise LookupError LookupError In my case, I get the LookupError because the token doesn't exist, but I think it should work for you. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: FILTER_VHOST not working

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/22/21 1:03 PM, Johannes Rohr wrote: > In /etc/mailman3/mailman-web.py I have added > FILTER_VHOST = True > so that only the list for the current domain are shown. > > But this has no effect. The current situation with Postorius >=1.3.3 and Hyperkitty >=1.3.3 is for HyperKitty, FILTER_VHOST = True works. For Postorius, it works only if in the domains view, each mail host has a unique web host. It doesn't work. See this post <https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message…> and others in that thread for more info. Prior to Postorius 1.3.3 and Hyperkitty 1.3.3 it would only work if the mail host and web host values were identical for the domain. > > What's more, in hyperkitty I see at the top left the lable for the > default domain, even though I am visiting from another domain. That has nothing to do with FILTER_VHOST. The displayed there is the site referenced in the SITE_ID setting. > The web domains are exactly the same as the mail domans > (lists.[domain].[tld]) In that case, I'm not sure what's going on. > In the Nginx config I have added > > location / { > proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme; > proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $host; > proxy_pass http://localhost:8000/; > [....] > > } > > to make sure that mailman3 knows from which URL it is visited. > > Am I overlooking something? > > I am using the distribution packages on Ubuntu 20.04: > mailman3 3.2.2-1 > mailman3-web 0+20180916-10 > > I see, the mailman3-web package is quite dated. Is it recommended to > install via virtualenv instead? Yes, the issue is at least partially that that mailman3-web package doesn't have any of the FILTER_VHOST fixes. And yes, if you don't want to be stuck with dated packages tha don't include recent fixes, we recommend installation as documented at <https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html> -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Mm3 - new adventure

by Mark Sapiro

On 03/14/2017 09:14 AM, SP2L wrote: > > Lately started adventurous journey with Mailman3 > which is way, way different already from the beginning. > > Used Mailman bundler to install GNU Mailman, Postorius and HyperKitty > testing instance in virtual environment, mainly relaying on belows recipe: > > https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman-bundler/ mailman-bundler is out of date and deprecated. You might find <https://wiki.list.org/x/17891998> of interest. > Present status. > > Above trio and MySQLServer are "talking" to each other > but because there isproper database on MySQLServer > I am facing strange and unexpected issues, Hi! > > Executing last two commands: > > (venv)$ ./bin/mailman start > (venv)$ ./bin/mailman-web-django-admin runserver 0.0.0.0:8000 & > > I see Postorius and HyperKitty up & runningbut... > > Belowvery condensed messages from the console: > > > /HyperKitty/ > > DEBUG = False > > [12/Mar/2017 18:59:43] "GET /archives/ HTTP/1.1" 200 8002 > WARNING Not Found: > /static/hyperkitty/libs/jquery/smoothness/jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css ... Have you run the script that bundler installs as bin/mailman-post-update? > /mailman3/ > > DEBUG = False > > Server Error (500) > > > DEBUG = True > > HTTP Error 500: A server error occurred. Please contact the administrator. > > Exception Location: > /var/lib/mailman3/mailman-bundler/eggs/mailmanclient-1.0.1-py2.7.egg/mailmanclient/_client.py > in call, line 109 > > Then VERY, verylong list... Without knowing what the exception was and at least the start of the traceback, it's hard to say what this might be. > By means of PhpMyAdmin I created manually mailman3 database > and few tables (looking at 0001_initial.py) , but it is not working O.K. > This handmade table is not doing it's job. You shouldn't need to do this. If you have the proper settings and credentials in the DATABASES setting in mailman-web/settings_local.py and the [database] section in deployment/mailman.cfg, the tables should be created for you. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Template's encoding setup

by Mark Sapiro

On 9/14/19 4:06 AM, Ugnius S wrote: > Yes, I have made several tests. I have set charset: iso-8859-13 > and default_language: lt in mailman.cfg. If you created the list before you set default_language: lt in mailman.cfg, the list's preferred_language is possibly 'en;' with character set us-ascii. > (Also I have set LANGUAGE_CODE = 'lt' in the settings_local.py, but I think > it is not related to this case.) Yes, LANGUAGE_CODE in settings_local.py is not relevant to this. > I have tried to set utf-8 as well in mailman.cfg as well. And I can > confirm - in all tested cases > text characters are correct (in footer as well) if sender sends text only. OK > If sender sends message in HTML (mostly all users send) then no > matter what the encoding is set in my mailman's > configuration or iso-8859-13, or utf-8 message body looks correct, but in > footer all national characters are replaced with > question marks " ? ". The addition of the footer is done by mailman/handlers/decorate.py. In the plain text case the message body is converted to unicode, the unicode footer is appended to the body and the new body is encoded for transmission. The encoding is the first of the list's character set, the incoming message's character set or utf-8 which produces no error. In the case where the incoming message is not a single plain text message part, the footer is added as a separate MIME part with the unicode footer encoded in the list's character set with errors='replace'. This is what produces the '?' characters. I suspect this happens because the list's preferred_language is 'en' with character set us-ascii. try running Mailman's bin/mailman shell -l your_list@domain at the prompt enter m.preferred_language if the response is not <Language [lt] Lithuanian> do m.preferred_language = 'lt' and then control-D to exit. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: restrict sending to owner/moderator

by Mark Sapiro

On 09/18/2017 02:28 AM, m.dohmen(a)xconnect.de wrote: > > I'd like to restrict message acceptance on a per-list basis to the owner or moderator, so that simple subscribers cannot send messages to the list. But I don't want the owner/moderator having to moderate own messages, so the member setting "hold for moderation" in Postorius isn't applicable. And on 09/19/2017 10:52 AM, David Krantz wrote: > > I have just tested a variant of this as I got curious: You find the > member you want to be able to send emails without moderation, then set > Administrative Options to "Accept Immediately (bypass other rules)". > That works. I have found no other ways, though. Or you may wish to set the owners/moderators subscriptions to "Default processing" which will still apply subsequent rule checks. I.e., set Default action to take when a member posts to the list to Reject (with notification) and set an appropriate notice (currently can't be set in Postorius - set it via 'mailman shell') and set Default action to take when a non-member posts to thelist to Discard or perhaps Reject but this creates backscatter. Then ordinary members have Moderation set to List default and owners/moderators have it set to Accept or Default. The problems with this are sall the owners/moderators need to be subscribers and there are maintenance issues with adding/removing owners/moderators. A better way to do this by sharing a "moderator password" for the list among the authorized posters. See <http://mailman.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/mailman/rules/docs/approved.html> for how this is done to pre-approve posts. Then set the list to Discard/Reject all posts, and people who know the "moderator password" can still post. There is still an issue in that the password needs to be changed and redistributed when people become unauthorized, but this is more secure as regular moderation can be fooled by spoofing the sender. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 years, 5 months

Search results for query "sapiro"