Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: spf/dkim/dmarc

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/19/23 09:10, Christian via Mailman-users wrote: > > May 18 12:53:11 lists postfix/smtp[28104]: C9D7A1005DA: > to=<billb6951(a)gmail.com>, > relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[142.250.138.27]:25, delay=0.69, > delays=0.01/0.01/0.14/0.53, dsn=5.7.26, status=bounced (host > gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[142.250.138.27] said: 550-5.7.26 The MAIL FROM > domain [lists.ccalternatives.org] has an SPF record 550-5.7.26 with a hard > fail policy (-all) but it fails to pass SPF checks with 550-5.7.26 the ip: > [192.46.218.224]. To best protect our users from spam and 550-5.7.26 > phishing, the message has been blocked. Please visit 550-5.7.26 > https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126#authentication for more 550 > 5.7.26 information. p3-20020a056870868300b001926c1449a6si1393979oam.240 - > gsmtp (in reply to end of DATA command)) `dig txt lists.ccalternatives.org` reports "v=spf1 a mx ip4=192.46.218.224 -all" It should be "v=spf1 a mx ip4:192.46.218.224 -all" i.e. :, not = > Could the hard fail policy be implicated in the gmail rejection? Yes but only because the ip4 is not effective due to the syntax error. ~all could help, but I suspect replacing the = with : will do it. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: List mails blocked from GMX - web.de > Spamfolder

by Mark Sapiro

On 7/19/23 10:45, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > % host -t TXT _dmarc.gmx.net > _dmarc.gmx.net descriptive text "v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarcreport@gmx.net" > % host -t TXT _dmarc.web.de > _dmarc.web.de descriptive text "v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarcreport@web.de" > > The important part is "p=none", which says that GMX does not reject or > quarantine *solely* because of a DMARC fail.[1] Not exactly. These DMARC records specify policies suggested to be applied by any recipient server to mail From: addresses in these domains. They don't say anything about mail To: addresses in these domains From: addresses in other domains. > Footnotes: > [1] IIRC, the "sp=quarantine" means that some fraction of DMARC > failing mail should be quarantined for testing purposes, but the > default fraction is 0 so that is ignored. Actually "sp" is subdomain policy and specifies the policy to be applied to mail From: sub-domains of the main domain. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: Migrating from SQLite to PostgreSQL

by Mark Sapiro

On 07/18/2018 02:07 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > > I have only now started playing around with Mailman 3.2, because I never > managed to get the earlier releases to work, and reading through the > documentation I thought that such situations could be handled with > Alembic, as described here under "Database Migrations": > > <http://mailman.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/mailman/docs/database.html> > > Is that not the case, and if not, in what cases can or should it be used? Alembic is used by Mailman core to migrate changes in Mailman's data models (database schema). It interfaces with SQLAlchemy <https://www.sqlalchemy.org/> which is used by Mailman core to interface with the underlying SQL database. Alembic is used by mailman developers to create migrations when table and column definitions are modified for some reason. It is not used by end users unless they are actually modifying Mailman's code and database schema. Alembic does not do migrations based on a change in the underlying database engine, e.g. SQLite -> PostgreSQL. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

7 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: Hyperkitty performance problem

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/22/24 00:37, Odhiambo Washington via Mailman-users wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 9:59 AM Tobias Diekershoff <tobiasd(a)fsfe.org> wrote: >> >> Are Mailman3/Postorius and Hyperkitty supposed to run in separated >> databases, or are they supposed to use the same database? ... > > The official documentation specifies two DBs - one for Mailman Core and the > other for Mailmanweb. > As far as I know, there are no conflicts in the tables so you could use the > same DB for both. And the mailmanweb DB is for HyperKitty and Postorius. I know of no doc suggesting separate databases for HyperKitty and Postorius and in fact accomplishing that would require separate Django instances for HyperKitty and Postorius. I.e., Postorius, HyperKitty and django-mailman3 are all Django applications and use the database configured in Django's settings. Mailman core is separate and uses the database configured in mailman.cfg. As Odhiambo says, there are no table conflicts between these databases so they can be either the same database or separate databases as you wish. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year

[MM3-users] Re: Custom templates (was: Re: Re: nginx configuration on a multitasking server)

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/14/22 6:11 PM, David Newman wrote: > On 1/14/22 4:54 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> It should work. I suspect you need to go to the list's Settings -> >> Automatic Responses and set `Admin immed notify` to Yes. > > > It's enabled. I think this triggers notifications only for new > subscription requests, not pending ones. Yes. That will send a single notification at the time of the request using the `list:admin:action:subscribe.txt` template. Notices of pending requests are sent by the `mailman notify` command using the `list:admin:notice:pending.txt` template. ... >> You can test `mailman notify` at any time by running it by hand. > > > Thanks. This still isn't working as intended. I took these steps: > > 1. Created the file > '/opt/mailman/mm/var/templates/lists/test.lists.domain.tld/en/list:admin:action:pending.txt' The template name is `list:admin:notice:pending.txt`, not `list:admin:action:pending.txt`. Thats why it didn't work. ... > 2. Restarted the mailman3 and mailmanweb services You only needed to restart Mailman core. ... > What I'm trying to do here is replicate a feature from MM2.1, where > pending notifications had URLs embedded in the message. That's not > available out of the box in MM3, and if there's a place for feature > requests I'd be glad to ask that this be made the default. The place for feature requests for Mailman core (which this is) is https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues, however, this is not straightforward as Mailman core doesn't know if you even have Postorius or some other web management UI installed or what the URL to access it might be. Thus it's not just a simple matter of editing templates. It would also require a configuration setting for the base URL for the web admin UI and changes in logic to provide an appropriate replacement depending on whether or not the base URL was configured. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Adding user - Error 409 Subscription request already pending

