Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: [SOLVED] Re: how to unhold a hold message from a nonmmeber in hold list.

by Odhiambo Washington

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 1:27 PM Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7) via Mailman-users <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> wrote: > > El 21/4/23 a las 11:03, Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7) via Mailman-users > escribió: > > > > El 21/4/23 a las 10:37, Odhiambo Washington escribió: > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:20 AM Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7) via > >> Mailman-users <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> wrote: > >> > >> I'm having troubles with Django and cannot access to web admin. > >> > >> I need to unhold a message while figures out what is happening. > >> > >> Searching the mailman cli help commands didn't help me. > >> > >> Anyone who knows how to unhold a message, please? > >> > >> > >> TBH, I find it a lot easier to fix the web UI than mess with the > >> python shell :-) > > > Well... I found you where right. Messing with the CLI seems a nightmare > to me. > > The problem with the UI seems solved. What I finally have done: > > Detected that the module "asgiref" was in a different version that the > server (with all the same config) that is working. pip upgraded it. This > didn't work, but it raised new error messages (about hyperkitty parsing > messages) > > Installed pip-review and upgraded ALL python modules with pip-review > --local --interactive > > (Re)upgraded all mailman3 packages with > > pip install --upgrade --force-reinstall --no-deps --no-cache-dir > django-mailman3 mailman mailman-hyperkitty mailmanclient postorius > django hyperkitty uwsgi mod-wsgi > > Restarted apache24 > > And then all begun to work. > > Thanks a lot for your advising and help. > Do you now see why a virtualenv style of setup will save you lots of grief? :-) -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

2 years, 5 months

Re: MM3 Docker

by Odhiambo Washington

On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 23:39, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > On 1/6/19 8:47 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > > If you could include the missing steps that you left out then I could > > possibly be able to follow the steps :-) > > > Please help me understand what steps are missing and I will try to > provide the information. Okay. At the installation stage, you say the following: "I already had some things set up in /opt/mailman including a git subdirectory containing clones of the GitLab mailman, mailmanclient, mailman-hyperkitty, hyperkitty, django-mailman3 and postorius projects. On the third server I have added mailman-suite because I use the settings.py from that project as the basis for mine." Please assume that the reader is a newbie to python3 virtualenv and give the details of the commands they need to execute to (a) clone all the projects needed and (b) create the virtualenv. The next steps are: mkdir /opt/mailman/mm Then you say "I then created a /opt/mailman/mm directory and within that a Python 3.6 virtualenv" What happens here is something that needs clarification, because you are specific about "python3.6". I have googled and realized that one has to be specific about the python version they want to use in their virtualenv as shown here -> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45293436/how-to-specify-python-version-… exact command to execute to create the /opt/mailman/mm/venv exact command to execute to activate virtualenv From there, I think the newbie can follow and fumble till they come up with a working MM3 site. Come to think of it, your steps kind of look clearer than most that I have encountered. I do understand that there are only a few people working on the MM3 development, which I think is the reason there still isn't a document similar to the ones included with MM2.1x source under doc/ However, if your steps here are polished a little, they can possibly become one such doc. I think MM3 docs would come with three options - virtualenv option, docker option and package option. Installing from source seems like something not easily doable. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", grep ^[^#] :-)

