Search results for "2021" - Mailman-users

Re: Rebuilding a list index fails

by Mark Dadgar

On Feb 17, 2021, at 9:58 AM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 2/16/21 9:59 PM, Mark Dadgar wrote: >> Now that I’ve got my instance back up and running on the latest released code, I am trying to rebuild a list index. I am using Xapian via haystack, which worked beautifully before my recent list meltdown. >> >> Error messages below. >> >> rebuild_index fails with the same error. >> >> This is with django version 3.0.12. > > > django.utils.six was removed in Django 3.0. See > <https://pypi.org/project/django-utils-six/> for a work around > replacement. I.e. in your venv do > > pip install django-utils-six OK, that got me a step further. Then I needed to do a “pip install xapian-bindings” and now I am up and running. I really appreciate the support of this community in general and you in particular, Mark. Thank you. - Mark ----- mark(a)pdc-racing.net | 408-348-2878

4 years, 4 months

Re: Bug in 2.1.36?

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/12/21 3:47 PM, Joel Lord wrote: > On 11/12/2021 5:25 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> Thanks for the report. I think the issue is caused by the fix for >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1949403 and can occur when a >> list admin is trying to handle moderator requests on a list that has >> no moderator password. I'll investigate and try to put out another fix >> later today. >> > > Just realized I misread your statement. No, these lists don't have any > "moderators", so they don't have a moderator password set. Just admins, > doing both roles. > Yes, the issue occurs when logging in to the admindb with the admin or site password on a list with moderator requests and no moderator password set. It is fixed in Mailman 2.1.37 which I just released (announcement to follow). -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 7 months

Re: Lessons learned and a couple little gotcha for newbies

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/28/21 5:58 PM, William Oliver wrote: > On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 17:50 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> The recommended uwsgi.ini includes >> >> pythonpath = /etc/mailman3/ >> >> according to >> https://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Options.html?highlight=pythonpa… >> >> this should work. Did you have that? If you did and it doesn't work, >> perhaps adding >> >> env = PYTHONPATH=/etc/mailman3 >> > > Yes, I had the first, and does not work. The second entry works. I updated the doc to use env = PYTHONPATH=/etc/mailman3 I don't know enough about uwsgi to know for sure, but the issue may be that setting pythonpath in a running python process doesn't work - it's too late as the path is already set in python's initialization. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 6 months

Re: Hyperkitty messages stuck in spool

by Ruth Ivimey-Cook

There may be some benefit in exploring these notes on configuring the linux memory managers: https://gist.github.com/JPvRiel/bcc5b20aac0c9cce6eefa6b88c125e03 My thought in suggesting this is that if you can put some back pressure on the processes running, to indicate that memory is indeed at a premium, you may be able to extract more from the hardware you have. For example, use 'ulimit' to prevent specific processes seeing all the memory they would otherwise see. In any case, to address the last point Mark makes, I would suggest adding quite limited amount of swap - perhaps 200-300MB, rather than 1-2GB, for the same reason. You give the kernel somewhere to put things at need without giving it the scope to go crazy! Finally, I would suggest going through the installation and remove everything you can manage that's not critical to running the mailing list. For example, mysql often runs many threads with lots of buffers, and on my MM install its virtual memory size (number of bytes it theoretically could use) is just under 3GB. It's 'resident' size (the amount it's actually using now) is however just 139MB, with another 2.3GB shared (with other processes on the system -- think c-lib, tls etc). Tuning mysql to a smaller memory footprint would probably result in several hundred MB lower use. Similarly, the same VM is running 'snapd', which claims a virtual size of 1.2GB and a resident size of 32K; perhaps it's not necessary to run snapd permanently or even have it installed? It's also using 'lxcfs' the linux containers framework, which while using very little resident is still claiming 290MB virtual space. My point is that all these virtual allocations add up, and while the kernel will overcommit (to account for memory requested but never used) and it tries hard, it cannot know which things to prioritise. Making some of the choices for it can only help. -- FWIW, my mail server VM is set up with 4 virtual CPUs, 5GB RAM (of which about 1.7G is actively used and the rest is file block buffer, some of which will be for shared code files) and 4GB swap (of which it's using 260K). It's running a fairly default setup of mariadb, dovecot, mailman3, exim4, fail2ban, and spamassassin, and is quite stable. NB I don't run postorius or django on this server... they're elsewhere. I do recall adding more RAM a while back, having initially allocated 2GB, and at the same time adding the swap space; it looks from these numbers the swap isn't needed and I could if I wanted have just given it 3GB rather than 5GB RAM (but the server has 64GB and I'm not bothered!). HTH, Ruth On 19/11/2021 16:20, Mark Dadgar wrote: > On Nov 19, 2021, at 5:47 AM, Andrew Hodgson <andrew(a)hodgson.io> wrote: >> Thanks for this it was due to changing cloud providers. My old provider I installed Debian from an ISO file which created the swap partition but on the new provider I used their cloud image with no swap. Swap now created and everything is back to normal. Its running on an instance with 2GB of RAM and based on how I am seeing the usage running I would see this as an absolute minimum for a standard Mailman 3 stack. > > I had this same experience on Digital Ocean. The short-term fix was enabling swap and the long-term fix was upping my service level to something with more memory. Without swap, I don’t think 2GB is realistically sufficient to run a full mm3 instance. > > The cloud providers really don’t like you to run swap because it hammers their SSDs. > > - Mark > ----- > mark(a)pdc-racing.net | 408-348-2878 > > > -- > Software Manager & Engineer > Tel: 01223 414180 > Blog: http://www.ivimey.org/blog > LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/ruthivimeycook/

