Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Change base mailman URL path

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/6/23 20:07, chad.hays86(a)gmail.com wrote: > Hi, I recently completed the a Mailman3 install using these[1] instructions. I'm able to access the web interface, the Django admin app, etc off the root domain URL. For example: https://mydomain.org/mailman3, https://mydomain.org/admin, https://mydomain.org/archives > > What's the most straightforward way to put all of these URL paths behind a different context? For example: https://mydomain.org/lists/mailman3, https://mydomain.org/lists/admin, https://mydomain.org/lists/archives > > I'm running Apache2 as my web server and am using mod_proxy to proxy requests to uwsgi. There are two pieces to this: For the Django side, copy /opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.x/site-packages/mailman_web/urls.py to /etc/mailman3/urls.py where python3.x is the python version in your venv and edit that file as in ``` 30,34c30,34 < path('mailman3/', include('postorius.urls')), < path('archives/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), < path('', include('django_mailman3.urls')), < path('accounts/', include('allauth.urls')), < path('admin/', admin.site.urls), --- > path('lists/mailman3/', include('postorius.urls')), > path('lists/archives/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), > path('lists/', include('django_mailman3.urls')), > path('lists/accounts/', include('allauth.urls')), > path('lists/admin/', admin.site.urls), ``` and add the following to /etc/mailman3/settings.py ROOT_URLCONF = 'urls' Then for the apache side, it depends what you have for your ProxyPass directives are. If you have several like ``` ProxyPass "/mailman3" "http://127.0.0.1:8000/mailman3" ProxyPass "/archives" "http://127.0.0.1:8000/archives" ... ``` change those to ``` ProxyPass "/lists/mailman3" "http://127.0.0.1:8000/lists/mailman3" ProxyPass "/lists/archives" "http://127.0.0.1:8000/lists/archives" ``` If you have just one like ``` ProxyPass "/" "http://127.0.0.1:8000/" ``` change it to ``` ProxyPass "/lists" "http://127.0.0.1:8000/lists" ``` -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: No e-mail distribution after import of archive

by Markus Grandpré

Dear Mr Sapiro, thank you so much for your advice: > Check ownership and permissions on everything in var/templates/ fixed the issue. All pending email has been delivered immediately after i changed ownership on our Debian12 server: # chown list:list /var/lib/mailman3/templates -R Best regards, Markus Grandpré Am 11/12/24 um 22:45 schrieb Mark Sapiro: > On 11/11/24 23:33, Markus Grandpré wrote: >> Dear Mr. Sapiro, >> >> on our test system we noticed the problem that after importing a mailing list archive from a Mailman system v2.1 into >> a Mailman system v3.3.8, e-mails are no longer distributed via this mailing list. E-mails that are written to the list >> find their way into the archive, but they are not sent to any member of the list. >> >> Before the archive was imported, writing an e-mail to the list and distributing this e-mail via the list was not a >> problem. Unfortunately, we cannot find any indication of this issue in the log of the mailman system v3.3.8. Please >> help us to further analyze and solve this problem, as we are planning to import 188 archives into our new productive >> mailman system v3.3.8 during the next months. > > Nothing in HyperKitty should affect Mail delivery from the list. The symptom you see could result in a file in Mailman's > mailman/templates/lists/<THIS.LISTS.ID>/<LC>/ directory not being readable by the Mailman user. Check ownership and > permissions on everything in var/templates/ > > See the latter part of the thread at https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/ > KGYZXN2QP3RWRZOQKLHD2MKUSI7H2W6B/ > > Note that if this is the issue, something other than hyperkitty_import did it. > -- Markus Grandpré Universität Konstanz Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM) Abteilung IT-Dienste Forschung, Lehre und Infrastruktur, Tel: ++49 7531 88 4342

1 year, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Invalid FilterAction: discard. Treating as discard

