Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: Mailman 3 api php

by Mark Sapiro

On 03/14/2017 05:24 AM, david.terni(a)gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > I apologize if this is't the right place but I don't understand how connect mailman 3 with api and php/CURL. It's possibile to do it? I tried to use the same url used with mailman2 but doesn't work. Mailman 3 is completely different from Mailman 2 in this respect. While it would be possible to use php/CURL to post to Postorius analagously to posting to the Mailman 2 web UI, this is not how it is done. Mailman 3 core exposes a RESTful api on localhost. Both Postorius and HyperKitty use this UI to communicate with the core and you should too. Start at <http://mailman.readthedocs.io/en/release-3.0/src/mailman/rest/docs/basic.ht…>. The "Previous" link will take you to the section on Addresses and the "Next" links will take you through the rest of the REST api. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

9 years

Re: Postorius is not working (throws "Error 500" suddenly after changing POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL and changing back)

by Odhiambo Washington

On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 1:41 PM Wikinaut <mail(a)tgries.de> wrote: > > Maybe you can make your life a little more bearable by abandoning the > use of Debian packages and embracing the virtualenv.... > > I fully understand. Need to look up how to smoothly backup the mailman3 > settings and list databases in order to make that move with losing stuff... > (kinda "mailman3 backup all" and mailman3 restore all" :-) > You do not really need to change much. The /etc/mailman3/* are almost usable as it with a little modification to file paths. The databases are also usable as-is. You may need to move a few files to the virtualenv directory tree and change permissions accordingly. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

2 years, 5 months

Re: Splitting hosts: mta&core vs postorius

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/20/20 7:24 PM, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote: > > ... the Body of reply, with the JSON text: > > { > "start": 0, > "total_size": 1, > "entries": [ > { > "alias_domain": null, > "description": null, > "mail_host": "ch-bc.org.uk", > "self_link": "http://0.0.0.0:8870/3.1/domains/ch-bc.org.uk", > "http_etag": "\"5d474f0be89222e6122b6dc375a18ff01190419d\"" > } > ], > "http_etag": "\"c6f15186189ff5cf5b67f2d06dcf4ea97ea447a9\"" > } All these self_link references are generated from self.api.path_t which is a reference to (in the case of 3.1) <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/master/src/mailman/core/api.py#L6… which gets the host portion from config.webservice.hostname, i.e. the value of hostname in the webservice section of mailman.cfg, and actually <sigh>, looking back at <https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message…> that's exactly where you said you set it to 0.0.0.0. Change that to greyarea-post -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 8 months

Re: Error -- postorius Un-handled exception

by Mark

----------------------- > > > "/opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/connection.py", > > line 160, in call > > raise HTTPError(params.get('url'), response.status_code, > > urllib.error.HTTPError: HTTP Error 500: {"title": "500 Internal > Server > > Error"} > > ERROR 2024-01-24 05:41:46,333 51799 django.request Internal Server > > Error: /postorius/lists/testing.example.com/ --------------------------- > Try running all the system initializations with "mailman info" and > "mailman conf". This often will elicit errors if the system is messed > up. More likely to get this error would be "mailman withlist $LIST" > (maybe you need an '-l' option to specify the list, I forget). If > that doesn't elicit the error, then check that Mailman's runners are > running with ps. Since it's Debian, I guess they should be running as > the 'list' user. Are Mailman's files and directories owned by 'list' > or sometimes 'www-data' for log files? Debian yes, but venv/pip installation so running as "mailman". > > The log is saying that when Postorius tried to look up that list, it > tried to call out to Mailman core via HTTP to the API to get the > information and that access failed with HTTP status 500. I think the > actual error is likely to be reported in mailman.log (or it might be > in error.log, "grep '05:41:46' *.log" in Mailman's log directory will > probably find it). I'm pretty sure there will be relevant log > entries, probably a matching traceback. ---------------------------- Hi, Thank you Steve, Mark, Odhiambo for your responses. After working my way through your suggestions with no joy I discovered to my embarrassment that I hadn't created the "mailman-hyperkitty.cfg" file. Once created all was well. This was of course after I had begun the installation process again from scratch. My apologies for the waste of bandwidth and your time. Regarding my installation, (following the docs at https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html) I found a couple of issues that others might also stumble over: 1. Installing Xapian needed clang. It didn't like gcc 2. Being a fresh Debian 12 OS, I needed to also install make, build-essential 3. For the user "mailman" to access the databases I needed to change the owner to mailman (even though all privileges has been granted) ... postgres=# create database mailman; CREATE DATABASE postgres=# create database mailmanweb; CREATE DATABASE postgres=# create user mailman with encrypted password '<PASSWORD>'; CREATE ROLE postgres=# grant all privileges on database mailman to mailman; GRANT postgres=# grant all privileges on database mailmanweb to mailman; GRANT psql -d mailman -U mailman -W $ psql -d mailman -U mailman -W Password: psql: error: connection to server on socket "/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432" failed: FATAL: Peer authentication failed for user "mailman" sudo -u postgres psql ALTER DATABASE mailman OWNER TO mailman; \q $ psql -h localhost -d mailman -U mailman -W Password: psql (15.5 (Debian 15.5-0+deb12u1)) SSL connection (protocol: TLSv1.3, cipher: TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384, compression: off) Type "help" for help. ... and same for mailmanweb So far, so good. Thanks and apologies once again, Mark

