Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: invalid parameter response of the rest-api

by Stephen J. Turnbull

gioklr71(a)gmail.com writes: > Dear Jacob did you make any progress on this issue? I've exactly > the same problem.... Is Jacob's problem really exactly the same as yours? Please compare your error message to Jacob's: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… Jacob Sievert writes: > Since a few days we get an error response from our automated membership > script. > > We use the following code to control the membership for some lists: > ``` > def mailinglist_manage(list_address, members): This looks like it should work. > Since Tuesday without any update performed by us we get the following > error from the script when it's running: *Something* changed. It would likely help if one of you can figure out what. > line 339, in subscribe > response, content = self._connection.call('members', data) > File > "/root/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/mailmanclient/restbase/connection.py", Either mailmanclient is now marshalling the URL and data incorrectly (which is hard to believe, it's hard to imagine this simple call is causing an error without causing both Postorius and HyperKitty to break too), or the REST protocol has changed for that resource, and the resource accessed by the URL that is constructed by self._connection.call() is not the member roster. This also seems unlikely. Your installation seems very old. From the next version of Mailman, we will not target Python 3.6 (that is, we have dropped it from the automated test pipeline), so regressions may occur. I know of at least one that occurs in old versions of core if you upgrade Python from < 3.8 to >= 3.8. Your Mailman installation also seems quite old: the code that the frame above says is on line 339 is on line 491 in git head. Are you sure you haven't applied a batch of security updates or the like that might affect any of Python, mailmanclient, or Mailman core?

4 years

Re: Confirmation emails aren't sent to users.

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Ibiam Chihurumnaya via Mailman-users writes: > Mark Sapiro wrote: > > > OK, this is Django. The default EMAIL_BACKEND from > > mailman_web/settings/base.py is > > django.core.mail.backends.smtp.EmailBackend and unless you've changed > > that or added overrides various other defaults are > > EMAIL_HOST = "localhost" > > EMAIL_PORT = 25 > > EMAIL_HOST_USER = "" > > EMAIL_HOST_PASSWORD = "" > > EMAIL_USE_TLS = False > > EMAIL_USE_SSL = False > > EMAIL_SSL_CERTFILE = None > > EMAIL_SSL_KEYFILE = None > > Are those appropriate? Do you have an outgoing MTA listening on > > localhost:25? What's in it's logs? > > I don't have any of those set, didn't realize I needed to have them > set, the docs didn't make it obvious too. Those defaults *are* set in the mailman_web settings files. You can override them in /etc/mailman3/settings.py, but often you don't need to. > I also didn't notice them in schema.cfg in mailman. This is for Django, whose configuration is in /etc/mailman3/settings.py, with defaults set in the mailmanweb package in your venv's site-package in the files in .../mailman_web/settings/. > smtp_port is currently set to 25, and I do have an outgoing MTA > listening on localhost:25. If Mailman can distribute posts that way, Django should be able to send mail with the default settings. > Nothing shows up in the MTA logs about this particular email. Not sure what to say about that. I'm not sure Postorius or Django log outgoing mail messages but I think they use the mailmanweb.log file by default if they log mail at all. (This is separate from the MTA logs which should record any connections from localhost and mail submitted.) -- GNU Mailman consultant (installation, migration, customization) Sirius Open Source https://www.siriusopensource.com/ Software systems consulting in Europe, North America, and Japan

7 months, 1 week

Re: Docker mailman3 delete social logins, did something change?