6 years, 9 months

Re: moving lists to another server

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/21/23 04:32, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > I tested the above out of curiosity. It failed. There are 9 lists in the > setup, but I am only interested in 1. > > ``` > (venv) mailman@debian12:~$ mailman-web shell > Python 3.11.2 (main, Mar 13 2023, 12:18:29) [GCC 12.2.0] > Type 'copyright', 'credits' or 'license' for more information > IPython 8.17.2 -- An enhanced Interactive Python. Type '?' for help. > > In [1]: from hyperkitty.lib.compat import get_list_by_name > > In [2]: mlist = get_list_by_name('list_name_only', 'list_domain') You can't use literally ('list_name_only', 'list_domain'). If the list of interest is for example alist(a)example.com, the above should be mlist = get_list_by_name('alist', 'example.com') ... > Was I supposed to substitute something for the real listname of the list I > wanted? Yes. > Another thing - totally unrelated - that surprised me: > While using the commented-out block below, I could not click and get > anything beyond http://http://list.name/mailman3 as anything to do with > /postorius/xxxxx gave "Page not found" error. > However, with the second config block that uses the UNIX socket, I am able > to access everything > > ``` > #<IfModule mod_proxy.c> > # ProxyPreserveHost On > # ProxyPass "/mailman3" "http://127.0.0.1:8010/mailman3" > # ProxyPass "/archives" "http://127.0.0.1:8010/archives" > # ProxyPass "/accounts" "http://127.0.0.1:8010/accounts" > # ProxyPass "/admin" "http://127.0.0.1:8010/admin" > # ProxyPass "/user-profile" "http://127.0.0.1:8010/user-profile" > # </IfModule> > > ProxyPassMatch ^/static/ ! > ProxyPassMatch ^/favicon.ico ! > ProxyPass / unix:/opt/mailman/mm/var/uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://localhost/ > ProxyPassReverse / unix:/opt/mailman/mm/var/uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://localhost/ > ``` > > Why is it that the UNIX socket option worked flawlessly while the other > option failed??? The first option does not have ProxyPass for urls matching /postorius or /hyperkitty so such urls don't work. The second option passes everything (ProxyPass / ) to uwsgi via the socket so all urls that uwsgi can handle will work. You could do something similar with the first option with simply ProxyPass "/" "http://127.0.0.1:8010/" assuming uwsgi is listening on port 8010. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 10 months

Re: Mailman 3 deployment: ok to use same database instance for core, web, and hyperkitty tables?

by Andrew Hodgson

Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >s.dobrau(a)ucl.ac.uk writes: > > We are currently working on a migration plan for Mailman -> Mailman > 3. We have around over 3000 mailing lists with a total of 50K > members >Medium-size. I guess a 2-CPU/4GB Linode or similar should handle the Mailman load (including Postorius and HyperKitty), you might want more memory and maybe more CPUs if you're running the RDBMS on the same host. In the 23k lists/50k users/100k inbound messages/day migration described below, >we ended up reconfiguring the VMs 3 times before declaring the system stable. IMO the 2 x 8CPU/16GB final setup was way overpowered for the need, but we didn't try to calibrate finer than that. Yep, I have helped a migration with around 150 lists but not as much archived data, and ended up with a 2 CPU with 8GB machine. I think we could have gone lower, but found we needed the larger VM to help us import the archives. I used a managed PostGreSQL instance from Amazon for the database. > > Our plan is to have core+web (instance 1) and Hyperkitty (instance > 2). With the archives on the FS local to the Hyperkitty. >The archives are in the database as BLOBs. There's no reason to have a separate instance for HyperKitty. It's not obvious to me that you need more than that 2x4 Linode for both Mailman and RDBMS, but if you're going to split it's Mailman vs RDMBS, not Mailman vs HyperKitty. I would agree. I think the issue here is there are several ways of splitting out Mailman people get bogged down in whether they should run separate parts on different instances. In my view I have always ran Mailman, Postorius and Hyperkitty on the same host and I think it works better that way. For example, if you run Mailman and the web components on different hosts, you need to make sure the Mailman REST interface is secured, whereas if its on the same host then the REST interface can just listen on localhost. The Dockerised instances do use separate containers for Mailman Core and the web components, but that is the only real time I have seen the components split. > > And all 3 tables (core, web, Hyperkitty) pointing to the same > database on a remote SQL (mysql-enterprise) instance. Using class > mailman.database.mysql.MySQLDatabase (and whatever necessary on the > Django/Hyperkitty instance). >Make sure your MySQL database(s) for Mailman are configured with the utf8mb4 option for 4 byte UTF-8 support, or it will choke on emojis and the like. I don't think there are any other gotchas for MySQL. Are there any performance benchmarks for running MySQL vs PostGreSQL? I tend to fall back to PostGreSQL because it seems to be what is used in a lot of places, I have never recommended going with MySQL for a Mailman instance. >Note there are a lot more than 3 tables in Mailman's databases. The "traditional" configuration is a "mailman" database for core and a "mailmanweb" database for Django and the archives, but Mark says that as the tables are disjoint across Mailman, Django, and the archives there's no reason not to use a >single "mailman" database for all of them. I believe that's how this list's host is configured. Yep, the original installation guide created one database for Mailman and the tables for all components are in the same database, this was how my larger install was done. Later revisions of the guide have us split the core vs web components to different databases, I don't think there is any performance hit either way by doing that. >Importing list configurations, users, and subscriptions into Mailman 3 is pretty fast, as long as you're not using the stock Postfix support.[2] The problem is that generating the Postfix alias files for the lists seems to be noticably linear in number of lists, which means it's quadratic for the mass import. IIRC with >5000 lists you'd be looking at >1m/list just to keep regenerating Postfix's alias database, ie 5000 minutes. I found two solutions, both of which required patching Mailman. I hope to get both into the next release. >I think we got it down to <5s/list, for 5000 lists that's < 1hr. That is very interesting I had a similar issue with the Postfix alias generation in my larger setup but didn't have time to identify the root cause. In the end I used Exim sending all mails for the list domain to Mailman which is the setup I use elsewhere and it doesn't rely on the alias file generation. >Importing archives is ... yeeech. The client decided they didn't want a ton of archives anyway (you know corporations, if it's not required by law, shred it after 6 months). I don't recall the size estimate accurately but we kept 6 months X 4500 lists, maybe 100GB out of 2.3TB of mboxes. That took 24 hours to >import into HyperKitty, without doing the full-text indexing. I do know the original conservative estimate was 20 days to import the whole 2,3 TB. The full-text indexing took more than a week if I remember correctly. Yes, I had the same problem with the archives. I did import all the archives, in our case it took us several months to get the archives in so as not to stress load on the box. Full text indexing really caused an issue for me, I ended up disabling it for the time we were importing archives then generated a clean index once the archives were imported. This wasn't a good user experience and I would probably plan this out better next time. >It's also quite possible to migrate incrementally, a few lists at a time. Mailman 2 and Mailman 3 can coexist happily on the same host. >Mark can advise on that, I think. Its worth noting this is more difficult to do now on Debian/Ubuntu installs as Python2 has been removed. This was something I ran into myself when trying to co-exist both installs on the same box. Andrew.

