Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: Hyperkitty 403 Forbidden Error

by Abhilash Raj

On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, at 9:49 AM, Phil Thompson wrote: > On 07/08/2019 17:04, Abhilash Raj wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, at 8:41 AM, Phil Thompson wrote: > >> On 06/08/2019 09:48, Phil Thompson wrote: > >> > On 06/08/2019 03:38, Abhilash Raj wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019, at 10:06 AM, Phil Thompson wrote: > >> >>> I'm in the process of setting up mailman3. The only problem I seem to > >> >>> be > >> >>> having is getting Hyperkitty to archive messages. Rather than the > >> >>> authorisation problems people have previously asked about on the > >> >>> list, I > >> >>> am getting a 403 error... > >> >>> > >> >>> Aug 05 15:38:40 2019 (10229) HyperKitty failure on > >> >>> http://localhost/mailman3/hyperkitty/api/mailman/urls: > >> >>> <html><title>Forbidden</title><body> > >> >>> <h1>Access is forbidden</h1></body></html> (403) > >> >>> Aug 05 15:38:58 2019 (10222) HyperKitty failure on > >> >>> http://localhost/mailman3/hyperkitty/api/mailman/archive: > >> >>> <html><title>Forbidden</title><body> > >> >>> <h1>Access is forbidden</h1></body></html> (403) > >> >>> > >> >>> Any suggestions would be appreciated. > >> >> > >> >> How did you install Hyperkitty? > >> > > >> > On Ubuntu... > >> > > >> > apt-get install mailman3-full > >> > > >> >> You probably need to the set the API key correctly in both Core and > >> >> Hyperkitty. > >> >> > >> >> Have you looked at documentation here[1]? > >> >> > >> >> [1]: > >> >> https://hyperkitty.readthedocs.io/en/latest/install.html#connecting-to-mail… > >> >> > >> >> Note that the MAILMAN_ARCHIVER_KEY = "value" (this value should be in > >> >> quotes, single or double, doesn't matter) in your settings.py for Web > >> >> (Django) should be same as the `api_key : value` (without quotes here > >> >> in hyperkitty.cfg config file). > >> > > >> > That's all correct. I'm familiar with the authorisation issues that > >> > other people have had. > >> > > >> > The only thing I'm doing differently (as far as I am aware) is that > >> > I'm using a URL prefixed with /mailman3 which is stripped off in my > >> > nginx configuration... > >> > > >> > # mailman3. > >> > location /mailman3/ { > >> > uwsgi_pass unix:/run/mailman3/web/uwsgi.sock; > >> > include uwsgi_params; > >> > uwsgi_param SERVER_ADDR $server_addr; > >> > uwsgi_modifier1 30; > >> > uwsgi_param SCRIPT_NAME /mailman3; > >> > } > >> > > >> > location /mailman3/static { > >> > alias /var/lib/mailman3/web/static; > >> > } > >> > > >> > location /mailman3/static/favicon.ico { > >> > alias /var/lib/mailman3/web/static/postorius/img/favicon.ico; > >> > } > >> > > >> > ...but I don't see this affecting the mailman to Hyperkitty > >> > communication. Posting to lists and the Postorius and Hyperkitty > >> > frontends seem to work fine. > >> > >> I have now fixed the 403 error (by setting MAILMAN_ARCHIVER_FROM to my > >> public IP address). However I now get a 400 Bad Request error. > >> > >> I have traced this to the archive() function in > >> hyperkitty/views/mailman.py which is expect a POST but is actually > >> getting a GET, specifically... > >> > >> GET '/mailman3/hyperkitty/api/mailman/archive?key=...' > >> > >> ...which seems to be a fairly fundamental problem. > >> > >> Again, any suggestions would be welcome. > > > > It should be sending POST request to archive emails[1]. How did you > > grab the above request? Was it from logs? > > Yes, I added DEBUG=True in mailman-web.py and captured the HTML from > mailman.log. DEBUG=True doesn't print anything more useful around the 400 error response? > > > Do you have anything else in the logs? There should be something in > > the Mailman Core or web logs should have something. > > There's nothing useful in the core log. > > There are 3 preceding entries in the web log... > > GET /mailman3/hyperkitty/api/mailman/urls?mlist=...&key=... > GET /mailman3/hyperkitty/api/mailman/urls?mlist=...&msgid=...&key=... > GET /mailman3/hyperkitty/api/mailman/urls?mlist=...&msgid=...&key=... > > There is one item in the spool directory. > > These were all (apparently) successful. It seems odd that the last two > entries were identical. The only other thing that I can think of is, ALLOWED_HOSTS. What settings do you have in your ALLOWED_HOSTS in settings.py for Django? You need to have 'localhost' or whatever is the value of the "Host" in the "base_url" in your hyperkitty.cfg file in Mailman Core. I am not sure what is the default value in Ubuntu system. If you don't know, you can debug by adding a '*' in your ALLOWED_HOSTS and see if the problem goes away, this will bypass the Host header check. -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

