Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: 12/24 hour clock ?

by Per Jessen

Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 11/28/20 7:18 AM, Per Jessen wrote: >> Hi all >> >> at openSUSE we have recently migrated to mailman3, and we seem to be >> having a couple of teething issues: >> >> a) hyperkitty and postorius both seem to insist on using a 12 hour >> clock format, no matter what the user has set. Is there a way of >> changing it system-wide ? > > > This is a Django setting. Try > > TIME_FORMAT = 'H' > > in settings_local.py. See > https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.1/ref/settings/#time-format and >https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.1/ref/templates/builtins/#std:templatef… Thanks, will have a look. >> b) overriding the default set of footers - despite having set the >> template "list:member:regular:footer" to empty for a specific list, I >> am still getting the default footers attached. > > > How did you set the template to empty? I edited it in list settings under Templates, at first really just leaving it empty, then actually writing "empty" :-) > it works for me in Postorius from the HEAD of the gitlab branch and > should work with any Postorius >= 1.3.0 > > Note that when you set a template in Postorius, it sets the URI in > Mailman core for that template to > https://<HOST>/<PATH>/api/templates/list/<LIST-ID>/<TEMPLATE-NAME> > where the https://<HOST>/<PATH> part is the Django setting for > POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL. Is that URI accessible from the Mailman > core host machine? I'll have to check, I only do the list admin, I don't maintain the installation. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (2.2°C) Member, openSUSE Heroes

4 years, 7 months

Re: Apache+mod_wsgi issue

by Odhiambo Washington

On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 3:47 PM Stephen J. Turnbull < stephenjturnbull(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Mark Sapiro writes: > > > You don't need all of those. ^postorius/ and ^mailman3/ are two > > different ways to access Postorius, and ^hyperkitty/ and ^archives/ are > > two different ways to access HypereKitty. You only need one of each, > > That's true from "outside", but there are internal links as well. For > example, in Postorius top page, the link to HyperKitty is .../archives. > I guess it's a good idea to grep the templates to see which URLS are > used. > > > > Now my question is about what could be adding the /mailman3. Is it > possible > > > that I installed something out of the ordinary? > > Besides mod_wsgi as Mark suggests and the uwsgi configuration, the > only thing I can think of is an Apache rewrite rule. It's not in the > Postorius and HyperKitty templates. > And I do not have any rewrite rules in my VHOST config: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/9MRMJST9zZ/ -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-)

2 years, 7 months

Re: Postorius performance with over 1000 pending users

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/8/19 9:13 AM, Nick W wrote: > I've got a couple things I need help with: The Symptom and The Problem. > > The Symptom: > > Postorius has gotten quite slow to load, taking more than 30s to load the > Subscription Requests tab. Having zero pending subscription requests (I'm on > v1.2.5), I started investigating unconfirmed subscriptions. > > I followed the commands from here[1] and got this: > > mailman shell -l your.list.id > util = getUtility(IPendings) > print(len(list(util.find(mlist=m,pend_type='subscription')))) > 1816 > > Wow, 1816 pending subscription requests. I can say for certain that my list is > not popular so these requests must have been submitted by bots. Let's get there > in The Problem. > > How can I "purge" this list? I'm willing to assume that none of these requests > are valid and would reject all unconfirmed user requests. mailman shell -l your.list.id util = getUtility(IPendings) for token, data in util.find(mlist=m, pend_type='subscription'): util.confirm(token, expunge=True) -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 1 month

Re: Moderate mails from owner

by Malcolm Austen

On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:27:01 -0000, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 3/21/19 3:02 AM, Malcolm Austen wrote: >> >> My only experience of MM3 is with Ancestry's 'RootsWeb' installation. >> From the emails I can see a header "X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.0" but I >> can't find anything to identify Postorius which is the only interface I >> have to the system. > > Isn't there a footer at the bottom of wach page with something like: > Postorius Documentation • GNU Mailman • Postorius Version 1.2.5 Unfortunately not Mark, Ancestry/RootsWeb have a history of tailoring Mailman heavily - and then deciding they don't have the resources to update to a new version :-( All there is on <https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/> is: RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community. Learn more. About Us | Contact Us | Rootsweb Blog | Copyright © 1997-2018 Ancestry | Corporate Information | Privacy | Terms and Conditions >> From symptoms seen and described by others, I have deduced that the >> Postorius admin-per-user moderation options of "Default processing" and >> "List default" mean that a user may be set (by default on the rootsweb >> system!) to use the system default moderation settings rather than the >> list default settings. > > New (non-)members always have Moderation set to List default. This means > their posts are governed by the applicable Settings -> Message > Acceptance settings. I suspect that everyone on the rootsweb system was mistakenly set to 'Default processing' when they were bulk-imported from Mailman2. > Setting a user's Moderation to Default Processing means that users posts > will not be held/rejected/discarded/accepted immediately based on > "Default action to take when a (non-)member posts to the list", but > additional checks will not be bypassed. See > <https://mailman.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/mailman/rules/docs/rules.html>. I will read that, and whatever else I can. >> Are my deductions correct? And if so, could this be the explanation of >> the issue detailed in this thread? > > Setting a user's Moderation to Default Processing (or Accept) would > bypass the list defaults and could be the explanation of this issue. > > When the non-member owner first posts to the list that address becomes a > non-member of the list. I.e. it is in the roster of known non-members of > the list and that non-member record could have had its Moderation set to > Accept or Default Processing at some point which would explain why the > posts are accepted. Thanks for the explanation and link, Malcolm. -- Malcolm Austen <malcolm.austen(a)weald.org.uk>

