Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: New messages not being archived

by Sarah H

going to port 8000 directly results in http.client.RemoteDisconnected: Remote end closed connection without response I have confirmed that uWsgi is listening at that port. $ netstat -tulnp (Not all processes could be identified, non-owned process info will not be shown, you would have to be root to see it all.) Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:8000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2864/uwsgi attempting to curl the suggested addresses from earlier in the thread return the same results. [sarah@]$ curl http://127.0.0.1:8000/hyperkitty/api/mailman/archive curl: (52) Empty reply from server [sarah@]$ curl http://127.0.0.1:8000/archive/api/mailman/archive curl: (52) Empty reply from server Matt: The admin list I am working with was created by the postorius web ui, but I am seeing the same behaviour on the 2 lists imported from mailman 2.1 as well, which were created and imported directly in bash. All 3 lists are sending and receiving mail properly.

5 years

Re: Unable to update templates

by Mark

************************************************** > On 5/27/25 18:54, Mark wrote: >> >> However when I update the template, the databases are updated >> correctly but the Welcome message is still sent with the old template >> content. >> >> mailman.templates >> mailmanweb.postorius_emailtemplate >> >> Additionally, if I delete the template and create a new one the old >> content still gets sent. >> >> I cannot find where this content is written or is being cached. ************************************************** On 2025-05-28 02:34, Mark Sapiro wrote: > The content is stored in the mailmanweb.postorius_emailtemplate table. > As far as Mailman core and Postorius are concerned, that's the only > place. > ... If the template is deleted, the > mailman.template table entry is deleted and at that point Mailman core > will get the template from the file system following it's normal > search rules, ************************************************** Where does Mailman core search for the file if the table entry is deleted?

1 year, 2 months

Re: Template URI gets written incorrectly

by Mark Dale

On 2023-05-24 10:11, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 5/23/23 16:51, Mark Dale via Mailman-users wrote: >> >> When I create a template, it writes the URI incorrectly into the template table in the mailman3 database and the list stops working. >> >> For example, it writes: >> >> http://localhost/mailman3/postorius/api/templates/list/markslist.lists.post… >> >> When I correct it like so, all is well: >> >> https://lists.postmark.io/mailman3/postorius/api/templates/list/markslist.l… >> >> Have I missed a config setting somewhere, or is this a bug with the older Debian Mailman 3.3.3 ? > > > You need to set > > POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL = 'https://lists.postmark.io/' > > in your Django settings. Debian probably has set it to 'http://localhost/'. > Indeed that was it! Thanks very much Mark. /etc/mailman3/mailman-web.py Line 190: POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL = 'https://lists.postmark.io/'

3 years, 2 months

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Re: Help with Newbie error -- I think I deleted my server

by William Oliver

On Sat, 2021-12-25 at 10:19 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 12/25/21 7:13 AM, William Oliver wrote: > > > > Just out of curiosity, if I could not have guessed a valid ID > > number > > and did not have the admin interface, how could I have figured out > > what > > site IDs were available? > > > If Postorius is working, recent versions show the SITE_ID in the > domains > view. I.e. after you added your domain you could have noted the > SITE_ID > and made the change in settings before deleting the example.com > domain. > > In any case, the django_site table in Mailman's database has the > information. > Thanks. Yep, I peeked at the database and there it was. That would probably been more efficient than randomly choosing numbers... billo

4 years, 7 months

Re: New messages not being archived

by Matt Wilbur EFS

I apologize if this is off-track, but when I originally was setting up lists in mm3 I made the mistake of using the Postorius "Create List" button. I found that when I did this, I saw no archives and I don't recall if mails flowed OK. The setup was incomplete for me. I had to delete, and then create my lists using the mailman command and then everything just magically worked. matt On 7/15/21 2:11 PM, Sarah H wrote: > I get a 301 when I go to http and the full html page not found text that is above if I go to https. if I curl loopback on html I get the same html response, https I get: > > curl: (35) error:1408F10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version number > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

5 years

Re: What's the difference between (purpose of) reject and ignore

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/25/22 07:54, denis.bitouze(a)univ-littoral.fr wrote: > Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> The difference between Reject and Discard is Reject notifies the >> sender of the rejection whereas Discard just discards the message >> without notification. > > IMHO, even in English, “Reject” and “Discard” are not self-explanatory. They seem so to me, but in any case, if you look at Postorius -> Settings -> Message Acceptance -> Default action to take when a (non-)member posts to the list, they are described there in much more detail. > BTW, no clue about an automatic banishment of emails from discarded messages? In the pop-up dialog from clicking the subject of a held post you can set the sender's moderation status when discarding the post. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 1 month

Re: Confirm and Moderate Unsubscribe Requests

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/21/20 8:53 AM, Brian Carpenter wrote: > If you set the unsubscription policy to confirm then moderate for a list > and someone unsubscribes, they receive a confirmation request. That is > good. They respond to it. That is also working fine. However the list > owner/moderator than gets a request to approve the unsubscribe request > and well, unless I am missing something, I don't see an interface to > handles such requests via Postorius. This is <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/332>. > How does one handle an unsubscribe request that requires moderator > approval? I'm not sure at this point, I can look further later, but if the notice to the admin has a token, it might work to send a `confirm <token>` command to the list-request address. Otherwise, don't moderate unsubscription requests. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 9 months

Re: Default setting for Delivery status

by Mark Dale

>> Where and how do I set the default setting of "Delivery status" to be "Enabled". > > It already is. See https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/master/src/mailman/core/constants… >> At the moment, a new subscriber is neither "Enabled" or "Disabled". > > That's because the member's list based preferences for that list are not set, so we fall back to address based preferences if set and finally to global preferences where Delivery status is enabled. > > Log in to Postorius and select Mailman settings from the dropdown on the upper right at your user name to see more. > > New list members don't have and list based preferences for that list and just fall back to their address based preferences or global preferences. > Ahhhh. Thanks very much Mark. I did some experimenting to get my head around what you've explained and I can see how it works now.

3 years, 9 months

Re: Cross-List and Domain based sender whitelisting ( accept_these_nonmembers )

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/9/23 05:31, Johannes Rohr wrote: > > Thanks! I assume, there is a reason why this cannot be easily > implemented, else it would have been. Asking because I know a number of > people would make extensive use of this in MM2. The actual implementation is probably not difficult, but it's more than just handling things like `@list_id` in *_these_nonmembers. It also requires developing appropriate unit tests, updating REST and `mailman import21` to accept the syntax and documentation updates at least for Postorius Settings -> Message Acceptance -> * these non-members. That adds up to a significant amount of work. I recognize it's a significant regression for some, but we are a small, all volunteer project and can't do everything. A well crafted merge request would certainly be accepted. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 6 months

Re: MM2.1 -> MM3.3 migration. To hold or not hold

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/18/24 23:13, mark(a)suburbia.org.au wrote: > - Modified second test user to "Hold for moderation" in Members list. Noted the Moderation was set to "List default" before changing it to "Hold for moderation" The actual value is None, but Postorius displays/sets that as List default. >> If that is true, I can only think that at the time of that post, >> settings weren't as they are now. > > I think for now I will have to assume that's the case, until the next email can be readied against the proper list. If you hear nothing further, assume that this was all based on some random quirk (by humans or machines). I'll update if it happens again. Thank you for doing the test. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 8 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"