Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

No styling for web apps?

by Morris Jones

I have most of a new mailman suite server built and working ... collectstatic gathered a good array of static files (uncompressed so far) nginx appears to be serving them successfully The Firefox developer tools show css and js files all being delivered But none of the postorius or hyperkitty pages exhibit any styling at all, only bare HTML elements. The Firefox inspector will show the available styles being requested and delivered (style.css, bootstrap, jquery, all the things). But if I use the inspector to look at the page, nothing has any CSS properties. I know I'm missing something simple. (Happy Thanksgiving!) Mojo -- Morris Jones, Monrovia, CA BridgeMojo <http://bridgemojo.com> Old Town Sidewalk Astronomers <http://otastro.org> Mojo's Blog <http://mojo.whiteoaks.com>

5 years

Re: All messages to a new list/domain shunted from "in" queue with no logged exceptions

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/25/23 7:53 AM, Jered Floyd wrote: > > File "/opt/app-root/src/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mailman/rules/dmarc.py", line 284, in maybe_mitigate > for address in mlist.dmarc_addresses: > TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable > Nov 25 15:49:26 2023 (90) SHUNTING: 1700927366.81852+6d2f84a8eb97e64c3ee93662f1744a2a756c7ca9 > [...] This may be a bug. I need to investigate. Meanwhile, go to the list's settings in Postorius and under DMARC Mitigations, put something in DMARC Addresses, save it and then remove it and save again. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years

Re: Subscribing users stuck in pending hell

by Quanah Gibson-Mount

--On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:13 AM -0700 Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > This was added in Postorius 1.3.0 which was released almost 4 years ago. > If you can't upgrade, see > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/messa > ge/6GKWYT3ZMXPHMGSXUW6OI6J2222AR7OV/ for a mailman shell script. That shell script seems to have errors: >>> pendings = getUtility(IPendings) >>> for token, data in pendings.find( ... token_owner=TokenOwner.subscriber, ... pend_type='subscription'): ... print("hello") ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "<console>", line 3, in <module> File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mailman/database/transaction.py", line 85, in wrapper return function(args[0], config.db.store, *args[1:], **kws) TypeError: find() got an unexpected keyword argument 'token_owner' --Quanah

2 years, 6 months

Re: Maximum number of recipients error

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/18/19 10:40 AM, brian(a)emwd.com wrote: > I am unable to modify the "Maximum number of recipients" setting. It generates the following error when I click the "save changes" button: > > "An error occured: Unknown attribute: max_num_recipients" > > I am using the docker version of MM3 and its happening on "Postorius Version 1.2.3". Is this a known bug? It works for me. It was added by <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/merge_requests/358>, but it requires Mailman core >= 3.2.1. What's in the docker image you're using? This may be an issue for <https://github.com/maxking/docker-mailman>. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 8 months

Re: Suspend a list temporarily

by Mark Sapiro

On 8/31/19 7:20 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: > I need a bit of handholding here. What settings do I have to make to reject with a message, and how to make or modify a template with my message containing the reason for temporary list processing suspension? The template to modify is list:user:notice:rejected. This does not seem to be one that can be customized via Postorius so you would need to make a templates/lists/<list.id>/en/list:user:notice:rejected.txt file in Mailman's var/ directory or set a URL for the template as in <https://mailman.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/mailman/rest/docs/templates.ht…> -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 3 months

