Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: Changes in Django admin interface are not syncing to postorius gui /database

by Odhiambo Washington

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 3:17 PM Ulf R. <ulf.rapphahn(a)offis.de> wrote: > Thank you (also for Odhiambo) > Now remains one question: We have a (internal) Active Directory (AD) > Authentication for Mailman3. > So everyone who wants to work as an owner nor moderator must be an AD-User. > In hyperkitty I am able to assign these list rights directly to > AD-Loginnames. > With the logic above I have to assign these rights in postorius too by > assining the mail address of the users AD-Account? (I see no AD-Data here). > Or would it works to assing the mail address of the users AD-Account first > an then the allocation will automaticly synced to hyperkitty - maybe using > the mail address as key? > What would be the best practice for owner/moderator user management? > Thank you! > Hi, TBH, I am clueless about MM3 integration with LDAP/AD. Google leads me to a feature request: https://gitlab.com/mailman/django-mailman3/-/issues/27 But the Devs have the final say on the available possibilities. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

2 years

Re: Postorius permissions granularity

by Liam Reilly

Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 12:07 PM Liam Reilly <l.reilly(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote: > > The issue is we don't want first line support staff to have superuser > > permissions, just the ability to assist end user list owners by being able > > to administer all lists. So something that is lower level than full > > superuser would be ideal. > > I'm considering a cron job that adds a web account as Owner to all lists > > but this feels like a bit of a bodge. > > I see. The permissions that can be granted in relation to Postorius are > quite limited. > PS: Is it possible that you could retain content that comes in the form of > responses to your posts, so the hierarchy is maintained? You seem to be > deleting everything, which make your post look like a new one, except for > the subject. > -- > Best regards, > Odhiambo WASHINGTON, > Nairobi,KE > +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 > In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. > "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) > [How to ask smart questions: > http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html] Apologies, I have been using the "Reply" button in the UI and have not been quoting the post I'm replying to. Does it look better now?

11 months

Re: re-sending confirmation mails (was Re: Re: pending subscriptions lost?)

by IEM Network Operation Center (IOhannes m zmölnig)

thanks again, Mark, for your detailed answer. On 3/15/22 17:21, Mark Sapiro wrote: > See https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/901 > > You can add something like > ``` > Alternatively, you can confirm by going to the URL > > https://$domain/mailman3/lists/$list_id/confirm/?token=$token > ``` hmm. the list-url (e.g. where you can subscribe to the list) for my instance looks like https://$domain/postorius/lists/$list_id/ (that is: it spells "postorius" rather than "mailman3"). so i guess the URL should be https://$domain/postorius/lists/$list_id/confirm/?token=$token, which unfortunately returns 404. also, my postorius/urls.py does not contain an url-pattern for "confirm", unlike the current one as found on <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/blob/master/src/postorius/urls.py#L83> so i guess this was not possible yet with postorius 1.2.4 > to the list:user:action:subscribe template. Note that `$domain` may not > be appropriate here because it is the email domain which may not be the > web domain. > >> also: the confirmation mail says that the subject must be kept intact. >> however, i noticed that the actual "From" address of the confirmation >> mail already contains the token. > > The current template > https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/master/src/mailman/templates/en/l… > doesn't say that. yes. the *current* template. but not the template that came with mailman3 3.2.1 > >> finally: what else is required to approve the confirmation? will the >> sender's email-address be taken into account? (e.g. if they subscribed >> "foo+mylist(a)example.com" but send the confirmation-reply from >> "foo(a)example.com", will that still work? > > > Yes. Only the token is required. > cool thanks. together with the not-yet-expired tokens, i think i can create some ad-hoc web-service that translates URLs to confirmation replies. mfd IOhannes

4 years, 7 months

KeyError: 'get_requests_count' after an upgrade

by Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7)

I've just upgrade mailman 3 installation following Mr. Sapiro advice: did a pip install --upgrade django-mailman3 hyperkitty mailman mailmanclient mailman-hyperkitty postorius I did a "python3 manage.py migrate" after, too. And all seemed to run well. All the lists showed in postorius via web, but when I try to accesss into one of them the browser shows an error. In the log you can see: *-*-*-*-*-*-* Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/base.py", line 119, in __getattr__ return self._get(name) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/base.py", line 86, in _get raise KeyError(key) KeyError: 'get_requests_count' ... (And after all the traceback lines) AttributeError: 'MailingList' object has no attribute 'get_requests_count' *-*-*-*-*-*-*-* The lists seem to be distributing messeages well.. but I cannot acces via web administration (django/postorius) Can anyone point me in the right direction to solve this, please?

