Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: Question: What happens if I delete a user from all lists and that user is sole owner of some list?

by Odhiambo Washington

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 6:58 PM David Partain <david.partain(a)ericsson.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 15:14 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > My question is: If one of these users is the sole owner of a list, what > > > will happen? Will the user be deleted and that list now owner-less? > > > Will mailman refuse to delete that user until I add a new owner? > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your feedback. > > > > 1. Create a testlist > > 2. Assign an owner to it > > 3. Delete the owner via the CLI or Postorius > > > > Give us your feedback :) > > I'll happily do so, and thanks for the idea. Try stuff, David! > > Cheers, > > Daudi Mwisho, as my mom liked to call me > Aah. Mswahili :-) -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

2 years, 7 months

Re: 502 bad gateway when unsubscribing users

by Jered Floyd

Hi Laura, This indicates a problem an error occurring within the specific install of Mailman that your university is running, and it will be very difficult to diagnose without access to the error logs. Is this something you can escalate with an IT administrator? They'll be in the best situation to figure out what's wrong -- it's definitely not anything that you are doing as a moderator. Regards, --Jered ----- On Aug 21, 2024, at 12:02 PM, laura thomas laura_thomas(a)fas.harvard.edu wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I moderate several email lists for a university using Postorius 1.3.4.1. I've > been trying to update our lists by removing members who have left the > department. However, when I click on a name and then "Unsubscribe Selected," I > always get a 502 Bad Gateway message, and I'm unable to remove any users from > the list. This has happened on every attempt across multiple users on multiple > mailing lists. Does anyone know what might be going on? I appreciate the help! > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > Archived at: > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… > > This message sent to jered(a)convivian.com

2 years, 2 months

Re: Custom templates (was: Re: Re: nginx configuration on a multitasking server)

by David Newman

On 1/14/22 6:35 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 1/14/22 6:11 PM, David Newman wrote: >> On 1/14/22 4:54 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >>> >>> It should work. I suspect you need to go to the list's Settings -> >>> Automatic Responses and set `Admin immed notify` to Yes. >> >> >> It's enabled. I think this triggers notifications only for new >> subscription requests, not pending ones. > > > Yes. That will send a single notification at the time of the request > using the `list:admin:action:subscribe.txt` template. Notices of pending > requests are sent by the `mailman notify` command using the > `list:admin:notice:pending.txt` template. > > ... >>> You can test `mailman notify` at any time by running it by hand. >> >> >> Thanks. This still isn't working as intended. I took these steps: >> >> 1. Created the file >> '/opt/mailman/mm/var/templates/lists/test.lists.domain.tld/en/list:admin:action:pending.txt' > > > The template name is `list:admin:notice:pending.txt`, not > `list:admin:action:pending.txt`. Thats why it didn't work. Bingo. Thanks -- the template works as intended now. > > ... >> 2. Restarted the mailman3 and mailmanweb services > > > You only needed to restart Mailman core. OK > > > ... >> What I'm trying to do here is replicate a feature from MM2.1, where >> pending notifications had URLs embedded in the message. That's not >> available out of the box in MM3, and if there's a place for feature >> requests I'd be glad to ask that this be made the default. > > > The place for feature requests for Mailman core (which this is) is > https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues, however, this is not > straightforward as Mailman core doesn't know if you even have Postorius > or some other web management UI installed or what the URL to access it > might be. Thus it's not just a simple matter of editing templates. It > would also require a configuration setting for the base URL for the web > admin UI and changes in logic to provide an appropriate replacement > depending on whether or not the base URL was configured. Understood, thanks. Although this distinction is very important for server admins, it's likely not meaningful for many list owners and moderators. For them, MM2.1 sent an email saying "go here" and MM3/Django/Postorius/Hyperkitty doesn't, at least not out of the box. There is some pending template in use by default, just not one with a URL included. Is this something better handled in the venv and/or Web installation docs? Or should I file a feature request for core, or Postorious or someplace else? Thanks very much! dn > >

4 years, 9 months

Re: If I manually add email addresses to a list and then delete them, how do i permanent delete them from Users?