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/12/19 1:46 AM, Henrik Rasmussen wrote: > > The difference was that list(m.pass_types) is [] > > Now, setting > > m.pass_types = ['multipart', 'message/rfc822', 'text/plain', 'text/html', 'application/pdf', 'application/nappdf', 'application/x-pdf', 'application/rtf', 'application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet', 'application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet', 'application/vnd.ms-excel', 'application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text', 'application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document', 'application/msword'] > > on the new testlist and resending the mail again, the mail still came out intact. > > So I guess the problem must be something complete different. > > Also I wonder why a newly created list accepts the PDF in question, when list(m.pass_types) is []. You need to look at all of pass_types, filter_types, pass_extensions and filter_extensions for both lists. For a newly created list, these are all empty. They work as in Mailmam 2.1 and are imported from the similarly named 2.1 attributes by `mailman import21`. In brief if filter_content is True, processing is: 1. If a part's MIME type is in filter_types it is removed. 2. If pass_types is not empty and a part's MIME type is not in pass_types it is removed. 3. If a part has a file name and the file name extension is in filter_extensions it is removed. 4. If a part has a file name and pass_extensions is not empty and the part's file name extension is not in pass_extensions it is removed. So in your case of the list that doesn't work, possibilities are: 1. The PDF part's MIME type is in filter_types, or 2. The PDF part has a file name whose extension is in filter_extensions, or 3. pass_extensions is non-empty and The PDF part has a file name whose extension is not in pass_extensions. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: Help with fresh debian install

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/5/19 11:30 AM, Mark Dadgar wrote: > > Running the commands as the correct user solved my issues. Specially, I ran the import21 command as the “list” user (created by the debian/ubuntu package) and the hyperkitty import command as the “www-data” user. I had to add login shells to the passwd entries for those users to make it happen as they get installed with nologin. You could just run, e.g., `sudo -u list bin/mailman import21 ...` which will work even if 'list' can't log in. > I imported a 24G archive inbox and something went wrong along the way - the archives for many months consist of just a single identical thread. Re-running the import results in the following in just a few seconds: ... > Any thoughts on how I can re-run the full import to make sure that all the archives are present? As far as reimporting the entire archive, you need the --since option. As it says in hyperkitty_import --help > --since SINCE only import emails later than this date. Defaults to > the date of the newest message in the existing archive > if any. If you run hyperkitty_import --since=1990-01-01, that should do it. As far as "the archives for many months consist of just a single identical thread", were there error messages when you ran the initial import? Were there issues in the imported mbox that you have corrected? Mailman 2.1's bin/cleanarch can help identify unescaped 'From ' lines that cause problems. If unescaped 'From ' lines is the issue and you have fixed them, rerunning the import should import the messages correctly, but it won't delete the bogus threads. You can delete these threads manually in HyperKitty if you are logged in as a Django superuser. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Active archivers and archiving and thread question.

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/31/22 04:39, bob B via Mailman-users wrote: > Thanks, that make sense, Also is there any way to turn that off via command line for a bunch of lists or just in the GUi, I looked at "'mailman shell --details:" but could not find a command to turn it off. > > I had archives off on my lists in mailman 2, and when I import they stayed off, but the archiver is enabled. The HyperKitty and Prototype archivers are enabled by default for new and imported lists. To change that, add ``` [archiver.hyperkitty] enable: no [archiver.prototype] enable: no ``` to mailman.cfg. > I have a script that pulls all the list configs > "curl --user *******:******* http://127.0.0.1:##/3.1/lists/"$i"/config | python3 -m json.tool >> ${OUTPUT_DATA_DIR}/listconfigs.txt > > Then I look to see if any list has changed this setting "archive_policy": "never", so I know if any list admin has enabled archives... > > But is there a setting in the config that shows if the archiver got turned on? I want to know if anyone turns it on after I turn it off You can do the following in `mailman shell` ``` $ mm/bin/mailman shell Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell Use commit() to commit changes. Use abort() to discard changes since the last commit. Exit with ctrl+D does an implicit commit() but exit() does not. >>>for mlist in getUtility(IListManager): ... print(mlist.display_name) ... print(f' ArchivePolicy was {mlist.archive_policy}') ... if mlist.archive_policy != ArchivePolicy.never: ... mlist.archive_policy = ArchivePolicy.never ... print(' set to ArchivePolicy.never') ... aset = IListArchiverSet(mlist) ... for ar in aset.archivers: ... if ar.is_enabled: ... ar.is_enabled = False ... print(f' Archiver {ar.name} was enabled; set disabled') ... >>> commit() ``` -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Error while mass operation, no progress display while mass operation is running