1 year, 11 months

how to migrate mailing lists to a new domain using mailman 3

by C. Souza

In a few days my current domain will be disabled (it is out of my control) and I would like to know how to migrate the mailing lists to the new domain name. As a solution I added a new domain in mailman 3 and created a script that replicates the lists in this new domain. To forward the emails received by the old lists, the script removes the members and adds the email of the new list. Is there a fashionable way to do that? Also, one problem that I don't have a solution is the archive of the old lists. How to bring them to the new ones? Thanks for your help. My mailing list server is running on a CenOS-7x with postgreSQL and the following mailman packages: Package Version ------------------- ---------- 1 aiosmtpd 1.2.4 2 alembic 1.5.3 3 arrow 0.17.0 4 asgiref 3.3.1 5 atpublic 2.1.2 6 authheaders 0.13.0 7 authres 1.2.0 8 bleach 3.3.0 9 blessed 1.17.12 10 certifi 2020.12.5 11 cffi 1.14.4 12 chardet 4.0.0 13 click 7.1.2 14 cmarkgfm 0.5.2 15 cryptography 3.3.1 16 decorator 4.4.2 17 defusedxml 0.6.0 18 Django 3.0.12 19 django-allauth 0.44.0 20 django-appconf 1.0.4 21 django-compressor 2.4 22 django-extensions 3.1.0 23 django-gravatar2 1.4.4 24 django-haystack 3.0 25 django-mailman3 1.3.5 26 django-picklefield 3.0.1 27 django-q 1.3.4 28 djangorestframework 3.12.2 29 dkimpy 1.0.5 30 dnspython 2.1.0 31 docutils 0.16 32 falcon 2.0.0 33 flufl.bounce 3.0.1 34 flufl.i18n 2.0.2 35 flufl.lock 3.2 36 gunicorn 20.0.4 37 HyperKitty 1.3.3 38 idna 2.10 39 importlib-resources 5.1.0 40 lazr.config 2.2.3 41 lazr.delegates 2.0.4 42 mailman 3.3.2 43 mailman-hyperkitty 1.1.0 44 mailman-web 0.0.3 45 mailmanclient 3.3.2 46 Mako 1.1.4 47 MarkupSafe 1.1.1 48 networkx 2.5 49 nose 1.3.7 50 oauthlib 3.1.0 51 packaging 20.9 52 passlib 1.7.4 53 pip 21.0.1 54 postorius 1.3.3 55 psycopg2-binary 2.8.6 56 publicsuffix2 2.20191221 57 pycparser 2.20 58 Pygments 2.7.4 59 PyJWT 2.0.1 60 pyparsing 2.4.7 61 python-dateutil 2.8.1 62 python-editor 1.0.4 63 python3-openid 3.2.0 64 pytz 2021.1 65 rcssmin 1.0.6 66 readme-renderer 28.0 67 requests 2.25.1 68 requests-oauthlib 1.3.0 69 rjsmin 1.1.0 70 robot-detection 0.4 71 setuptools 39.2.0 72 six 1.15.0 73 SQLAlchemy 1.3.23 74 sqlparse 0.4.1 75 typing-extensions 3.7.4.3 76 urllib3 1.26.3 77 uWSGI 2.0.19.1 78 wcwidth 0.2.5 79 webencodings 0.5.1 80 wheel 0.36.2 81 Whoosh 2.7.4 82 zipp 3.4.0 83 zope.component 4.6.2 84 zope.configuration 4.4.0 85 zope.deferredimport 4.3.1 86 zope.deprecation 4.4.0 87 zope.event 4.5.0 88 zope.hookable 5.0.1 89 zope.i18nmessageid 5.0.1 90 zope.interface 5.2.0 91 zope.proxy 4.3.5 92 zope.schema 6.0.1 -- Carlos Souza

