Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: spanish localization

by Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7)

On 13/2/21 9:04, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Victoriano Giralt writes: > > > Thanks Stephen for reminding me that sometimes I write what looks like > > proper English on the surface, but the meaning of it comes from the > > deep corners of my mind in some long forgotten dialect :-) > > Your English is fine, it was just my lack of imagination: on February > 12, I couldn't conceive of February 3 being even a little "old"! But... here is a thing that I can not understand: If the source (the .po file) is from november 7th, it doesn't matter how many times you recompile it: the result will be the same. I did what Mark recommended. Before that: /usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailman/messages/es/LC_MESSAGES # ls -la total 192 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 8 12:00 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Feb 8 12:00 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 80700 Feb 3 02:47 mailman.mo -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 102963 Nov 7 01:50 mailman.po Then... /usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailman/messages/es/LC_MESSAGES # msgfmt -o mailman.mo mailman.po And that is: the same .mo file just with different date /usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mailman/messages/es/LC_MESSAGES # ls -la total 192 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 13 11:09 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Feb 13 11:09 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 80700 Feb 13 11:09 mailman.mo -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 102963 Nov 7 01:50 mailman.po I'm not trying to diminish the effort and the excelent work that are indeed making all of you. I appreciate that so much. But is evident to me that something fails in the translation path chain of upgrades. If you access the postorius web to manage subscriptions you can see a full mixed language words. It's not a life or death item... but it has not to be that way as the terms, as far as I know, are 100% translated (at least in spanish). And the subscriptors complain. If that is not a thing that the release manager can do, well... We are stucked, isn't it? I don think it has to be a matter of "automate production of pip'able packages containing only new translations": a new version has just released and the localization languages, at least spanish, were not merged into it for the last Weblate updates. I will wait untill the next update, this thread is closed to me. Thanks, again, for all your good work. > > More important, as long as the .mo file is more recent than the .po > file, that's the best the release manager can do. I haven't been > involved in the release process, so I can't swear to it personally, > but if Mark says that new translations generate a merge request > automatically, and we make sure that the translations are merged > before release, I believe him. That's optimal as far I am concerned. > > Perhaps some enterprising soul would be willing to automate production > of pip'able packages containing only new translations, but without > that, I don't see how to beat our current procedures. (I wouldn't > want to use such a thing, though, I'd be too afraid that one day all > the translations would be replaced with Dril tweets!) > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >

4 years, 8 months

Re: Turn off social logins?

by Torge Riedel

Am 12.02.19 um 17:11 schrieb Stephen J. Turnbull: > Note: I've changed the order of sentences from Torge's post to fit my > responses. > > Torge Riedel writes: > > > I do agree, same here on my side. Lot's of my users are very > > "sensitive" to social media and don't want see them here. > > This is the first I've heard of this. Obviously it's fairly > widespread; *please* speak up if anyone have similar issues that we > haven't addressed. AFAIK all of the currently active Mailman > developers believe that social auth is a GoodThang[tm], so we're > unlikely to DTRT as you see it without your help. Well most of my users are 60+ so social media is some kind of a thing from hell for them ;-) I don't want to blame it, but to ensure acceptance in my scenario it is required to hide them somehow. > > > I need to migrate from mailman2 to mailman3 and was wondering why > > social accounts are enabled by default > > By default Mailman 3 is social media: you have a profile, you can be > searched in the indicies of the archives, and so on. The large auth > providers provide more secure authentication, and a lot of convenience > for users who have such accounts already. They also take some > administrative burden off the list and site managers when people lose > their passwords and forget what their subscription address is, and > similar scenarios. Clearly, these are not universally-valued > features, but I think that they justify the current defaults. Yes, this was a bit unprecise. For my feeling it is better to enable one after another, but it is ok for me to do it the other way. > > > and are difficult to disable. > > They're easy enough to disable (easy to recognize and just add a hash > character in front), since you have to edit settings_local.py to > install anyway. If you're using a packaged version and the package > configuration utility doesn't handle it, there's nothing we can do > about it. The distro will have to deal with that. > > It should be better documented, I imagine (haven't checked yet). > > > I propose something like an additional setting listing the enabled > > social accounts. > > Do you mean in the Postorius administration interface? If so, do you > want it by-site, by-domain, or by-list? ("You" is everybody who wants > to disable social auth, not just Torge!) > > If you mean in settings_local.py, I suggested something similar > earlier. It's not obvious it would be easy to do (sometimes these > things are order-dependent, though that's bad practice). Having the configuration in the UI would be the best solution. So not everything needs to be done by me. A first approach is the mentioned setting, which can be set to an empty value to overwrite the default. Without the risk to break something else. Just to repeat. > > > And if the admin is setting this to an empty value in the > > settings_local.py everything is disabled > > Because the settings are a Python module, this is the way > settings_local.py works anyway. That's why Mark suggested editing > INSTALLED_APPS. > > Thanks so far for going into the discussion.