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/25/23 3:02 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote: > Mark London wrote: > >> I added some email addresses manually to a mailing list and then removed them. But now I can't find how to totally remove them from mailman3. They show up in the Users list. > > You may find this script useful: > https://www.msapiro.net/scripts/clean_users.py That script will only delete Django users and optionally the Mailman user corresponding to the deleted Django user. I think the OP wants to delete Mailman users that are not members of any lists even if there is no corresponding Django user. That script won't do that. Mailman Users can be deleted from the Postorius Users view, but it's a one at a time process, and there's no indication that the User has memberships unless you first go to `Manage` to check. I will modify the script to enable deleting Mailman users with no memberships even if they aren't Django users and post here when it's done. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 6 months

Re: spanish localization

by Abhilash Raj

On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 01:08, Victoriano Giralt <victoriano(a)uma.es> wrote: > El sáb, 13-02-2021 a las 14:53 -0800, Mark Sapiro escribió: >> What translations are those? Please give specific examples. What I >> am >> saying is Mailman core 3.3.3 is currently up to date with weblate. >> There >> are no Spanish translations for core done after 7 November in >> weblate >> and weblate shows 100% completion for Spanish for Mailman core. > > Mark, please, how do you check when translations happened? Nov 7th is > a > very significant date for me (it is my wedding anniversary) and I'm > 90% > sure that I dedicated time to Weblate after that date... You can look at the commit history of the spanish po file to get a detailed history of when and who made the changes. For example: Core: <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/commits/master/src/mailman/messages/es…> Postorius: <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/commits/master/src/postorius/locale/…> You find similar histories in all the repos. Each person's changes should be an individual commit in the repo, typically all outstanding translations are committed every night in Weblate. > > All strings related to Mailman (core, django_mailman3, postorius and > hyperkitty) are translated into Spanish 100%, but the interfaces, > after > updating to the latest releases, are still in Englanish (more English > than > Spanish). Could this be because of the .mo files not being up-to-update? There used to be some strings that were translated incorrectly, but I think we fixed all of those that we found. Abhilash > This is not a fight, we want to help, but do not know how. > > Thanks! > > -- > Victoriano Giralt Innovation Director > Digital Transformation Vicerectorate University of Malaga > +34952131415 SPAIN > ================================================================== > Note: signature.asc is the electronic signature of present message > A: Yes. >> Q: Are you sure ? >>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email ? > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > <mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> > <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/> thanks, Abhilash Raj On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 00:57, Victoriano Giralt <victoriano(a)uma.es> wrote: > El sáb, 13-02-2021 a las 20:52 +0100, Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7) > via > Mailman-users escribió: >> On 13/2/21 20:00, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> > On 2/13/21 2:33 AM, Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7) via Mailman-users >> > wrote: >> > > But... here is a thing that I can not understand: If the source >> (the >> > > .po >> > > file) is from november 7th, it doesn't matter how many times you >> > > recompile it: the result will be the same. >> > Correct, but the point is if you download the latest >> > gnu-mailman-mailman-es.po from weblate, and compare it to the Nov >> 7 >> > file >> > in the distribution, you will find they are identical, so it it >> appears >> > that the weblate translation hasn't changed since that time. >> > >> > If there are issues in this mailman.po, they exist in weblate too >> and >> > need to be fixed there. >> >> That clarifies all. Thanks. As I said in my previous message, I'll >> wait >> for the next upgrade and hopingly the translations done after 7h of >> november (by others and me) will be there. > > I've visited Weblate, all Spanish strings are translated. Spanish is > 100% > translated, but, none of them have been "approved", whatever that is. > It > seems that a reviewer needs to approve the translation in order for > them to > be incorporated or released or whatever. I was sure I had reviewed > everything between November 7th and the day Abhilash announced the > release > candidate and asked for translation review, but nothing has made it > to the > released version. > > Maybe there's something in the translation flow that we are doing > wrong. > I'm starting to miss the good old days when Mailman 2 translators just > downloaded the .po files and returned them :-) > >> > Also note that the translations on weblate only affect strings in >> the >> > core code. The Mailman core templates are not currently >> translated in >> > weblate and there are currently no Spanish language templates. One >> > would >> > need to create Spanish translations of all the templates in >> > < >> > >> <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/tree/master/src/mailman/templates/en> >> > > >> > and submit a merge request to add them to a mailman/templates/es/ >> > directory. >> > >> I will make the template translations locally, test them, and then, >> if >> they are yet lacking in the main repo, follow your suggestion. > > I'm a bit short on time, but I'll help Guillermo with that, at least > reviewing or doing a second pass. I'm not proficient enough to speak > about > Mailman core templates, but for Django templates, there is a nice tag > for > marking text with translations in the .mo files ... > > -- > Victoriano Giralt Innovation Director > Digital Transformation Vicerectorate University of Malaga > +34952131415 SPAIN > ================================================================== > Note: signature.asc is the electronic signature of present message > A: Yes. >> Q: Are you sure ? >>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email ? > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > <mailto:mailman-users@mailman3.org> > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > <mailto:mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org> > <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/>