by Abhilash Raj

On 9/15/21 7:37 AM, bob B wrote: > I want to remove the social logins from mailman3 in docker. Which version tag are you using? > > I found this info > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… > > but the link to the default shows > *************** > INSTALLED_APPS = [] > DEFAULT_APPS = [ > 'hyperkitty', > 'postorius', > 'django_mailman3', > # Uncomment the next line to enable the admin: > 'django.contrib.admin', > # Uncomment the next line to enable admin documentation: > # 'django.contrib.admindocs', > 'django.contrib.auth', > 'django.contrib.contenttypes', > 'django.contrib.sessions', > 'django.contrib.sites', > 'django.contrib.messages', > 'django.contrib.staticfiles', > 'rest_framework', > 'django_gravatar', > 'compressor', > 'haystack', > 'django_extensions', > 'django_q', > 'allauth', > 'allauth.account', > 'allauth.socialaccount', > ] > ***************** The link to default is a dynamic one, so it changes as the changes are made in the repo, unfortunately, this is basically the new stuff that isn't out yet. > > > However when I go to the bug https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman/issues/283 > > it shows > > ********* > INSTALLED_APPS = ( > 'hyperkitty', > 'postorius', > 'django_mailman3', > # Uncomment the next line to enable the admin: > 'django.contrib.admin', > # Uncomment the next line to enable admin documentation: > # 'django.contrib.admindocs', > 'django.contrib.auth', > 'django.contrib.contenttypes', > 'django.contrib.sessions', > 'django.contrib.sites', > 'django.contrib.messages', > 'django.contrib.staticfiles', > 'rest_framework', > 'django_gravatar', > 'paintstore', > 'compressor', > 'haystack', > 'django_extensions', > 'django_q', > 'allauth', > 'allauth.account', > 'allauth.socialaccount', > 'django_mailman3.lib.auth.fedora', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.openid', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.github', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.gitlab', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.google', > ) > > ******** > > > The two examples are different so what should it be? If you want to remove social auth applications, you basically want to override INSTALLED_APPS configuraiton in your settings_local.py. In the list above, you want to remove everything after 'django_mailman3.lib.auth.fedora' and set that as INSTALLED_APPS in your settings_local.py. > > I tried to add it in both ways and when I do I get bad gateway and he mailman website is broke. I have not setup any domains yet, just setup the admin password,. Bad gateway usually will emit some sort of logging error in the mailman logs at /opt/mailman/web/logs/, what kind of exception are you seeing there? The configuration above, while enables social auth, shouldn't *break* the website. There must be errors/exceptions in logs to point in the direction of what the error might be. > > > For example this breaks my website > > cat /opt/mailman/web/settings_local.py > > ALLOWED_HOSTS = ['127.0.0.1','localhost','REDACTED','REDACTED','REDACTED','REDACTED','REDACTED'] > #ALLOWED_HOSTS = ['*'] > DEBUG = True > #DEBUG = False > EMAIL_BACKEND = 'django.core.mail.backends.smtp.EmailBackend' > EMAIL_HOST = 'REDACTED' > EMAIL_PORT = 25 > INSTALLED_APPS = ( > 'hyperkitty', > 'postorius', > 'django_mailman3', > # Uncomment the next line to enable the admin: > 'django.contrib.admin', > # Uncomment the next line to enable admin documentation: > # 'django.contrib.admindocs', > 'django.contrib.auth', > 'django.contrib.contenttypes', > 'django.contrib.sessions', > 'django.contrib.sites', > 'django.contrib.messages', > 'django.contrib.staticfiles', > 'rest_framework', > 'django_gravatar', > 'paintstore', > 'compressor', > 'haystack', > 'django_extensions', > 'django_q', > 'allauth', > 'allauth.account', > 'allauth.socialaccount', > 'django_mailman3.lib.auth.fedora', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.openid', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.github', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.gitlab', > 'allauth.socialaccount.providers.google', > ) > ************************************************************************* > And I have even removed anything? > > What should my /opt/mailman/web/settings_local.py look like? -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

5 years

Re: Mailman 3 localization

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Daniel writes: > FYI: I did translate some strings a while ago. Have a look > https://gitlab.com/dadosch/mailman3-german-translation-foo > > The reason I didn't made a PR or similar was, that I didn't know where > :D I think you attach those messages in mailman/src/mailman/messages/de/LC_MESSAGES/de.po, and add a README.de at mailman/src/mailman/messages/de/README.de. The README contains information about how to participate in the German translation, such as who is the coordinator (or at least someone willing to read email about it and bring it to our attention), if you're using a translation management site, etc. Then submit the PR at http://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman. If you are willing to coordinate the German translation, I bet Simon would be willing to cooperate in merging his translation. It would certainly be helpful in getting the process going to have an example of a translation effort for other languages to follow, and it looks like there's a lot of interest in German. So German may be a good place to start. As I mentioned before, the core developers are not particularly focused on any translation effort. The policy issue about whether to centralize translation management and/or allow use of sites based on non-free software is delicate, as mentioned elsewhere, and there is the issue of coordinating the translation community with release management. Finally, there is the task of translation for Postorius and HyperKitty, which may benefit from a use of Django-specific tools (I'm not familiar with localizing Django applications so that may be completely stupid :-). So this is going to take time to plan. Please feel free to lobby us, here and on mailman-developers. Contribution of effort (planning or coordination) is not necessary but of course would be welcome. Also, anybody who has participated in translation efforts who can describe a process that results in accurate translations while minimizing core developer and translator pain would be very welcome. Steve

