Search results for "2021" - Mailman-users

Re: Newbie question 2: Rewriting issue for bounced emails

by William Oliver

On Sun, 2021-12-26 at 16:47 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 12/26/21 3:06 PM, William Oliver wrote: > > > > When running mailman3, do I need to set up a completely different > > virtual domain for it to run in? > > No. > > > > My "real" domain name is > > libertyfp.org, and I'm trying to make mailman work on that domain, > > e.g. > > "testlist(a)libertyfp.org." I'm starting to get the idea that I need > > to > > stick a completely different domain in there for the mailinglist. > > No. > > DNS or anywhere outside your server. > > Have you actually set an alias domain in Postorius for the > libertyfp.org > domain. It doesn't matter what name it is as long as it isn't > a real domain. A good choice is x.libertyfp.org. Have you set that > or > things like > > testlist(a)libertyfp.org testlist(a)x.libertyfp.org > testlist-bounces(a)libertyfp.org testlist-bounces(a)x.libertyfp.org > testlist-confirm(a)libertyfp.org testlist-confirm(a)x.libertyfp.org > ... [snip] Ah. I misunderstood you. I thought you meant that I had to tweak *postfix* to get this done. It's not that you weren't clear, it's that when I read the mailman3 instructions, I got the impression that *mailman* would set the alias domain automatically, so I was dead set on munging postfix. This makes more sense, and I can back out of some of the changes I made in postfix, which for the last couple of rounds was mostly flailing about randomly -- I've heard that's often not a good admin strategy. So.. if I need to do it myself, can you point me to what file I need to create/modify in the /opt/mailman/mm tree to set up the alias? Thanks! billo

3 years, 6 months

Re: spanish localization

by Victoriano Giralt

El sáb, 13-02-2021 a las 16:44 -0800, Mark Sapiro escribió: > On 2/13/21 4:08 PM, Victoriano Giralt wrote: > > Mark, please, how do you check when translations happened? Nov 7th is a > > very significant date for me (it is my wedding anniversary) and I'm 90% > > sure that I dedicated time to Weblate after that date... > > With respect to Mailman core, all I'm doing is downloading the .po for > Spanish and comparing it to mailman/messages/es/LC_MESSAGES/mailman.po > from the Mailman core 3.3.3 package on PyPI and they are identical. > > If there are translated strings on weblate that are different from that, > they don't show up in the downloaded > <https://hosted.weblate.org/download/gnu-mailman/mailman/es/>;. And you are very right and I have fallen as a newbee ... and first of all I apologise for the noise. I've been doing diffs with files downloaded from Weblate and those installed on the server by pip. As I should have done from the start. Mailman core and hyperkitty show no differences. Postorius shows a bunch and django_mailman3 just a couple. I leave for others a more detailed check of the strings between downloaded .po files and Weblate online strings, it's too late here. > > And I too want to help. It would be a help to me if you can give me > examples of specific strings whose weblate translation differs from > what's in the distributed .po files. And you have helped me, making me thing twice and stop moaning and going for the facts. Apologetic-thankful-big-mouth-shut-ly, Victoriano. -- Victoriano Giralt Innovation Director Digital Transformation Vicerectorate University of Malaga +34952131415 SPAIN ================================================================== Note: signature.asc is the electronic signature of present message A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure ? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email ?

4 years, 4 months

Race condition when mass subscribing same email addresses to two lists?

by Alan So

We are testing the latest Mailman core 3.3.5 and Postorius 1.3.6. My colleagues reported that some email addresses cannot subscribe to the lists when two of them are using mass subscribe feature to add email addresses to the list. Then I try whether I can repeat the same issue. I did this: 1) Create two lists with default setting 2) Prepare a list of 1000 fresh email addresses not added to the system before 3) Mass subscribe both lists of these 1000 email addresses around the same time with all three Pre (confirm, approved, verified) checked There are quite a lot of similar errors in mailman.log. Did not study the code yet. Which part is causing the issue? SQLAlchemy 1.3.24 psycopg2-binary 2.8.6 [2021-10-28 08:38:30 +0000] [20141] [ERROR] Error handling request /3.1/members Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/gunicorn/workers/sync.py", line 136, in handle self.handle_request(listener, req, client, addr) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/gunicorn/workers/sync.py", line 179, in handle_request respiter = self.wsgi(environ, resp.start_response) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/database/transaction.py", line 51, in wrapper config.db.commit() File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/database/base.py", line 52, in commit self.store.commit() File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/session.py", line 1046, in commit self.transaction.commit() File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/session.py", line 502, in commit self._assert_active(prepared_ok=True) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/session.py", line 296, in _assert_active code="7s2a", sqlalchemy.exc.InvalidRequestError: This Session's transaction has been rolled back due to a previous exception during flush. To begin a new transaction with this Session, first issue Session.rollback(). Original exception was: (raised as a result of Query-invoked autoflush; consider using a session.no_autoflush block if this flush is occurring prematurely) (psycopg2.errors.UniqueViolation) duplicate key value violates unique constraint "ix_address_email" DETAIL: Key (email)=(testemail999(a)example.com) already exists.

