Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Using Header filters

by Mark Sapiro

On 8/13/21 10:55 AM, Mohsen Masoudfar wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if it is possible using the "Header filters" option to filter for a specific word to push the message to Moderation? You can use Header filters to hold for moderation any messages that have a header matching a pattern. The pattern match is unanchored and case insensitive so for example to hold for moderation any message which contains the string `word` or `Word`, etc. anywhere in the Subject: you would create a Header Filter with Header = subject, Pattern = word and Action = Hold for moderation. If you want to match only the word `word` and not things like `foreword` and `wordless`, you'd use a pattern like (^|\W)word(\W|$). See <https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/rules/docs…> and <https://docs.python.org/3/library/re.html>. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: Whitelist in mailman3: How to allow only ~400 e-mail senders in a file whitelist to send to a list?

by Mark Sapiro

On 8/3/25 13:52, Wikinaut wrote: > In mailman2, it was quite handy to place "@whitelist" into the field sender/accept_these_nonmembers, when such a file has been set up. > > How can I (per list or programmatically) define the ~400 e-mail senders to be allowed to send to my about 30 lists? > And, yes, I already searched for a solution of this problem, but could not find any. This feature was added in Mailman core 3.3.10. See https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/docs/NEWS.… https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/794 https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/merge_requests/1154 and documented in postorius 1.3.13. See https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/589 https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/merge_requests/938 -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 months, 3 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: localhost[::1] said: 550 Requested action not, taken: mailbox unavailable

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/26/2017 11:30 PM, Bjoern Franke wrote: > > Oct 27 08:24:58 srv20 postfix/lmtp[2981]: 8798E40979: > to=<admin(a)lists.ffnw.de>, relay=localhost[127.0.0.1]:8024, delay=0.51, > delays=0.43/0.02/0.02/0.03, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host > localhost[127.0.0.1] said: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox > unavailable (in reply to end of DATA command)) This may be a Mailman bug. I'll look further when I have time. The message above says that Postfix tried to deliver the message to Mailman's lmtp runner and the runner said there was no such list. I'm guessing that there may be confusion between the admin@... list address and a listname-admin@... address. If this is the case, it means there is a bug which would affect any lists named 'admin', 'bounces', 'confirm'. 'join', 'leave', etc. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: Change settings via mailman shell

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/6/19 1:32 AM, kk(a)eco.cept.org wrote: > I am trying to find a way to set some parameters on the lists from a shell script. One specific parameter - max_message_size is not presented through the REST interface apparantly, and i found a way to set this with mailman shell command. Continuing this path i seem not to be able to set any other parameters like this: > m.archive_policy = 'never' You can't set archive_policy to a string. it has to be set to an attribute of mailman.interfaces.archiver.ArchivePolicy i.e. from mailman.interfaces.archiver import ArchivePolicy m.archive_policy = ArchivePolicy.never See <https://mailman.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/mailman/handlers/docs/archives…> > m.subject_prefix = '' > m.dmarc_mitigate_action = 'munge_from' Likewise dmarc_mitigate_action is an attribute of mailman.interfaces.mailinglist.DMARCMitigateAction See <https://mailman.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/mailman/handlers/docs/dmarc-mi…> -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 11 months

[MM3-users] Re: Strange URL in error message

by Mark Sapiro

On 7/14/24 9:14 AM, waps(a)tantalus.jena.thur.de wrote: > (Debian 12) > > I have the problem that the hyperkitty archive is empty. The file /var/log/mailman3/mailman.log show sometimes the message > > urllib3.exceptions.MaxRetryError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='www.XXXXX-project.demailman3', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /hyperkitty/api/mailman/archive (Caused by NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPSConnection object at 0x7fa48b43a910>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno -2] Name or service not known')) > > (there is a slash missing between 'project.de' and 'mailman3'). My goal is, of course, to have an running archive. But I think the error message could be a hint about the reason) It appears that your setting for base_url in mailman-hyperkitty.cfg is missing the slash. I.e., it is http://www.XXXXX-project.demailman3/ and should be http://www.XXXXX-project.de/mailman3/ -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Migrating from old V2 server to new V3 server. Questions.