2 years, 1 month

Re: integrate subscribe form in Website -> CSRF-token

by Jens Günther

Thank you for your questions. I hope I can give you the needed answers on what we try to do :-) - We do have a Wordpress-Site for our association set up. - There we put a html-Snippet for the visitors to be able to subscribe for a mailing list (newsletter). - This snippet has been with Mailman2 (2.1.23): <form method="POST" action="https://$domain/mailman/subscribe/$short_listname"> <input name="email" value="" type="text"><br> <input name="email-button" value="Subscribe" type="submit"> </form> We wanted to do the same with Mailman3 (Docker, 3.3.3, Postorius 1.3.4): <form method="POST" action="https://$domain/postorius/lists/$short_lisname.$domain/anonymous_subscribe"> <input name="email" value="" type="text"><br> <input name="email-button" value="Anmelden" type="submit"> </form> When I now enter a mailaddress, the quoted error occurs. Checking another answer directly to me, there seems to be another hint :-) > I believe you are attempting to use the MM Core API via http GET/POST, rather than via Postorius? That you have tried and get the CSRF error reported? > > Typically this is because you need to add a token to the request to indicate to the MM Core that your request isn't a forgery. Typically this token is requested from Core and then presented with subsequent requests. Have you tried this? > Therefor it is needed to send also a token!? Or use another URL, not postorius in order to subscribe!? How can I submit such a token? Still wondering if there is something sorresponding to this documentation!? If not, I'm also willing to write some lateron, if somebody could lead me the way on how to achieve this :-) https://wiki.list.org/DOC/4.33%20How%20do%20I%20put%20a%20subscribe%20form%… Thanks already a lot! Am 21.06.21 um 17:23 schrieb Stephen J. Turnbull: > Jens Günther writes: > > > (forbidden 403 - CSRF-verification failed. Request aborted.) > > I think you need to tell us more about what you're trying to do (the > obvious way to implement a "website subscribe form" is "run Postorius" > which should just work), the configuration you now have, and exactly > what actions you take in the browser to get this response. > > It would also be helpful to tell us what operating system(s) you're > using and their versions, and the versions of Mailman 2 and 3. > > Steve >

4 years, 8 months

Re: Filter who can send on mailman3 list?

by Allan Hansen

Marcus, One of the MM3 bugs is the inability of list moderators to see the list of members of the list they are moderating. This in spite of MM3 having an option to allow moderators to see the list's members. The bug has been reported. My own moderators regularly request their lists and I have to log in to the server directly and use the mailman core API to get the list and then used mailx to send it to them. Yours, Allan On 4/7/21, 11:58 , "Mark Sapiro" <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: On 4/7/21 1:32 AM, Marcus Granath wrote: > > Sorry, but actually I can not find any "Users dropdown" to select "Non-Members" at any Postorius in my web interface. :-( It's one of the various tabs across the top of the page. What Postorius version is this? Seversal versions back, I think it was called `members` rather than `users`. In current Postorius, the tabs are Info Subscription requests Held messages Users Templates Settings Mass operations Ban List Header filters Delete As I said, `Users` used to be `Members` and `Templates` was added at some point, but that's the general idea. > Maybe, could it be that I am actually not the admin of the mailman3 server, I'm "just" the admin of my mailman-list - so just admin for my mailman-list and not for the mailman server? As Steve said, the list admin should see all those. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