6 years, 3 months

Re: Using REST with CLI using curl .... help needed

by kontakt＠michaelbakonyi.de

Hey everyone, I have the same usecase as Krešimir and tried the example of Mark. So in mailman.cfg I set hostname to "https://lists.mydomain.org" and then fire this command curl -urestadmin:mypw --referer https://lists.mydomain.org --request POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' --data-binary '{"list_id": "thelist.lists.mydomain.org", "subscriber": "user(a)example.net", "display_name": "Joe User", "pre_verified": true, "pre_confirmed": true, "pre_approved": true}' https://lists.mydomain.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/thelist.lists.mydomain.… But then I get a CSRF-warning. Do I now have to get the token and put it in my POST or is there an easier way to do this? cheers, Michael

3 years, 3 months

Re: Converting discussion list to read-only list (settings)

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/12/19 8:55 PM, Paul Arenson wrote: > I have found that my users in the discussion list are creating their own topics rather than using the existing ones, so decided to make it a read-only list and use WordPress moderated comments. Since I do not have the original settings for READ ONLY (this is a hosted version), I want to make sure that these are correct. Can someone comment. I'm guessing what you want and what you are saying First, I think you are saying your issue is that your users are using HyperKitty as a web forum and when replying to a message in an existing thread instead of using the 'reply' action on that message, they use the Start a new thread button. Is that really what you are saying? > MOST IMPORTANT—> What setting makes it a discussion list as opposed to read only? If by "read only" you mean the "Announce only mailing list style" as opposed to the "Ordinary discussion mailing list style" the only difference is that for the Announce only style the list attribute allow_list_posts is False and for the Discussion style, it's True. This is the setting in Postorius -> Settings -> Alter Messages -> Include the list post header an all it does is include or not include the List-Post: header in mail from the list. > ALTER MESSAGES > ----------------------- > Filter content Now YES > > Collapse Alternatives Now yes > > Convert html to plain text Now NO Above are not relevant. > Anonymous NOW YES Are you sure you want this. What it does is replace the From: address with the list posting address and removes all other headers that could aid in identifying the poster. It is intended for lists discussing things such as domestic abuse where people may want to be able to post anonymously. > Include RFC2369 headers Now Yes OK, but not relevant > Include the list post header Now Yes This is what the announce style will set to No. > Reply Goes to List Now No munging > > Pipeline Default > > > > DMARC MITIFGATIONS > ----------------------- > > Replace From with list address > > DMARC mitigate unconditionally Now NO > > > MESSAGE ACCEPTANCE > ----------------------- > > Require Explicit Destination Yes > > Administrivia YES The above are OK, but again not relevan to what I think you're asking. > > Default action to take when a member posts to the list Hold for moderation > > > Default action to take when a member posts to the list Hold for moderation Basically these two settings will hold all posts for moderator action, however if the user has a moderation setting other thgan list default, they won't apply. > OTHER? See the FAQ at <https://wiki.list.org/x/4030685>. This is written for Mailman 2.1 and older and some of the settings aren't relevant or exactly the same in Mailman 3, but it may help. On the other hand, if I'm not understanding what you want, please clarify. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 1 month

