Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Membership list changes

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/18/21 9:37 AM, Vako Nicolian wrote: > Using MM 2.1.33 > When I send an email to /{list}-request(a){domain.com} /with /who > <password> /on the subject line, I get a list of the members of the list. > > Here are my questions: > A) Is there a way to export the list to cvs or txt format? copy/paste > B) Can we format the list to have it come in name 1st and then email> C) display number of members > D) Sort the list These things can be done by manipulating the copy/paste result to turn it into a .csv and importing that into a spreadsheet. For example, piping this input ``` Non-digest (regular) members: user1(a)example.com (User One) user2(a)example.com Digest members: user3(a)example.com (Three, User) user4(a)example.com ``` through this script ``` #! /usr/bin/env python import sys from email.utils import parseaddr flag = '' for line in sys.stdin.readlines(): if line.startswith('Non-digest'): flag = 'Reg' continue if line.startswith('Digest'): flag = 'Dig' continue name, addr = parseaddr(line) print('"{}",{},{}'.format(name, addr, flag)) ``` produces this output ``` "User One",user1(a)example.com,Reg "",user2(a)example.com,Reg "Three, User",user3(a)example.com,Dig "",user4(a)example.com,Dig ``` -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: Mailman3 not working following distribution upgrade from Debian 10 to 11.

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/4/22 11:15, gordon(a)dickens.com wrote: > > 173.165.166.34 - root [04/Feb/2022:12:54:06 -0500] "GET /mailman3/postorius/lists/members.georgiajets.org/ HTTP/1.1" 404 282 > 173.165.166.34 - root [04/Feb/2022:12:54:06 -0500] "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1" 200 318 > > So, I get File Not Found error 404 for the web page but the favicon.ico file appears to be found successfully. Therefore, I suspect that my apache configuration file for mailman3 may be at the source of my problems and specifically the alias for the static directory. Here is my apache configuration file: It's not the alias for static > Alias /mailman3/favicon.ico /var/lib/mailman3/web/static/postorius/img/favicon.ico > Alias /mailman3/static /var/lib/mailman3/web/static > > <Directory "/var/lib/mailman3/web/static"> > Require all granted > </Directory> > > <IfModule mod_proxy_uwsgi.c> > ProxyPass /mailman3/favicon.ico ! > ProxyPass /mailman3/static ! > # ProxyPass /mailman3 unix:/run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://localhost > </IfModule> It's the fact that ProxyPass /mailman3 unix:/run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://localhost is commented out. This should not be commented assuming you are using uWSGI and it is listening on the socket /run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: Rejection based on total message size including attachments

by Mark Sapiro

On 09/19/2018 03:34 PM, leith(a)khimaira.com wrote: > As a web hosting provider I have searched and searched for a way to limit the total size of messages posted to all lists. We have moderators who just can't get it through their heads to limit the size of attachments. One list today distributed a 6 mb pdf to over 700 recipients. I have found information on creating a custom handler and some old and brief logic on limiting max_message_size from Mr. Sapiro. > > Would anyone who has developed a custom handler to reject messages based on total size, mind sharing the full file? If so, could you also state where the handler was positioned in the chain of handlers. Is this a Mailman 3 question or a Mailman 2.1 question? If Mailman 3, the architecture is quite different. This would be done with a rule, not a handler, but based on details in your question, I think you are asking about Mailman 2.1. In that case, the appropriate list is really mailman-users(a)python.org <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users>, but since you're here, the basic info on custom handlers for MM 2.1 is at <https://wiki.list.org/x/4030615>. There is an example called MyHandler.py linked from that page. It won't do what you want but can be used as a starting point. Also, look at Mailman/Handlers/Hold.py, in particular the code following the "# Is the message too big?" for how to determine the message size. That handler will compare the size to the list's max_message_size and hold the post if it's too big. You probably want to compare the size to a fixed value or a size defined in mm_cfg.py and either reject or discard the message. If you put your handler between Moderate and Hold, it's probably safe to reject the message because it is from a member or an address in accept_these_nonmembers. Rejecting post from arbitrary non-members is a bad idea because of spam backscatter. If you need more help, please join mailman-users(a)python.org and post to that list. In any case, this could be generally useful enough that I will probably add it to the stuff at <https://www.msapiro.net/scripts/>. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

7 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Archive import fails: "IndexError: list index out of range"

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/4/24 9:42 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Dan Caballero writes: > > > I've got a message that keeps getting re-queued to the > > /hyperkitty/spool/ folder. > [...] > > "During handling of the above exception (expected atom at a start > > of dot-atom-text but found > > '[1db292f04b54496ab40544b0989a2122-JFBVALKQOJXWILKNK4YVA7CPNZSVMZLUPRCW2YLJNRKGK43UPRCXQ32TNV2HA===(a)microsoft.com]>')" > > This is arguably a HyperKitty bug. The email package is correctly > refusing to parse that as a Message-ID (it's been illegal syntax since > RFC 822 if I remember correctly), but something, presumably > HyperKitty, should catch the error and do something to sanitize it to > message-id syntax. On the other hand, I never heard of a message > trigger that exception before a couple months ago, so maybe it's the > responsibility of spam filters. This is <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/1065> fixed in Mailman 3.3.9 by <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/merge_requests/1099>. > In a later post you say that message came back, but I suspect it isn't > the same message, but a new one likely from the same source. I agree. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: Newbie Wants To Know About Multiple Lists