3 years, 3 months

Re: List creation error

by Brian Carpenter

Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 15:36, Andreas Barth aba(a)ayous.org wrote: > > > > Odhiambo Washington (odhiambo(a)gmail.com) [210106 12:12]:PS: I could probably have caused the error with some weird operation I > > did: > > Initially when postorius comes up, it has the domain - example.com > > http://example.com. I am not sure > > where it gets this. > > > > > > example.com is the default domain from django. Renaming that via the > > django (e.g. mailman3/admin/sites/site/1/change/ ) worked for me quite > > well (without touching anything in the database by hand). > > Hi Andi, > I could be missing something still... > > At what juncture during the installation do you do this renaming? > Where is this directory? On my setup, I have no such directory - but I > could be missing something in the install process, maybe.. > > root@debian10:/opt/mailman# pwd > /opt/mailmanroot@debian10:/opt/mailman# find . -type d -name sites > ./mm/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/jedi/third_party/django-stubs/django-stubs/contrib/sites > ./mm/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/contrib/sites > Do you find anything amiss with this HOWTO - > https://wiki.list.org/DOC/Howto_Install_Mailman3_On_Debian10 ?? I > find > the guide rather straight and clear. That is my work in progress and thank you for the compliment. > It's the one I am following - almost to the letter - except for the fact > that I am using Apache+mod_wsgi+MySQL+Exim instead. > I have configs in place by the time I run 'mailman info' portion. But then > again, when I run this command, I don't like what it prints because I see > some reference to sqlite. Can you paste what the mailman info output is and the contents of your mailman.cfg file? > As it is, I believe my problem lies elsewhere, not possible to solve with > your rename option. To get rid of example.com, I log into Django, create a new site using the main list domain and note the site id. I then edit the settings_local.py file and change the SITE_ID setting to the new site id of the main list domain. You will need to restart mailman and qcluster I believe after making that change.

4 years, 9 months

Re: Digest Formatting

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/7/20 9:08 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > I thought there was a way to trigger immediate distribution of a > digest immediately, but I guess I'm remembering that from Mailman 2. > Neither the Postorius management interface nor the core documentation > suggests there's such a trigger in Mailman 3. There is nothing in the web UI or REST, but the `mailman digests` command can send accumulated digests for one or more named lists or all lists unconditionally or only if the list's digest_send_periodic is set to True. see `mailkman digests --help` for details. > > 2) I have customized list:member:digest:header, but am not seeing > > the custom text where I thought it should be. The documentation > > seems to imply that both list:member:digest:header and > > list:member:digest:footer surround each message in the digest > > Which documentation do you mean? As far as I know (Mark will have > authoritative information if I'm wrong), the digest header and footer > appear at the top and bottom of the *whole* digest message (ie, once > each per digest), not surrounding or in the bodies of the component > messages. Steve is correct. The layout is as follows The masthead from the list:member:digest:masthead template. The digest header if any from the list:member:digest:header template. The table of contents. The individual messages. The digest footer from the list:member:digest:footer template. For the MIME digest, these are all separate MIME parts and the individual messages are message/rfc822 parts within a multipart/digest part. For the plain text digest, the digest is one text/plain part containing the above formatted par RFC 1153 And in another post, mailman(a)manygoodideas.com wrote: > I also have a feature request (I didn't see it in the docs), consider creating list:member:digest:mastfoot – a chunk of text that could be at the end of the digest. Thanks. This already exists, it is list:member:digest:footer. Your confusion seems to be because you think the list:member:digest:header template and list:member:digest:footer template are prepended/appended to each individual message in the digest which would not make sense and is not the case. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 11 months

