Search results for "sapiro" - lists.mailman3.org

[MM3-users] Re: Issue with Held Messages

by Mark Sapiro

On 08/19/2016 10:39 PM, Jean-Luc Wasmer wrote: > On 2016-08-19 17:58, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> On 08/17/2016 09:17 PM, Jean-Luc Wasmer wrote: >>> >>> No matter what action I set for member posts (Hold for moderator, >>> Reject) they are always delivered. >> >> >> I don't know why this would be. Perhaps the member's moderation is set >> to Accept immediately - you can see this on ther member's options page >> in Postorius when logged in as a list owner. > > Apart from "Mode of Delivery" that is set to "Regular" for the user, > none of the following attributes are set: > > Mail Delivery > Receive own posts to the list > Receive acknowledgement mails > Conceal address from the subscriber list > Avoid duplicate copies of messages If you look at the user's options when logged in as a list owner, you should see an additional "Administration options" section below those with a "Moderation" setting. What is that set to? ... > By the way, I didn't mention before but in Settings | Message > Acceptance, the "Acceptable aliases:" box contains "[]". When I try to > Save changes after modifying something, I gut "An error occured: []" in > the yellow banner (instead of "The settings have been updated."). What happens if you clear the Acceptable aliases box before saving? ... >> This is apparently <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailmanclient/issues/10> >> fixed by <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailmanclient/merge_requests/16> > > Any ETA when this will be pushed to "mailman-bundler"? I expect bundler will be updated when 3.1 is released and that should be soon. You may find <https://wiki.list.org/x/17891998> of interest. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

9 years

[MM3-users] Re: Memory footprint

by Mark Sapiro

On 04/10/2017 02:25 PM, David Krantz wrote: > Hi. > > Now running mailman 3 I am a bit surprised that the memory footprint > is so large. I count to 13 processes with each a virtual space of > 160-250MB and a reserved space of about 50MB each. Not much, but quite > much to run on smaller cloud instances which generally have limited > memory. This is (a lot) more than the corresponding postgres > installation uses, > > Is this normal? Those numbers seem "normal" but you really have to look deeper to understand if you just have a bunch of processes sitting in memory because the memory is available and nothing else wants it, or if there's real memory contention going on. The article at <https://wiki.list.org/x/4030711>, while written about Mailman 2.1, has some general information which may be of interest. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 years, 5 months

[MM3-users] Re: Template Ignored?

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/17/22 10:10, Stephen Daniel wrote: > Fixed the POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL. Doesn't fix the issue. > I've been playing with wget, and no matter what I put, I keep getting a 404 > error. > > So: this works: > > wget -O wget.out --user restadmin --password restpass ' > http://localhost:8001/3.1/lists/list.example.com' > > but this does not (404 error): > > wget -O wget.out --user restadmin --password restpass ' > http://localhost:8001/3.1/templates/list/list.example.com/list:user:notice:… You are using Mailman core's REST API which is wrong. You need to get the template from Postorius. Maybe something like http://localhost/postorius/api/templates/list/list.example.com/list:user:no… Where http://localhost/postorius/ is the URL you use to access Postorius, maybe mailman3 instead of postorius. Once you figure that out, POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL is just the scheme and domain part of that. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 7 months

[MM3-users] Re: Subscribing users stuck in pending hell

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/24/23 08:11, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > Hi, > > We frequently end up with users who never receive their email to confirm > their account, leaving them in a netherworld where they cannot become > list members. If I try to subscribe them via the mass subscribe option, > it says I can't because their subscription is pending. If I go to > subscription requests, it says there are 0. If I go to "non-members" in > the UI, I can find them, but I don't see an option to convert them to > members. Subscription requests says 0 because it only counts those pending moderator approval, but if you pull down the menu and select Pending Confirmation, it should show the request and enable you to delete it, and then mass subscribe will work. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: General question mailman3: message sender acceptance "always"

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/23/23 05:41, Wikinaut wrote: > > I could not find such an option (in the moderation dialog) in Mailman3 (only "accept" or "reject" and "discard", but "accept and add to white-list = accept always"). In the Postorius held messages view, click on the message's subject to open a dialog showing the messages content and a dropdown to set the moderation for this user and a box to enter a reject reason if you are going to reject the message. If you want to accept further messages from this yser, it is best to set moderation to Default processing rather than Accept immediately as the latter bypasses other checks that could result in the message being held. Note that even though the dropdown says Set member moderation, it works for non-members too. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 10 months

[MM3-users] Re: repeated headers in mails from mailinglists

by Mark Sapiro

On 7/12/24 11:30 PM, Tobias Diekershoff wrote: > Dear all, > > we have recently migrated from Mailman2 to Mailman3 and now discovered > that all mails going through Mailman3 have the headers Archived-At and > List-Archive repeated identically in the mail header ~100 times each. This should definitely not happen unless mailman/handlers/rfc_2369.py is broken. > We are running Mailman3 on Debian Bookworm from the Debian repositories > (mailman3 3.3.8-2~deb12u2) with postfix (3.7.11-0+deb12u1) and > hyperkitty (1.2.1-1). This may be a Debian issue. See https://wiki.list.org/x/12812344 > Can somebody of you help me to get rid of the repeated header? You could in Postorius set Alter Messages -> Include RFC2369 headers to No, but this will not include any of the List-* or Archived-At headers at all which is not what you want. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 2 months