8 years, 2 months

Re: Postorius is not working (throws "Error 500" suddenly after changing POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL and changing back)

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Wikinaut writes: > I fully understand. Need to look up how to smoothly backup the > mailman3 settings and list databases in order to make that move > with losing stuff... (kinda "mailman3 backup all" and mailman3 > restore all" :-) One piece of generic Python advice: don't mix OS packages and pip (except for Python itself). Always use a venv if you need to use pip for packages that aren't in your OS distro. (Of course it's possible to do so in many cases if you *really* know what you're doing, but it's almost never worth the pain.) All of the site configuration data should be in /etc/mailman3 (except for a few template files in $var_dir/templates), and all of the domain, list configuration, and archive data is in the RDBMS (usually PostgreSQL or MySQL). The RDMBS should be backed up regularly according to its procedures, but that's completely out of scope for Mailman.[1] The RDBMS should "just work" with exactly the same Mailman-side configuration as Debian.[2] As I think Odhiambo mentioned, the Mailman side of the site configuration also does not change (for example, the RDBMS URL and authentication). What you do want to change is the file system configuration. Except for /etc/mailman3, it should be completely different -- as with pip'ing packages, you don't want to share files across a local venv and the OS version of the same package. It just leads to pain. I think among the developers the preferred root = /opt/mailman (or /opt/mailman3) for Mailman's directory hierarchy. This will be populated with subdirectories when you run `mailman info` (or start Mailman) the first time. The directories relevant to configuration are all under $root/var, and you inform Mailman about this by setting `var_dir` in mailman.cfg. If there are other file and directory configurations in mailman.cfg, they need to changed from the Debian values (probably /var/lib/mailman3/...). You may do fine by simply deleting all other directory configurations and let Mailman decide where to put them relative to the `var_dir`, You will need to fix the setting for STATIC_ROOT (I think that's the name, if not search for "static") in settings.py, and maybe in mailman-web.cfg. While it's not necessary (and may be a little inconvenient), I recommend changing the root for Mailman's log files from the Debian value (probably /var/log/mailman3) to the Mailman default of $root/var/logs, and similarly for the Django logs in settings.py. Non-Mailman settings I think you will need to change the settings for your MTA (usually Postfix or Exim4) so that it will recognize Mailman lists and route them to Mailman correctly. There will probably be mailman-related files in /etc/$MTA/conf.d (or something like that). You can edit them directly, but I recommend changing the name (paranoia so that dpkg doesn't overwrite them). The only thing I can think of for the webserver (Apache?) is the location of the static directory. I think Debian uses uwsgi by default so you may need to adjust its configuration too. I think you need to fix logrotate's configuration in /etc/logrotate.d. Not sure how many mailman-related config files are in there. I think you mentioned systemd .service files. If so that doesn't make sense to me -- Debian should provide those. You need to make sure those are disabled or deleted so that Debian Mailman services don't start on reboot. This is automatic if you delete the Debian packages, of course, but not for any files you created yourself. Probably the Debian .service files will work, but you need to make sure they refer to the venv Mailman (using the full path to the `mailman` utility in the venv's bin directory will work, and similarly for `mailman-web`). systemd does not configure the /opt hierarchy in it search path by default. I put the mailman, qcluster, and gunicorn (if you use that instead of uwsgi) .service files in /usr/local/lib/systemd/system, and that works for me. Flotsam and jetsam If you have run Mailman with any success at all, you may find some stuff in Debian's $var_dir/queue/* directories or in its $var_dir/lists/* directories. The queue/* directories contain incoming messages at various stages of processing, and the lists/* directories contain files containing multiple messages that are scheduled to be sent out as digests. You can read the queue files with `mailman qfile /path/to/queue/file.pck`, and the digests are just text files. That way you can check if there's anything important in them. If not, you can just delete them. If there is, you can just copy them to the same place in the venv $var_dir as they were in Debian's $var_dir, but you may want to ask here first before doing that. It's best to let Mailman run until all the queues are cleared (except maybe bad and shunt, but if those have any files in them you need to intervene anyway). Afterword I'm sure this sounds complicated, but in fact it's a pretty short list. When you get there we'll help you. Footnotes: [1] But not for this list. You may as well ask here, somebody probably will tell you the basics quickly. But for troubleshooting, go the the RDBMS's own channels. [2] In fact, it is possible to keep the Debian installation, copy the the mailman.cfg somewhere, edit it, stop Debian Mailman, and start up the venv Mailman. I don't recommend this -- the point is that the venv and the databases are that isolated from the rest of the system.