Re: Apache+mod_wsgi issue

by Eggert Ehmke

Am Montag, 26. Dezember 2022, 16:08:42 CET schrieb Odhiambo Washington: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 5:07 PM Eggert Ehmke <eggert(a)eehmke.de> wrote: > > Ok, > > > > I hope this is readable. I just copíed the content of some files into the > > pastebin, don't know if it is possible to post tar.gz there. > > https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/mmRJJwKDc3/ > > > > Just tell me if this works for you, and when something is missing. > > Most of the settings are copied from some other sites and just adjusted > > for my > > needs. > > Good luck! > > So it seems your WSGIDaemonProcess is defined somewhere outside the VHOST, > right? Or it wasn't necessary? I have no settings for WSGIDaemon whatsoever. It's all handled by the uwsgi inside the venv. > And what does your urls.py look like? Which of the various urls.py files do you need? > > My setup is PUBLIC for everyone so I will not hide the domain name :-) > > In my setup, MM3 is installed in /opt/mailman/mm/. and mod_wsgi is enabled > in Apache. > I am running uwsgi on a TCP socket, not unix socket. > > The whole of my *VHOST:* > <CUT> > WSGIDaemonProcess mailman-web display-name=mailman-web > maximum-requests=1000 umask=0002 user=mailman group=mailman > python-path=/opt/mailman/mm:/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages > :/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.9 python-home=/opt/mailman/mm/venv > home=/opt/mailman/mm/var > WSGIRestrictSignal Off > <VirtualHost *:443> > ServerName mm3-lists.kictanet.or.ke > > SSLEngine on > SSLCertificateFile "/usr/local/etc/letsencrypt/live/ > mm3-lists.kictanet.or.ke/cert.pem" > SSLCertificateKeyFile "/usr/local/etc/letsencrypt/live/ > mm3-lists.kictanet.or.ke/privkey.pem" > SSLCertificateChainFile "/usr/local/etc/letsencrypt/live/ > mm3-lists.kictanet.or.ke/chain.pem" > CustomLog /var/log/mm3-lists-access.log combined > ErrorLog /var/log/mm3-lists-error.log > LogLevel info > Alias /favicon.ico /opt/mailman/mm/static/hyperkitty/img/favicon.ico > Alias /static "/opt/mailman/mm/static" > <Directory "/opt/mailman/mm/static"> > Require all granted > </Directory> > WSGIScriptAlias / /opt/mailman/mm/wsgi.py > <Directory "/opt/mailman/mm/"> > <Files wsgi.py> > Order deny,allow > Allow from all > Require all granted > </Files> > WSGIProcessGroup mailman-web > </Directory> > </VirtualHost> > </CUT> > > *2. uwsgi.ini:* > <CUT> > [uwsgi] > http-socket = 127.0.0.1:8000 > pidfile = /opt/mailman/mm/var/uwsgi.pid > chdir = /opt/mailman/mm/ > virtualenv = /opt/mailman/mm/venv/ > module=mailman_web.wsgi:application > env =PYTHONPATH=/opt/mailman/mm/ > env =DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=settings > master = true > process = 2 > threads = 2 > attach-daemon = /opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/mailman-web qcluster > req-logger = file:/opt/mailman/mm/var/logs/uwsgi.log > logger = qcluster file:/opt/mailman/mm/var/logs/uwsgi-qcluster.log > log-route = qcluster uwsgi-daemons > logger = cron file://opt/mailman/mm/var/logs/uwsgi-cron.log > log-route = cron uwsgi-cron > logger = file:/opt/mailman/mm/var/logs/uwsgi-error.log > uid = mailman > gid = mailman > </CUT> > > *3. uwsgi - *Running supervised (supervisord): > <CUT> > [program:uwsgi] > directory=/opt/mailman/mm/ > environment=PYTHONPATH=/opt/mailman/mm/ > command=/usr/bin/su -m mailman -c '/opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/uwsgi --ini > /opt/mailman/mm/uwsgi.ini' 2>&1 | logger -t uwsgi > autostart=true > autorestart=true > user=mailman > group=mailman > stopasgroup=true > killasgroup=true > </CUT> > > *4. urls.py*: > <CUT> > from django.conf.urls import include > from django.urls import re_path > from django.contrib import admin > from django.urls import reverse_lazy > from django.views.generic import RedirectView > from django_mailman3.views.profile import delete_account, user_profile > urlpatterns = [ > re_path(r'^$', RedirectView.as_view( > url=reverse_lazy('list_index'), > permanent=True)), > re_path(r'^postorius/', include('postorius.urls')), > re_path(r'^hyperkitty/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), > re_path(r'^user-profile/delete$', delete_account, > name='mm_user_account_delete'), > re_path(r'^user-profile/$', user_profile, name='mm_user_profile'), > re_path(r'^accounts/', include('allauth.urls')), > re_path(r'^admin/', admin.site.urls), > re_path(r'^mm/', include('postorius.urls')), > re_path(r'^archives/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), > ] > </CUT> > > And that's pretty much what I am using on my FreeBSD server. > > > PS: Possible to bottom-post instead of top-posting? :)

