Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Mailman rewrite the Cc header incorrectly

by Mark Sapiro

Mark Sapiro wrote: > Thus, the issue occurs downstream of lmtp runner. It will take more > investigation to determine where. The issue occurs in mailman/handlers/avoid_duplicates.py. That module will rewrite the Cc: header after possibly deleting some of the entries. That module calls msg.get_all('cc') to get the original Ccs and calls email.utils.getaddresses() on that to get a list of all the name, address pairs. In our case, msg.get_all('cc') returns one of two things. If the message came via LMTP with CRLF line endings, it returns ['"ABC DEF\r\n (XYZ)" <mark(a)msapiro.net>'] If the message came from `mailman inject` with LF line endings, it returns ['"ABC DEF\n (XYZ)" <mark(a)msapiro.net>'] then email.utils.getaddresses() calls internally email.utils.parseaddr on each item in the list to make a list (of one in our case) of name, address pairs. The result is different depending on the line endings which explains why it works with `mailman inject` but not with LMTP. In the case where the line endings are LF, the return is [('ABC DEF\n (XYZ)', 'mark(a)msapiro.net')] but if the line endings are CRLF, the return is [('XYZ', 'ABC DEF')] If the "folding" is not quoted as in ABC DEF (XYZ) <mark(a)msapiro.net> then the return is ('ABC DEF (XYZ)', 'mark(a)msapiro.net') regardless of the line ending as it should be. I can't really fault parseaddr() here because the only time it produces an unexpected result is when the CRLF line folding occurs in the middle of a quoted string which is clearly non-compliant. For Mailman to defend against this, something like the attached patch would do. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: Mailmansuite.log Entries

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/1/20 5:31 PM, Brian Carpenter wrote: > > On 12/1/20 8:22 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> Those come from the HyperKitty sync_mailman job which is run by >> hyperkitty_import if you don't specify --no-sync-mailman, but is also >> one of the Django daily jobs. > > Ok but those number are the same for thousands of entries and apparently > are being logged for weeks. That can't be good. How does one fix this? The sync_mailman job does two things. The first thing it does is for all lists known to HyperKitty, it gets the list attributes "display_name", "description", "subject_prefix", "archive_policy", "created_at" and "list_id" from Mailman core and updates the list properties in Hyperkitty. Then it gets every message sender known to Hyperkitty for which HK's sender.mailman_id is null, and, 1000 senders at a time, it tries to get and set the core user_id for the address to the sender's mailman_id. What happens when you import old archives, you archive a lot of posts with senders that are no longer list members and are not known to core, and every time sync_mailman runs, it tries again to get those core user_ids. You definitely want the first part to run to pick up changes like a change in archive_policy or a change in subject_prefix (to be able to strip it from Subject: headers. The second step could also find a newly registered core user, but is less important. Whether it is bad is a matter of opinion. At worst, it is a waste of some processing time, and at best it will pick up new users if there are any. "Fixing" it requires modification of the sync_with_mailman function in hyperkitty/libs/mailman.py. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 8 months

[MM3-users] Re: Handling of SPAM mails in mailman3 - Check for X-Spam Header

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/16/20 10:51 AM, Torge Riedel wrote: > > Such SPAM mails are currently hold for moderation with reason "not from > a list member". Is there no check for the "X-Spam: Yes" header or is > this check done later? If you set a Header Filter (in Postorius the Header filters tab) those checks are done before non-member moderation. This won't work for posts from members because the header checks are done between member moderation checks and non-member moderation checks, but if you create a Header Filter for header 'x-spam' and pattern 'yes' with action hold, a message from a non-member which has an X-Spam: Yes header should be held for that reason. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Apache Configuration for Subdomain

by Mark Sapiro

On 7/26/22 15:29, Mail Person wrote: > So adding the slashes did not fix, but I did get a workaround to work from the other thread: > > ProxyPass /mailman3 unix:/run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://localhost > ProxyPass /mailman unix:/run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://localhost > > Now makes it so that lists.example.com/mailman3 works sort of correctly. Weirdly enough, however, it redirects to lists.example.com/mailman/postorius/lists/ rather than */mailman3/* > > AND, if you go to lists.example.com/mailman it errors out with a 404 but redirects to > > lists.example.com/mailma > > So somehow a letter is getting deleted for some reason. This is a known issue with some versions of uWSGI. The only information I have is in the thread at https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years

[MM3-users] Re: No DBA password when installing Mailman3 with remote database server