4 years, 11 months

Re: Mailman, etc. upgrade woes and persistent bugs

by Abhilash Raj

On Sun, Feb 14, 2021, at 8:59 AM, Allan Hansen wrote: > Mark, > > Thank you for this reminder, but it’s not really sufficient for most. > The ‘Mailman Settings’ dialog does, indeed show the other preferences > tags, and yes, as you say, the dialog for ‘List-based preferences’ only > shows values that are not inherited and when you set a value there, it > shows. > > There a two problems with this: > > a. Once a value is overridden on the ‘List-based preferences’ dialog, > you cannot go back to it being inherited by removing the override. Yes! This is something we've known for a while and haven't been able to fix properly. https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/414 https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/195 There more than one open issue for this. And one of the reasons it hasn't been fixed yet is that it is larger problem than most low hanging fruits that gets fixed in the available time window for the us to work on issue. This is a long weekend for me, so I'll start some work on this, but not sure if that would be enough to finish. > b. You cannot see, on this dialog, what the inherited value is. https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/476 I opened an issue for this too, but this might be a little bit longer of a task because the whole inheritance and calculation of effective preference/setting happens in Core. It would require that Core expose the effective values. We do have some calculation of preferences in Postorius to display the "Global Mailman preferences" page for a User. > This is not user-friendly. > > May I suggest the following: > > That each option shows the following: > > o Value 1 > o Value 2 > (or the equivalent for pull-down menus) > > A box showing inheritance status: > [ ] Use inherited value from address-based preference: Value2 > > If the ‘Use inherited value’ is chosen, then the inherited value shows. > but the value radio buttons become non-selectable. It is a good idea, might need Javascript skills that I don't have ;-) I'll still try to take a stab at implementing such a view. > If not, then whatever value the value radio box has become the value > for the list, > > From what I see, the ‘Use inherited value’ is the default for new > lists/addresses. To change a value, the user would > uncheck this box, making the radio buttons selectable, and then set the > desired value. > > Yours, > > Allan > > > > On Feb 12, 2021, at 11:52 , Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > > >> I then looked at several of the disabled accounts, but the subscription info page in Postorius had no information about whether an account was enabled or disabled. Why is this not displayed???. The members can't see if their account is enabled. Is this another example of the disconnect between Mailman and Postorius? > > > > > > If the user has a Django account, she can see all that info at (e.g. for > > this list) <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/accounts/subscriptions/ <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/accounts/subscriptions/>> > > She gets there from `Mailman settings` in the dropdown under her user > > name. She can also get there via the `Manage Subscription` button on the > > list's Info page. That takes her to `List-based preferences` for the > > list. Any setting not selected there is inherited from the Address-based > > preferences or Global Mailman preferences > > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

5 years, 1 month

Re: Apache shows No Lists

by Odhiambo Washington

mailman3 createsuperuser? On Mon, May 22, 2023, 22:58 <ceo(a)sartrack.nz> wrote: > Postorius is running. > I just removed all mailing lists, and created new empty ones. > These now show in the Apache2 website, via the link to Postorius I assume. > Then I imported members from the old mailing list "Templist" into the new > one. > Now the "templist" is no longer visible on the website! > It is here: > https://sartrack.nz/mailman3/ > Note that the existing list "Templist" is missing. > > Now I need to login as 'superuser' or whatever it is called, so I can > manage all the lists. > Where do I set up my login and password for access via the web browser? > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > Archived at: > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > This message sent to odhiambo(a)gmail.com >

2 years, 9 months

Re: Help needed to create filters that were working in Mailman 2.

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/20/23 11:04 PM, mrl(a)psfc.mit.edu wrote: > How do I make a filter that if it matches, it accepts the message and doesn't check the remaining filters? > > I could do this using the anti-spam filters in mailman 2, as there was a Accept option. > > But there is no Accept option in Mailman 3 (that I can find). > > I tried using "Default antispam action", but that didn't stop the rest of the filters from being applied. The default action for "Default antispam action" is "hold" but you can change that to "accept" by setting ``` jump_chain: accept ``` in the [antispam] section of mailman.cfg, however current Postorius offers "Accept immediately (bypass other rules)" as a choice for the Header Filters action. Does yours not? What is your Postorius version? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 8 months

Re: Multi-domain oddities in Hyperkitty and Postorius

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/16/23 05:34, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > Clearly a total misreading on my part of the Django documentation to > which you referred earlier. It talks about having to feed Django > multiple settings.py files with different SITE_ID values and running > migrate to configure them, then links to the document on migrations > which starts out explaining how to use makemigrations to create > them. I took that to mean creating and configuring Django sites from > the command line required supplying customized database migrations. > > The particularly misleading bits are where it says: > > "To set the correct name and domain for your project, you can > use a data migration." > > "In order to serve different sites in production, you’d create a > separate settings file with each SITE_ID" > > It doesn't seem to talk about using django_admin at all (or if it > does, it's not mentioned by name, maybe assuming the reader knows to > use it in order to perform the necessary steps). Yes, that doc really isn't appropriate for your purpose, but it's the only one I could find on Django sites. Most of what it talks about is for more complex situations than ours and whatever bits are relevant are already done in Postorius/HyperKitty. Sorry for leading you astray. > Thanks for the clear examples! If these are available somewhere in > Django's documentation, I did a terrible job of searching for them. I don't think Django's docs address the simple task of adding a site. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 1 month

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"