Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Request for help with configuring "from" headers in mailman3 list

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/6/22 12:52 PM, Stephen Daniel wrote: > > Sendgrid requires that the "From:" address on any email reference an > authenticated domain. > > In the old mailman2 implementation, emails sent by mailman are listed as > > From: <human name via LISTNAME> LISTNAME(a)LISTDOMAIN.org > > Reply-to: <human name> sender(a)senderdomain.com (the original email's sender) > > Sendgrid would be happy with this, because LISTDOMAIN.org is a > validated domain. > > However, in my mailman3 implementation, the From: header lists the original > email's sender. Sendgrid rejects this because the original email's > sender's address is not one of the validated domains. > > How do I configure mailman3 to generate headers in the same style as the > old mailman2 implementation? In the list's Settings -> DMARC mitigations, set DMARC mitigation action to Rrplace From: with list address and DMARC Mitigate unconditionally to Yes. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Lost posting in archives

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/21/22 3:06 PM, Axel Rau wrote: > I created a list, did migration from 2.1 and run update_index_one_list. > Then I posted a test mail to the list and it got distributed and was seen in the archive. > Now 2 days later it does no longer show up in the archive. > > What is going on here? > May this have to do with > HYPERKITTY_RENDER_INLINE_IMAGE > which I have turned on meanwhile. It may. Is there anything in Django's log about this? If you have the original message from the list, can you go to the URL in the Archived-At: header? is the message in the hyperkitty_email table in the database? E.g., SELECT * FROM hyperkitty_email WHERE message_id_hash ='xxx'; (xxx is the value of the Message-ID-Hash: header from the message) If the prototype archiver is enabled for the list, the message should be in Mailman's var/archives/prototype/list(a)example.com/new directory and that message will have the Archived-At: and Message-ID-Hash: headers. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: MM2.1 -> MM3.3 migration. To hold or not hold

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/18/24 04:12, mark(a)suburbia.org.au wrote: > > For the list I am talking about: > - Default action to take when a member posts to the list is set to "Hold for moderation" > - Default action to take when a non-member posts to the list is set to "Hold for moderation" > - When I am viewing all users, the migrated ones are set to Moderation Action: "Hold for moderation". The mass-added ones post-migration are set to Moderation Action: "None" > - When a mass-added post-migration user sent an email to the list it passed through without being held. This should not happen. In the message as delivered to the list what do you see in the X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: header and the X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: header if any? > Happy to check any logs if there might be something to hunt for. What if anything is in the lists Accept these non-members setting? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

7 months, 1 week

[MM3-users] Re: Patch/kludge suggestion and a question on adding accepted addresses

by Mark Sapiro

On 04/24/2017 07:07 AM, David Krantz wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry(a)list.org> wrote: >> On Apr 23, 2017, at 10:33 PM, David Krantz wrote: > >>> I have another question: In the old mailman you could add accepted >>> senders without adding them to the list. Is that possible in Mailman >>> 3/Postorius? >> >> You do this by creating a "nonmember" subscription for the sender, and then >> setting that member's moderation_action to Action.accept. > > Okay. I see no way of doing that in my instance of Postorius but in > this case it is okay to do it in the command prompt. Yes. There are still quite a few things that aren't yet exposed in Postorius and probably some not yet exposed in the rest API. In these cases you have to resort to mailman shell (aka mailman withlist). -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: Installing mailman 3

by Rafael Mora

Installing mailman-suite for web ui. I did this: (env) [mailman@localhost ~]$ git clone https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman-suite/ Cloning into 'mailman-suite'... error: RPC failed; result=22, HTTP code = 404 fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly but it returned an error, what should I do?? Thanks El vie., 21 jul. 2017 a las 13:02, Mark Sapiro (<mark(a)msapiro.net>) escribió: > On 07/21/2017 10:29 AM, Rafael Mora wrote: > > Can we modify the docs? > > > > El vie., 21 jul. 2017 a las 12:25, Mark Sapiro (<mark(a)msapiro.net>) > > escribió: > >> > >> However, that said, the doc is wrong. The lines should be added to > >> main.cf, not master.cf. See > >> <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman-suite-doc/issues/14>. > > > That's what the above issue and associated MR are for. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- Atentamente / Best Regards Ing. Rafael Mora

