Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: A little stuck with installation of MM3 - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'flufl.lock'

by Mark Sapiro

On 7/27/20 4:29 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 at 02:49, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: >> >> Is there an empty /opt/mailman/mm/__init__.py file? >> > > No. There has to be one. Create it and then Django will be able to import your settings. See the first line after Create directories: ... and files: at <https://wiki.list.org/DOC/Mailman%203%20installation%20experience#line-69> > Yes. However, that also means the /opt/mailman should be owned by mailman3, > right? So I wasn't quite mistaken. It doesn't matter what user actually `owns` this directory and its subordinates as long as the Mailman user, mailman3 in your case, can read and write there. Of course, making everything owned by the Mailman user is the easiest way to ensure this. Note also that any commands in /opt/mailman/mm/bin need to be run as the Mailman user and not root. Running them as root can create things owned by root the can't be read by the Mailman user. > PS: There is the issue with qcluster, which doesn't seem to have been > documented in details from your "experience". > I see the configuration file and the init script, but not how to install > it, or whether the procedure already installed it. qcluster is part of Django. If you have this # # Asynchronous tasks # Q_CLUSTER = { 'timeout': 300, 'save_limit': 100, 'orm': 'default', } or similar uncommented in your Django settings, and also 'django_q' in your INSTALLED_APPS, it's there and all you need to do is run /opt/mailman/mm/bin/django-admin qcluster to run it, but it should be run as a service via init or ?? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Installing mailman 3

by Mark Sapiro

On 08/02/2017 07:55 AM, Rafael Mora wrote: > HyperKitty is looking for some files in /static/CACHE/... but it doesn't > find them: > > [02/Aug/2017 14:53:38] "GET /static/CACHE/css/b3547a2ab51b.css HTTP/1.1" > 404 107 > [02/Aug/2017 14:53:38] "GET /static/CACHE/css/4c17bb8058aa.css HTTP/1.1" > 404 107 > [02/Aug/2017 14:53:38] "GET /static/CACHE/css/2fa1cba00450.css HTTP/1.1" > 404 107 > [02/Aug/2017 14:53:38] "GET /static/CACHE/js/4ce1260ef558.js HTTP/1.1" 404 > 105 > [02/Aug/2017 14:53:39] "GET /static/CACHE/js/4ce1260ef558.js HTTP/1.1" 404 > 105 > > > Should I run any command to activate the CACHE dir? You need to ensure you have a working sass compiler. As I said at <https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message…>, See the third bullet under <http://docs.list.org/en/latest/prodsetup.html#dependencies>. Then you need to run commands like django-admin collectstatic --clear django-admin compress -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: Subscription notification sent from the site admins work-mail.

by Mark Sapiro

On 09/13/2018 05:01 AM, Henrik Rasmussen wrote: > One of my list administrators told me that all seven list administrators on a list received a "None <foo(a)example.com> has been successfully subscribed to [LIST NAME].", when someone subscribed to their list, however the sender of the mail (From:) was my own work mail address. I am not associated with the list other that I am site admin. This is expected behavior. In Mailman 2.1 notices like this were sent From: the site list (normally 'mailman'). In Mailman 3, there is no site list so the notices are from the site admin. If you'd rather not expose your work mail address in this way, set the site admin to something generic like mailman-admin(a)example.com and alias that to where you want the mail to go. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

7 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Cannot see the cron jobs for Mailman 3 Installed

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/23/20 4:49 AM, Shashikanth Komandoor wrote: > Hi, > > I have setup the Mailman 3 on my RHEL 7.5 box and found it was working > fine. But I found that I am not getting daily summary notifications for > which I learnt after browsing through different websites, there should be > an entry of *checkdb* in the cron job list. checkdbs is a Mailman 2.1 job The equivalent Mailman 3 job is `mailman notify` > But I did not find any such nor I don't find any cron job updated after > the installation of mailman 3. See <https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/config-core.html#configuring-cron-jobs> and <https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/config-web.html#scheduled-tasks-required> If you installed Mailman from a package and the cron's weren't installed, report this to the packager. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: Subscription issue with ghost confirmations