3 years, 7 months

Re: Django Internal Server Error on held_messages

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/24/22 04:02, Hasan Berkay Çağır via Mailman-users wrote: > Hello, > > We've been running a Mailman3 instance with Debian 10's official package: > > Mailman Core Version: GNU Mailman 3.2.1 (La Villa Strangiato) > Mailman Core API Version: 3.0 > Mailman Core Python Version: 3.7.3 (default, Jan 22 2021, 20:04:44) [GCC 8.3.0] > > For some reason, and only on some lists, when we try to see held messages on Postorius, we get an error message "An error occurred while processing your request." and the following error email: > > """ > Internal Server Error: /postorius/lists/list.example.com/held_messages As Andrew suggests, you will probably find exceptions with tracebacks in Mailman core's mailman.log. This is probably /var/log/mailman/mailman.log in the Debian package. If you find such and you can't determine the problem from them, post one here. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 3 months

Re: hyperkitty.views.mailman Could not archive the email with message-id '<snip>': A string literal cannot contain NUL (0x00) characters

by Gilles Filippini

Mark Sapiro a écrit le 11/03/2021 à 22:15 : > On 3/11/21 12:59 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have this error message repeating endlessly into the mailman-web logs. >> The related list is an open one on which we receive spam sometimes. I >> understand these emails can me malformed and cause this error. How to >> deal with them? They can't stay forever at the hyperkitty door. > > > The message is queued at `var/archives/hyperkitty/spool/`. The files in > that directory are Python pickles. You can examine them with the > `mailman qfile` command and delete the spam ones. Looking at the offending message with 'mailman qfile', it appears it is a legitimate one actually, sent from an Android phone. Couldn't hyperkitty be a bit less strict? _g.