3 years, 8 months

Re: [Django] ERROR (EXTERNAL IP): Internal Server Error: /accounts/login/

by Mark Dadgar

On May 18, 2021, at 5:34 PM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 5/18/21 4:06 PM, Mark Dadgar wrote: >> I have a user attempting to access the list archives and he’s generating this login error. I have verified that he does have a django account. I’ve never seen this one before and I didn’t find anything relevant in the lit archives. >> >> Any ideas what’s going on here? > ... >> File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.8/site-packages/allauth/account/utils.py", line 134, in _has_verified_for_login >> emailaddress = EmailAddress.objects.get_for_user(user, email) >> File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.8/site-packages/allauth/account/managers.py", line 54, in get_for_user >> ret = self.get(user=user, email__iexact=email) >> File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.8/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py", line 82, in manager_method >> return getattr(self.get_queryset(), name)(*args, **kwargs) >> File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.8/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 419, in get >> raise self.model.MultipleObjectsReturned( >> >> Exception Type: MultipleObjectsReturned at /accounts/login/ >> Exception Value: get() returned more than one EmailAddress -- it returned 2! >> Request information: >> USER: AnonymousUser > > > Go to the Django admin users page - something like > http(s)://example.com/admin/auth/user/ - and search for the email > address. This search is case-insensitive and I'm guessing it will find > two users differing in case. > > In any event, django allauth is trying to find this user and is finding > multiple EmailAddress.objects for this address or username. I had actually done this but checked the Users section and had overlooked the Email Addresses section. It was as you suggested - duplicate emails differing only in case. Given that there was only one user account, how does this happen? List subscription without associated user account creation with slightly different case? - Mark ----- mark(a)pdc-racing.net | 408-348-2878

4 years, 1 month

Re: nginx configuration on a multitasking server

by David Newman

On 12/22/21 8:50 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 12/22/21 7:54 PM, David Newman wrote: >> On 12/22/21 7:29 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >>> This looks like a uwsgi issue as discussed at >>> https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… >>> although that's with apache and not nginx so it may not be. >> >> If I'm reading the thread correctly, it's Apache workarounds to an >> underlying Debian issue, so I agree it may not apply with nginx. > > > I think you're correct that it doesn't apply to nginx, but the symptom > is not the same. It is not a Debian issue per se. It is an Apache change > that got installed with a Debian update, but the underlying issue is > with Apache. See > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > > >> There are 260 files named 'urls.py' under /opt/mailman, mostly for >> socialaccount stuff. >> >> Where does that change go? All files? Or just this one: >> >> /opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/postorius/urls.py > > > Not that one. The one whose content looks like > https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman-web/-/blob/master/mailman_web/urls.py. It > is probably in the same directory as your Django settings. On my system that file lives here: /opt/mailman/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mailman_web/urls.py But the error persists after this addition and restarting MM3 and mailmanweb and nginx: url(r'^mailman/', include('postorius.urls')), There is this 404 error in uwsgi.log: [pid: 73356|app: 0|req: 3/3] 127.0.0.1 () {48 vars in 1544 bytes} [Wed Dec 22 21:13:48 2021] GET /mailman/admindb/listname => generated 5328 bytes in 14 msecs (HTTP/1.0 404) 6 headers in 197 bytes (1 switches on core 0) If this is a uwsgi issue, is there something else to tweak with that? Thanks dn > >

3 years, 6 months

Re: Fwd: [Django] ERROR (EXTERNAL IP): Internal Server Error: /mailman3/hyperkitty/api/mailman/archive