[MM3-users] Re: makemigrations --merge error after Debian upgrade

by Mark Sapiro

On 9/30/24 03:00, Chupin Maxime via Mailman-users wrote: > Hi, > I upgraded my debian version, Issues with the Debian Mailman packages should be reported to Debian. Please see https://wiki.list.org/x/12812344 and https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/message/T6LB… > and since, it seems that I have a problem. I tried `mailman-web migrate` (and `mailman-web collectstatic` etc.) and I get the error message: > ``` > CommandError: Conflicting migrations detected; multiple leaf nodes in the migration graph: (0010_auto_20220618_2315, 0014_schedule_cluster in django_q; 0014_auto_20220618_2315, 0018_alter_emailtemplate_language in postorius). > To fix them run 'python manage.py makemigrations --merge' > ``` > So I tried `mailman-web makemigrations --merge` that ended with > ``` > PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/postorius/migrations/0019_merge_20240930_1159.py' > ``` Did you run this as the Mailman user (`list` in the Debian packages)? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

11 months, 2 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: Connection lost during _handle_client()

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/27/24 5:58 PM, Alain D D Williams wrote: > Nov 28 00:59:45 2024 (1268378) ('127.0.0.1', 42128) connection lost > Nov 28 00:59:45 2024 (1268378) ('127.0.0.1', 42128) Connection lost during _handle_client() > > I am concerned about the connection lost message above. It is normal and not a concern. > Mailman sees it, the message ID matches that at the end of the first line > in the exim log (above): > /var/log/mailman3/mailman.log > Nov 28 00:59:45 2024 (1268377) ACCEPT: <Z0fAe9xODd2y33N8(a)phcomp.co.uk> So Mailman got the message and accepted it. > Is there any more logging that I can look-at/switch-on to see what is happening ? Is there anything else in mailman.log? Does the message get archived? Is there anthing in any of Mailman's var/queue/* directories? Is Mailman core running? Does `mailman members --nomail enabled` list any members? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

9 months, 3 weeks

[MM3-users] Re: Weird hourly indexing error

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/9/20 9:29 PM, Mark Dadgar wrote: > On Jun 9, 2020, at 1:57 PM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: >>> THANK YOU for all the help. >> >> >> I'm glad we finally got it resolved. > > > I may have spoken too soon: > > [ERROR/MainProcess] Failed indexing 1 - 1000 (retry 5/5): Term too long (> 245): XSUBJECT95251413 (pid 729081): Term too long (> 245): XSUBJECT95251413 > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/haystack/management/commands/update_index.py", line 97, in do_update > backend.update(index, current_qs, commit=commit) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/xapian_backend.py", line 492, in update > database.replace_document(document_id, document) > xapian.InvalidArgumentError: Term too long (> 245): XSUBJECT95251413 > > "XSUBJECT95251413“ has some serious weirdness embedded in it. > > Not sure how to search for that in the django shell? I suspect the issue here is the 'weirdness' is in the Subject: rather than the message body. The script we were using only looked at the body. The message you sent me had a Subject which visually looked like `[PDC] MEGAMillions- Ticket №7383246 9` but the № and the digits were interspersed with strings of unicode zero width spaces, so the decoded Subject: was actually '[PDC] MEGAMillions- Ticket №7\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b3\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b8\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b3\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b2\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b4\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b6\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b9\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b' where all the \u200b unicodes are the zero width spaces. I suspect your current issue is with the Subject:. Actually, looking back at the thread, the prior one probably was too, but we also found messages that had this in the body. To alter the specific script to look at the Subject: just change the line if email.content.find('\u200b'*5) >= 0: to if email.subject.find('\u200b'*5) >= 0: There's probably a reply there somewhere that has the Subject: but didn't quote the bad stuff in the body. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 3 months

[MM3-users] Re: ARC issues

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/2/20 7:45 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > David Krantz writes: > > > Is there any known issues with ARC that I should be aware of? > > Doesn't Postfix do ARC yet? :-( rspamd seems to be recommended by a > couple of Linux distros, supports the milter interface that Postfix > uses to call out to 3rd party processes, and the website looks good. > See rspamd.com. That said, if you want to use Mailman's support... I've been trying openarc <https://github.com/trusteddomainproject/OpenARC> with Postfix as well as Mailman's ARC. I still haven't got it all worked out - I have a fairly convoluted mail flow with the possibility of messages being altered before they ever get to Mailman. There is an issue with Mailman's ARC signing in a supporting library. See <https://github.com/ValiMail/authentication-headers/issues/5>. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 6 months

Search results for query "sapiro"