Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

set a new default for max_message_size

by Paul Paulchen

Hi MM Community, I guess Mark can answer this question in a split second. We want another default than 40kb for the max_message_size. I know you can change it with the mailman shell or with postorius. But we want to skip this part an set the default to 4000kb for instance. I read about the max_message_size in this thread from 2020 https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… According to the answer of Mark you can change the "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mailman/styles/base.py" - mlist.max_message_size. Now time went by, is there a possibility to use the mailman.cfg to set a new default? Cheers and thanks in advance!

3 years, 6 months

Apache Configuration for Subdomain

by Mail Person

I'm trying to move my mailman3 web interface from example.com/mailman3 to just lists.example.com like this site. I am not having luck with the apache configuration. I've tried below but I just get a 403: <VirtualHost *:80> ServerAdmin admin(a)example.com ServerName lists.example.com ServerAlias www.lists.example.com <Directory "/var/lib/mailman3/web/static"> Require all granted </Directory> <IfModule mod_proxy_uwsgi.c> ProxyPass /favicon.ico ! ProxyPass /static ! ProxyPass / unix:/run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://localhost </IfModule> </VirtualHost> Alias /favicon.ico /var/lib/mailman3/web/static/postorius/img/favicon.ico Alias /static /var/lib/mailman3/web/static

3 years, 3 months

Re: Apache Configuration for Subdomain

by Mail Person

So adding the slashes did not fix, but I did get a workaround to work from the other thread: ProxyPass /mailman3 unix:/run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://localhost ProxyPass /mailman unix:/run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://localhost Now makes it so that lists.example.com/mailman3 works sort of correctly. Weirdly enough, however, it redirects to lists.example.com/mailman/postorius/lists/ rather than */mailman3/* AND, if you go to lists.example.com/mailman it errors out with a 404 but redirects to lists.example.com/mailma So somehow a letter is getting deleted for some reason.

3 years, 3 months

Hyperkitty displaying example.com

by Mark Dale

Hi On a new installation I'm seeing "example.com" displayed at the top of the HyperKitty pages. I was expecting to see "lists.mydomainname.com", so I think I've missed something somewhere. Also, when a user signs up, the confirmation email reads as: ////////////////////////// SUBJECT: [example.com] Please Confirm Your E-mail Address FROM: postorius(a)lists.mydomainname.com BODY: Hello from example.com! You're receiving this e-mail because user yogibear has given your e- mail address to register an account on example.com. To confirm this is correct, go to https://lists.mydomainname.com/mailman3/accounts/confirm-email/NQ:1obAI3:Yw… Thank you for using example.com! example.com ////////////////////////// Any clues greatly appreciated. Thanks, Mark

3 years, 1 month

Re: Footer from templates not working - DB issue?

by mailman＠ma.yer.at

Dear All, I have a similar issue. Also on Debian 11. Also installed as Debian PKG. It's version GNU Mailman 3.3.3 (Tom Sawyer) I am using sqlite3. When I do the SQL-query I get an URI which is in multiple reasons wrong http://localhost/mailman3/postorius/api/templates/list/....../list:member:r… OK - the hostname could be changed but the path is not existing at all. There is no file "list:member:regular:footer" on the complete filesystem. Kind regards Hans

3 years, 1 month

Re: Internal Server Error: Reattach this thread

by hasimoto＠designet.co.jp

Thank you for your reply. (1) I installed while watching "Virtualenv Installation". (https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#virtualenv-inst…) Specifically, it is installed with the following command. -- -- # su mailman $ pip install wheel mailman psycopg2-binary\<2.9 -- -- (2) This list was newly created with Mailman 3. Specifically, it is created with the following command. -- -- # su mailman $ mailman create testml(a)list1.example.com -- -- (3)The installed versions are as follows. mailman-3.3.5 postorius-1.3.6 HyperKitty-1.3.5 mailmanclient-3.3.3 mailman_hyperkitty-1.2.0 Django-3.0.14 django_mailman3-1.3.7 It may be irrelevant, but the thread uses Japanese(multibyte). Please let me know if any other information is needed. Thank you very much.

3 years

Mailman3-core rest failure

by Jacob Sievert

Hello, since our last update from python 3.6 to python 3.9 our mailman server returns the following errors if we try to access the list via postorius. [29/Oct/2022:13:25:25 +0200] "GET /3.1/lists/XXX.XXX.XX/archivers HTTP/1.1" 500 38 "-" "GNU Mailman REST client v3.3.4" I tried to set the logging to a more verbose state but couldn't get a better message yet. If somebody knows what went wrong, that would be great. regards Jacob

3 years

Re: Emergency moderation and clearing out a lot of held messages

by Stephen J. Turnbull

I don't have a helpful suggestion yet but would like to clarify: Dan Caballero writes: > "2022-11-09T18:37:49.106105Z 19100868 [Note] Aborted connection > 19100868 to db: 'mailman3_prod' user: 'mailman' host: '10.6.5.187' > (Got an error reading communication packets)" db: mailman3_prod is the core database, not the Django (Postorius and Hyperkitty, or mailman-web), is that correct?

2 years, 11 months

Re: Emergency moderation and clearing out a lot of held messages

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/11/22 07:17, Caballero, Danny (Dan) wrote: > I don't understand. We have a single database configured for everything. I don't recall reading anything in the set-up documentation about using more than 1 database for Mailman3. A single database for everything is fine. Some of our docs, e.g. <https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#setup-database>, suggest two databases, `mailman` for Mailman core and `mailmanweb` for Postorius/HyperKitty, but either way is fine. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 11 months

Re: Emergency moderation and clearing out a lot of held messages

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/13/22 10:38, Dan Caballero wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I ran the commands and it took about 35 seconds for the loop to run. > > Here's the result. > >>>> count > 4168 So that's at least part of the issue. How does 35 seconds compare to the length of time to process one moderated message through Postorius? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 10 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"