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/2/21 1:55 PM, David Partain via Mailman-users wrote: > On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 13:43 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> Unless you want to remove the Ubuntu package and install everything >> with >> pip, you need to just stick with what you have that at least partly >> works and we'll try to determine how to fix the utf8mb4 issue. > > Hi Mark, > > You're a very patient soul. Thank you. > > Yes, I'm resigned to exactly that. The archives when folks send emojis > will break, but that's just life. Mail will get sent. Heck, I guess I > could edit the file in /var/lib/mailman3/archives/hyperkitty/spool to > get rid of the emoji in the worst case... You would need to do that, because once one of the `emoji` messages gets into /var/lib/mailman3/archives/hyperkitty/spool, I think no further messages are archived because mailman_hyperkitty tries to process the queued messages first and throws the exception. But, it's still not clear to me whether you have removed the settings_local.pyc and restarted uWSGI or whatever interfaces to Django. > Once I've migrated my 1500 mailing lists (this weekend) to the server, > I'll think about how to get a new server set up that I can shift to and > I'll install that with pip, since that'll clearly give me something > more supportable. > > Is Ubuntu 20.04 a reasonable platform for that? Yes it is. FWIW, this list runs bleeding edge Mailman 3 on an Ubuntu 14.04 server (yes we should upgrade), the only issue being that we needed to install Python 3.6 (the latest at the time) from source because the native Python 3 was 3.4 -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 4 months

Re: migration

by Abhilash Raj

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021, at 12:06 PM, Dave McGuire wrote: > > Hi folks. Some time ago, I set up mm3 and have been running a bunch > of lists on it with great success. I was a long-time mm2 user, and > while the differences are significant, I'm glad I made the switch. > > However, in what seems to have been a moment of insanity in > retrospect, I installed mm3 from my OS' package repository. > > Yeah, I know, that was dumb. Now I'd like to migrate to a new > server, and I'd like to install mm3 in the normal way. > > Is there a way that I can "dump" the configuration from an existing > mailman3 server, and "import" it into a new instance? I'd really like > to avoid re-doing all of the configuration, etc, as there are quite a > few lists and everything is set up pretty much the way I want it. You can copy the database from your old install to the new install using the database native tools (or just point the new install to the same old database if that is a possibility). Mailman Core will upgrade the database schema when it first starts to the latest version's expected schema. For web-components, you'd have to manually run the django's `migrate` command to upgrade the database. The exact migrate command depends on how you install the new one (mailman-web or django-admin --settings settings). I'd also say you should avoid updating database versions in this process because that would just add another variable to the process. > > I would appreciate any advice from this learned group. > > Thanks, > -Dave > > -- > Dave McGuire, AK4HZ > New Kensington, PA > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

3 years, 11 months

New install - The Message have no valid senders

by kenneth.karlsson＠eco.cept.org

I have installed a brand spanking new Ubuntu 21.10, with postfix as SMTP server and mailman3-full apt package.. All checks out fine except when i deliver mails into MM. Mailman Core Version GNU Mailman 3.3.3 (Tom Sawyer) Mailman Core API Version 3.1 Mailman Core Python Version 3.9.7 (default, Sep 10 2021, 14:59:43) [GCC 11.2.0] I have a very simple mail command going into Postfix, and it receives it fine and relay it to MM (email address obscured below but of course a proper email address was used !): The command: EHLO contoso.com mail from: <xxx(a)xxx.com> rcpt to: <mhtest(a)list.cept.org> DATA This is a test message . Accepted by Postfix: Mar 29 11:17:17 lits01a postfix/smtpd[4088]: B86DD6A04B9: client=unknown[192.168.200.157] Mar 29 11:17:30 lits01a postfix/cleanup[4091]: B86DD6A04B9: message-id=<> Mar 29 11:17:30 lits01a postfix/qmgr[3952]: B86DD6A04B9: from=<xxx(a)xxx.com>, size=200, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Mar 29 11:17:30 lits01a postfix/lmtp[4109]: B86DD6A04B9: to=<mhtest(a)list.cept.org>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:8024, delay=24, delays=24/0.01/0/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Ok) Mar 29 11:17:30 lits01a postfix/qmgr[3952]: B86DD6A04B9: removed MM receives it: Mar 29 11:17:30 2022 (3940) ('127.0.0.1', 37146) handling connection Mar 29 11:17:30 2022 (3940) ('127.0.0.1', 37146) Data: b'LHLO list.cept.org' Mar 29 11:17:30 2022 (3940) ('127.0.0.1', 37146) Data: b'MAIL FROM:<xxx(a)xxx.com>' Mar 29 11:17:30 2022 (3940) ('127.0.0.1', 37146) sender: xxx(a)xxx.com Mar 29 11:17:30 2022 (3940) ('127.0.0.1', 37146) Data: b'RCPT TO:<mhtest(a)list.cept.org>' Mar 29 11:17:30 2022 (3940) ('127.0.0.1', 37146) recip: mhtest(a)list.cept.org Mar 29 11:17:30 2022 (3940) ('127.0.0.1', 37146) Data: b'DATA' Mar 29 11:17:30 2022 (3940) ('127.0.0.1', 37146) Data: b'QUIT' Mar 29 11:17:30 2022 (3940) ('127.0.0.1', 37146) connection lost Mar 29 11:17:30 2022 (3940) Connection lost during _handle_client() But MM3 discards it: Mar 29 10:08:03 2022 (1767) DISCARD: <164854848338.1768.3954079936807939297@lits01a>; ['The message has no valid senders'] I have no idea where its goes wrong, but fear its something in the source code. Kind regards Kenneth Karlsson