6 years, 8 months

Re: Confirm on mass subscription

by Mark Sapiro

On 7/5/17 1:48 PM, David Krantz wrote: > > Is there a way of requiring all mass subscribed users to confirm their > email adress? I have an use case where we have a current mail list but > when moving it to mailman I for different reasons would like to > confirm all subscribers. Some very shallow testing suggests that if I > just add them using mass subscribe, they will not have to confirm at > all. > > I have yet to upgrade to 3.1 but I will do so in due time. In MM 2.1, you just send the users invitations rather than subscribing them. In MM3/Postorius, this does not seem to be an option at present. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 years, 3 months

Problems after Upgrade

by Jeff

Hello, I tried to upgrade to the latest mailman3 version using the following command: pip install -U mailman postorius django-mailman3 hyperkitty mailman-web mailmanclient There didn’t appear to be any problems with this step and I’ve since run it again a few times and only see that the requirements have been satisfied. When first running the command: mailman-web migrate I received several errors dealing with search_text in the package compressor (at least that’s as best as I remember, I wasn’t taking notes). I fixed these manually by changing it to search_str. Eventually "mailman-web migrate” started working and has subsequently worked. When I run the command: mailman-web compress I get the following error: traceback (most recent call last): File "bin/mailman-web", line 8, in <module> sys.exit(main()) File "/usr/local/mailman3/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/mailman_web/manage.py", line 37, in main execute_from_command_line(sys.argv) File "/usr/local/mailman3/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 446, in execute_from_command_line utility.execute() File "/usr/local/mailman3/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 440, in execute self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv) File "/usr/local/mailman3/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 279, in fetch_command klass = load_command_class(app_name, subcommand) File "/usr/local/mailman3/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 49, in load_command_class return module.Command() File "/usr/local/mailman3/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 274, in __init__ raise TypeError("requires_system_checks must be a list or tuple.") TypeError: requires_system_checks must be a list or tuple. I have not been able to fix this and would appreciate any assistance. When I run the command: bin/mailman-web collectstatic It asks me yes or no continue and when I enter “yes” it displays the following which I assume means it worked: 372 static files copied to '/usr/local/mailman3/web/static', 38 unmodified Starting mailman3 seems to work by the status message shows the following: systemctl status -l mailman3 ... Oct 30 14:51:03 mailhost.steele.com mailman[3521451]: return function(args[0], config.db.store, *args[1:], **kws) Oct 30 14:51:03 mailhost.steele.com mailman[3521451]: File "/usr/local/mailman3/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/mailman/model/bounce.py", line 259, in send_warnings_and_remove Oct 30 14:51:03 mailhost.steele.com mailman[3521451]: self._send_warnings() Oct 30 14:51:03 mailhost.steele.com mailman[3521451]: File "/usr/local/mailman3/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/mailman/database/transaction.py", line 85, in wrapper Oct 30 14:51:03 mailhost.steele.com mailman[3521451]: return function(args[0], config.db.store, *args[1:], **kws) Oct 30 14:51:03 mailhost.steele.com mailman[3521451]: File "/usr/local/mailman3/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/mailman/model/bounce.py", line 310, in _send_warnings Oct 30 14:51:03 mailhost.steele.com mailman[3521451]: member.address, Oct 30 14:51:03 mailhost.steele.com mailman[3521451]: File "/usr/local/mailman3/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/mailman/model/member.py", line 121, in address Oct 30 14:51:03 mailhost.steele.com mailman[3521451]: return (self._user.preferred_address Oct 30 14:51:03 mailhost.steele.com mailman[3521451]: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'preferred_address' lines 13-35/35 (END) I have been receiving admin requests to approve messages. But, I can’t approve them because of the following issue: Starting mailman-web seems to work as expected with no errors. However, when I try to login to the web interface, I get a HTML page with the following error: init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'providing_args' Request Method: GET Request URL: http://lists.crestwood-dc.org/accounts/login/?next=/mailman3/lists/crestwoo… Django Version: 4.1.2 Exception Type: TypeError Exception Value: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'providing_args' Exception Location: /usr/local/mailman3/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/compressor/signals.py, line 4, in <module> Raised during: allauth.account.views.LoginView Python Executable: /usr/local/mailman3/bin/uwsgi Python Version: 3.8.13 As a result, I cannot login and approve posts. I would greatly appreciate any assistance with these issue. Thanks much!

