Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: Virtual alias + shell

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/26/23 4:36 AM, alopez(a)ac.upc.edu wrote: > Hello, > I want to have a mailman configured together with virtual alias. To do that I need to use alias_domain. > I have tried to do it with mailman shell. The domain seams to be created but when I leave the shell and enter again, the domain is not longer there. Because you are leaving mailman shell with exit() which doesn't commit changes. You deed to either explicitly commit with `commit()` or exit with control-D. Recent mailman shell will report in its banner Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell Use commit() to commit changes. Use abort() to discard changes since the last commit. Exit with ctrl+D does an implicit commit() but exit() does not. > On the other hand, If I create a domain in administrator interface, it is not listed in the shell. If I create in the web interface, which field correspond to the alias_domain : Domain Name, Display Name , Mail domain? Your Postorius is too old to support alias_domain, and your Mailman core may be too - requires core >= 3.2.0. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 6 months

Re: Ann: Mailman Core 3.3.5 is out

by Odhiambo Washington

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 7:59 PM Brett Delmage via Mailman-users < mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2021, Eggert Ehmke via Mailman-users wrote: > > > Should I upgrade my Mailman 3.3.3 installed from Debian Bullseye? I > would have > > to bypass the Debian installer. Or will there be Debian packages > available? > > Same question for Postorius 1.3.6 > > I am excited to see 3.3.5 with its many updates > available. Thanks to all the contributors. > > I would like to know this too, as I was just about to install parallel to > the Debian package(s). I expect there are many of us. > > Going forward, what is the best way to maintain a stable version of 3.3.5 > with security and defect fixes only, exluding new features? Is > picking and applying individual checkins on gitlab the only way? > If you install using the guide from Virtualenv Installation — Mailman Suite 3.3 documentation (mailman3.org) <https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#virtualenv-inst…>, then you can pretty much upgrade at will. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' :-)

4 years, 2 months

Re: Wrong info in moderation mail when held due to match of a header rule

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/17/20 1:31 PM, tlhackque via Mailman-users wrote: > > I might also add the rule number or config filename:line, as in > > Header "{name}": rule in {file}:{n} matched value "{value}" > > This would be helpful when backtracking from a rejected message to the > cause. > > A sample expansion might be: > > Header "X-Spam": rule in foo.conf:83 matched value "yes" These rules are not in a configuration file. They are in the headermatch table in the database and the rules for a particular list are exposed on the Header filters tab in Postorius or at the REST lists/LISTNAME/header-matches endpoint. Perhaps something like {name}: header match rule, pattern "{pattern}" matched value "{value}" example: subject: header match rule, pattern "sex|long|list|of|other|bad|words" matched value "This is a post about filtering based on words like sex in the subject." but that could be just adding more clutter. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 1 month