4 years, 3 months

Re: Mailman, etc. upgrade woes and persistent bugs

by Abhilash Raj

On Sun, Feb 14, 2021, at 8:59 AM, Allan Hansen wrote: > Mark, > > Thank you for this reminder, but it’s not really sufficient for most. > The ‘Mailman Settings’ dialog does, indeed show the other preferences > tags, and yes, as you say, the dialog for ‘List-based preferences’ only > shows values that are not inherited and when you set a value there, it > shows. > > There a two problems with this: > > a. Once a value is overridden on the ‘List-based preferences’ dialog, > you cannot go back to it being inherited by removing the override. Yes! This is something we've known for a while and haven't been able to fix properly. https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/414 https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/195 There more than one open issue for this. And one of the reasons it hasn't been fixed yet is that it is larger problem than most low hanging fruits that gets fixed in the available time window for the us to work on issue. This is a long weekend for me, so I'll start some work on this, but not sure if that would be enough to finish. > b. You cannot see, on this dialog, what the inherited value is. https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/476 I opened an issue for this too, but this might be a little bit longer of a task because the whole inheritance and calculation of effective preference/setting happens in Core. It would require that Core expose the effective values. We do have some calculation of preferences in Postorius to display the "Global Mailman preferences" page for a User. > This is not user-friendly. > > May I suggest the following: > > That each option shows the following: > > o Value 1 > o Value 2 > (or the equivalent for pull-down menus) > > A box showing inheritance status: > [ ] Use inherited value from address-based preference: Value2 > > If the ‘Use inherited value’ is chosen, then the inherited value shows. > but the value radio buttons become non-selectable. It is a good idea, might need Javascript skills that I don't have ;-) I'll still try to take a stab at implementing such a view. > If not, then whatever value the value radio box has become the value > for the list, > > From what I see, the ‘Use inherited value’ is the default for new > lists/addresses. To change a value, the user would > uncheck this box, making the radio buttons selectable, and then set the > desired value. > > Yours, > > Allan > > > > On Feb 12, 2021, at 11:52 , Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > > >> I then looked at several of the disabled accounts, but the subscription info page in Postorius had no information about whether an account was enabled or disabled. Why is this not displayed???. The members can't see if their account is enabled. Is this another example of the disconnect between Mailman and Postorius? > > > > > > If the user has a Django account, she can see all that info at (e.g. for > > this list) <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/accounts/subscriptions/ <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/accounts/subscriptions/>> > > She gets there from `Mailman settings` in the dropdown under her user > > name. She can also get there via the `Manage Subscription` button on the > > list's Info page. That takes her to `List-based preferences` for the > > list. Any setting not selected there is inherited from the Address-based > > preferences or Global Mailman preferences > > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

4 years, 4 months

Re: Issues with cross posted emails after upgrading to mailman 3.3.6

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/7/21 5:19 PM, Simon Coggins wrote: > > > On 8 Nov 2021, at 11:11 am, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net<mailto:mark@msapiro.net>> wrote: > > I made a small change to defend against 'impossible' situations. See https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/merge_requests/933/diffs<https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/merge_requests/933/diffs> > > Thanks for the heads up. I did a bunch of testing with the original patch and was happy with it so we’re running that in prod now. How far off is 3.3.6? Just working out if I apply this slight change or wait for the full release. We don't have a specific release schedule. I think it could be several months before a 3.3.6 release. I don't think this change is critical. I was just considering 'what ifs' that actually shouldn't occur, but I suggest going ahead and applying the change. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 7 months

seems solved (was: Re: error changed after restart)

by Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7)

