Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: Disable user registration

by Abhilash Raj

> On Mar 20, 2021, at 6:22 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <turnbull.stephen.fw(a)u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote: > > jens.guenther(a)posteo.de writes: > >> Same question here :-) > > This is not a simple question. Mailman is built from the ground up on > the assumption that users sign up. Making sign-up easy and powerful > is the raison d'etre of Mailman. > > One obvious approach is to add "^.$" to each list's ban list > (eventually that should be configurable as a list style, so "easy" to > make domainwide or sitewide), but that doesn't stop people from > creating users via Postorius. One way to address that would be to > clean out users with no subscriptions once a week or so. > > I guess you could go into the templates and remove the > accounts/signup/ links everywhere if "denial by obscurity" is enough, > or into urls.py and send that URL to a "Get out of here you hacker!" > view. Since these interventions are global, though, so the > desideratum of "no site admin intervention" is right out. Users are > site-global. Modifying urls.py to match `/accounts/signup` and redirect to a static page that says “Signups are disabled” or just event a 404 page is probably easiest to do. diff --git a/example_project/urls.py b/example_project/urls.py index 9c854989..3187756e 100644 --- a/example_project/urls.py +++ b/example_project/urls.py @@ -23,16 +23,22 @@ This file is the main URL config for a Django website including HyperKitty. from django.conf import settings from django.conf.urls import include, url from django.contrib import admin +from django.http import Http404 from django.urls import path, reverse_lazy from django.views.generic import RedirectView +def not_found(request): + raise Http404("Signups are disabled on this site.") + + urlpatterns = [ url(r'^$', RedirectView.as_view( url=reverse_lazy('hk_root'))), url(r'^hyperkitty/', include('hyperkitty.urls')), # url(r'^postorius/', include('postorius.urls')), url(r'', include('django_mailman3.urls')), + url(r'^accounts/signup', not_found), url(r'^accounts/', include('allauth.urls')), # Django admin url(r'^admin/', admin.site.urls), This did the job for me locally and will present the user with a 404 page saying the “Signups are disabled on this site”. Note it is important to put the new pattern before the “^accounts/“ pattern since the URLs are matched in the order they are defined. -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

4 years, 8 months

Re: Pck files stuck in out queue

by Lieuallen, Thomas Otis

I’m still wondering about mailman’s cache (cache_dir setting). I have 2x cache files under it that are 3-4 days old. These are mailman cache files, not mailman-web. # pwd /opt/mailman/mm # find cache -type f -ls 38627053 4 -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 13 Feb 6 16:42 cache/26/26/2626c32ded811be4e9631d2215f32d88522b67142bf0eea502362d2b15c4743e 118392 4 -rw-rw---- 1 mailman mailman 11 Feb 7 09:42 cache/98/14/9814e4457e2489e2ec77d19ce982d3643fac3ad849c9861a9198eebf53f1fcde I haven’t figured out how to work with these cache files. I found some mention that a runner would clean up cache files after a week (default) and that one could use ‘cache_life’ to change that default. So, I set the following and restarted mailman. The cache files hadn’t been removed after > 4 hours, so I unset it and restarted again. Cache_life: 1d Without further information or direction, I’m tempted to just remove those cache files and move on with life. Thank you Tom Lieuallen From: Lieuallen, Thomas Otis via Mailman-users <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> Date: Friday, February 7, 2025 at 1:43 PM To: mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> Subject: [MM3-users] Re: Pck files stuck in out queue [This email originated from outside of OSU. Use caution with links and attachments.] Mark, I checked the database; nothing there. Note that there are only 3x entries and only one is list:member:regular:header (my test), so just nothing of interest. The URL works and produces the proper template information. I finally did a find/grep in the mailman tree and found a match for this errant string. It is under the cache folder. This corresponds to the cache_dir value. I could wipe the file out, but what is the proper way of doing so and should they be cleaned out via a schedule? These don’t appear to be web related, as far as I can tell. Thank you Tom Lieuallen From: Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> Date: Friday, February 7, 2025 at 10:37 AM To: mailman-users(a)mailman3.org <mailman-users(a)mailman3.org> Subject: [MM3-users] Re: Pck files stuck in out queue [This email originated from outside of OSU. Use caution with links and attachments.] On 2/7/25 10:08, Lieuallen, Thomas Otis via Mailman-users wrote: > > I have a remaining issue that baffles me. With my test list, I created a template for ‘list:member:regular:header’. It just has text in it, keeping it simple. I create it and see the entries in the database tables and they are correct. However, when I send a test email, my template text is not inserted, but instead another simple text: “testing hello”. I do the same with list:member:regular:footer, and it works just fine. It is just the header that is working incorrectly. When I remove that postorius header template for the list, that ‘testing hello’ goes away. So, it’s only appearing when I have a postorius template setup for that list. What do you get from the following database queries? SELECT * FROM template WHERE name = 'list:member:regular:header'; SELECT * FROM postorius_emailtemplate WHERE name = 'list:member:regular:header'; Depending on your installation, these tables may be in separate databases, i.e., template table in mailman db and postorius_emailtemplate in mailmanweb db. And what do you get if you go to the uri in the result(s) from the first query? The context in the first results and maybe the second results should also be a clue. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai…<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai…><https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/> Archived at: https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai…<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai…><https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message…> This message sent to lieualth(a)oregonstate.edu _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai…<https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/> Archived at: https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mai…<https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message…> This message sent to lieualth(a)oregonstate.edu