Re: sqlite3 Database "read only" error on mailman_sync job

by Abhilash Raj

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, at 1:15 PM, Ugnius wrote: > > I do not know... In the setup example settings was something like process number = 2. But I understand at least 1 uwsgi and 1 run server should run? No, only uwsgi needs to run. It is fine if there are two of those, since it probably forks to have 2 worker process. There shouldn't be any "python manage.py runserver" processes running at all, it is meant only for testing purposes. The doc mentions that it is "development" server[1][2]. [1]: # Run the Django's "development" server at localhost:8000 [2]: http://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/prodsetup.html#setting-up-django-project Perhaps it should be more descriptive about what does it mean. > > On 5 Sep 2019, at 23:08, Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> wrote: >> 6644 ? S 0:12 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini >> 6645 ? S 0:00 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 >> 6653 ? Sl 636:28 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 >> 6656 ? Sl 0:27 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini >> >> This fishy, why do you have both uwsgi and "python manage.py runserver" running? >> >> You only need one of those, since they both do the exact same thing. Please remove >> whatever is running the "python manage.py runserver" part and only use uwsgi. >> >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, at 1:02 PM, Ugnius S wrote: >>> Thank You, Abhilash, to helping. I have checked the processes, but also I have read, that sqlite3 can run in multi writing mode. >>> May mailman processes are next: >>> >>> 6644 ? S 0:12 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini >>> 6645 ? S 0:00 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 >>> 6653 ? Sl 636:28 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 >>> 6656 ? Sl 0:27 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini >>> 6643 ? S 0:00 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/master -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg >>> 659 ? S 0:46 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=in:0:1 >>> 6660 ? S 0:42 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=nntp:0:1 >>> 6661 ? S 0:42 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=digest:0:1 >>> 6662 ? S 0:48 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=pipeline:0:1 >>> 6663 ? S 0:44 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=archive:0:1 >>> 6664 ? S 0:41 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=command:0:1 >>> 6665 ? S 0:01 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=retry:0:1 >>> 6666 ? S 0:45 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=virgin:0:1 >>> 6667 ? Sl 0:16 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=lmtp:0:1 >>> 6668 ? Sl 1:30 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=rest:0:1 >>> 6669 ? S 0:42 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=bounces:0:1 >>> 6670 ? S 0:49 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=out:0:1 >>> >>> Looks like there are no double. Nothing more is running. >>> >>> 2019-09-05, kt, 03:16 Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> rašė: >>>> __ >>>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019, at 2:05 PM, Ugnius S wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have installed using documentation. My linux distribution version has no full package available. I have installed step by step: >>>>> $ sudo pip3 install mailman >>>>> $ sudo pip3 install postorius >>>>> $ sudo pip3 install hyperkitty >>>>> $ sudo pip3 install mailman-hyperkitty >>>>> And of course all mandatory components... Everything without errors, I can drop db files and I can download mailman-suite again and start from empty page again. But it will not guarantee that DB will not become READ ONLY again. Here should be logic. No developing support here? >>>> >>>> Could you be running two separate processes such that the database is locked by one and so other finds it as READ Only? When you find a read only database, can you check if it is open in some other process? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2019-09-03, an, 19:36 Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> rašė: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019, at 3:22 AM,ugniusviln(a)gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> > Hi. All the project installation is under the same user / path and >>>>>> > it works. Archiving working as well, (just one remark: no matter what >>>>>> > to set in postorius, hyperkitty shows list as public) >>>>>> > I have found work around - it is possible to change list as private in >>>>>> > "admin" page. >>>>>> > I started to get issues with runjobs after I have created couple of >>>>>> > new lists with "no archive" option. >>>>>> >>>>>> How did you install all these components. It seems there the installation is broken in weird ways. >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > If as owner user from project home I run: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > django-admin mailman_sync >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Traceback (most recent call last): >>>>>> > File >>>>>> > "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", >>>>>> > line 84, in _execute >>>>>> > return self.cursor.execute(sql, params) >>>>>> > File >>>>>> > "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/db/backends/sqlite3/base.py", >>>>>> > line 383, in execute >>>>>> > return Database.Cursor.execute(self, query, params) >>>>>> > sqlite3.OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database >>>>>> > >>>>>> > "django-admin runjob sync_mailman " - makes read only errors as well. >>>>>> > "django-admin runjob new_lists_from_mailman" >>>>>> > django.db.utils.OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database >>>>>> > END TRACEBACK >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I did not find information how to fix this. It was worked without errors >>>>>> > before. >>>>>> > I noticed, that if I stop mailman, "django-admin mailman_sync" starts >>>>>> > to work. >>>>>> > If I start "mailman start", then "django-admin mailman_sync" failing >>>>>> > again. >>>>>> > I did not check other jobs, but I think what is related to database, >>>>>> > will get errors. >>>>>> > Seems mailman locking the database. It is not a file permissions issue. >>>>>> > Mailman db location is: /project_directory/var/data/mailman.db >>>>>> > >>>>>> > if to rename /project_directory/var/data/mailman.db to something, >>>>>> > mailman creates database file size 0, django-admin runjobs start >>>>>> > working, but of course postorius stops working. I did it for testing. >>>>>> > I have returned this database file back, postorius started to work >>>>>> > again, but django-admin runjobs does not work, error: "database read >>>>>> > only". >>>>>> > Please help me how to fix this issue. >>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >>>>>> > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >>>>>> > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> thanks, >>>>>> Abhilash Raj (maxking) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> thanks, >>>> Abhilash Raj (maxking) >>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> thanks, >> Abhilash Raj (maxking) >> >> -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

6 years, 3 months

Re: Avoiding non-members to be saved.

by Guillermo Hernandez (Oldno7)

On 7/8/21 20:03, Mark Sapiro wrote: > This is the way MM 3 works. The only reason *_these_nonmembers exists > in MM 3 is to support the legacy regexps from MM 2.1. For non-regexp > addresses the address is a nonmember with the appropriate moderation > action. > > I actually find this convenient. When a nonmember posts spam to a list > and that spam is held, I discard the spam in Postorius and at the same > time set the nonmember's moderation action to discard so I never see > any more from that address. Also, when someone who I recognize as a > list member posts from an alternate nonmember address, I can accept > that post and set the nonmember address moderation action to default > processing. > I find it very convenient too, but it concerns me that spammers, really "profesional" spammers and senders of phising mail change the forged address and sender domain too rapidly to track them. As of it, the non-member database is growing more and more. It could be a "monster" in two or three years... Not a problem now. And I know now how to delete them in one go :) --

4 years, 4 months

Re: Migration of the e-mail templates

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/6/25 2:24 PM, Markus Grandpré wrote: > > Thank you for your prompt reply. Based on a customer request, it seems > that custom templates need to be copied manually. Could you kindly > indicate which files and locations should be considered when > transferring them from the source to the target system? In MM 2.1, you could have list specific templates in directories like lists/<listname>/<language>/, domain specific templates in directories like templates/<list.host_name>/<language> and sitewide templates in directories like templates/site/<language>. In MM 3 You can create list and domain specific templates in Postorius or you can create them in sub-directories of Mailman's var/templates/ directory. List specific templates in lists/<list-id>/<language>/, domain specific templates in directories like domains/<mail-host>/<language>/ and sitewide templates in directories like site/<language>/. However, you can't just copy MM 2.1 templates because the variable replacement syntax is different and the template file names are different. See https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/rest/docs/… for documentation of the MM 3 templating system. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