3 years

Re: Exception with processing subscription confirmation email

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/29/21 7:56 AM, Eric Broens wrote: > Hi, > > A new user tried to subscribe to a mailinglist, received the confirmation > mail, and replied to it. > > The subscriber is however not subscribed and remains listed in the "pending > confirmation" list. > > The following exception appears in the error.log. > > Does anyone knows how to resolve this? In the past we didn't experience any > issues and no changes but security updates have been installed. > > Apr 29 16:15:55 2021 (1581) deque: do_confirm_verify > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File > "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/app/workflow.py", > line 69, in __next__ > > return step() > > File > "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/app/subscriptions.p > y", line 356, in _step_send_confirmation > > raise StopIteration > > StopIteration Tracebacks like the above are normal and probably shouldn't be logged at all. > Apr 29 16:16:28 2021 (1490) Uncaught runner exception: Expecting ':' > delimiter: line 1 column 256 (char 255) > > Apr 29 16:16:28 2021 (1490) Traceback (most recent call last): > > File > "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/core/runner.py", > line 173, in _one_iteration > > self._process_one_file(msg, msgdata) > > File > "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/core/runner.py", > line 266, in _process_one_file > > keepqueued = self._dispose(mlist, msg, msgdata) > > File > "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/runners/command.py" > , line 208, in _dispose > > mlist, msg, msgdata, parts, results) > > File > "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/commands/eml_confir > m.py", line 54, in process > > mlist).confirm(token) > > File > "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/app/subscriptions.p > y", line 578, in confirm > > workflow.restore() > > File > "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/app/workflow.py", > line 146, in restore > > data = json.loads(state.data) > > File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/json/__init__.py", line 354, in loads > > return _default_decoder.decode(s) > > File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/json/decoder.py", line 339, in decode > > obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end()) > > File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/json/decoder.py", line 355, in raw_decode > > obj, end = self.scan_once(s, idx) > > json.decoder.JSONDecodeError: Expecting ':' delimiter: line 1 column 256 > (char 255) > > Apr 29 16:16:28 2021 (1490) SHUNTING: > 1619705788.5856323+57a1a759275c59b732cfa8e2985f76cfcc27dda5 This one is the issue. There was some problem with the user's confirmation reply. View the shunted message with the command ``` mailman qfile path/to/var/queue/shunt/1619705788.5856323+57a1a759275c59b732cfa8e2985f76cfcc27dda5.pck ``` although that probably won't show anything wrong as it appears that the issue is with the saved workflow. You can get the token from the shunted message and then look at the database with something like ``` SELECT data FROM workflowstate WHERE token = '<the token>' ``` but I suspect the issue is because the database is MySQL or MariaDB, your Mailman core is older than 3.3.3 and your database server mode is such that data too long for column results in truncation, and the data in this case is truncated to 255 bytes. In Mailman 3.3.3, this column was changed from VARCHAR(255) to VARCHAR(510) for MySQL. As far as subscribing the user is concerned, you can in Postorius view the subscriptions waiting user confirmation and delete this one and then `mass subscribe` the user. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 6 months