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/31/22 07:04, Markus Ludwig Grandpré wrote: > Dear Mailman3 list, > > I try to install the Mailman3 software 3.3.3-1 on a Debian 11 system > with a remote Postgres database server. During the installation process > dpkg is asking for the DBA password that our DBA team would not provide > to me. So what can I do? This is really a question for Debian, but apparently dpkg wants to create databases for Mailman and Mailman Web. You will need to get your DBA team to create these databases (probably named `mailman` and `mailmanweb`) and a Mailman user (probably `list`) with all access to these databases and probably manually configure the `[database]` section of mailman.cfg and `DATABASES` on Django's settings -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 9 months

[MM3-users] Re: Monthly Password Reminders

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/3/23 04:05, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > For the passwords, yes. It was frequently reported as a bug, in fact. > Mostly the reminders generate requests to know how to shut them off. > You're the first in probably a decade who's asked how to turn them on! > > While in theory we could protect in transit with SMTP over TLS, we > can't guarantee end-to-end encryption (eg, if there's a .forward at > the subscribed address), and while TLS is widely implemented, it's > still not universal. Perhaps more significantly, all passwords are now stored in encrypted form, so for practical purposes we couldn't send the unencrypted password because we don't know it and the encrypted password is not useful to the user. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 6 months

[MM3-users] Re: Error -- postorius Un-handled exception

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/10/24 03:42, admin(a)bclug.ca wrote: > > After `systemctl restart mailman3.service mailman3-web.service` I'm still getting: > >> ERROR 2024-04-10 10:19:19,739 104735 postorius Un-handled exception: HTTP Error HTTP Error 500: {"title": "500 Internal Server Error"} >> File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/connection.py", line 161, in call >> raise HTTPError(params.get('url'), response.status_code, >> urllib.error.HTTPError: HTTP Error 500: {"title": "500 Internal Server Error"} >> ERROR 2024-04-10 10:19:19,744 104735 django.request Internal Server Error: /mailman3/lists/new_test.domain.tld/ >> ERROR 2024-04-10 10:19:19,744 104735 django.request Internal Server Error: /mailman3/lists/new_test.domain.tld/ >> ERROR 2024-04-10 10:19:19,745 104735 django.server "GET /mailman3/lists/new_test.domain.tld/ HTTP/1.0" 500 8667 > > > Anyone have suggestions? What's in var/logs/mailman.log? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: Issue with send mail to my domain in mailman3

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/11/22 10:36, Paul Ssekamatte via Mailman-users wrote: > I get this error in mail.log when I try to send mail to my domain > Recipient address rejected: SMTP AUTH is required for users under this sender domain (in reply to RCPT TO command)). > My setup is such that the server hosting the mailman3 (lists@tld) lists is different from the mail server (mail@tld) > Please advise. This is an MTA configuration issue. The mail@tld MTA needs to deliver list mail via LMTP to Mailman's LMTP runner at lists@tld or alternatively via SMTP to an MTA at lists@tld which relays via LMTP to Mailman. We can't begin to advise you without knowing more detail about the MTA(s) configuration. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 4 months

[MM3-users] Re: combine postorius and hyperkitty into one Apache vhost

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/29/22 12:58, Eggert Ehmke via Mailman-users wrote: > So you prefer Gunicorn over uWSGI? When I have a working installation that > uses uwsgi, should I reconfigure for Gunicorn? At the moment I see no reason > for this, and while I am open for alternate solutions, ... No, don't change. If uWSGI is working for you, it's fine. I prefer Gunicorn and recommend it for new installations because it's already installed as a dependency of Mailman core, at least if the web UI is on the same machine as Mailman core, and because I think its configuration is simpler than uWSGI. uWSGI does have an advantage in that it can be configured to start qcluster eliminating the need to do that separately. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: parallel processing of out queue messages

by Mark Sapiro

Dan Caballero writes: > > So is there a 1:1 relationship between the number of runners and the maximum number of messages that may be processed with .bak files in the out queue? Yes. The way this works is the runner gets the first message in it's slice from the .pck file and renames the .pck to .bak. It then processes the message and upon successful completion removes the .bak. I.e., the .bak file contains the message currently being processed by that runner. The purpose of the .bak is disaster recovery in case the runner gets killed (say by a power failure), when it starts again it recovers the .bak file. See https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/master/src/mailman/core/switchboa… for the details of how all this, including slicing, works. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 10 months

Search results for query "sapiro"