Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: How to turn off Emergency Moderation for imported MM2 lists?

by Mark Sapiro

On 7/27/20 3:38 PM, Brian Carpenter wrote: > I recently imported a number of MM2 lists into MM3. Unfortunately, the person had emergency moderation turned on for these lists. Since EM is not exposed to Postorius what can be done to reverse this? To do one list: mailman shell -l <list-id> m.emergency = False commit() To do several lists: mailman shell from mailman.models.mailinglist import MailingList mlist = MailingList('first.list.id') mlist.emergency = False commit() mlist = MailingList('second.list.id') mlist.emergency = False commit() And so on for more lists. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 7 months

Re: Unadvertised lists accessible even if not signed in

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/5/26 12:54, Peter Chubb via Mailman-users wrote: > > How can I prevent anyone not logged in, and not a member of an > unadvertised list, from seeing it? You could probably modify code to do that. For Postorius, the mods would probably be in the ListSummaryView class in postorius/views/list.py. It seems to me that in the general case, this would not be desirable as it would prevent things like a user being told out of band that they should go to, e.g., https://www.example.com/mailman3/lists/unadvertized.example.com/ and subscribe. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 months, 1 week

Re: FILTER_VHOST for 3.2.1 not working after install

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/8/20 2:33 AM, Élodie BOSSIER via Mailman-users wrote: > > I would like with Mailman 3.2.1 see into : > - "example1.com/postorius/lists/" only the mailing list related to example1, > - and into "example2.com/postorius/lists/" only the mailing list related > to example2 as Mailman 2.1.x do it. > > I don't understand what I missed, could you help me please ? It works for me. I suspect in your case it has something to do with how ngnix is set up to forward to Django. What are your nginx settings for this? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 2 months

No styling for web apps?

by Morris Jones

I have most of a new mailman suite server built and working ... collectstatic gathered a good array of static files (uncompressed so far) nginx appears to be serving them successfully The Firefox developer tools show css and js files all being delivered But none of the postorius or hyperkitty pages exhibit any styling at all, only bare HTML elements. The Firefox inspector will show the available styles being requested and delivered (style.css, bootstrap, jquery, all the things). But if I use the inspector to look at the page, nothing has any CSS properties. I know I'm missing something simple. (Happy Thanksgiving!) Mojo -- Morris Jones, Monrovia, CA BridgeMojo <http://bridgemojo.com> Old Town Sidewalk Astronomers <http://otastro.org> Mojo's Blog <http://mojo.whiteoaks.com>

5 years, 3 months

Re: Starting new thread in Postorius -> disappears

by Cameron Smith

Mark, My apologies for not investigating more thoroughly before opening my mouth (so to speak). You are, of course, correct in your analysis of what happened to my emails, and this is not the first time that my email setup has caused me problems. I’ve added my alternate email address to my lists.mailman3.org user profile, so hopefully it won’t happen again. > On 2017.11.29, at 18:09 , Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > On 11/29/2017 05:05 PM, Cameron Smith wrote: >> >> On November 21, I sent the message below, as a part of this very thread, to Thor and cc’d the mailman 3 list. But the message never showed up in HyperKitty [1]. I don’t know if other list members received it in their email inboxes or not. > > > Your post was received: > > Nov 21 14:31:20 mailman postfix/cleanup[15735]: 2B3798008D: > message-id=<836BFAB0-4879-4EDF-9026-FEC17D4A2BEC(a)mail2.cetsi.com> > Nov 21 14:31:20 mailman postfix/qmgr[20545]: 2B3798008D: > from=<ccsmith(a)mail2.cetsi.com>, size=10048, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > > delivered to Mailman core: > > Nov 21 14:31:20 mailman postfix/lmtp[15737]: 2B3798008D: > to=<mailman-users(a)mailman3.org>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:8024, > delay=0.31, delays=0.28/0/0/0.02, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Ok) > > and immediately discarded: > > Nov 21 14:31:21 2017 (19106) DISCARD: > <836BFAB0-4879-4EDF-9026-FEC17D4A2BEC(a)mail2.cetsi.com> > > >> Thor obviously received the message (it was addressed to him directly), because he referenced it in a message that is in the archives [1]. However, I never received an email copy of his message from the list. > > > Possibly you never received a list copy of his message because you were > directly addressed and your list option "Receive list copies (possible > duplicates)" is set to No. > > >> So, what’s going on? > > > As to why your post was discarded, unfortunately, the logs don't give > more info. There are a couple of possibilities. If your post contained > an attachment with Content=Type: application/subtype where sub-type > doesn't contain 'signature' it would have been discarded by a header > filter rule. Also it looks like you sent the message From: > <ccsmith(a)mail2.cetsi.com>. If that is not an address on your > <ccsmith(a)cetsi.com> account, it would have been discarded as a > non-member post. > > >> What baffles me is that more people are not complaining about this. Is it just that no one has noticed? Or is it some subtle misconfiguration in my system? And in Thor’s apparently. And maybe in the lists.mailman3.org system as well. > > > I see nothing so far to indicate anything at lists.mailman3.org is > broken in this respect. The only "unusual" thing is this is now a new > thread > <https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/…>, > but presumably that is because your post was in reply to your earlier > post which wasn't archived. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ Cameron Smith Nanaimo, BC tel:1.604.803.0051

