Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

First time mailman installation

by roland＠giesler.za.net

I have installed mailman3 on Ubuntu including postorius & hyperkitty (from the packages). I have questions now which are not quite clear to me from the docs: 1. How do I specify my mail server details (which is my own server running postfix, etc) 2. How do I create new lists from the postorius UI, or can I only do that in the config files or the command line console for mailman3? thanks!

1 year, 3 months

Re: How to remove Held Unsubscriptions

by Mark Sapiro

On 9/9/24 12:14, lowell(a)fas.harvard.edu wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > I'm having the same issue. We're Postorius Version 1.3.4.1. Which is three and a half years old. > I have no idea of how to use a shell or REST API. I update things via the web. If you can't upgrade to Postorius >= 1.3.5, see https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… which describes the `mailman shell` interaction required to do this. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 1 month

Re: Postorius not HTML-decoding < to "<" characters

by Jeremy Stanley

On 2024-11-09 13:05:16 -0800 (-0800), Mark Sapiro wrote: [...] > Also, it depends on the archive rendering mode and only occurs if the mode > is Markdown text rather than Plain text. It is really `mistune`, > <https://mistune.lepture.com/en/latest/index.html>, which is doing the > markdown rendering and which `escapes` HTML tags. [...] On a related note, the MD rendering here seems to misinterpret sig separators as markup. Like this... -- Jeremy Stanley

11 months, 3 weeks

Postorius Suggestion: Give owner a view of all users of all owned lists

by Andreas Vetter

Hi, it would be real great if owners that own several lists, but are not superusers, can see all users of all *their* lists and manage them. A down-"selected" version of the superusers view. Use case is an organisation (here are the superusers) with sub-organisations (here are the owners, e.g finance, research, production) having lists for the very sub-org itself and its sub-sub-orgs (e.g. research-all, research-solar, research-wind, research-battery). Would that be possible? -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Andreas Vetter

7 months, 3 weeks

Re: Disabling the version disclosure.

by Mark Sapiro

On March 25, 2025 5:18:13 PM GMT+07:00, ninad--- via Mailman-users <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> wrote: > >Please let me know if there are any settings that I can set. I don't want to change any html code for the same. There are no settings for this. To remove the version from Postorius footers you would need to edit postorius/templates/postorius/base.html and for Hyperkitty, hyperkitty/templates/hyperkitty/base.html For Mailman core, where are you seeing the version exposed? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> Sent from my Not_an_iThing with standards compliant, open source software.

7 months, 1 week

Re: New subscribed (by invitation) user: no password received in invitation/welcome e-mail. Postorius sign up / password reset broken

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Marco Emilio Poleggi via Mailman-users writes: > Yeah, indeed, it was a stupid configuration error. Those are always annoying. I'm really happy that it was that easy, and that things are working well for you now. Steve -- GNU Mailman consultant (installation, migration, customization) Sirius Open Source https://www.siriusopensource.com/ Software systems consulting in Europe, North America, and Japan

2 months

Re: Splitting hosts: mta&core vs postorius

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/18/24 05:36, samuel.d.darwin(a)gmail.com wrote: > > However our latest plan as of this moment is to revert back to a one-server implementation. mailman-core and mailman-web will be on the same machine. Thus, the enhancement is not critical. It still seems "theoretically" useful to implement the fix, unless the documentation states "it is recommended that core and web should be on the same machine" or similar. See the fourth paragraph at https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/rest/docs/… -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 9 months

Re: Core, Hyperkitty and Postorius releases

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/14/21 5:02 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 2:52 PM Jeff Steele <jeff(a)steele.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On May 14, 2021, at 7:49 AM, Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> /bin/sh: sass: Permission denied* >> >> >> >> Did you check the permissions on your sass binary? >> > > My mailman installed in /opt/mailman/mm > > find /opt/mailman/ -type f -name sass > > yielded nothing! Try `which sass` -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 5 months

Re: django-mailman3 update causing errors

by Darren Smith

So we have pulled all fresh versions of these projects from gitlab as of last Friday: postorius hyperkitty django-mailman3 mailmanclient Django is version 1.11 When we installed, each of these were placed in a conda virtual environment. Postorius, Hyperkitty, and django-mailman3 are all still under a python 2.7 environment. Is that our problem here? Do they need to be in python 3 now? -Darren On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 05/01/2018 01:35 PM, Darren Smith wrote: > > Hello, > > > > In attempting to update our mailman3/postorius/hyperkitty installation, I > > have run into an error after upgrading the django-mailman3 project. > ... > > Any thoughts on why updating django-mailman3 would cause this? > > > To what version did you update? any 1.2 version is part of the migration > of Postorius/HyperKitty to Python 3 and requires > > postorius>=1.2.0b1 > hyperkitty>=1.2.0a1 > Django>=1.11 > django-mailman3>=1.2.0a2 > mailmanclient>=3.2.0b1 > > and is all Python 3 > > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >

7 years, 6 months

Re: Mass un/subscribe optimization?

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/28/22 12:12, Bryan Loniewski wrote: > Hi -- > > We've noticed slowness in mass un/subscribing users; looking through the issue(s) log we see both #419 [1] and #627 [2] open and related. From the cmd line we get better performance, but with the subscriber size on many of our Faculty/Staff/Students ad-hoc lists (think 1k-15K subscribed addresses) and with our number of lists (2600) and unique owners utilizing these actions it would be helpful to optimize the mass actions. We wanted to get some thoughts and guidance on what needs to be optimized/redesigned/fixed? Or is there already something in the works, but needs more time? We may be able to provide resources to encourage and/or assist with any development and/or testing... > > We run a split core/web setup with Apache,mod_wsgi and MySQL backend (AWS hosted). > > [1] - https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/419 > [2] - https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/627 Regarding mass removal and #627, that should be fixed as of Postorius 1.3.5. What is your Postorius version. If you want to work on providing a REST endpoint for mass subscribe and supporting it in mailmanclient and Postorius, that would be great. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 8 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"