2 years, 9 months

Re: Mailman3 without Hyperkitty in docker

by Danil Smirnov

Hi Abhilash, Thank you very much - the previous error is fixed now. But I have another one now, which causes the same 500 Server Error: bash-4.3# cat /opt/mailman-web-data/logs/uwsgi-error.log *** Starting uWSGI 2.0.18 (64bit) on [Fri Mar 1 05:42:09 2019] *** compiled with version: 6.3.0 on 01 March 2019 01:52:42 os: Linux-3.10.0-693.11.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 4 23:52:40 UTC 2017 nodename: mailman-web machine: x86_64 clock source: unix detected number of CPU cores: 2 current working directory: /opt/mailman-web detected binary path: /usr/local/bin/uwsgi !!! no internal routing support, rebuild with pcre support !!! setgid() to 101 setuid() to 100 chdir() to /opt/mailman-web your memory page size is 4096 bytes detected max file descriptor number: 1048576 building mime-types dictionary from file /etc/mime.types...1168 entry found lock engine: pthread robust mutexes thunder lock: disabled (you can enable it with --thunder-lock) uwsgi socket 0 bound to TCP address 0.0.0.0:8080 fd 8 uwsgi socket 1 bound to TCP address 0.0.0.0:8000 fd 9 Python version: 3.6.8 (default, Jan 30 2019, 23:58:16) [GCC 6.3.0] Python main interpreter initialized at 0x55a2df7f57e0 python threads support enabled your server socket listen backlog is limited to 100 connections your mercy for graceful operations on workers is 60 seconds mapped 166752 bytes (162 KB) for 2 cores *** Operational MODE: threaded *** Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/utils/module_loading.py", line 20, in import_string return getattr(module, class_name) AttributeError: module 'django.contrib.auth.middleware' has no attribute 'SessionAuthenticationMiddleware' The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception: Traceback (most recent call last): File "wsgi.py", line 38, in <module> application = get_wsgi_application() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/wsgi.py", line 13, in get_wsgi_application return WSGIHandler() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/handlers/wsgi.py", line 136, in __init__ self.load_middleware() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", line 34, in load_middleware middleware = import_string(middleware_path) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/utils/module_loading.py", line 24, in import_string ) from err ImportError: Module "django.contrib.auth.middleware" does not define a "SessionAuthenticationMiddleware" attribute/class unable to load app 0 (mountpoint='') (callable not found or import error) *** no app loaded. going in full dynamic mode *** *** uWSGI is running in multiple interpreter mode *** spawned uWSGI master process (pid: 1) spawned uWSGI worker 1 (pid: 37, cores: 2) --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- --- no python application found, check your startup logs for errors --- As per my investigation, this error possibly caused by Django upgrade: *The SessionAuthenticationMiddleware class is removed. It provided no functionality since session authentication is unconditionally enabled in Django 1.10.* See https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.0/releases/2.0/ After I've removed the line https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman/blob/master/postorius/mailman-web… from settings.py, the container is finally working. I've placed PR in github: https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman/pull/314 Thank you for your help. Danil пт, 1 мар. 2019 г. в 04:33, Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in>: > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, at 5:19 PM, Abhilash Raj wrote: > > On February 27, 2019 11:53:34 PM PST, Danil Smirnov <danil(a)smirnov.la> > wrote: > > >Hi Mark, > > > > > >Actually all this stuff happens inside the container after it's started > > >and > > >initialized without errors. I didn't amend the image anyhow. > > > > > >Also I have the configuration based on docker-compose.yaml provided in > > >the > > >repository which works just fine for mailman-web image. > > > > > >The very same config with postorius image (+ UWSGI_STATIC_MAP param) > > >fails > > >with 500 error... > > > > > >Now answering your questions: > > > > > >ср, 27 февр. 2019 г., 22:56 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net>: > > > > > >> do you have django-q in INSTALLED_APPS in your Django settings and > > >what > > >> is set for Q_CLUSTER? > > >> > > > > > >I've checked settings.py inside the container and I haven't found any > > >of > > >the mentioned configurations there. > > > > > >Does the manage.py that's being run here point to the right > > >settings.py? > > >> > > > > > >No clue. > > > > > >Also I wonder why we have some Hyperkitty-related cronjobs in non-HK > > >configured image? > > > > > > > https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman/blob/master/postorius/mailman-web… > > > > Because I am a dum dum ;-) > > > > Will work on removing those crons and stuff. Would be nice if you > > opened an issue on Github so that I don't forget. > > Should now be fixed in the latest image. > > > > > >Danil > > > > > > > > > > > >> -- > > >> Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > > >> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. > > >Dylan > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > > >> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > > >> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > > >> > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > > >To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > > >https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > > > > > > -- > > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > -- > thanks, > Abhilash Raj (maxking) >