8 years, 3 months

Re: All messages to a new list/domain shunted from "in" queue with no logged exceptions

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/25/23 7:53 AM, Jered Floyd wrote: > > File "/opt/app-root/src/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mailman/rules/dmarc.py", line 284, in maybe_mitigate > for address in mlist.dmarc_addresses: > TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable > Nov 25 15:49:26 2023 (90) SHUNTING: 1700927366.81852+6d2f84a8eb97e64c3ee93662f1744a2a756c7ca9 > [...] This may be a bug. I need to investigate. Meanwhile, go to the list's settings in Postorius and under DMARC Mitigations, put something in DMARC Addresses, save it and then remove it and save again. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 3 months

Re: sqlite3 Database "read only" error on mailman_sync job

by Ugnius

I do not know... In the setup example settings was something like process number = 2. But I understand at least 1 uwsgi and 1 run server should run? > On 5 Sep 2019, at 23:08, Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> wrote: > > 6644 ? S 0:12 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini > 6645 ? S 0:00 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 > 6653 ? Sl 636:28 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 > 6656 ? Sl 0:27 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini > > This fishy, why do you have both uwsgi and "python manage.py runserver" running? > > You only need one of those, since they both do the exact same thing. Please remove > whatever is running the "python manage.py runserver" part and only use uwsgi. > >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, at 1:02 PM, Ugnius S wrote: >> Thank You, Abhilash, to helping. I have checked the processes, but also I have read, that sqlite3 can run in multi writing mode. >> May mailman processes are next: >> >> 6644 ? S 0:12 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini >> 6645 ? S 0:00 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 >> 6653 ? Sl 636:28 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 >> 6656 ? Sl 0:27 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini >> 6643 ? S 0:00 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/master -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg >> 659 ? S 0:46 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=in:0:1 >> 6660 ? S 0:42 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=nntp:0:1 >> 6661 ? S 0:42 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=digest:0:1 >> 6662 ? S 0:48 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=pipeline:0:1 >> 6663 ? S 0:44 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=archive:0:1 >> 6664 ? S 0:41 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=command:0:1 >> 6665 ? S 0:01 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=retry:0:1 >> 6666 ? S 0:45 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=virgin:0:1 >> 6667 ? Sl 0:16 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=lmtp:0:1 >> 6668 ? Sl 1:30 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=rest:0:1 >> 6669 ? S 0:42 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=bounces:0:1 >> 6670 ? S 0:49 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=out:0:1 >> >> Looks like there are no double. Nothing more is running. >> >> 2019-09-05, kt, 03:16 Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> rašė: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019, at 2:05 PM, Ugnius S wrote: >>> >>> I have installed using documentation. My linux distribution version has no full package available. I have installed step by step: >>> $ sudo pip3 install mailman >>> $ sudo pip3 install postorius >>> $ sudo pip3 install hyperkitty >>> $ sudo pip3 install mailman-hyperkitty >>> And of course all mandatory components... Everything without errors, I can drop db files and I can download mailman-suite again and start from empty page again. But it will not guarantee that DB will not become READ ONLY again. Here should be logic. No developing support here? >> >> Could you be running two separate processes such that the database is locked by one and so other finds it as READ Only? When you find a read only database, can you check if it is open in some other process? >> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2019-09-03, an, 19:36 Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> rašė: >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019, at 3:22 AM,ugniusviln(a)gmail.com wrote: >>> > Hi. All the project installation is under the same user / path and >>> > it works. Archiving working as well, (just one remark: no matter what >>> > to set in postorius, hyperkitty shows list as public) >>> > I have found work around - it is possible to change list as private in >>> > "admin" page. >>> > I started to get issues with runjobs after I have created couple of >>> > new lists with "no archive" option. >>> >>> How did you install all these components. It seems there the installation is broken in weird ways. >>> >>> > >>> > If as owner user from project home I run: >>> > >>> > django-admin mailman_sync >>> > >>> > Traceback (most recent call last): >>> > File >>> > "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", >>> > line 84, in _execute >>> > return self.cursor.execute(sql, params) >>> > File >>> > "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/db/backends/sqlite3/base.py", >>> > line 383, in execute >>> > return Database.Cursor.execute(self, query, params) >>> > sqlite3.OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database >>> > >>> > "django-admin runjob sync_mailman " - makes read only errors as well. >>> > "django-admin runjob new_lists_from_mailman" >>> > django.db.utils.OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database >>> > END TRACEBACK >>> > >>> > I did not find information how to fix this. It was worked without errors >>> > before. >>> > I noticed, that if I stop mailman, "django-admin mailman_sync" starts >>> > to work. >>> > If I start "mailman start", then "django-admin mailman_sync" failing >>> > again. >>> > I did not check other jobs, but I think what is related to database, >>> > will get errors. >>> > Seems mailman locking the database. It is not a file permissions issue. >>> > Mailman db location is: /project_directory/var/data/mailman.db >>> > >>> > if to rename /project_directory/var/data/mailman.db to something, >>> > mailman creates database file size 0, django-admin runjobs start >>> > working, but of course postorius stops working. I did it for testing. >>> > I have returned this database file back, postorius started to work >>> > again, but django-admin runjobs does not work, error: "database read >>> > only". >>> > Please help me how to fix this issue. >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >>> > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >>> > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> thanks, >>> Abhilash Raj (maxking) >> >> -- >> thanks, >> Abhilash Raj (maxking) >> >> > > -- > thanks, > Abhilash Raj (maxking) > >