5 years, 8 months

Re: Solved Re: after last upgrade I've got a CSRF failed verification

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/27/22 03:04, Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7) via Mailman-users wrote: > > Since I made all the mailman3 enviroment wide server open (not using > venv) I already executed the migration doing a > > su -m mailman3 -c "python3 manage.py collectstatic" > su -m mailman3 -c "python3 manage.py migrate" > > Being mailman3 the user who runs all of mailman3 related stuff > > I had problems doing the migrate part, showing an error of lacking > perms. I solved it running the migration under root (I know it could be > trouble after, but...) It would be much better to identify the problem files/directories and adjust their ownership. It is possible that running stuff as root in the past left things owned by root causing the issue. > > After that the compress part showed errors... but the postorius web > maintenance was working well except for the CSRF error verification. I > will trace the compress errors and will try to find the problem later. Do you have `COMPRESS_ENABLED = True` in your settings? If that's not the issue, it may be in the settings for COMPRESS_PRECOMPILERS -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years

Re: [Mailman-Users] MM3 startup issues

by Mark Sapiro

Restoring original Subject:, and doesn't this thread belong on mailman-users(a)msailman3.org - CCing there. On 1/5/20 11:51 PM, Allan Hansen wrote: > > Thanks again, Mark! > My responses below. > >> On 1/4/20 5:47 PM, Allan Hansen wrote: >>> >>> a. The server was set up with the wrong domain name (our fault), so I had to add the ‘correct’ one. I had seen the command ‘Add Domain’ in >>> the UI and thought that would do it, but Brian kindly sent me a list of additional instructions, which we then implemented. That made it possible to create a list in the new domain, subscribe people and post messages. However, messages are not archived. What extra step is needed to enable archiving? >> >> >> What are the setytings in Postorius -> Settings -> Archiving? > > Archive policy: Private archives > Archive archivers: hyperkitty, prototype Are the messages in Mailman's var/archives/prototype/LIST@DOMAIN/new directory? Are there messages in Mailman's var/archives/hyperkitty/spool/ directory? What's the setting for base_url in mailman-hyperkitty.cfg? Are there any errors in var/logs/mailman.log? >>> b. When go to the server using the new domain (both before and after logging in), I see not just the lists I created in the new domain, but the lists created in the old domain. These lists of lists are domain specific and should not be listed together. That’s just IMHO, but not serious, as I will soon get rid of anything in the old domain. So feel free to ignore this one if this is intended, which I could see might be the case. >> >> >> Set >> >> FILTER_VHOST = True >> >> in settings_local.py >> > > Yes, Brian told me to do the same. This is the what I wrote back: > > hansen@rccrmail:/opt/mailman/mm$ sudo vi settings.py > > Edited the setting to: > # Only display mailing-lists from the same virtual host as the webserver > FILTER_VHOST = True You shouldn't edit settings.py. You should override the setting by putting it in settings_local.py. > Then Brian told me to restart qcluster: > hansen@rccrmail:/opt/mailman/mm$ sudo systemctl restart qcluster qcluster is not what you need to restart. You need to restart whatever is supporting the wsgi interface to Django. This may be uwsgi or gunicorn or ??. Whatever it is, that's what needs to be restarted. > I then logged in, but the same lists are showing. It either takes the system a long time to reset or it has ignored the > setting. > Just tried it again, and the lists are all showing. Do I need to manually recompile the file? > >> >>> c. I then moved on to the templates and added a template for the message text to send to new subscribers. That resulted in the following error message when I went in as moderator to approve of a new subscription: >>> >>> Something went wrong >>> Mailman REST API not available. Please start Mailman core. >> >> >> Postorius is unable to access core's REST API. Is Mailman running? > > Well, I was able to post to the lists, so I assume it is. Listing at processes, I see a bunch of postgres, python3, nginx, django-adminp but > nothing explicitly with a ‘mailman’ string. If you do `ps ax|grep runner=`, what do you see? If you don't see at least three processes with `--runner=rest:0:1`, stop Mailman and start Mailman. >> If so, what's in /opt/mailman/mm/var/logs/mailmansuite.log or whatever it's >> called - defined as `filename` in the `file` handler in the LOGGING >> definition in settings(_local).py. > > hansen@rccrmail:/opt/mailman/mm/logs$ tail -f mailmansuite.log > return Site.objects.get_current(request) > File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/contrib/sites/models.py", line 60, in get_current > return self._get_site_by_request(request) > File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/contrib/sites/models.py", line 45, in _get_site_by_request > SITE_CACHE[domain] = self.get(domain__iexact=domain) > File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py", line 82, in manager_method > return getattr(self.get_queryset(), name)(*args, **kwargs) > File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 408, in get > self.model._meta.object_name > django.contrib.sites.models.Site.DoesNotExist: Site matching query does not exist. This is because of the domain change. In settings(_local).py you have a setting for SITE_ID. Possibly, setting that in settings_local.py to a value one greater that the current setting will do. To be certain of the correct value, you need to look at the django_site table in mailman's database. That table has 3 columns, id, domain and name. The id for the row of your domain is what needs to be set as SITE_ID. > [ABH] At this point I click to accept a subsription request: > > ERROR 2020-01-06 07:32:41,439 699 postorius.middleware Mailman REST API not available > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 672, in urlopen > chunked=chunked, > File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 421, in _make_request > six.raise_from(e, None) > File "<string>", line 3, in raise_from > File "/opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 416, in _make_request > httplib_response = conn.getresponse() > File "/usr/lib/python3.7/http/client.py", line 1321, in getresponse > response.begin() > File "/usr/lib/python3.7/http/client.py", line 296, in begin > version, status, reason = self._read_status() > File "/usr/lib/python3.7/http/client.py", line 265, in _read_status > raise RemoteDisconnected("Remote end closed connection without" > http.client.RemoteDisconnected: Remote end closed connection without response > > So yes, the REST API is not there. How can I get it going? Stop Mailman and then start it. > Before we added the new domain, I was able to accept subscription requests to the previous domain’s lists. No more. > > Yours, > > Allan -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 10 months