2 years, 11 months

Re: New year releases!

by Odhiambo Washington

Funny thing is that if you take your time and go over the changelog as posted you end up nipping the issues in the bud. It just happens that we are not thorough. Breaking changes are always documented. Many years ago I used to go through changelog with a toothcomb, even to see what new features were there. I'm heading back there. I was also bitten by the same wasps that bit you, because the release announcement did not lay bare these issues in the mail. They obviously expected us to 'behave' like people running critical infrastructure 😂 On Sun, Feb 12, 2023, 17:16 Torge Riedel <torgeriedel(a)gmx.de> wrote: > Dears, > > I like to know and discuss ideas to get the update process more stable! > > Today I updated core and web of mailman3 and ran into all the issues you > can have: > - Dependencies are not updated properly > - In case you use "--force-reinstall" Django gets also updated in web and > you need to update the urls.py file accordingly > - Enhancement of settings file required (DEFAULT_AUTO_FIELD = ...) > > Finally I got it working, but there is always the fear for breaking > something on update. > > I know it is open source and no one gets paid for the work. But I think > there is space for improvement here. > > Kind regards > Torge > > Am 04.01.23 um 10:59 schrieb Abhilash Raj: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > Happy new year! > > > > I am pleased to announce several new releases for GNU Mailman project. > > > > 1. Mailman Core 3.3.8 [1] > > 2. Postorius 1.3.8 [2] > > 3. Hyperkitty 1.3.7 [3] > > 4. Mailmanclient 3.3.5 [4] > > 5. Django-mailman3 1.3.9 [5] > > 6. Mailman-hyperkitty 1.2.1 [6] > > > > All the releases are published to PyPI and you can find links to all the > PyPI projects: > > > > https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/ > > > > A full list of change logs are available below: > > > > [1]: > https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/docs/NEWS.… > > [2]: > https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/postorius/en/latest/news.html#news-1-3-8 > > [3]: > https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/hyperkitty/en/latest/news.html#news-1-3-7 > > [4]: > https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailmanclient/en/latest/src/mailmanclien… > > [5]: https://gitlab.com/mailman/django-mailman3/-/blob/master/README.rst > > [6]: > https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman-hyperkitty/-/blob/master/README.rst > > > > Finally, the minimum Python version required is 3.7, and all the > components now support Python 3.7 to 3.11. > > > > Thanks to all the contributors for making this release possible! > > > > If you find any issues, you can report them at the respective bug > tracker for the projects. The links to issue trackers are available > > here: https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/ > > > > Installation documentation is available at > > > > https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/install.html > > > > and if you are upgrading an existing virtualenv install you can refer > > > > https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/upgrade-3.2.html > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > > Archived at: > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > > > This message sent to torgeriedel(a)gmx.de > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > Archived at: > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > This message sent to odhiambo(a)gmail.com >