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/31/20 7:28 AM, Brian Carpenter wrote: > > This has occurred again. A person sends an email to listname-subscribe@listdomain and the subscription policy of said list is set to moderate only. Instead of honoring this, a confirmation email is sent out. The issue is that when a request is received to subscribe an address to a list and that address is not verified and the pre_verified flag is not set in the request, the user is sent a confirmation request. This is not a request to confirm the subscription request, but rather a request to confirm the address, however they use the same template so they are indistinguishable. We probably should check the subscription policy and not send this request if the policy is moderate. We should also ignore a pending request if the policy is moderate per <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/789>. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: Can't deliver mails in queue

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/19/21 2:45 PM, Nathanael Schneider wrote: > > They were in fact not identical, as I changed some stuff in hopes to get > it up and running again quickly. I now changed the completely new List > to be identical with the cleanly created one (as far as postorius shows > me) and it still works just fine. Do I understand correctly that you deleted the MM 2.1 imported list and created a new list in Postorius with just two members and it doesn't work. If that understanding is not correct, please outline all the steps you took to arrive at the current list that doesn't work. Also, please capture one of the .pck or .bak files from the out queue and send it to me off list. I will treat it confidentially, but there might be clues in it. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: list footer web customization procedure

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/30/21 1:11 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > Does Django empty out the "spacetebasket" if it's all white space, or > does spurious whitespace in that box lead to an (apparently) empty > footer being added? Postorius used to remove leading and trailing whitespace from the template, but not since https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/301 was fixed. > Anway, I recommend to the OP that they make sure there's no whitespace > in the Data box. A good recommendation. While a header or footer template with some whitespace might not be noticeable when added to a text/plain message, it will cause extra mime parts to be added to more complex messages. Also, if the goal in setting an empty footer is to avoid breaking a DKIM signature, even adding a bit of whitespace to a text/plain message is an issue. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: Python 3.9 support

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/24/22 14:01, dancab(a)caltech.edu wrote: > > Only mail delivery was hung overnight. I had to restart the Gunicorn process followed by a Mailman core restart for mail to flow again. Because Mailman's "out" runner (/opt/mailmanve/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mailman/runners/outgoing.py from the above traceback) is what hit the exception and died. The master watcher should restart it, but see https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/898 > Any insight into how we could monitor this in the future? For example which specific "runner" reported the error above? Something like ``` ps --ppid=`cat /opt/mailman/mm/var/master.pid|tr -d '\n'`|wc -l ``` will report the number of child processes of the master. You could test that against the expected number and do something. Note that `mailman restart` probably won't start a runner that died - you need to do `mailman stop;mailman start` to be sure. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years

[MM3-users] Re: Strange messages after upgrading Mailman3

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/4/22 20:09, Allan Hansen wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been getting a few of these messages after my Mailman 3 was upgraded: > > "The content of this message was lost. It was probably cross-posted to > multiple lists and previously handled on another list." > > The messages appear to come from list members and are distributed to the relevant lists, but with nothing of the original contents. > They have appeared on different lists with, apparently different senders (unless spoofed). > Other messages are going through the system unchanged. > > Anyone has any ideas? To what version did you upgrade? This is most likely https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/955 which was fixed in Mailman core 3.3.6, but it could be https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/1027 if the posts are to umbrella lists (lists with other lists as members). -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: Messages hold for moderation - compared to mailman2 it appears that there are fewer options: missing option(?)

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/7/24 9:35 AM, Wikinaut wrote: > Hello, I miss sadly the option of > > both: > > i) discarding the current message of a sender (not member of a closed list) ; and in the same action > ii) adding this person to the whitelist, i.e. accept further mails from this sender. When you go to the held messages view in the web UI and click the Subject: of the held message, there is a dropdown to set the sender's moderation action. you can select `default processing` to accept subject to additional checks or `accept` to accept unconditionally, subsequent posts from that sender before clicking the `discard` or other button. This works for non-members as well as for members. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 11 months

Search results for query "sapiro"