6 years, 7 months

Re: Mailman installation results in KeyError: 'env_py'

by Marvin Gülker

Am 22. October 2017 um 07:49 Uhr -0700 schrieb Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net>: > or you can install the fix at Thanks. Applying this patch makes it work. Now I've got a different problem, though. I can't get it to connect to Postfix for sending emails it appears. After I created a superuser account using $ python manage.py createsuperuser as described on <http://postorius.readthedocs.io/en/latest/setup.html>, I tried to login using this credentials into Postorius. It then reported it sent a confirmation email to me (for an account I created on commandline?!), but Postfix' logs reveal that it didn't; there's not even a sign of an attempted delivery in /var/log/mail.log. I've configured the Postfix configuration in mailman.cfg like this: [mta] incoming: mailman.mta.postfix.LMTP outgoing: mailman.mta.deliver.deliver lmtp_host: 127.0.0.1 lmtp_port: 8024 smtp_host: localhost smtp_port: 25 configuration: python:mailman.config.postfix as was outlined on <http://mailman.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/mailman/docs/mta.html>. mailman-suite's settings.py contains: # Change this when you have a real email backend EMAIL_BACKEND = 'django.core.mail.backends.smtp.EmailBackend' EMAIL_HOST = 'localhost' EMAIL_PORT = 25 which was described on <http://docs.list.org/en/latest/config-web.html>. For completeness, the following is in Postfix' main.cf, but is not the cause of the problem as it affects the incoming direction, whereas I refer to the outgoing one: transport_maps = hash:/home/mailman/var/data/postfix_lmtp local_recipient_maps = hash:/home/mailman/var/data/postfix_lmtp I failed to locate any kind of logging information about the failed email, so I don't even know where I should start looking for the problem. var/logs/smtp.log is empty in the mailman directory, and likewise is logs/mailmansuite.log in the mailman-suite_project directory. That being said, the enormous number of configuration files to consider and dozens of cross-references to other pages in the docs make the installation guide hard to follow; it also lacks logical structure in my opinion, when it refers to parts of the configuration which are later explained. For someone like me who never programmed a Django application (Ruby dev) this is all pretty cryptic. Especially, that some parts of information are on <http://docs.list.org/en/latest/index.html> whereas other parts are scattered over readthedocs.io makes it very complicated. Greetings Marvin -- Blog: https://www.guelkerdev.de PGP/GPG ID: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F

7 years, 11 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"