Re: MM3 Docker

by Abhilash Raj

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019, at 5:52 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 03:29, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > > On 1/7/19 1:18 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 23:39, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > >> > > >> Please help me understand what steps are missing and I will try to > > >> provide the information. > > > > > > > > > Okay. > > > > > > At the installation stage, you say the following: > > > "I already had some things set up in /opt/mailman including a git > > > subdirectory containing clones of the GitLab mailman, mailmanclient, > > > mailman-hyperkitty, hyperkitty, django-mailman3 and > > > postorius projects. On the third server I have added mailman-suite > > > because I use the settings.py from that project as the basis for mine." > > > > > > Please assume that the reader is a newbie to python3 virtualenv and give > > the > > > details of the commands they need to execute to (a) clone all the > > projects > > > needed > > > and (b) create the virtualenv. > > > > > > The next steps are: > > > mkdir /opt/mailman/mm > > > > > > Then you say "I then created a /opt/mailman/mm directory and within that > > a > > > Python 3.6 virtualenv" > > > What happens here is something that needs clarification, because you are > > > specific about "python3.6". > > > I have googled and realized that one has to be specific about the python > > > version they want to use in their virtualenv > > > as shown here -> > > > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45293436/how-to-specify-python-version-… > > > > > > exact command to execute to create the /opt/mailman/mm/venv > > > exact command to execute to activate virtualenv > > > > > > I have added a comment to the page which I hope gives you what you want. > > > > I also added a section on templates instead of referring to a prior > > version of the page. > > > > That makes it better. > However, as a newbie, something is not yet clear: > > "When active in a particular shell, it can be deactivated with the command > > deactivate > or by exiting that shell." > > HI am trying to understand the effect of detaching from a venv. I am > assuming that a virtualenv is a container that is supposed to be always > active for the services within to be accessible. Is that right? So, how do > I ensure it's always running/up, or that does not matter as the scripts > which run the services will always refer to the files? virtualenv is not actually a container that is supposed to be active. It is merely a set of settings that are applied to your SHELL when you are in the virtual environment. It is not supposed to be always active, only when you actually want to run commands in that virtual environment. The services will keep on running after you deactivate your shell and would function like other normal services on your machine. -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