Re: Fwd: Re: Removing a mail addresses and users

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/10/20 3:33 PM, Allan Hansen wrote: > > Some dedicated and skilled developers are currently investing heavily in a replacement for Postorius, but I really believe that any work is better spent transforming Mailman Core etc. into a true account-based system. Then, and only then, will it make sense to build new and better interfaces on top, as, without a healthy core, such interface will currently may have to inherit the confusion and disconnect that currently is so aggravating. I think you misunderstand what Mailman Core currently is. I think Mailman Core's concept of User is exactly what you are talking about when you ask for a "true account-based system". The problem is that Mailman Core was intentionally designed without any web UI and a RESTful API for separate web based UIs or whatever to use to communicate with it. Then the people who developed the web based management UI (Postorius) and archive UI (HyperKitty) chose to develop those within a Django framework and Django has its own concept of User separate from Mailman Core and that is where the disconnect occurs. It's not that Mailman Core lacks what you want. It's that Django doesn't use it. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 4 months

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman 3.1 beta coming soon

by Florian Fuchs

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:07:24AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: >Hello Mailman 3 users and developers! > >It's been a long slog but I think we are finally ready to begin the release >process for Mailman 3.1. I am pretty happy about the state of the Core, and >Florian is going to do some more integration testing with HyperKitty and >Postorius. We still have a few issues and a merge proposal or two to address, I did some manual integration testing today (core+mailmanclient+postorius) which looked fine so far. I didn't get to test HyperKitty and the bundler though, so any help testing those would be very much appreciated. I will have some more time tomorrow. I did all of my testing locally, which has some limitations. So I started setting up a more realistic environment on one of my dev machines. But I'm not done yet. Will report back when I'm done... ;-) >but I am planning to spin a beta of Core this weekend to facilitate testing. I think it's OK to put out a separate beta of the core, because the version pulled from pypi will still be 3.0 if I'm not terribly mistaken. For the real 3.1 we should probably do a coordinated release of all components, once everything's tested a little more thoroughly. Cheers Florian

9 years, 11 months

Re: What's the difference between (purpose of) reject and ignore

by denis.bitouze＠univ-littoral.fr

Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 6/25/22 07:54, denis.bitouze(a)univ-littoral.fr wrote: > > > Mark Sapiro wrote: > > The difference between Reject and Discard is Reject notifies the > > sender of the rejection whereas Discard just discards the message > > without notification. > > IMHO, even in English, “Reject” and “Discard” are not > > self-explanatory. > > They seem so to me, but in any case, if you look at Postorius -> > Settings -> Message Acceptance -> Default action to take when a > (non-)member posts to the list, they are described there in much more > detail. OK: not easy to figure out. A tooltip on the corresponding buttons would be helpful. > > BTW, no clue about an automatic banishment of emails from discarded > > messages? > > In the pop-up dialog from clicking the subject of a held post you can > set the sender's moderation status when discarding the post. Sorry but I can only see: - “--- Set member moderation ---” (non selectable, I guess) - “Hold for moderation” - “Reject (with notification)” - “Discard (no notification)” - “Accept immediately (bypass other rules)” - “Default processing” and cannot see how I can at the same time “Discard (no notification)” and “Banish the email of the post's sender”.

4 years, 4 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"