Re: Starting new thread in Postorius -> disappears

by Cameron Smith

Mark, My apologies for not investigating more thoroughly before opening my mouth (so to speak). You are, of course, correct in your analysis of what happened to my emails, and this is not the first time that my email setup has caused me problems. I’ve added my alternate email address to my lists.mailman3.org user profile, so hopefully it won’t happen again. > On 2017.11.29, at 18:09 , Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: > > On 11/29/2017 05:05 PM, Cameron Smith wrote: >> >> On November 21, I sent the message below, as a part of this very thread, to Thor and cc’d the mailman 3 list. But the message never showed up in HyperKitty [1]. I don’t know if other list members received it in their email inboxes or not. > > > Your post was received: > > Nov 21 14:31:20 mailman postfix/cleanup[15735]: 2B3798008D: > message-id=<836BFAB0-4879-4EDF-9026-FEC17D4A2BEC(a)mail2.cetsi.com> > Nov 21 14:31:20 mailman postfix/qmgr[20545]: 2B3798008D: > from=<ccsmith(a)mail2.cetsi.com>, size=10048, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > > delivered to Mailman core: > > Nov 21 14:31:20 mailman postfix/lmtp[15737]: 2B3798008D: > to=<mailman-users(a)mailman3.org>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:8024, > delay=0.31, delays=0.28/0/0/0.02, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Ok) > > and immediately discarded: > > Nov 21 14:31:21 2017 (19106) DISCARD: > <836BFAB0-4879-4EDF-9026-FEC17D4A2BEC(a)mail2.cetsi.com> > > >> Thor obviously received the message (it was addressed to him directly), because he referenced it in a message that is in the archives [1]. However, I never received an email copy of his message from the list. > > > Possibly you never received a list copy of his message because you were > directly addressed and your list option "Receive list copies (possible > duplicates)" is set to No. > > >> So, what’s going on? > > > As to why your post was discarded, unfortunately, the logs don't give > more info. There are a couple of possibilities. If your post contained > an attachment with Content=Type: application/subtype where sub-type > doesn't contain 'signature' it would have been discarded by a header > filter rule. Also it looks like you sent the message From: > <ccsmith(a)mail2.cetsi.com>. If that is not an address on your > <ccsmith(a)cetsi.com> account, it would have been discarded as a > non-member post. > > >> What baffles me is that more people are not complaining about this. Is it just that no one has noticed? Or is it some subtle misconfiguration in my system? And in Thor’s apparently. And maybe in the lists.mailman3.org system as well. > > > I see nothing so far to indicate anything at lists.mailman3.org is > broken in this respect. The only "unusual" thing is this is now a new > thread > <https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/…>, > but presumably that is because your post was in reply to your earlier > post which wasn't archived. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ Cameron Smith Nanaimo, BC tel:1.604.803.0051

8 years

Re: Mailman-web showing "An error occurred while processing your request."

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/9/23 07:57, C. Souza wrote: > > Just for curiosity, does anyone know the reasons for this kind of problem > and how to avoid it? Cause: Something in the specific email message. Avoidance: Possibly if we knew what the specific issue was or could see the held messages as displayed by the mailman shell script I provided, we could detect the issue and do something about it. Possibly Postorius could catch this and be more graceful about it, but again we'd probably need a message that triggers this issue. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 10 months