3 years, 7 months

Re: About to Install MM3 -- Seeking clarification

by Onyeibo Oku

On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 17:27:13 +0100 Onyeibo Oku <onyeibo(a)schemefusion.com> wrote: > [Reviving this thread]. > > I abandoned the hyperkitty setup for a while and returned to it again > today. I made progress. It turns out that I needed the > uwsgi-logger-file rpm package and It wasn't installed with the uwsgi > server. I adapted the settings also, since I was using Emperor mode > (recall that there are other Django projects on the box). Currently, > mailman, uwsgi and nginx are all running. They all seem to be happy > until I assess the mailman-web home URL (e.g. http://my.server.com) > > The outcome: > "502 Bad Gateway" > > Nothing shows in the logs except at /var/log/nginx/error.log: > > 2022/12/08 15:35:10 [error] 5879#5879: *7 upstream prematurely closed > connection while reading response header from upstream, client: > 105.113.33.89, server: my.server.com, request: "GET /favicon.ico > HTTP/1.1", upstream: "http://127.0.0.1:8000/favicon.ico", host: > "my.server.com", referrer: "https://my.server.com/". > > Something seems to be wrong between uwsgi and mailman, but I don't > know where to look. > > Regards Onyeibo Happy New Year to all the Mailman People here (nice rhyme). I pulled the plugs on uwsgi and installed Gunicorn. Gunicorn gave more mileage but something is still not right. When I visit the mailmanweb home with a browser, I see the following: "Server Error. An error occurred while processing your request." Mailmanweb and mailman3 services are running. I perused the log file at /opt/mailman/web/logs/mailmanweb.log and found the following: raise MailmanConnectionError( mailmanclient.restbase.connection.MailmanConnectionError: ('Could not connect to Mailman API: ', 'ConnectionError(MaxRetryError("HTTPConnectionPool(host=\'localhost\', port=8001): Max retries exceeded with url: /3.1/lists?advertised=true&count=0&page=1 (Caused by NewConnectionError(\'<urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object at 0x7f7f4b128c40>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111] 0x7f7f4b128c40>Connection refused\'))"))') During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/core/handlers/exception.py", line 55, in inner response = get_response(request) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", line 199, in _get_response response = self.process_exception_by_middleware(e, request) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", line 362, in process_exception_by_middleware response = middleware_method(request, exception) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/postorius/middleware.py", line 48, in process_exception return utils.render_api_error(request) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/postorius/utils.py", line 36, in render_api_error return render(request, 'postorius/errors/generic.html', File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/shortcuts.py", line 24, in render content = loader.render_to_string(template_name, context, request, using=using) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/template/loader.py", line 62, in render_to_string return template.render(context, request) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/template/backends/django.py", line 62, in render return self.template.render(context) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line 173, in render with context.bind_template(self): File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/contextlib.py", line 135, in __enter__ return next(self.gen) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/template/context.py", line 254, in bind_template updates.update(processor(self.request)) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django_mailman3/context_processors.py", line 32, in common context["site_name"] = get_current_site(request).name File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/contrib/sites/shortcuts.py", line 16, in get_current_site return Site.objects.get_current(request) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/contrib/sites/models.py", line 59, in get_current return self._get_site_by_id(site_id) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/contrib/sites/models.py", line 30, in _get_site_by_id site = self.get(pk=site_id) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py", line 85, in manager_method return getattr(self.get_queryset(), name)(*args, **kwargs) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 650, in get raise self.model.DoesNotExist( django.contrib.sites.models.Site.DoesNotExist: Site matching query does not exist. Can someone point me in the right direction please? Regards Onyeibo

3 years, 8 months

Re: MM3 Postfix FROM header issue

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/17/23 9:10 AM, eboltz(a)lhtservices.com wrote: > Mark, > > Here is my postconf -n > > alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases > alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases > always_add_missing_headers = yes > append_dot_mydomain = no > biff = no > compatibility_level = 2 > default_destination_concurrency_limit = 15 > default_destination_recipient_limit = 30 > header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks > header_size_limit = 409600 > inet_interfaces = all > inet_protocols = ipv4 > local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps hash:/var/lib/mailman3/data/postfix_lmtp > mailbox_size_limit = 0 > mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost, $mydomain > myhostname = lists.example.com > mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 [::fff:127.0.0.0]/104 [::1]/128 > myorigin = /etc/mailname > readme_directory = no > recipient_delimiter = + > relay_domains = hash:/var/lib/mailman3/data/postfix_domains > relayhost = [mail.smtp2go.com]:587 > smtp_always_send_ehlo = yes > smtp_sasl_security_options = noanonymous > smtp_tls_CApath = /etc/postfix/o365_smtp_cert.pem > smtp_tls_security_level = may > smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtp_scache > smtp_use_tls = yes > smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Debian/GNU) > smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks permit_sasl_authenticated defer_unauth_destination > smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem > smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key > smtpd_tls_security_level = may > transport_maps = hash:/var/lib/mailman3/data/postfix_lmtp > unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550 > virtual_alias_maps = hash:/var/lib/mailman3/data/postfix_vmap It looks like you are now following <https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/docs/mta.h…>. > What would I have to do to ensure that MM3 and postfix (same new server) use the newly created lists.example.org domain, which only exists within Postfix when setting up the Postorius domain and lists? > I want to have it so that whatever the list name is, for example 'Staff(a)lists.example.org' will route through Postfix correctly. Have you set an alias_domain for the lists.example.org domain? What are the contents of /var/lib/mailman3/data/postfix_vmap and /var/lib/mailman3/data/postfix_lmtp? If you feel it is necessary to anonymize the domains in these, please only change the tld so we can see the actual subdomains. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 9 months