6 years, 9 months

Re: Message Sent to A Re-Created List Results In Error

by matthew＠alberti.us

I checked all over the mailman core logs and couldn't find a problem. But then I noticed that the 550 error was coming from dovecot-lmtp. I should rename this thread because the actual problem seems to be unrelated to re-created lists. It seems like the actual problem seems to occur in the following situation: * Using Postfix * Using Dovecot * /etc/postfix/virtual includes addresses with same domain as mailman lists. * An e-mail address subscribed to a mailman list is in the /etc/postfix/virtual file as an alias (possibly also if destination address for an alias). * (Possibly related) E-mail address is also one of the list owners. In that environment, Postfix seems to check only 'virtual_transport' list, which in my case is dovecot-lmtp, and when it doesn't find the mailman listname@domain entry in there, it sends a 550 user unknown. It seems to be that it isn't getting passed to 'transport_maps', which is mailman-lmtp. When I remove that one address (that is in /etc/postfix/virtual) from the list of subscribers, I'm able to post again. Interestingly enough, when I put it back in as a subscriber. I'm still able to post. So it seems unsubscribing and re-subscribing that address fixed it, or adding an additional list owner and deleting it fixed it, or some combination of those. I know this might be shaping up to be a very unlikely scenario. But basically the account is mine, an admin, doing testing before/after a deployment.. I'll try to create a few test procedures to document the method to reproduce the problem, and also hopefully fix it. If I can do that, I'll open another thread. This could also be a postfix config error of some kind, which is definitely possible if not likely. Thanks for reading. - Matt Alberti -----Original Message----- From: Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2020 11:42 PM To: matthew(a)alberti.us; Mailman users <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> Subject: [MM3-users] Re: Message Sent to A Re-Created List Results In Error On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, at 10:00 AM, matthew(a)alberti.us <mailto:matthew@alberti.us> wrote: > I created a list in the Postorius interface, used it, and then deleted > it. A week or so later, I re-created the list, and things were fine > thru the creation and subscription process. But when I sent a message > to the list, a > "550 user unknown" error was sent back. Can you share more error details from the Mailman logs? If 550 error response was sent, there must be some internal error traceback in the logs. > > > I tried to determine if this is a known issue by searching the issues > in Gitlab; but didn't find anything. But wanted to ask if this was a > known issue or not? I personally don't remember seeing such an issue, but Mark or others might know. > > > > Thanks. > > > > - Matt Alberti > > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> To > unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking) _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org <mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

4 years, 10 months

what process creates webui tables (mailmanweb db)?

by tflatley＠gmail.com

hello again, running a venv installation i think the tables in 2 databases (mailman/mailmanweb) were initially created by running mailman-web migrate - this wrapper is not available in a package install - so i think i need to run something like this after editing my settings.py file python3 manage.py migrate Operations to perform: Apply all migrations: account, admin, auth, contenttypes, django_mailman3, django_q, hyperkitty, postorius, sessions, sites, socialaccount Running migrations: No migrations to apply. Your models have changes that are not yet reflected in a migration, and so won't be applied. Run 'manage.py makemigrations' to make new migrations, and then re-run 'manage.py migrate' to apply them. i do see tables in the mailman db but mailmanweb is empty - is there a different flag i need to run to seed the mailmanweb db? Thanks

3 years, 1 month

Re: Re-enable member after bouce processed disable

by Henrik Rasmussen

Henrik Rasmussen wrote: > Recently I upgraded Mailman to GNU Mailman 3.3.4 (Tom Sawyer) (Postorius: 1.3.5 and HyperKitty: 1.3.4) which is now processing bounces. > When a member have been disabled due to bounces, how is the member re-enabled? I would guess it would be under the "Users -> Members -> Member options -> Delivery status", but theses are both (Enabled and disabled) unchecked, not indicating whether or not the member is either or. It seems that I was right, however, I need to re-enable all members on a single list who have been disabled due to bounces. Using the `mailman members` command it is possible to list such members, however how do I enable them using either the `mailman shell` command (available) og the mailmanclient (needs first to be installed in the docker container)? Regards, Henrik Rasmussen

3 years, 10 months

Mailman3 via Docker and NGINX

by brian＠emwd.com

I have Mailman3 installed on CentOS 7 using maxking's docker image. I believe the installation went fine and running "curl http://172.19.199.3:8000/postorius/lists/" produces the correct output. I also will be using exim and nginx with this installation. It seems I am stuck with the nginx setup. I created a sitename.com.conf file in the /etc/nginx/conf.d folder. I have the following inputted there: server { listen 80; server_name `sitename.com`; location /static/ { alias /opt/mailman/web/static/; } location / { include uwsgi_params; uwsgi_pass 172.19.199.3:8000; uwsgi_read_timeout 300; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $remote_addr; } } However when I go to http://sitename.com (obviously using an alias here for privacy reasons) I get the default nginx index page. Do I need to add anything to the main nginx.conf file to be able to see my mailman3 installation? Thank you for any assistance, Brian Carpenter

6 years, 10 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"