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/2/24 20:33, jkoral(a)luc.edu wrote: > Not sure if this means anything. This is the log from old server after trying to send. I edited the FQDN and IP though. Any thoughts? I think it may be the configuration of postfix on the new server though. > > Oct 2 22:26:59 listservls01 postfix/smtp[139911]: B1FD27ED: to=<test(a)listservnew.example.com>, orig_to=<olivertest(a)lists.luc.edu>, relay=listservnew.example.com[x.x.x.x]:25, delay=0.01, delays=0/0/0.01/0, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (lost connection with listservnew.example.com[x.x.x.x] while receiving the initial server greeting) The message is deferred. Postfix will keep trying for maximal_queue_lifetime (default 5 days). Possible causes are a firewall on the new server blocking port 25 connects or some postfix misconfiguration on that server. Can that server receive mail at all? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: Confirm and Moderate Unsubscribe Requests

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/21/20 8:53 AM, Brian Carpenter wrote: > If you set the unsubscription policy to confirm then moderate for a list > and someone unsubscribes, they receive a confirmation request. That is > good. They respond to it. That is also working fine. However the list > owner/moderator than gets a request to approve the unsubscribe request > and well, unless I am missing something, I don't see an interface to > handles such requests via Postorius. This is <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/332>. > How does one handle an unsubscribe request that requires moderator > approval? I'm not sure at this point, I can look further later, but if the notice to the admin has a token, it might work to send a `confirm <token>` command to the list-request address. Otherwise, don't moderate unsubscription requests. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: High memory usage

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/16/22 00:18, Philip Colmer wrote: > Thank you for the replies from Mark and Stephen. > > One of the reasons why Prasanth & I are concerned with this specific system > is because the first time memory usage crept up, it got to the point where > oomkiller stepped in and, as is usual for that particular mechanism, one of > the processes it killed was sshd, thus removing access to the system :(. I > know that oomkiller can be tuned to stop it killing processes like sshd but > it will, nevertheless, start killing *some* processes if it sees an out of > memory situation. It sounds like there is a memory leak somewhere. This is an issue with some versions of Python. I know both Python 3.10.2 and 3.9.10 were released ahead of schedule to fix this. See https://bugs.python.org/issue46347 -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years

[MM3-users] Re: Cross-List and Domain based sender whitelisting ( accept_these_nonmembers )

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/9/23 05:31, Johannes Rohr wrote: > > Thanks! I assume, there is a reason why this cannot be easily > implemented, else it would have been. Asking because I know a number of > people would make extensive use of this in MM2. The actual implementation is probably not difficult, but it's more than just handling things like `@list_id` in *_these_nonmembers. It also requires developing appropriate unit tests, updating REST and `mailman import21` to accept the syntax and documentation updates at least for Postorius Settings -> Message Acceptance -> * these non-members. That adds up to a significant amount of work. I recognize it's a significant regression for some, but we are a small, all volunteer project and can't do everything. A well crafted merge request would certainly be accepted. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 1 month

[MM3-users] Re: MM2.1 -> MM3.3 migration. To hold or not hold

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/18/24 23:13, mark(a)suburbia.org.au wrote: > - Modified second test user to "Hold for moderation" in Members list. Noted the Moderation was set to "List default" before changing it to "Hold for moderation" The actual value is None, but Postorius displays/sets that as List default. >> If that is true, I can only think that at the time of that post, >> settings weren't as they are now. > > I think for now I will have to assume that's the case, until the next email can be readied against the proper list. If you hear nothing further, assume that this was all based on some random quirk (by humans or machines). I'll update if it happens again. Thank you for doing the test. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 3 months

Search results for query "sapiro"