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/6/25 04:53, Markus Grandpré wrote: > > At the University of Konstanz we have mailing list administrators who > frequently add and remove up to 10000 (and sometimes more) list members. > I have therefore tested the “Mass subscription” and “Mass removal” > operations and found that both the “Remove ALL members” operation and > the “Mass subscription” operation report an internal server error on the > website, but continue to run in the background until all new members > have been successfully added or deleted. The internal server error is probably due to the wsgi server timing out waiting for a response. See https://docs.gunicorn.org/en/stable/settings.html#timeout for Gunicorn or https://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Options.html#harakiri for uWSGI > Unfortunately, I have not found > any error message in the log files. If you are using uWSGI, a harakiri timeout should be logged in uWSGI's log. > I also tested that mass operations > “Remove listed users” and “Remove Selected” ran successfully and without > any errors. You may want to increase the appropriate timeout and see if that helps. > Regardless of whether a mass operation process runs without errors or > continues to run despite an error, I find it hard that Postorius does > not display the progress of such a mass operation in order to monitor > the process, as mass operations with more than 1000 members are very > time-consuming. Perhaps this could be changed in a future version of > Postorius? This is a reasonable request. The best place for such a request is https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/new Requests and suggestions on the mailing list, no matter how reasonable, get lost over time. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: Cannot Run Web Frontend

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/24/25 08:14, dap1--- via Mailman-users wrote: > How do I tell if mailman-web is running? There is no such service. In this case, the mailman-web service is gunicorn. > /etc/mailman3/gunicorn.py (recall I had to use py rather than conf to get it to work under Ubuntu): It should have worked as gunicorn.conf despite the warning (not error) that it didn't have a .py extension. > # /etc/mailman3/gunicorn.conf > # # > bind = ['127.0.0.1:8000'] > proc_name = "mailman-web" > # # If you are having response issues you can tune the number of workers. > # # The suggested starting point is (2 x $num_cores) + 1 > # # See https://docs.gunicorn.org/en/latest/design.html#how-many-workers > workers = 3 > chdir = "/opt/mailman/mm" > pidfile = "/opt/mailman/mm/var/gunicorn.pid" > accesslog = "/opt/mailman/mm/var/logs/access.log" > errorlog = "/opt/mailman/mm/var/logs/error.log" > loglevel = 'debug' > > I did notice one thing in the access.log that is wrong: > > 127.0.0.1 - - [24/Nov/2025:16:02:55 +0000] "GET /archives/api/mailman/urls?mlist=lllllllllll%40dddddd.net&msgid=705caa > ab-afcc-4249-8d1d-cc48050d02d1%40bellsouth.net HTTP/1.1" 200 113 "-" "python-requests/2.32.5" This request came from HyperKitty. > The mlist name is wrong. It should be lllllllllll%40gmail.com. I don't know where that is coming from but I'm sure it is left over from before I changed the list name. To you have a hyperkitty list named lllllllllll%40dddddd.net. What does SELECT name FROM hyperkitty_mailinglist; show? > When I include the port in the URL I get an unable to connect page. So nothing is listening on 127.0.0.1:8000 (localhost:8000 assuming the `localhost` is 127.0.0.1 in /etc/hosts and not an IPv6 fe00::0 address) What if any does `netstat -lntp` show is listening on 127.0.0.1:8000? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 months, 2 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: Strange issue with bounce processing