On 7/2/21 19:33, Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7) via Mailman-users wrote: > On 7/2/21 19:04, Abhilash Raj wrote: Well... I did reinstall all mailman relationed apps with a pip install --upgrade --force-reinstall --no-deps --no-cache-dir django-mailman3 mailman mailman-hyperkitty mailmanclient Restarted thee apache24 server... Aaaaaand closed de admin session and reopened it... (just for a "what if" sensation). I can not tell what have been the solution here, but now I can access the administrative pages and attend de pending subscriptions and discard retained messages. Thanks Abhilash and Mark for your support. >> >> On Sun, Feb 7, 2021, at 1:07 AM, Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7) via >> Mailman-users wrote: >>> On 6/2/21 21:19, Abhilash Raj wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 19:44, Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7) via >>>> Mailman-users <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> wrote: >>>>> On 6/2/21 18:08, Abhilash Raj wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2021, at 3:04 AM, Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7) >>>>> via >>>>> Mailman-users wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I restarted de server and the error changed. Now the log >>>>> shows "KeyError: 'subscription_mode'": >>>>> >>>>> Did you also restart Mailman Core after the upgrade? >>>>> >>>>> Yes, indeed: I stopped mailman core and all the processes related. >>>>> Did the upgrades. Started all again. Find the errors in the web user >>>>> interface. Stopped all again. Looked for errors in the log. Restarted >>>>> the complete server. Found the second error that this second mail is >>>>> about to. It happens when, in the main page that shows all the lists >>>>> you click to see one of them. It seems to me that it has been >>>>> database structure changes in django that the upgrade is not aware... >>>>> but it's a very long shot from my side. >>>> `subscription_mode` was added in Mailman Core 3.3.2 and it is actually >>>> a derived atrribute and not stored in Database. Mailman's API >>>> should be >>>> returning this attribute for each Member, but for some reason it seems >>>> to me like it isn't doing that even though do have Mailman 3.3.3 >>>> running >>>> like you said. >>>> If you have Curl installed, can you send me the output of: >>>> $ curl -u <user>:<pass> >>>> http://localhost:8001/3.1/members?count=5&page=1 >>> This is the output you asked for (it's the same you can see when you >>> try >>> to interact with one list): >>> >>> /usr/local/mailman3 # curl -u XXXXXX:XXXXXX >>> http://localhost:8001/3.1/members?count=5&page=1 >>> /usr/local/mailman3 # <html> >>> <head> >>> <title>Internal Server Error</title> >>> </head> >>> <body> >>> <h1><p>Internal Server Error</p></h1> >>> >>> </body> >>> </html> >>> >>> No log entry has been produced... >> This is weird, if you have working Core, then there should be *some* >> json returned >> from the above command. Do you have the Gunicorn running? > I have the uwsgi approach running... >> What is the >> output of `ps -ef | grep mailman`? > > none > > but if I do an ps ax | grep mailman it shows > > /usr/local/mailman3 # ps ax | grep mailman > 26803 - IsJ 0:00.87 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/master > --force -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/et > 26834 - SJ 0:07.57 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 26835 - IJ 0:05.84 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 26836 - SJ 0:07.16 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 26837 - SJ 0:08.74 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 26838 - SJ 0:03.16 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 26839 - SJ 0:07.07 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 26840 - SJ 0:08.12 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 26841 - SJ 0:09.07 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 26842 - SJ 0:07.45 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 26843 - IJ 0:00.95 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 26844 - SJ 0:07.27 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 26845 - SJ 0:07.69 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 26859 - IJ 0:01.01 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 26860 - IJ 0:05.75 /usr/local/bin/python3.7 /usr/local/bin/runner > -C /usr/local/mailman3/var/etc/mailma > 50153 - IsJ 0:00.16 /usr/local/bin/uwsgi --ini > /usr/local/mailman3/uwsgi.ini > 50481 2 S+J 0:00.00 grep mailman > 26808 1 SJ 0:02.09 /usr/local/bin/uwsgi --ini > /usr/local/mailman3/uwsgi.ini > 26832 1 IJ 0:00.00 /usr/local/bin/uwsgi --ini > /usr/local/mailman3/uwsgi.ini > >> Are you able to run `mailman members` command to list the members of >> a list? > > Yes. All the commands are working as expected. > >> Also, how did you actually install Mailman? > > Using pip. Here is a detailled post of how I did put all together: > > https://forums.FreeBSD.org/threads/mailman-3.61050/post-488128 > > Thanks for your support > >> >> Abhilash. >> >>> TIA. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> It should ideally return an output that looks something like shown >>>> here[1]. You >>>> can put the username/password of Core's API server in the above >>>> command. >>>> [1]: >>>> https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/rest/docs/… >>>> >>>> >>>> Abhilash >>>>> I'm using sqlite as django database and mysql for mailman. >>>>> >>>>> ERROR 2021-02-06 11:47:49,015 26798 django.request Internal >>>>> Server Error: >>>>> /mailman3/mailman3/lists/name_and_domain.of.the.list >>>>> Traceback (most recent call last): File >>>>> "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/base.py", >>>>> >>>>> line 119, in __getattr__ return self._get(name) File >>>>> "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/base.py", >>>>> >>>>> line 86, in _get raise KeyError(key) KeyError: >>>>> 'subscription_mode' During handling of the above exception, >>>>> another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call >>>>> last): File >>>>> "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/core/handlers/exception.py", >>>>> line 34, in inner response = get_response(request) >>>>> File >>>>> "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", >>>>> >>>>> line 115, in _get_response response = >>>>> self.process_exception_by_middleware(e, request) File >>>>> "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", >>>>> >>>>> line 113, in _get_response response = >>>>> wrapped_callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs) >>>>> File >>>>> "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/views/generic/base.py", >>>>> >>>>> line 71, in view return self.dispatch(request, *args, >>>>> **kwargs) File >>>>> "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/postorius/views/generic.py", >>>>> line 74, in dispatch return super(MailingListView, >>>>> self).dispatch(request, *args, **kwargs) File >>>>> "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/views/generic/base.py", >>>>> >>>>> line 97, in dispatch return handler(request, *args, >>>>> **kwargs) File >>>>> "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/postorius/views/list.py", >>>>> line 295, in get member.subscription_mode == File >>>>> "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/base.py", >>>>> >>>>> line 124, in __getattr__ self.__class__.__name__, name)) >>>>> AttributeError: 'Member' object has no attribute >>>>> 'subscription_mode' *********************** some info about >>>>> the installed versions via pip list: pip list | grep django >>>>> django-allauth 0.44.0 >>>>> django-appconf 1.0.4 >>>>> django-compressor 2.4 >>>>> django-extensions 3.1.0 >>>>> django-gravatar2 1.4.4 >>>>> django-haystack 3.0 >>>>> django-mailman3 1.3.5 >>>>> django-picklefield 3.0.1 >>>>> django-q 1.3.4 >>>>> djangorestframework 3.12.2 pip list | grep mailman >>>>> django-mailman3 1.3.5 >>>>> mailman 3.3.3 >>>>> mailman-hyperkitty 1.1.0 >>>>> mailmanclient 3.3.2 pip list | grep >>>>> postorius >>>>> postorius 1.3.4 On 6/2/21 11:12, >>>>> Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7) via Mailman-users wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I've just upgrade mailman 3 installation following Mr. >>>>> Sapiro advice: did a pip install --upgrade >>>>> django-mailman3 hyperkitty mailman mailmanclient >>>>> mailman-hyperkitty postorius I did a "python3 manage.py >>>>> migrate" after, too. And all seemed to run well. All the >>>>> lists showed in postorius via web, but when I try to >>>>> accesss into one of them the browser shows an error. In >>>>> the log you can see: *-*-*-*-*-*-* Traceback (most >>>>> recent >>>>> call last): File >>>>> "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/base.py", >>>>> >>>>> line 119, in __getattr__ return self._get(name) >>>>> File >>>>> "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/base.py", >>>>> >>>>> line 86, in _get raise KeyError(key) KeyError: >>>>> 'get_requests_count' .. (And after all the traceback >>>>> lines) AttributeError: 'MailingList' object has no >>>>> attribute 'get_requests_count' *-*-*-*-*-*-*-* The lists >>>>> seem to be distributing messeages well.. but I cannot >>>>> acces via web administration (django/postorius) Can >>>>> anyone point me in the right direction to solve this, >>>>> please? _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >>>>> <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> To unsubscribe send >>>>> an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >>>>> <mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> >>>>> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >>>>> <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3org/> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mailman-users >>>>> mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >>>>> <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> To unsubscribe send an >>>>> email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >>>>> <mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> >>>>> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >>>>> <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3org/> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing >>>>> list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >>>>> <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> To unsubscribe send an email to >>>>> mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >>>>> <mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> >>>>> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >>>>> <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3org/> >>>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >>> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >>> > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >

4 years, 4 months

Re: Trying to set up mailman3 on my mail server

by Mark Dadgar

On Oct 14, 2021, at 7:51 PM, Shawn Heisey <mailman(a)elyograg.org> wrote: > I'm having a lot of trouble with trying to set up mailman3 on my mail server. > > It's on an AWS instance, running Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. All software is installed from Ubuntu packages. Mailman version is 3.2.2. I REALLY encourage you not to install via the Ubuntu packages. A number of us here have done so and it always ends in tears. I ended up paying someone to re-install for me via pip so I had a clean baseline to admin from going forward. Seriously, the packages are an outdated mess and you end up with a somewhat non-standard install, which makes it harder for this community to help you out. Save yourself a lot of trouble and start over now before you have actual lists running. Use the docker images or install via pip. You really want to save yourself this grief. Ask me how I know. - Mark ----- mark(a)pdc-racing.net | 408-348-2878

3 years, 8 months

Mailman-users search results for query "2021"