Re: Moderator e-mails only going out once a day

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/26/25 12:52 AM, jkoral(a)luc.edu wrote: > Mark, thank you for your reply. I did not mention it, but that is already set and we are still having an issue. Is there anything in the setting I can check? Also, I changed the name of the e-mail in the settings and restarted the mailman3 service. Does anything else need to be restarted? Assuming admin_immed_notify is True (Postorius Admin immed notify is Yes), the notice should be sent. Check Mailman's mailman.log and your MTA logs for clues. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 months

Re: Can't remove footer(s)

by Henrik Rasmussen

Mark Sapiro wrote: > The templates named list_member_digest_footer.txt and > list_member_regular_footer.txt (with underscores) were created by > import21 and set as the URIs for those templates. Had you just copied > /dev/null (or otherwise made empty) those files and done nothing else, > that would have done what you wanted, but since you deleted the template > URIs for the list, the template names are now the default How do I make these not default? > list:member:digest:footer.txt and list:member:regular:footer.txt names > (with colons) and those are the empty files you need to create. Or when I upgrade to V3.2.2 will I be able to just empty the templates in /postorius/lists/LISTNAME/templates? Henrik

7 years, 1 month

Re: Mailman3 without Hyperkitty in docker

by Abhilash Raj

Test email to check something, please ignore. Abhilash On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, at 5:19 PM, Abhilash Raj wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, at 10:18 PM, Danil Smirnov wrote: >> Hi Abhilash, >> >> Thank you very much - the previous error is fixed now. >> >> But I have another one now, which causes the same 500 Server Error: >> >> bash-4.3# cat /opt/mailman-web-data/logs/uwsgi-error.log >> *** Starting uWSGI 2.0.18 (64bit) on [Fri Mar 1 05:42:09 2019] *** >> compiled with version: 6.3.0 on 01 March 2019 01:52:42 >> os: Linux-3.10.0-693.11.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 4 23:52:40 UTC 2017 >> nodename: mailman-web >> machine: x86_64 >> clock source: unix >> detected number of CPU cores: 2 >> current working directory: /opt/mailman-web >> detected binary path: /usr/local/bin/uwsgi >> !!! no internal routing support, rebuild with pcre support !!! >> setgid() to 101 >> setuid() to 100 >> chdir() to /opt/mailman-web >> your memory page size is 4096 bytes >> detected max file descriptor number: 1048576 >> building mime-types dictionary from file /etc/mime.types...1168 entry found >> lock engine: pthread robust mutexes >> thunder lock: disabled (you can enable it with --thunder-lock) >> uwsgi socket 0 bound to TCP address 0.0.0.0:8080 fd 8 >> uwsgi socket 1 bound to TCP address 0.0.0.0:8000 fd 9 >> Python version: 3.6.8 (default, Jan 30 2019, 23:58:16) [GCC 6.3.0] >> Python main interpreter initialized at 0x55a2df7f57e0 >> python threads support enabled >> your server socket listen backlog is limited to 100 connections >> your mercy for graceful operations on workers is 60 seconds >> mapped 166752 bytes (162 KB) for 2 cores >> *** Operational MODE: threaded *** >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/utils/module_loading.py", line 20, in import_string >> return getattr(module, class_name) >> AttributeError: module 'django.contrib.auth.middleware' has no attribute 'SessionAuthenticationMiddleware' >> >> The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception: >> >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "wsgi.py", line 38, in <module> >> application = get_wsgi_application() >> File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/wsgi.py", line 13, in get_wsgi_application >> return WSGIHandler() >> File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/handlers/wsgi.py", line 136, in __init__ >> self.load_middleware() >> File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", line 34, in load_middleware >> middleware = import_string(middleware_path) >> File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/utils/module_loading.py", line 24, in import_string >> ) from err >> ImportError: Module "django.contrib.auth.middleware" does not define a "SessionAuthenticationMiddleware" attribute/class >> unable to load app 0 (mountpoint='') (callable not found or import error) >> *** no app loaded. going in full dynamic mode *** >> *** uWSGI is running in multiple interpreter mode *** >> spawned uWSGI master process (pid: 1) >> spawned uWSGI worker 1 (pid: 37, cores: 