6 years, 4 months

Re: hidden list is hidden even to the owner

by Mohsen Masoudfar

As always: Thanks a lot! To answer your question, I am running 1.1.2-3 # apt search postorius python-django-postorius/bionic,now 1.1.2-3 all [installed,automatic] Web user interface to access GNU Mailman3 This is after a long fight with AWS and Redhat versions, I ended up installing the mailman3-full package on Ubuntu18. Installation was straight forward and easy, but it seems it is not easily possible to update/upgrade Postorius alone in this configuration, is it? Thanks Mohsen -----Original Message----- From: Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 5:43 PM To: mailman-users(a)mailman3.org Subject: [MM3-users] Re: hidden list is hidden even to the owner [EXTERNAL EMAIL] On 7/1/20 2:05 PM, Abhilash Raj wrote: > > Which version of Postorius are you running? > > Newer version shows all the lists you are related to by default when you are logged-in. So, the ones you own, moderate, subscribe to. That's correct, but it's tricky. If as an owner of an unadvertised list, you go to a URL like https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.examp… you will see the unadvertised list(s) that you own as well as any that you are a member or moderator of. Likewise you will see the unadvertised list(s) you own at https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.examp… and if you are a member as well as owner of an unadvertised list, you will see it at https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.examp…. But (here's the tricky part) if you go to https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.examp…, you will not see any unadvertised lists, not even ones you own. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai…

5 years

Timeout in Postorius when trying to approve or reject moderated messages

by Sebastian Hagedorn

Hi, I just set up a new Mailman 3 Suite installation (GNU Mailman 3.3.1 (Tom Sawyer)) on CentOS 7 using the virtualenv installation guide: https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html I encountered a few issues, but I was able to resolve all of them, I think. All three components of the suite are up and running. The backend is a MariaDB database, the frontend is Apache with mod_wsgi. I can send messages to the server, and they are delivered to list members. One thing that I can't figure out is why I can't approve or reject messages that are held for moderation. In case it matters, I'm trying to moderate the list using the "root" account. Discarding works, but when I try to either accept or reject a message, there is a timeout. I can't find anything in mailman.log, mailmansuite.log or even /var/log/httpd/access_log. I managed to reject and approve messages manually using mailmanclient and the REST API, so the issue appears to be somewhere between Postorius 1.3.3 and mailmancore. Any ideas? -- .:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:. .:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:. .:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-470-89578.:.

4 years, 10 months

Re: mm3 installation question

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/6/24 1:33 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:13 PM Stephen J. Turnbull < > turnbull.stephen.fw(a)u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote: > >> Odhiambo Washington writes: >> >> > The odd thing is that the HOWTO that he followed never involves the >> > manipulation of any urls.py at all - it's not even mentioned at any >> > point. So obviously the issue is caused by something else and I >> > suspect something within Apache needs to be re-evaluated in the >> > guide. The HOWTO installs mailman-web which contains a urls.py. >> >> Note that Apache doesn't know about the "/postorius" and "/hyperkitty" >> URI paths. It is quite unclear to me how this works at all with >> either the >> >> path('mailman3/', include('postorius.urls')), >> path('archives/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), >> path('postorius/', include('postorius.urls')), >> path('hyperkitty/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), >> >> version of urls.py or the reverse order version >> >> path('postorius/', include('postorius.urls')), >> path('hyperkitty/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), >> path('mailman3/', include('postorius.urls')), >> path('archives/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), This is an issue with Django. I'm not sure of the exact mechanism, but consider the first of the above two sets. If you go to the mailman3/ URL that gets redirected to the postorius/ URL. I.e. two paths that ultimately reference the same thing wind up considering the second path as the canonical path and redirecting the first path to the second. I was not initially aware of this when I added the postorius/ and hyperkitty/ paths to mailman_web/urls.py. I did this with the intent of making either set of paths work, and I added those paths after the mailman3/ and archives/ paths, and this version got released as mailman-web 0.0.8. That caused the recommended Apache config to fail because now the mailman3/ and archives/ paths were redirected to the postorius/ and hyperkitty/ URLs which are not in the recommended Apache config. I have since reordered the paths in mailman_web/urls.py, but that version isn't yet released. Thus the issue. See https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… for some background. > My thinking then is that the documentation at > https://docs.list.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#apache-configuration > needs to be fixed by adding the missing bits, What needs to be done is a mailmab-web 0.0.9 release in PyPI. This will fix the issue. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 4 months