9 months

Re: Handling of SPAM mails in mailman3 - Check for X-Spam Header

by Torge Riedel

Am 16.01.20 um 21:43 schrieb Mark Sapiro: > On 1/16/20 10:51 AM, Torge Riedel wrote: >> Such SPAM mails are currently hold for moderation with reason "not from >> a list member". Is there no check for the "X-Spam: Yes" header or is >> this check done later? > > If you set a Header Filter (in Postorius the Header filters tab) those > checks are done before non-member moderation. > > This won't work for posts from members because the header checks are > done between member moderation checks and non-member moderation checks, > but if you create a Header Filter for header 'x-spam' and pattern 'yes' > with action hold, a message from a non-member which has an X-Spam: Yes > header should be held for that reason. > > Hi Mark, thank you for your answer. Just to understand that right: In case a posting with an "X-Spam: Yes" header comes from a member, it will not be held? It will be directly forwarded to the list? If yes, is there any chance to change or extend this? Best regards Torge

5 years, 10 months

Re: Subscription request cannot be moderated: 404 Not Found

by Eric Broens

Hi Mark, The link that shows the subscription request pending approval is as follows: 'https://<host_url>/postorius/lists/<listname>.<domain>/subscription_requests' The link behind the accept button is as follows. 'https://<host_url>/postorius/lists/<listname>.<domain>/handle_subscription_request/4d6b4b11266c7332684c5a492eb3f92c531f761b/accept' I have checked if there is already a subscription with that email address, but that's not the case. Best Regards,Eric On Thursday, January 14, 2021, 08:43:54 PM GMT+1, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: On 1/9/21 5:39 AM, Eric Broens via Mailman-users wrote: > For one of our mailinglists we also have a problem with accepting a subscription request. > When Clicking "Accept", we get a 404 Not found error. > See the attached screenshot. > Is there a way to solve this? Content filtering removed your screenshot so we can't see it. What is the URL that gives the 404? How does this compare to the URL of the held message view? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

4 years, 10 months

List Migration from MM2.1 -> MM3

by Odhiambo Washington

So I thought I have everything running. Fresh install of MM3 on Ubuntu-22.04. I have created a list in postorius - it has the same name as my old list in MM2. [image: MM3.png] Now, following - https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/migration.html - I change user to mailman so as to run the migration. mailman@lists:~$ pwd /opt/mailman mailman@lists:~$ id uid=1003(mailman) gid=1002(mailman) groups=1002(mailman),4(adm),38(list) mailman@lists:~$ */opt/mailman/mm/venv/bin/mailman import21 skunkworks(a)lists.my.co.ke <skunkworks(a)lists.my.co.ke> /var/list/lists/skunkworks/config.pck *# running without specifying the absolute path is not working! Usage: mailman import21 [OPTIONS] LISTSPEC PICKLE_FILE Try 'mailman import21 -h' for help. Error: No such list: skunkworks(a)lists.my.co.ke mailman@lists:~$ ls -al /var/list/lists/skunkworks/config.pck -rw-rw---- 1 root list 63765 Aug 14 11:10 /var/list/lists/skunkworks/config.pck mailman@lists:~$ exim -bt skunkworks(a)lists.my.co.ke skunkworks(a)lists.my.co.ke router = mailman3_router, transport = mailman3_transport mailman@lists:~$ What am I missing? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) ___________________________________________ Mailman's content filtering has removed the following MIME parts from this message. Content-Type: image/png Name: MM3.png Replaced multipart/alternative part with first alternative.

3 years, 3 months

Re: Welcome message template errors

by Mark

On 2024-04-23 11:33, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 4/22/24 17:06, Mark wrote: >> >> There was no line POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL in >> /etc/mailman3/settings.py > So presumably you were getting the default > > POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL = 'http://localhost:8000' > > from mailman-web/settings/mailman.py because of > from mailman_web.settings.mailman import * > in your settings.py. Yes. # Mailman Web configuration file. # /etc/mailman3/settings.py # Get the default settings. from mailman_web.settings.base import * from mailman_web.settings.mailman import * ... > >> Then, as site-owner, creating a new custom Welcome template (again via >> the WebUI) I can see it correctly added to the database in >> mailman.template.uri >> >> - >> https://lists.mydomain.com/mailman3/api/templates/list/lists.mydomain.com/l… That URI should have been; https://lists.mydomain.com/mailman3/api/templates/list/mytestlist.lists.myd… If I go to the above URL, the text of the list's Custom welcome message displays on an otherwise empty webpage. > > > And what happens if you go to that URL in a web browser? Also what do > you get when going to https://lists.mydomain.com/mailman3? I get the Postorius page "Mailing Lists" that displays the table of lists.

1 year, 7 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"