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/16/22 15:46, Dan Caballero wrote: > Which database table contains these pending subscriptions? I checked the "members" and "address" tables but no luck yet. > > I'm trying to help someone clear a few hundred of these. I can try writing a Python script to use the "hex_token" values in the Python dict. But maybe doing something via MySQL would be easier. The tables are `pended`, `pendedkeyvalue` and `workflowstate`, but don't do it via MySQL. A `mailman shell` interaction like this is better. ``` $ ./mailman shell -l list.example.com Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell Use commit() to commit changes. Use abort() to discard changes since the last commit. Exit with ctrl+D does an implicit commit() but exit() does not. The variable 'm' is the list.example.com mailing list >>> util = getUtility(IPendings) >>> for token, data in util.find(mlist=m, pend_type='subscription'): ... if data.token_owner == 'subscriber': ... util.confirm(token, expunge=True) ... >>> commit() >>> ``` -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: Cannot connect to SMTP server

by Mark Sapiro

On 8/13/22 15:14, mkummini(a)cmi.ac.in wrote: > > However, I get the following line each time I do a restart > Aug 14 03:19:57 2022 (4096859) Cannot connect to SMTP server localhost on port 587 > I tried to specify the name of the postfix server, though it runs on the same machine as mailman3, and the different ports : 25, 465 and 587; they all raise the same error. You only see this message once at startup because it is only issued once until there is a successful delivery. This error can occur for reasons other than an inability to connect to the smtp server. In particular, if there are errors in decorating the message with a header and/or a footer because of permissions or other problems in retrieving a list:member:regular:header or list:member:regular:footer template, this will occur. Have you put templates in Mailman's var/templates directory (possibly named /var/lib/mailman/templates in the debian package). If so, can the Mailman user (I think `list` in a debian package) find and read them? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: Mailman shutting down Hyperkitty: Request too large

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/31/25 21:44, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > I don't think that's the best we can do, though. Especially if > Convert HTML to plain is also yes, we want to preserve the HTML part > and convert it, don't we? Not if we're collapsing alternatives. If we're collapsing a multipart/alternative part with text/plain and text/html alternatives to just the first alternative we don't keep the text/html part. The only html parts we keep and possibly convert to plain text are ones that aren't a second or later alternative in a multipart/alternative part. > I think a better (or additional) strategy > would be to check the selected alternative for blank, and if so, drop > it and try again for an appropriate type. The collapsing of a two part multipart message with an empty first part into a single part message with just the second part is the last thing that's done after all other content filtering. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

10 months, 2 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: 2.1 -> 3 migration without mboxes?

by Mark Sapiro

On 9/12/25 09:25, David Romerstein via Mailman-users wrote: > Hey, folks. I've searched the list archive but haven't found a relevant thread yet. Any pointers would be helpful. > > I have a handful of lists in a 2.1 instance for which I have web archives but not original .mbox files. Is there a way to migrate those lists, including the years of archives, to 3? Ideally you would have Mailman's archives/private/LISTNAME.mbox/LISTNAME.mbox files which is all you need. If tho don't have those, but you have the periodic archives/private/LISTNAME/*.txt files, you could concatenate those for a list into one mbox file. In some cases the From: headers will be munged. I.e., they may be like From: user at example.com (user name) and you would at least want to replace ` at ` with `@`. If you don't have even those, you would have to somehow process the HTML files into messages for a mbox. There is no way to import the HTML directly into HyperKitty. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 months

[MM3-users] Re: Good choice of defaults for content filtering?

by Mark Sapiro

On 7/30/20 5:00 PM, hansen(a)rc.org wrote: > Hi all, > > I had MM2 set to the default filtering that I think came OOTB. MM3 has none such and I was wondering: > a. What were those MM2 defaults (My MM2 server is long gone now). You will find the content filtering defaults beginning at <https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mailman-coders/mailman/2.1/view/head:/Mailman…>. These have been the defaults for new lists since Mailman 2.1.21. Prior th that, the the default for pass_mime_types was ['multipart/mixed', 'multipart/alternative', 'text/plain'] > b. Is there a better set today. I know that MIME types can be faked, but they have worked. I want to avoid anything that can contain malicious code while also allowing simple text to go through. If you go with the current defaults, except of course for setting filter content on, you can add text/html to pass_types and any html parts that aren't collapsed out by collapse alternatives will be kept and converted to plain text. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 4 months

Search results for query "sapiro"