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/16/18 11:20 PM, Christopher Garwood wrote: > Howdy, > I am new to Mailman and there are so many things I would like to know. Before I try to find out how to install and configure the software, I need to know if, how and what is required for us to set up this software to deal with more than one email list. There's lots of documentation. Start here <http://docs.list.org/en/latest/>. > I am working with a plan to setup a CentOS VPS on which Mailman will be hosted. The objective is to host and administrate mailing list for the 3 entities that I am directly involved with. These lists must function completely unrelated to each other including the email addresses from which the emails & news letters are sent from. If this is possible can I be given information or a link to how it can be done and what is required? A single Mailman installation can support multiple lists, each with different membership, owners and moderators. For example, see <https://mail.python.org/mailman3/>. The lists can all be in the same domain or in different domains if the server supports multiple domains. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

7 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: Using MySQL via unix socket

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/2/19 5:31 AM, Torge Riedel wrote: > > A call to > > mysql -umailman -p > > successfully uses the socket on the machine and logs in. Yet you haven't specified -S or --socket > I tried > > mysql+pymysql://mailman:mailmanpass@127.0.0.1/mailman3?charset=utf8&use_unicode=1&unix_socket=/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock > > > as the connection string but it says that mysql server is not available. > Which is the same if remove the "unix_socket" parameter. I have found > this parameter when searching the net, but I'm not sure if it is supported. I think it should be, but the actual connection is via the the sqlalchemy create_engine() function. It appears this should be passed to the pymysql Connection() function per <https://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_1_2/core/engines.html#custom-dbapi-args> What happens if in a Python 3 session, you do from pymysql import connect conn = connect('127.0.0.1', user='mailman', password='mailmanpass', database='mailman3', charset='utf8', use_unicode=1, unix_socket='/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock') As I understand it, that's what sqlalchemy should be doing with your database url. In my testing, the above works with or without the unix_socket= argument, so I suspect something else is wrong in your case. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

7 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: FILTER_VHOST fix - was: Postorius & multi domain

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/23/20 2:48 AM, Gelpi Andrea wrote: > > I saw the change in the file. > > As I'm not a programmer How can I test your fix? > > My system was installed via Debian 10 stable repository. > > I upgrade with testing repository postorius, django and mailmanclinet > > Postorius V 1.3.2 > Django V. 2.2.12 > Django filters V 2.1.0 > Djanog mailman V 1.3.2 > mailmanclient V 3.3.0 I don't know where the Debian package puts things, but you have to find the location of postorius/views/list.py. Something like locate views/list.py should find it. Then you need to download <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/merge_requests/500.diff> and edit it to remove the first 15 lines so the first remaining line is the diff --git a/src/postorius/views/list.py b/src/postorius/views/list.py line. Then make a backup copy of postorius/views/list.py and run the command patch postorius/views/list.py path/to/500.diff where postorius/views/list.py is actually the full path to postorius/views/list.py and 500.diff is the edited file you downloaded. Then restart uWSGI. If anything goes wrong, restore your backup copy of postorius/views/list.py and restart uWSGI. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years

[MM3-users] Re: How to strip DKIM headers on a domain level or a list level

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/23/20 8:00 PM, Joel Lord wrote: > > I've done the same thing, but Yahoo is pretty good at sanitizing their > report to make it difficult to impossible to tell who actually needs to > get ejected. I added "Sent to %(user_name)s at %(user_address)s" to the > footer and while they'd generally get the user_address wiped out, the > user_name would generally survive. For this reason, Mailman 2.1 has this feature. > # If the following is set to a non-empty string, that string is the name of a > # header that will be added to personalized and VERPed deliveries with value > # equal to the base64 encoding of the recipient's email address. This is > # intended to enable identification of the recipient otherwise redacted from > # "spam report" feedback loop messages. For example, if > # RCPT_BASE64_HEADER_NAME = 'X-Mailman-R-Data' > # a header like > # X-Mailman-R-Data: dXNlckBleGFtcGxlLmNvbQo= > # will be added to messages sent to user@@example.com. > RCPT_BASE64_HEADER_NAME = '' This hasn't been implemented for Mailman 3 but could be if there's demand. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Failed first login

by Mark Sapiro

On 8/31/20 6:59 AM, Massimo Zappalà wrote: > Hi everyone, > i installed mailman3-full on debian 10. > During installation, it asks me to enter the admin user credentials. > After configuration, I restart mailman3 and mailman3-web. > When I try to log in for the first time by entering the admin credentials, a message warns me that the credentials are incorrect. > I looked at the mailman logs, but I find nothing. > It seems that it is a django authentication problem, because even in the django admin panel I can't log in. > Looking at the mailman3web db, in the auth_user table, I see the admin user. > How can I see why it does not accept the credentials? > Thank you in advance I have no idea what the Debian package is doing, but you can see the superuser(s) with the database query select * from auth_user where is_superuser; and you can change the user's password with the django admin changepassword command and/or create a superuser with the django admin createsuperuser command. Give the commands with a --help option for more info. Since you can see the user in the auth_user table, try the django admin changepassword command to change the password. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Still unable to get mailman3 working on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/6/22 6:28 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Michael Heseltine writes: > > > > Do you have all of these apache modules enabled, proxy.conf, > > > proxy_http.load and proxy.load, in particular proxy_http.load? > > > > Well, mostly: > > > > > # a2enmod proxy_http.load > > > Considering dependency proxy for proxy_http: > > > Module proxy already enabled > > > Module proxy_http already enabled > > > # a2enmod proxy.load > > > Module proxy already enabled > > > # a2enmod proxy.conf > > > ERROR: Module proxy.conf does not exist! > > In my Debian configuration that module is needed because it contains > the necessary directives to enable proxying. Actually though, I think that's enabled as part of proxy. > The bottom line, though, is that that error message has to do with the > internal configuration of Apache, and as far as I can see it has > nothing to do with Mailman itself. However, see https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… I now suspect the real issue is there's no wsgi server listening on port 8000. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 4 months

Search results for query "sapiro"