2) >> --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- >> --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- >> --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- >> --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- >> --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- >> --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- >> --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- >> --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- >> --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- >> --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- >> --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- >> --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- >> >> As per my investigation, this error possibly caused by Django upgrade: >> >> *The SessionAuthenticationMiddleware class is removed. It provided no functionality since session authentication is unconditionally enabled in Django 1.10.* >> >> See https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.0/releases/2.0/ >> >> After I've removed the line >> https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman/blob/master/postorius/mailman-web… >> from settings.py, the container is finally working. >> >> I've placed PR in github: >> https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman/pull/314 > > Thank you for your contributions! > > I have merged your pull request and it should now be out (hopefully!). > >> >> Thank you for your help. >> >> Danil >> >> >> пт, 1 мар. 2019 г. в 04:33, Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in>: >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, at 5:19 PM, Abhilash Raj wrote: >>> > On February 27, 2019 11:53:34 PM PST, Danil Smirnov <danil(a)smirnov.la> wrote: >>> > >Hi Mark, >>> > > >>> > >Actually all this stuff happens inside the container after it's started >>> > >and >>> > >initialized without errors. I didn't amend the image anyhow. >>> > > >>> > >Also I have the configuration based on docker-compose.yaml provided in >>> > >the >>> > >repository which works just fine for mailman-web image. >>> > > >>> > >The very same config with postorius image (+ UWSGI_STATIC_MAP param) >>> > >fails >>> > >with 500 error... >>> > > >>> > >Now answering your questions: >>> > > >>> > >ср, 27 февр. 2019 г., 22:56 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net>: >>> > > >>> > >> do you have django-q in INSTALLED_APPS in your Django settings and >>> > >what >>> > >> is set for Q_CLUSTER? >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > >I've checked settings.py inside the container and I haven't found any >>> > >of >>> > >the mentioned configurations there. >>> > > >>> > >Does the manage.py that's being run here point to the right >>> > >settings.py? >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > >No clue. >>> > > >>> > >Also I wonder why we have some Hyperkitty-related cronjobs in non-HK >>> > >configured image? >>> > > >>> > >https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman/blob/master/postorius/mailman-web… >>> > >>> > Because I am a dum dum ;-) >>> > >>> > Will work on removing those crons and stuff. Would be nice if you >>> > opened an issue on Github so that I don't forget. >>> >>> Should now be fixed in the latest image. >>> >>> > >>> > >Danil >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> -- >>> > >> Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, >>> > >> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. >>> > >Dylan >>> > >> _______________________________________________ >>> > >> Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >>> > >> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >>> > >> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >>> > >> >>> > >_______________________________________________ >>> > >Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >>> > >To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >>> > >https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>> >>> -- >>> thanks, >>> Abhilash Raj (maxking) > > -- > thanks, > Abhilash Raj (maxking) > > -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

6 years, 8 months

Re: Held messages showing a reason not in English on the Postorious

by Alan So

Yes, it is a screenshot of held message view in Postorius. Right. It's basically due to some customization in old days. In the mailman 2 days, we customized somethings that related to wordings or else and made it as English (UK) and used the code uk. When these lists were imported to mailman 3, the preferred language changed to the original meaning of the code uk (Ukrainian) and we did not aware. I could not repeat the issue of held message view when I only changed the language of the list. However, I can repeat the issue when the sender's preferred language is set to Ukrainian.