Docker Support Sucks

by Brian Carpenter

Ok, now that I got that out of the way. Maybe I can get some help here for a Docker Installation of Mailman 3. I updated a Maxking's Docker installation to Postorius 1.3.3. It made my client's list unusable to a continual stream of removals due to ghost bounce processes. So, I want to totally move away from the use of Docker (mainly because I have found it buggy and the support is simply lacking) and install Mailman 3 for this client from source. However I need to get an export of their list members. But of course, I can't. Rest API times out and I don't know how to apply the instructions I was given to fix it and I don't have days to way for one. So please help. I increased the gunicorn workers to 4, hoping that would allow me to do the CSV export. No. So was given these instructions: ### The issues seems to be due to timeout not due to high load. You want to increase the timeout for gunicorn and you can do that by specifying a gunicorn.ini config file: [webservice] configuration: /path/to/gunicorn.cfg and then in the gunicorn.cfg you can add [gunicorn] timeout = 90 graceful_timeout = 30 ### I applied the above changes to /opt/mailman/core/mailman-extra.cfg and created the gunicorn.cfg file. Restarted the docker container (mailman-core) and no access to Postorius due to no REST api. After restarting docker-mailman, I can't access Postorius due to the following error: ERROR 2020-07-20 20:16:27,351 15 postorius Mailman REST API not available Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/urllib3/connection.py", line 160, in _new_conn (self._dns_host, self.port), self.timeout, **extra_kw File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/urllib3/util/connection.py", line 84, in create_connection raise err File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/urllib3/util/connection.py", line 74, in create_connection sock.connect(sa) ConnectionRefusedError: [Errno 111] Connection refused During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 677, in urlopen chunked=chunked, File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 392, in _make_request conn.request(method, url, **httplib_request_kw) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/http/client.py", line 1254, in request self._send_request(method, url, body, headers, encode_chunked) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/http/client.py", line 1300, in _send_request self.endheaders(body, encode_chunked=encode_chunked) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/http/client.py", line 1249, in endheaders self._send_output(message_body, encode_chunked=encode_chunked) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/http/client.py", line 1036, in _send_output self.send(msg) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/http/client.py", line 974, in send self.connect() File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/urllib3/connection.py", line 187, in connect conn = self._new_conn() File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/urllib3/connection.py", line 172, in _new_conn self, "Failed to establish a new connection: %s" % e urllib3.exceptions.NewConnectionError: <urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object at 0x7f96340a2e10>: Failed to establish a new con$ During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/requests/adapters.py", line 449, in send timeout=timeout File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 725, in urlopen Commenting out "configuration: /opt/mailman/gunicorn.cfg" brings Postorius back up. I am really frustrated here. All I want to do is export a 3000 member list and I can't. Updating Mailman 3 using new Docker images shouldn't break a stable installation either. Please help. Brian

5 years

Another set of new releases

by Abhilash Raj

Hi Everyone, Hope everyone had a great weekend! I am pleased to announce new set of releases: - Postorius 1.3.2 - Django-mailman3 1.3.2 - Hyperkitty 1.3.2 This release was required as it turned out 1.3.1 releases did not includes translations in the tarballs that I created and uploaded to PyPI. They do include a couple of bugfixes and more translations. - Hyperkitty (https://hyperkitty.readthedocs.io/en/latest/news.html#id1) - Postorius (https://postorius.readthedocs.io/en/latest/news.html#id1) All three of these releases also officially drop support for Django 1.11. Although, there hasn't been any code change that breaks compatibility with 1.11. It has just been dropped form our CI machinery since our dependencies no longer support 1.11. All the releases are available on PyPI, as usual! -- Thanks Abhilash Raj

5 years, 6 months

Approve an email

by Lars Bjørndal

Hi, list! I'm on Fedora 36 with the packages mailman3-3.3.4-6.fc36.noarch and postorius-1.3.6-2.fc36.noarch installed. with the command sudo -u mailman mailman3 create <listname> I was able to create a list. I'm not able to find out how to setup and configure the postorius package. There's no mailman-web command. Hyperkitty will not installed du to a dependency conflict, but I dont need archiving for the list. Here comes my quesitons: - What's the easiest way to approve an email sent to the list? - How can I configure the list to accept messages also from non members? - How can I setup postorius to work on Fedora? I have django-admin, but I'm not sure where to go. Thanks in advance, Lars

2 years, 6 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"