Re: sqlite3 Database "read only" error on mailman_sync job

by Ugnius

I do not know... In the setup example settings was something like process number = 2. But I understand at least 1 uwsgi and 1 run server should run? > On 5 Sep 2019, at 23:08, Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> wrote: > > 6644 ? S 0:12 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini > 6645 ? S 0:00 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 > 6653 ? Sl 636:28 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 > 6656 ? Sl 0:27 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini > > This fishy, why do you have both uwsgi and "python manage.py runserver" running? > > You only need one of those, since they both do the exact same thing. Please remove > whatever is running the "python manage.py runserver" part and only use uwsgi. > >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, at 1:02 PM, Ugnius S wrote: >> Thank You, Abhilash, to helping. I have checked the processes, but also I have read, that sqlite3 can run in multi writing mode. >> May mailman processes are next: >> >> 6644 ? S 0:12 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini >> 6645 ? S 0:00 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 >> 6653 ? Sl 636:28 /usr/bin/python3 /opt/home/manage.py runserver 0:8015 >> 6656 ? Sl 0:27 /usr/bin/uwsgi --master --ini /opt/home/uwsgi.ini >> 6643 ? S 0:00 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/master -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg >> 659 ? S 0:46 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=in:0:1 >> 6660 ? S 0:42 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=nntp:0:1 >> 6661 ? S 0:42 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=digest:0:1 >> 6662 ? S 0:48 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=pipeline:0:1 >> 6663 ? S 0:44 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=archive:0:1 >> 6664 ? S 0:41 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=command:0:1 >> 6665 ? S 0:01 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=retry:0:1 >> 6666 ? S 0:45 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=virgin:0:1 >> 6667 ? Sl 0:16 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=lmtp:0:1 >> 6668 ? Sl 1:30 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=rest:0:1 >> 6669 ? S 0:42 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=bounces:0:1 >> 6670 ? S 0:49 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/runner -C /opt/home/mailman.cfg --runner=out:0:1 >> >> Looks like there are no double. Nothing more is running. >> >> 2019-09-05, kt, 03:16 Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> rašė: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019, at 2:05 PM, Ugnius S wrote: >>> >>> I have installed using documentation. My linux distribution version has no full package available. I have installed step by step: >>> $ sudo pip3 install mailman >>> $ sudo pip3 install postorius >>> $ sudo pip3 install hyperkitty >>> $ sudo pip3 install mailman-hyperkitty >>> And of course all mandatory components... Everything without errors, I can drop db files and I can download mailman-suite again and start from empty page again. But it will not guarantee that DB will not become READ ONLY again. Here should be logic. No developing support here? >> >> Could you be running two separate processes such that the database is locked by one and so other finds it as READ Only? When you find a read only database, can you check if it is open in some other process? >> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2019-09-03, an, 19:36 Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in> rašė: >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019, at 3:22 AM,ugniusviln(a)gmail.com wrote: >>> > Hi. All the project installation is under the same user / path and >>> > it works. Archiving working as well, (just one remark: no matter what >>> > to set in postorius, hyperkitty shows list as public) >>> > I have found work around - it is possible to change list as private in >>> > "admin" page. >>> > I started to get issues with runjobs after I have created couple of >>> > new lists with "no archive" option. >>> >>> How did you install all these components. It seems there the installation is broken in weird ways. >>> >>> > >>> > If as owner user from project home I run: >>> > >>> > django-admin mailman_sync >>> > >>> > Traceback (most recent call last): >>> > File >>> > "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", >>> > line 84, in _execute >>> > return self.cursor.execute(sql, params) >>> > File >>> > "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/db/backends/sqlite3/base.py", >>> > line 383, in execute >>> > return Database.Cursor.execute(self, query, params) >>> > sqlite3.OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database >>> > >>> > "django-admin runjob sync_mailman " - makes read only errors as well. >>> > "django-admin runjob new_lists_from_mailman" >>> > django.db.utils.OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database >>> > END TRACEBACK >>> > >>> > I did not find information how to fix this. It was worked without errors >>> > before. >>> > I noticed, that if I stop mailman, "django-admin mailman_sync" starts >>> > to work. >>> > If I start "mailman start", then "django-admin mailman_sync" failing >>> > again. >>> > I did not check other jobs, but I think what is related to database, >>> > will get errors. >>> > Seems mailman locking the database. It is not a file permissions issue. >>> > Mailman db location is: /project_directory/var/data/mailman.db >>> > >>> > if to rename /project_directory/var/data/mailman.db to something, >>> > mailman creates database file size 0, django-admin runjobs start >>> > working, but of course postorius stops working. I did it for testing. >>> > I have returned this database file back, postorius started to work >>> > again, but django-admin runjobs does not work, error: "database read >>> > only". >>> > Please help me how to fix this issue. >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >>> > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >>> > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> thanks, >>> Abhilash Raj (maxking) >> >> -- >> thanks, >> Abhilash Raj (maxking) >> >> > > -- > thanks, > Abhilash Raj (maxking) > >

6 years, 3 months

Re: I have issue where it does not send emails on to people in the list I create.

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/30/20 1:09 PM, john_warland(a)hotmail.com wrote: > > I had been concentrating so much on the mailman suite config file as I was sure the answer was a setting in there that I didn't think to double check the mailman.cfg For what it's worth, The actual mail list management, i.e. receiving and delivering posts, only involves Mailman core and your mailman suite config file is only for Postorius and HyperKitty and doesn't affect Mailman core. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 7 months

Re: Using it with the "smtp2go" email relay service that has special deliverability rules

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/19/23 06:03, golden_rock(a)hotmail.com wrote: > > To make it work, I would have to have something like: > > Sender: bounce-address(a)lists.mailman3.org - untouched > From: original.sender@gmail.com@lists.mailman3.org - change #1 having the From address to be From the list > Reply-To: original.sender(a)gmail.com - change #2 - if someone replies > > Then smtp2go will send the email. In Postorius Settings -> DMARC Mitigations set DMARC mitigation action to Replace From: with list address and set DMARC Mitigate unconditionally to Yes. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

2 years, 10 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"