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/25/20 6:36 PM, Brian Carpenter wrote: > Dear List, > > First of all Merry Christmas to those of you that are observing it. > > I have an issue on one of my Mailman 3 servers. The bounce runner is not > running, even after restarting mailman core. All the other runners are > working fine. Here is the problem, after restarting it, a number of > messages show up in queue/bounces from a single list. What happens if instead of restating core, you stop and then start it? > However the bounce > runner is still not running. So I remove these messages from > queue/bounces folder and restart mailman core. The same messages show up > from the same single list again in queue/bounces. In the > var/logs/bounce.log file, addresses from this list are being logged as > being removed after starting mailman core. They correlate with the > messages showing up in queue/bounces. Bounce runner doesn't actually do much with received/queued bounces. It just gets the bounce and stores a bounce event in in the bounceevent table in the database. It then periodically processes the unprocessed events in the bounceevent table. See <https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/model/docs…>. > I assume these "cached" bounces are what is interfering with the running > of the bounce runner. I don't see anything in the mailman or > mailmansuite log that would explain this behavior. How can I fix this? I don't really understand what's going on. The only messages which get queued in queue/bounces/ are messages to the LIST-bounces address delivered from the MTA, unless possibly they are somehow in queue/retry/ and being retried. What do you see in the MTA logs? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: new list not working

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/10/23 05:07, Christian via Mailman-users wrote: > There are no such messages as you describe. > > After turning on debugging I got this from a test message sent to the new > list: > > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) Available AUTH mechanisms: LOGIN(builtin) > PLAIN(builtin) > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) Peer: ('127.0.0.1', 51982) > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) handling connection > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) >> b'LHLO > zarathustra.ccalternatives.org' > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) >> b'MAIL > FROM:<christian(a)naturalintelligence.us> SIZE=3499' > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) sender: > christian(a)naturalintelligence.us > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) >> b'RCPT > TO:<redlatinleg(a)lists.ccalternatives.org>' > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) recip: > redlatinleg(a)lists.ccalternatives.org > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) >> b'DATA' > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) >> b'QUIT' > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) connection lost > Mar 10 04:39:51 2023 (1005) ('127.0.0.1', 51982) Connection lost during > _handle_client() Again, that's only the post being delivered to Mailman. What comes after that in the log? And have you checked if Mailman's out runner is running? Note that if it died for some reason and wasn't restarted or used up its restarts, restarting Mailman core won't start it. You need to stop Mailman core and then start it. Are there files in mailman's var/queue/out/ or var/queue/shunt/ directories? You say that only the new list and one other have this issue, but I wonder if the issue is not with specific lists, but rather with posts after a certain time. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 1 month

[Test] Re: mailman-users@mailman3.org

by Mark Sapiro

On 04/05/2016 09:09 AM, Simon Hanna wrote: > There are a couple of issues that would be nice to fix first. Most of them have merge requests > pending with fixes that I think are ready for merging. I agree it would be 'nice' to have everything fixed first, but we've been promising this list since last year and it's time to eat our own dog food. > Postorius: > > https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/issues/70 > All non ascii input shows up garbled upon saving in postorius. > The fix is in mailmanclient and I have a mr pending: > https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailmanclient/merge_requests/10 > > > https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/issues/93 > Isn't really a bug, but it looks weird and has a merge request pending > > > This one doesn't affect users (admins only) but already has a merge request: > https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/issues/117 I have the patch from this MR installed. > https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/issues/20 > Not important if all lists will have public archives, otherwise this should be fixed first It will have public archives. > And Hyperkitty: > > https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/issues/23 > This will affect users, the bug has a merge request pending I've patched this one too. > https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/issues/76 > Just found it, shouldn't be caused by normal navigation though so it's not that important > > https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/issues/29 > It's a nasty bug but we can live without fixing it for now Yes, and I've looked into it some per my comments on the issue, but we'll live with it. > https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/issues/65 > It's not important if all lists that are created are sent an email immediately There is an archive. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

10 years, 1 month

Search results for query "sapiro"