Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Badsignature on uwsgi-error.log

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/20/24 14:25, Helio Loureiro wrote: > Hi, > > I keep receiving a lot of errors like this: > > --- Logging error --- > Traceback (most recent call last): ... > "/local/mailman/venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/django_q/core_signing.py", > line 55, in unsign > raise BadSignature('Signature "%s" does not match' % sig) > django.core.signing.BadSignature: Signature "F6V0Dr_SvBsx5-cY8vcvLXrX8tA" > does not match ... > > The api_key on mailman-hypperkitty.cfg, SECRET_KEY and MAILMAN_ARCHIVE_KEY > on setting.py are the same. Of those three, the api_key on mailman-hypperkitty.cfg and MAILMAN_ARCHIVE_KEY must match. SECRET_KEY is different. It is a Django thing and has nothing to do with the others. See https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/ref/settings/#secret-key If you changed it, that's the issue. If you know what it was previously, you could set the previous value in SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS, see https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/ref/settings/#secret-key-fallbacks -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Bulk delivery status change?

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/10/24 08:34, Odhiambo Washington via Mailman-users wrote: > On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 7:16 PM Stephen Daniel <swd(a)pobox.com> wrote: > >> Mistakes were made, and for while every single outbound email bounced. >> I've fixed the mistakes, but now in my largest and most active email list, >> every single user's delivery status is "Disabled by Bounces". >> >> Is there a way to bulk fix this? Or do I have to go into each user, one at >> a time, and fix them? > > Please see this thread: > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… The script in that post does all lists. For a single list see https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… but note that the command line ``` $ shell -l list(a)example.com ``` should be ``` $ mailman shell -l list(a)example.com ``` -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Fwd: [Django] ERROR (EXTERNAL IP): Internal Server Error: /mailman3/hyperkitty/api/mailman/archive

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/2/21 1:55 PM, David Partain via Mailman-users wrote: > On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 13:43 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> Unless you want to remove the Ubuntu package and install everything >> with >> pip, you need to just stick with what you have that at least partly >> works and we'll try to determine how to fix the utf8mb4 issue. > > Hi Mark, > > You're a very patient soul. Thank you. > > Yes, I'm resigned to exactly that. The archives when folks send emojis > will break, but that's just life. Mail will get sent. Heck, I guess I > could edit the file in /var/lib/mailman3/archives/hyperkitty/spool to > get rid of the emoji in the worst case... You would need to do that, because once one of the `emoji` messages gets into /var/lib/mailman3/archives/hyperkitty/spool, I think no further messages are archived because mailman_hyperkitty tries to process the queued messages first and throws the exception. But, it's still not clear to me whether you have removed the settings_local.pyc and restarted uWSGI or whatever interfaces to Django. > Once I've migrated my 1500 mailing lists (this weekend) to the server, > I'll think about how to get a new server set up that I can shift to and > I'll install that with pip, since that'll clearly give me something > more supportable. > > Is Ubuntu 20.04 a reasonable platform for that? Yes it is. FWIW, this list runs bleeding edge Mailman 3 on an Ubuntu 14.04 server (yes we should upgrade), the only issue being that we needed to install Python 3.6 (the latest at the time) from source because the native Python 3 was 3.4 -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: hyperkitty.views.mailman Could not archive the email with message-id '<snip>': A string literal cannot contain NUL (0x00) characters

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/11/21 12:59 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote: > Hi, > > I have this error message repeating endlessly into the mailman-web logs. > The related list is an open one on which we receive spam sometimes. I > understand these emails can me malformed and cause this error. How to > deal with them? They can't stay forever at the hyperkitty door. The message is queued at `var/archives/hyperkitty/spool/`. The files in that directory are Python pickles. You can examine them with the `mailman qfile` command and delete the spam ones. You will also find log messages in `var/logs/mailman.log` with tracebacks, but presumably you know that as one such is the Subject: of this message. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Default setting for Delivery status