start_chain not present in migrated lists

by Paul Honig

Hi, Please let me know where I can post my question if this list is not the right place. I'm configuring a mailing list server, migrating from Mailman 2.1 to 3.2.2, and I can't get the migrated mailing lists to work. When I create new mailing lists there is no problem. Here are the versions of Mailman I run : mailman 3.2.2 mailman-hyperkitty (1.1.0) django-mailman3 (1.2.0) postorius (1.3.2) mailmanclient (3.2.2) HyperKitty (1.2.2) The command line I use the migrate the mailing list: /opt/mailman_venv/bin/mailman -C /opt/mailman_venv/var/etc/mailman.cfg import21 mltest(a)test.domain /var/vmail/mig/data/lists/mltest/config.pck When I send an email to a migrated list, of which I made myself a member, no mail is sent, and I get the following stack trace in the log: ==> /var/log/mailman/mailman.log <== Jan 21 15:02:37 2020 (15948) Uncaught runner exception: None Jan 21 15:02:37 2020 (15948) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/mailman_venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/core/runner.py", line 173, in _one_iteration self._process_one_file(msg, msgdata) File "/opt/mailman_venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/core/runner.py", line 266, in _process_one_file keepqueued = self._dispose(mlist, msg, msgdata) File "/opt/mailman_venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/runners/incoming.py", line 79, in _dispose process(mlist, msg, msgdata, start_chain) File "/opt/mailman_venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman/core/chains.py", line 40, in process chain = config.chains[start_chain] KeyError: None Jan 21 15:02:37 2020 (15948) SHUNTING: 1579615357.5331464+c5918e305ec281d47ef0caaed070c8c4bde26ee3 It seems like the start_chain has value 'None' and that prevents the mail from processed, but I can't find where to correctly set the start_chain. Please let me know how I can remedy this issue. Kind regards, Paul Honig This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo(a)esa.int)

6 years, 8 months

Re: Importing config and archives only partially succeeded?

by Eric Broens

Thanks for your prompt reply.To import the config and archives I ran the commands as outlined in Migrating from Mailman 2.1 to Mailman 3 — Mailman Suite 3.3 documentation : mailman import21 foo-list(a)example.com /path/to/mailman2/foo-list/config.pck python manage.py hyperkitty_import -l foo-list(a)example.com $var_prefix/archives/private/foo-list.mbox/foo-list.mbox After running these commands the archives became available for most of the mailinglists. I didn't run the Django admin command with arguments "update_index_one_list" to build the indices for each mailinglist seperately. After everything was imported, and I noticed that the mails were not shown in the archives for half of the mailinglists, I ran "manage.py update_index" to index the mails for all mailinglists.This command is still running for hours.Since it builds the search index, I don't expect that this would make the mails available on the webpage. Best regards,Eric On Sunday, December 13, 2020, 12:12:46 AM GMT+1, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: On 12/12/20 2:33 PM, Eric Broens via Mailman-users wrote: > Today I have migrated about 30 mailinglists from mailman 2.1 to mailman 3.3.2 & Hyperkitty 1.3.3. > Although no error responses were given when importing the 2.1 pck files, and neither for importing the archives, for about half of the mailinglists the hyperkitty webpage doesn't show any subscribers, nor archived emails. > The imported members and other settings are correctly shown in the postorius page. > Is there anything that I can verify why the archive is not shown on the hyperkitty page?The hyperkitty_email database table does contain the emails. Did you specify --no-sync-mailman when you ran hyperkitty_import? If so did you run the django sync_mailman job when you finished importing? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

5 years, 9 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"