1 year, 5 months

delete unverified accounts

by noemi

Hi, I'm noticing that a lot of 'spammers' are registering themself via postorius. They do not send emails, neither they are in any list, so they are not technically spammers, but they are a lot [maybe around 500 subscribed in the last month]. While waiting for a captcha system[0] for the main distribution, I'm looking for a rapid/easy way to delete this accounts; since they are not 'verified', I was wondering if I can locate this information in the mailman3 database or if there is some easier way to delete all unverified accounts. Do some of you any help or indications? I'm using GNU Mailman 3.3.9 (Tom Sawyer). Thanks, noemi for pangea.org [ https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… ]

1 year, 11 months

Re: Extracting mailing list users

by Jan Eden

On 2023-01-02 14:36, Eggert Ehmke via Mailman-users wrote: > Thank you, that worked! Now all my addresses are clean. > > Still, don't you think this should be possible via Postorius, or by some mailman cli command, like > mailman rename_member <old> <new> > > It happened I had still the patched cli_members.py where I had both the old and new line active: > print(formataddr((address.display_name, address.original_email)), file=outfp) > print(f'{address.display_name} <{address.original_email}>', file=outfp) > The first (old) line still produces the output with utf-8 codes. Is this to be expected? I would assume the original line outputs the QP-escaped names, to be used in an email header. - Jan

2 years, 10 months

Re: Mailman 3 Status Update Please?

by Abhilash Raj

Hi David, On Thu, Jul 20, 2017, at 12:47 PM, ddw David Wilson wrote: > Mailman 3 Status Update Please > > I have been following the progress and difficulties with great interest > as many struggle to implement the new version of the great Mailman 3 > list-server software. Last year about this time I posed some questions > regarding the current development status and recognize that many > additional problems seem to get in the way of actually working on long > term big picture issues. > > From my perspective of being an senior (ie overaged) person desirous of > implementing fully-featured, capable, scalable, reliable, secure > applications such as Mailman, I am convinced that I am thoroughly over > my head. > > From my limited perspective, it would seem to me that a 'nice to have' > system would incorporate the following. > > 1. An open container standard configurable system install, compatible > with different web & mail servers, DB utilities, etc; This already exists as of today, there are some open bugs and issues but nothing that would prevent you from using it right now. You can follow the documentation for the container images here[1] and look at the issues on the corresponding Github project. It should be compatible with major web & mail server and databases. [1]: https://asynchronous.in/docker-mailman/ > 2. Python 3 version Django utilities for archiving and mail list name > management; This is in the Roadmap and on high priority now that we have Mailman 3.1 out. > 3. A design/plan from an inside expert perspective stating costs, time > and resources to implement the plan, incorporating crowdfunding to > pay for project. > 4. As a backup incentive to the crowdfunding plan might be the offer of > an expert to set up a system for each significant amount donated, > say US$1,000, such as might be accomplished by an SSL session on the > target computer/server after the user has specified all necessary > detail as required in a template. AFAIK the Core developers aren't providing any services for Mailman 3 as of now. > > I am sure that the program author and other major contributors could > greatly enhance this list. > > In summary, I guess what I am requesting is an overview forecast by half > year period and out for the next two years? > > Please share the big picture? There are some TODO items that we have talked about but they aren't set as hard goals with deadlines. Most important of it is adding more features to Postorius (the Web Frontend) so as to accomplish everything one would want to interact with Mailman Core. One missing feature of the top of my head is the customizing the template. Fixing the upgrade path from Mailman 2 is another important issue. Other changes have more to do with the quality of code and probably more robust testing of the different components. Another important thing would be to have more user documentation for different management related tasks, like a List Administrator Manual. Apart from this, I can't think anything more as of now. Others might step in if they feel there is something missing in the list. -- thanks, Abhilash Raj

8 years, 4 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"