7 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: LMTP not listening

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/24/2017 04:40 AM, Bartosz Sawicki wrote: > > But messages send to the list address are not delivered to the list :( I've > started to investigate whats happening and realize that Postfix can not > connect to mailman using LMTP. It seems that mailman is not listening on > port 8024. > > Nov 24 13:12:31 lists postfix/lmtp[2737]: connect to > 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:8024: Connection refused > > I've checked log files, but haven't realize anything unusual . Any ideas > where I could try to find cause of the problem ? Is Mailman, particularly the lmtp runner, running? $ ps -fwwu mailman|grep lmtp mailman 19107 19085 0 Nov16 ? 00:00:44 /usr/local/bin/python3 /usr/local/bin/runner -C /opt/mailman/mailman-bundler/deployment/mailman.cfg --runner=lmtp:0:1 If so, where is it listening $ sudo netstat -lntp|grep 19107 tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:8024 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 19107/python3 where the 19107 in the grep is the PIP of the lmtp runner. If that's all OK, is there a firewall (iptables or ??) thats not allowing access to localhost:8024? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

7 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Core, Hyperkitty and Postorius releases

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/13/21 2:27 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:00 AM Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> wrote: > >> Hey Everyone, >> >> I am pleased to announce new stable releases for Mailman Core, Postorius, >> Hyperkitty. >> >> These include both new features and bug fixes. Complete change log for >> each components: >> >> Mailman Core 3.3.3: >> https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/docs/NEWS.… > > > May I ask if this is a typo? > I am asking because Mailman Core 3.3.4 was announced on Marc 22nd. > So is this new one version 3.3.3 or 3.3.5? The text you are quoting is from the Feb 2 announcement <https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-announce@python.org/message/N…> of the release of Mailman core 3.3.3. Mailman 3.3.4 was released and announced at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-announce@python.org/message/H… on March 21 and is the current release. There is no "new one". -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: templates

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/4/23 11:15, Christian via Mailman-users wrote: > In March when I started troubleshooting my lists, you stated: > > "Also, one other thing you might check. Do these non-working lists have > templates defined in postorius, in particular, one for > list:member:regular:footer, and if not, are there any in Mailman's > var/templates/lists/redlatinleg(a)lists.ccalternatives.org/ derectory that > Mailman doesn't have permission to find and read?" > > There are no other templates listed in either Postorius nor in Mailman's > var/templates (as I stated, I do not even lave a 'lists' subdirectory under > Mailman's var/templates). My subscribers are not receiving message > distributions from my lists, even while some of them are listed in the > archives. See the original thread at https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… (which you hijacked about 4 messages in) and particularly the message at https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… Without further information, I can't say more than that. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Database permission problem?

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/15/24 14:45, Bill Oliver wrote: > > In any case, here it is changed back: > > ls -l > total 68 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 mailman mailman 0 Oct 15 12:53 postfic_vmap.db > -rw-rw-r-- 1 mailman mailman 12288 Oct 15 12:53 postfic_vmap.db.db Were these created manually? They should not be there. Likewise the .db.db files below. > -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 353 Oct 15 13:37 postfix_domains > -rw-r----- 1 mailman mailman 12288 Oct 15 13:37 postfix_domains.db > -rw-rw-r-- 1 mailman mailman 12288 Oct 15 12:53 postfix_domains.db.db > -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 1155 Oct 15 13:37 postfix_lmtp > -rw-r----- 1 mailman mailman 12288 Oct 15 13:37 postfix_lmtp.db > -rw-rw-r-- 1 mailman mailman 12288 Oct 15 12:53 postfix_lmtp.db.db > -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 1118 Oct 15 13:37 postfix_vmap > -rw-r----- 1 mailman mailman 12288 Oct 15 13:37 postfix_vmap.db Does Postfix have read and search ('x') on all of /opt, /opt/mailman, /opt/mailman/mm, /opt/mailman/mm/var and /opt/mailman/mm/var/data? Perhaps there is a SELinux issue. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 months, 2 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: Message getting held due to max number of recipients and maximum message size

by Mark Sapiro

On 9/22/23 14:56, Wong, Wesley wrote: > I can confirm that the list was set to 0 for max recipients and message size. In addition, I checked the base.py and the defaults are the ones in the message. If I went ahead and modified the settings in base.py, would this immediately to all existing lists in Mailman? No. It would only affect lists created after you did that. I suggest the following mailman shell interaction ``` $ ./mailman shell Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell Use commit() to commit changes. Use abort() to discard changes since the last commit. Exit with ctrl+D does an implicit commit() but exit() does not. >>> for mlist in getUtility(IListManager): ... if (mlist.max_num_recipients == 10 and ... mlist.max_message_size == 40): ... print(mlist.list_id) ... ``` This will print the list ids of all lists with max_num_recipients = 10 and max_message_size = 40 Your held message notice is for one of those lists. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 9 months

Search results for query "sapiro"