5 years, 9 months

Re: Incorrect error log message in OutgoingRunner._dispose()

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/26/26 10:42 AM, Craig Leres wrote: > On 4/26/26 06:52, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> Did you by chance run import21 as root or another non-mailman user >> resulting in template files unreadable by Mailman? > > Yes and no. I ran it as a user in group mailman; the template files are > owned by the user but are group mailman read/write... Then those templates in Mailman's var/templates/LIST-ID/LC/ should be used for the list for that language as long as they are readable and not overridden by a Postorius template or other URI for the list in the template table in the database. Was there anything in mailman.log prior to your defining a Postorius template indicating why they weren't used? >>> Apr 25 12:32:22 2026 (82977) Cannot connect to SMTP server >>> 127.0.0.1 on port 25 >> >> This is a well known issue. See <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/ >> work_items/582> and related issues referenced therein. > ... > What really bothers me about the error message is that it's reporting a > SMTP connection failure when what really happened was a HTTP connection > failure. That is all part of the above referenced issues. It is a bug and should be fixed but hasn't been yet. It is caused by the low level socket error upon trying to fetch the template, ultimately being caught by the try/except in outgoing runner's sending of the message. >>> I'm using the default webservice port (8001) so I would not expect >>> anything to ever be listening on 8000. >> >> The default web service port (Postorius and HyperKitty) is 8000. Port >> 8001 is Mailman core's rest api. > > Ah. I never noticed anything telling me the apache config needed to also > listen on 8000. It's also confusing to me to call the rest api port the > "web service port" (Also, I'm not running hyperkitty.) Apache doesn't listen on port 8000. The WSGI server (uWsgi or Gunicorn or ...) listens on port 8000 and Apache listens on ports 80 and 443 as normal and proxies the mailman requests to port 8000. > Ok, I added apache config to handle 127:0.0.1:8000 and that solves the > "SMTP" (HTTP) connection error and cpu bound runner. I don't know what you did, but see <https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#apache-configur…> for how Apache should proxy to port 8000. > I still can't get templates to work but I'll debug further and ask for > help later if I still can't get it to work. Do you have a WSGI server running and listening on port 8000? See <https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#setting-up-a-ws…>. You need this for Postorius as Postorius is a Django project and Django is a WSGI application. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 months, 2 weeks

Re: What's the difference between (purpose of) reject and ignore

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/23/22 12:37, denis.bitouze(a)univ-littoral.fr wrote: > Hi, > > at a page of the form .../postorius/lists/mylist/held_messages, it is > possible to: > > - Accept > - Reject > - Ignore What is the Postorius version and is it installed from source, pip or as package and if as package, what package? The choices should be Accept, Reject and Discard. There should be no Ignore choice, but I'm guessing you see them in French where the translation of Discard is Ignorer. See https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/blob/master/src/postorius/locale/fr/…. The difference between Reject and Discard is Reject notifies the sender of the rejection whereas Discard just discards the message without notification. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 4 months

Re: How can administrator sign people up to a list?

by worik

Sorry about the noise. Found it. It is on the page for the list, a ,menu option at the top of the page. Thanks Worik On 11/02/19 2:28 PM, worik wrote: > On 11/02/19 2:25 PM, Mike wrote: >> Sign into Postorius and go to "Mass Operations" - >> "Mass Subscribe". >> >> >> >> On 2/10/2019 7:13 PM, worik wrote: >>> As a list administrator, how do I add a group of email addresses to a >>> list? > > I cannot see that option. > > When I click on the Postorius logo I get to postorius/lists/?all-lists > > Worik > -- If not me then who? If not now then when? If not here then where? So, here I stand, I can do no other root(a)worik.org 021-1680650, (03) 4821804 Aotearoa (New Zealand)

7 years, 9 months

Re: Separating Lists by Domain

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/1/20 9:59 AM, Sven Seeberg via Mailman-users wrote: > >> Is it possible to have only the lists to show that are part of the >> domain being used to access? This is the setting FILTER_VHOST = True. It causes problems in Postorius and doesn't work well in HyperKitty. See <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/394> and <https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/-/issues/254>. Both these issues are fixed for the next releases of Postorius and HyperKitty which should be out later this month. > On > top of that another question: is it possible to add user accounts that > can manage lists for one domain but not other domains? We already have the concept of domain owner, but implementation of domain owner permissions is not yet done. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 6 months

Re: Multiple domain problem

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/10/23 01:43, Lars Bjørndal wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:05:09PM -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> On 2/9/23 13:21, Lars Bjørndal wrote: >>> >>> If I connect to example2.com, the title is example2.com, without the >>> preceding List index. And the body says Page not found. >> >> >> What's in the browser's address bar for that page? > > It's https://example2.com/mailman3/lists/ And when you get the Page not found, is it a browser 404 error or a Postorius error page? > >> What's in Postorius domains view? > > I realized that I have to change SIT_ID to 1 to be able to connect to http://localhost:8000/. Then, when checking Domains, I have both domains with different SIT_ID value (1 and 2). Why are you going to http://localhost:8000/? You should be able to see the domain's view at https://example1.com/mailman3/domains/ or https://example1.com/mailman3/domains/ or by just clicking Domains in Postorius top nav bar. > Going to http://localhost:8000/admin and choosing Sites, I have both domains listed. Again you should be able to go to https://example1.com/admin or https://example2.com/admin. If these don't work, you need to add directives in your web server to proxy them to http://localhost:8000/admin -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 9 months

Re: Residual signature?

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/28/26 06:57, Paul Tomblin via Mailman-users wrote: > > But anyway, I had no idea those templates were there, so I'll have to file that away in my memory for next time I wonder why lists have footers that don't show up in the UI. Am I right in thinking that a UI configured template will override the ones in that directory tree? That is correct. Creating a template in Postorius will put an entry for that template in the template table in the database with a URI pointing to Postorius and that is where Mailman core will go to find that template. However, it you delete that template from Postorius, that will remove the entry from the template table, and absent that, Mailman core will fall back to default search rules. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 months, 2 weeks

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"