3 years, 3 months

Re: [Mailman-Users] Web interface for users (not admins)?

by Abhilash Raj

> On May 7, 2021, at 11:01 AM, smorytko(a)gmail.com wrote: > > I'm new here and mostly lurking to simply try to understand more about MM3. At the risk of dragging down the very technical discussions I've read so far, here's a question for you. > > We manage a MM3 list (list admin level only). I'd like to be able to offer subscribers the ability to take an RSS feed from our list and maybe feed a website page too. Our vendor uses Empathy (which I suspect some here are aware of). I understand that the HyperKitty interface is the "standard" web interface offering associated with MM3. Now I'm not a developer and I know little about how this all goes together so please bear with me. > > I was pleasantly surprised to see that I could add this list to my Feedly reader. This gives me hope that an RSS feed is possible with our installation too. However, I was not successful adding an RSS feed for our list though. There could be a very simple answer for why it doesn't work (like the wrong URL, ...) but I suppose it may be more complicated too. I've made an inquiry to our vendor but I'm not sure an answer is forthcoming soon because of very unfortunate circumstances. > > I wondered though if RSS capability is a function provided by the web interface (HyperKitty) or perhaps it's more at the MM3 level or maybe another app that provides that function? Hyperkitty recently gained the ability of have RSS feeds for MailingLists, that feature hasn’t been released yet (1.3.5, release date is TBD!). It works on this list because we run the bleeding edge version from our source. This is a functionality provided by Hyperkitty and not Mailman 3 Core. Core doesn’t store emails and is simply relaying them or sending it to archivers which store them. -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

4 years, 1 month

Re: rest api runner not running

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/27/21 5:13 AM, Christine wrote: > Hi, > I have been using mailman for about ten years, now I want to move the > lists to another server, I have installed mailman3 there, most of it > seems to be running, but the "rest api runner" is not. Nothing is > listening on port 8001. What have I missed? What do I do to start the > restapi runner? I checked the logs, I don't see anything suspicious. > > this is what systemctl status says: > > root@lists:~# systemctl status mailman3 > ● mailman3.service - Mailman3 server > Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/mailman3.service; enabled; > vendor preset: enabled) > Active: failed (Result: timeout) since Sat 2021-03-27 12:04:06 UTC; > 6min ago > Docs: man:mailman(1) > https://mailman.readthedocs.io/ > Process: 173111 ExecStart=/usr/bin/mailman -C > /etc/mailman3/mailman.cfg start --force (code=killed, signal=TERM) > > Mar 27 12:02:36 lists systemd[1]: Starting Mailman3 server... > Mar 27 12:04:06 lists systemd[1]: mailman3.service: start operation > timed out. Terminating. > Mar 27 12:04:06 lists systemd[1]: mailman3.service: Failed with result > 'timeout'. > Mar 27 12:04:06 lists systemd[1]: Failed to start Mailman3 server. Nothing is listening on port 8001 because apparently Mailman core failed to start. > There is nothing in mailman.log, nor in smtp.log What Mailman package is installed? Perhaps you should contact the packager for support. Can you run the mailman command manually, e.g. ``` sudo -u xxx mailman -C /etc/mailman3/mailman.cfg ``` where `xxx` is the Mailman user which if I'm guessing correctly that this is a debian/ubuntu package, is `list`. Otherwise it might be `mailman`. That should just produce a list of `mailman` subcommands. If that works, try ``` sudo -u xxx mailman -C /etc/mailman3/mailman.cfg info ``` and ``` sudo -u xxx mailman -C /etc/mailman3/mailman.cfg start ``` and see what they produce. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 3 months

Mailman-users search results for query "2021"