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/10/22 15:31, Mark Dale via Mailman-users wrote: > > Where and how do I set the default setting of "Delivery status" to be > "Enabled". It already is. See https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/master/src/mailman/core/constants… > I'm not seeing any clues in mailman3-web/settings.py > > At the moment, a new subscriber is neither "Enabled" or "Disabled". That's because the member's list based preferences for that list are not set, so we fall back to address based preferences if set and finally to global preferences where Delivery status is enabled. Log in to Postorius and select Mailman settings from the dropdown on the upper right at your user name to see more. New list members don't have and list based preferences for that list and just fall back to their address based preferences or global preferences. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: Message getting held due to max number of recipients and maximum message size

by Mark Sapiro

On 9/22/23 11:37, Wong, Wesley wrote: > > Currently, the settings are set to 0 for both settings on the list so I am not sure where mailman is getting the default settings. Is this default hard coded somewhere in the Mailman core? The version of Mailman running is 3.3.6. This is very strange. Are you certain the list's settings are 0? Are there possibly two lists in different domains or otherwise similar names and you are looking at the wrong one? The only place where the defaults are set is in mailman/styles/base.py and this only affects the default settings for a new list. The values in the ``` Message has more than 10 recipients The message is larger than the 40 KB maximum size ``` messages come from the list's settings. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: configuring postfix local recipient table

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/29/25 00:17, Alexander Inzinger-Zrock via Mailman-users wrote: > [Status] > > Suggestion: > > It seems, we are wasting to much time with a probably messed up system. > I suggest, that i do as initially suggested [1] and start over with a > reinstall. > > Last idea before that would be to > > 1. delete the files: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 mailman mailman 0 Mar 21 11:58 postfix_domains > -rw-r--r-- 1 mailman mailman 12K Mar 24 11:44 postfix_domains.db > -rw-r--r-- 1 mailman mailman 0 Mar 21 11:58 postfix_lmtp > -rw-r--r-- 1 mailman mailman 12K Mar 24 11:44 postfix_lmtp.db > > 2. restart services > > 3. test if programms make new files > > 4. report to mailinglist > > Would that be of interest to someone? Yes. Also, is there anything in Mailman's logs from the time you ran `mailman aliases`? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year

[MM3-users] Re: Time Zone Issue in Postorius

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/4/22 09:48, Andy Summers wrote: > Hello, > > I'm encountering an error that sounds similar to this previous thread: > > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > I've tried setting my TIME_ZONE to 'UTC' in my settings.py and > settings_local.py files (and restarting Mailman), but when I check the > datetime for a held message in Postorius, the datetime seems to be > pushed +8 hours unexpectedly. > > My Postorius account time zone is set to "US/Pacific". The appropriate setting for Django is always `TIME_ZONE = 'UTC'`because the time passed from Mailman core is a naive datetime.datetime object and is actually UTC. This should then display the time in your account timezone since Postorius 1.3.4. See https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/merge_requests/531 If this isn't working in Postorius >=1.3.4, it's a Django issue. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: Templates do not work

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/28/22 02:50, Eggert Ehmke wrote: > I created some templates in Postorius to get > personalized notifications when there are > moderator requests. The notifications I get seem to > be the standard texts. When I look into mailman/ > mm/var/templates > the directory is empty. Nevertheless, the templates I > create in Postorius seem to be stored (where?), they > just do not work. As Steve said the templates are stored in the database. I suspect the issue is and incorrect value for `POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL` in your Django settings. This is used to construct the URI to retrieve the template. The URI is stored in the `template` table in the database. It is normally just `http(s)://host.name/` If this is the issue, after correcting the setting and restarting the web service, you will need to delete and re-enter the template in Postorius to correct the `template` table entry. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years

[MM3-users] Re: combine postorius and hyperkitty into one Apache vhost

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/29/22 05:51, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote: > Hi, > > I'm in the process to set up a new mailman3 site. > (Migrating from mailman2) > > There are RPMs for my distribution which integrate postorius and > hyperkitty with uwsgi. I think you'll be much happier if you don't use the distro's RPMs which are probably out of date and instead follow <https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html>. Those instructions use uWSGI as a WSGI interface, but Gunicorn <https://gunicorn.org/> is what is used on the site supporting this list. The advantages of Gunicorn are it's already installed as a dependency of Mailman core, and it's what the Mailman developers are more familiar with. I'll work on updating <https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html> to include Gunicorn as an alternative. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 4 months

Search results for query "sapiro"