10 months

Re: Template URI gets written incorrectly

by Mark Dale

On 2023-05-24 10:11, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 5/23/23 16:51, Mark Dale via Mailman-users wrote: >> >> When I create a template, it writes the URI incorrectly into the template table in the mailman3 database and the list stops working. >> >> For example, it writes: >> >> http://localhost/mailman3/postorius/api/templates/list/markslist.lists.post… >> >> When I correct it like so, all is well: >> >> https://lists.postmark.io/mailman3/postorius/api/templates/list/markslist.l… >> >> Have I missed a config setting somewhere, or is this a bug with the older Debian Mailman 3.3.3 ? > > > You need to set > > POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL = 'https://lists.postmark.io/' > > in your Django settings. Debian probably has set it to 'http://localhost/'. > Indeed that was it! Thanks very much Mark. /etc/mailman3/mailman-web.py Line 190: POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL = 'https://lists.postmark.io/'

2 years, 6 months

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Re: Help with Newbie error -- I think I deleted my server

by William Oliver

On Sat, 2021-12-25 at 10:19 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 12/25/21 7:13 AM, William Oliver wrote: > > > > Just out of curiosity, if I could not have guessed a valid ID > > number > > and did not have the admin interface, how could I have figured out > > what > > site IDs were available? > > > If Postorius is working, recent versions show the SITE_ID in the > domains > view. I.e. after you added your domain you could have noted the > SITE_ID > and made the change in settings before deleting the example.com > domain. > > In any case, the django_site table in Mailman's database has the > information. > Thanks. Yep, I peeked at the database and there it was. That would probably been more efficient than randomly choosing numbers... billo

3 years, 11 months

Re: New messages not being archived

by Matt Wilbur EFS

I apologize if this is off-track, but when I originally was setting up lists in mm3 I made the mistake of using the Postorius "Create List" button. I found that when I did this, I saw no archives and I don't recall if mails flowed OK. The setup was incomplete for me. I had to delete, and then create my lists using the mailman command and then everything just magically worked. matt On 7/15/21 2:11 PM, Sarah H wrote: > I get a 301 when I go to http and the full html page not found text that is above if I go to https. if I curl loopback on html I get the same html response, https I get: > > curl: (35) error:1408F10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version number > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

4 years, 4 months

Re: What's the difference between (purpose of) reject and ignore

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/25/22 07:54, denis.bitouze(a)univ-littoral.fr wrote: > Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> The difference between Reject and Discard is Reject notifies the >> sender of the rejection whereas Discard just discards the message >> without notification. > > IMHO, even in English, “Reject” and “Discard” are not self-explanatory. They seem so to me, but in any case, if you look at Postorius -> Settings -> Message Acceptance -> Default action to take when a (non-)member posts to the list, they are described there in much more detail. > BTW, no clue about an automatic banishment of emails from discarded messages? In the pop-up dialog from clicking the subject of a held post you can set the sender's moderation status when discarding the post. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 5 months

Re: Confirm and Moderate Unsubscribe Requests

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/21/20 8:53 AM, Brian Carpenter wrote: > If you set the unsubscription policy to confirm then moderate for a list > and someone unsubscribes, they receive a confirmation request. That is > good. They respond to it. That is also working fine. However the list > owner/moderator than gets a request to approve the unsubscribe request > and well, unless I am missing something, I don't see an interface to > handles such requests via Postorius. This is <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/332>. > How does one handle an unsubscribe request that requires moderator > approval? I'm not sure at this point, I can look further later, but if the notice to the admin has a token, it might work to send a `confirm <token>` command to the list-request address. Otherwise, don't moderate unsubscription requests. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 1 month

Re: Default setting for Delivery status

by Mark Dale

>> Where and how do I set the default setting of "Delivery status" to be "Enabled". > > It already is. See https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/master/src/mailman/core/constants… >> At the moment, a new subscriber is neither "Enabled" or "Disabled". > > That's because the member's list based preferences for that list are not set, so we fall back to address based preferences if set and finally to global preferences where Delivery status is enabled. > > Log in to Postorius and select Mailman settings from the dropdown on the upper right at your user name to see more. > > New list members don't have and list based preferences for that list and just fall back to their address based preferences or global preferences. > Ahhhh. Thanks very much Mark. I did some experimenting to get my head around what you've explained and I can see how it works now.

3 years, 2 months

Re: Cross-List and Domain based sender whitelisting ( accept_these_nonmembers )

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/9/23 05:31, Johannes Rohr wrote: > > Thanks! I assume, there is a reason why this cannot be easily > implemented, else it would have been. Asking because I know a number of > people would make extensive use of this in MM2. The actual implementation is probably not difficult, but it's more than just handling things like `@list_id` in *_these_nonmembers. It also requires developing appropriate unit tests, updating REST and `mailman import21` to accept the syntax and documentation updates at least for Postorius Settings -> Message Acceptance -> * these non-members. That adds up to a significant amount of work. I recognize it's a significant regression for some, but we are a small, all volunteer project and can't do everything. A well crafted merge request would certainly be accepted. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 11 months

Re: MM2.1 -> MM3.3 migration. To hold or not hold

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/18/24 23:13, mark(a)suburbia.org.au wrote: > - Modified second test user to "Hold for moderation" in Members list. Noted the Moderation was set to "List default" before changing it to "Hold for moderation" The actual value is None, but Postorius displays/sets that as List default. >> If that is true, I can only think that at the time of that post, >> settings weren't as they are now. > > I think for now I will have to assume that's the case, until the next email can be readied against the proper list. If you hear nothing further, assume that this was all based on some random quirk (by humans or machines). I'll update if it happens again. Thank you for doing the test. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"