6 years, 6 months

Re: Subscribing users stuck in pending hell

by Quanah Gibson-Mount

--On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:13 AM -0700 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > This was added in Postorius 1.3.0 which was released almost 4 years ago. > If you can't upgrade, see > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/messa > ge/6GKWYT3ZMXPHMGSXUW6OI6J2222AR7OV/ for a mailman shell script. That shell script seems to have errors: >>> pendings = getUtility(IPendings) >>> for token, data in pendings.find( ... token_owner=TokenOwner.subscriber, ... pend_type='subscription'): ... print("hello") ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "<console>", line 3, in <module> File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mailman/database/transaction.py", line 85, in wrapper return function(args[0], config.db.store, *args[1:], **kws) TypeError: find() got an unexpected keyword argument 'token_owner' --Quanah

2 years, 9 months

Re: Maximum number of recipients error

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/18/19 10:40 AM, brian(a)emwd.com wrote: > I am unable to modify the "Maximum number of recipients" setting. It generates the following error when I click the "save changes" button: > > "An error occured: Unknown attribute: max_num_recipients" > > I am using the docker version of MM3 and its happening on "Postorius Version 1.2.3". Is this a known bug? It works for me. It was added by <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/merge_requests/358>, but it requires Mailman core >= 3.2.1. What's in the docker image you're using? This may be an issue for <https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman>. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

7 years

Re: Suspend a list temporarily

by Mark Sapiro

On 8/31/19 7:20 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: > I need a bit of handholding here. What settings do I have to make to reject with a message, and how to make or modify a template with my message containing the reason for temporary list processing suspension? The template to modify is list:user:notice:rejected. This does not seem to be one that can be customized via Postorius so you would need to make a templates/lists/<list.id>/en/list:user:notice:rejected.txt file in Mailman's var/ directory or set a URL for the template as in <https://mailman.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/mailman/rest/docs/templates.ht…> -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 6 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"